[考研类试卷]考研英语模拟试卷126及答案与解析.doc
《[考研类试卷]考研英语模拟试卷126及答案与解析.doc》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《[考研类试卷]考研英语模拟试卷126及答案与解析.doc(31页珍藏版)》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。
1、考研英语模拟试卷 126及答案与解析 一、 Section I Use of English Directions: Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D. (10 points) 1 High oil prices have not yet produced an economic shock among consuming countries, but further rises, especially sharp (1)_, would
2、undoubtedly hurt the world economy, and (2)_ would inevitably harm producers, too. Beyond this obvious point, (3)_, higher prices could even do harm to both oil firms and producers. Big oil firms (4)_ rolling in money today, but that disguises the fact that their longer-term prospects are (5)_. Behi
3、nd the reserves-accounting scandal at Royal Dutch/ Shell (6)_ a problem bedeviling all of the majors: replacing their dwindling reserves. (7)_ existing fields in Alaska and the North Sea are rapidly declining, OPEC countries and Russia are (8)_ them out. (9)_ they are to survive in the long term, th
4、e big oil firms must embrace other sources of energy (10)_ oil. (11)_ it is to believe, higher oil prices could be bad news for producing countries (12)_. Political leaders in Russia, Venezuela and other oil-rich countries are bending laws to crack (13)_ on foreign firms and to strengthen their grip
5、 on oil (14)_ through state-run firms. This may be convenient for the political leaders themselves. Alas, it is (15)_ to do much for their countrymen. For years corruption and inefficiency (16)_ the typical results of government control of oil resources. Producing countries should (17)_ embrace open
6、 markets. (18)_ one thing, shutting out foreign investment will only hurt their own oil output by (19)_ the sharpest managers and latest technologies. For another, economic liberalisation (including reform of bloated welfare states) would help OPEC countries (20)_ their economies as the NAFTA trade
7、deal has done for oil-rich Mexico and so prepare them for the day when the black gold starts running out. ( A) ones ( B) shock ( C) prices ( D) countries ( A) this ( B) that ( C) which ( D) what ( A) but ( B) so ( C) however ( D) nevertheless ( A) may ( B) perhaps ( C) maybe ( D) may be ( A) bleak (
8、 B) leak ( C) weak ( D) freak ( A) is ( B) has ( C) lies ( D) does ( A) As ( B) Just as ( C) So as ( D) Even as ( A) preventing ( B) shutting ( C) closing ( D) keeping ( A) If ( B) Even if ( C) Whether ( D) How ( A) aside ( B) from ( C) beside ( D) aside from ( A) For hard ( B) As hard ( C) Very har
9、d ( D) As hard as ( A) also ( B) too ( C) either ( D) as well ( A) down ( B) up ( C) out ( D) from ( A) incomes ( B) revenues ( C) payment ( D) contributions ( A) likely ( B) unlike ( C) unlikely ( D) alike ( A) is ( B) are ( C) has been ( D) have been ( A) in place of ( B) instead ( C) rather ( D)
10、rather than ( A) For ( B) To ( C) Of ( D) In ( A) concluding ( B) including ( C) excluding ( D) exploring ( A) verify ( B) purify ( C) diversify ( D) multiply Part A Directions: Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B, C or D. (40 points) 21 Rarely has a
11、national security issue of major importance become a subject of distortion and spin like the debate over the intelligence reform bill on Capitol Hill the outcome of which will determine how US intelligence agencies and their military function for a generation to come. This is particularly true of th
12、e heated debate now taking place over how much power should be given to a new director of national intelligence. Along with House Armed Services Committee Chairman Duncan Hunter, one of the most respected defense experts on Capitol Hill, the Joint Chiefs of Staff and other elements within the Defens
13、e Department have raised serious questions about the far-reaching authority granted to the intelligence director under the Senate version of the bill. Specifically, Mr. Hunter believes that the Senate bill would interfere with the militarys access to intelligence on the battlefield. Right now, Mr. H
14、unter points out, Army units, Marines and US special forces use intelligence gleaned from overhead satellites to target enemy troops. In order to do this, they need to work closely with combat support agencies like the National Security Agency and National Reconnaissance Office. It is essential that
15、 there be a well-functioning chain of command between the American troops on the ground, the Defense Department and the people who operate the satellites. This was particularly critical during the recent fighting in Fallujah, where American troops relied on satellite photos to watch the terrorists t
16、hey were seeking to kill. Although President Bush has agreed to the Senate proposal, administration officials acknowledge there is real concern that its version of the bill could undercut a system that is working well. As one official told this newspaper on Monday, the Senate measure could produce t
17、he following scenario: Every time the generals want to move a satellite to help a commander quickly obtain overhead images of the enemy or intercepted communications, they would have to get the approval of the new director of national intelligence. Noting the Fallujah experience, Mr. Hunter adds tha
18、t the Senate bill “translates into ineffectiveness on the battlefield and, at worse, combat casualties“. When asked to give his opinion on the Senate bill and an alternative measure proposed by Mr. Hunter that would preserve the current chain of command, Gen. Richard Myers, the chairman of the Joint
19、 Chiefs of Staff, endorsed the California Republican lawmakers version. So, too, have the heads of the Air Force, Army, Marine Corps and Navy. The truth is that the very idea of shifting control of defense intelligence agencies away from the Pentagon (as embodied in the Senate bill) is a proposal to
20、 “fix“ a non-existent problem, When Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton, chairman and vice chairman of the September 11 commission, testified on Capitol Hill, both acknowledged in response to a question from Mr. Hunter their panel had come across no specific instance of a failure or negligence on the part
21、of a Department of Defense agency. Unfortunately, the response from some senators and some sectors of the press to Mr. Hunters substantive concerns has been to portray him as undermining national security in order to preserve his bureaucratic turf. At one level, these charges are slanderous, given t
22、hat Mr. Hunters son, a Marine, just completed a tour of duty in Iraq. Chairman Hunter is trying to protect his son, and all other young heroes not his turf. If supporters of the Senate bill have substantive arguments to make that would explain why they are right and the Joint Chiefs and Mr. Hunter a
23、re wrong, they should make them. If not, they should accede to the House position. If the Senate refuses to budge, then the best course of action would be to re-visit the issue next year. 21 The best title for this passage might be ( A) The Effects Fallujah Fight Brings. ( B) A Debate Between Duncan
24、 Hunter and Some Senators. ( C) A Debate on the Intelligence Reform Bill. ( D) Duncan Hunter, A Respected Defense Expert. 22 The word “gleaned“ (Line 2, Paragraph 3) could be probably replaced by ( A) gathered. ( B) come. ( C) piled. ( D) originated. 23 Mr. Hunter disagrees to the intelligence refor
- 1.请仔细阅读文档,确保文档完整性,对于不预览、不比对内容而直接下载带来的问题本站不予受理。
- 2.下载的文档,不会出现我们的网址水印。
- 3、该文档所得收入(下载+内容+预览)归上传者、原创作者;如果您是本文档原作者,请点此认领!既往收益都归您。
下载文档到电脑,查找使用更方便
2000 积分 0人已下载
下载 | 加入VIP,交流精品资源 |
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 考研 试卷 英语 模拟 126 答案 解析 DOC
