[外语类试卷]雅思（写作）模拟试卷64及答案与解析.doc

《[外语类试卷]雅思（写作）模拟试卷64及答案与解析.doc》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《[外语类试卷]雅思（写作）模拟试卷64及答案与解析.doc（3页珍藏版）》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。

1、雅思（写作）模拟试卷 64及答案与解析 1 You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 2

2、 You should spend about 40 minutes on this task. Write about the following topic: Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? Give reasons for your answe

3、r and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Write at least 250 words. 雅思（写作）模拟试卷 64答案与解析 1 【正确答案】 This is an answer written by a candidate who achieved a Band 7 score. Here is the examiners comment:This answer clearly presents the key features of the diagrams, and alth

4、ough the first map is described only briefly, this is acceptable for this particular task. The description is accurate though some aspects, such as the section on the accommodation, could have been more fully extended. The final paragraph summarises the main points effectively. The information is lo

5、gically organised and can be easily followed throughout the response. A range of cohesive devices including reference and substitution is used appropriately, with only occasional inaccuracies. Some less common vocabulary and collocations are used appropriately, e.g. central reception block; western

6、accommodation units, and there are no spelling errors. There is a variety of grammatical structures and many sentences contain no inaccuracies. Where errors do occur, they do not affect understanding.2 【正确答案】 This model has been prepared by an examiner as an example of a very good answer. However, p

7、lease note that this is just one example out of many possible approaches. Traditionally children have begun studying foreign languages at secondary school, but introducing them earlier is recommended by some educationalists. This policy has been adopted by some educational authorities or individual

8、schools, with both positive and negative outcomes. The obvious argument in its favour is that young children pick up languages much more easily than teenagers. Their brains are still programmed to acquire their mother tongue, which facilitates learning another language, and unlike adolescents, they

9、are not inhibited by self-consciousness. The greater flexibility of the primary timetable allows for more frequent, shorter sessions and for a play-centred approach, thus maintaining learners enthusiasm and progress. Their command of the language in later life will benefit from this early exposure,

10、while learning other languages subsequently will be easier for them. They may also gain a better understanding of other cultures. There are, however, some disadvantages. Primary school teachers are generalists, and may not have the necessary language skills themselves. If specialists have to be brou

11、ght in to deliver these sessions, the flexibility referred to above is diminished. If primary language teaching is not standardised, secondary schools could be faced with a great variety of levels in different languages within their intake, resulting in a classroom experience which undoes the earlie

12、r gains. There is no advantage if enthusiastic primary pupils become demotivated as soon as they change schools. However, these issues can be addressed strategically within the policy adopted. Anything which encourages language learning benefits society culturally and economically, and early exposure to language learning contributes to this. Young childrens innate abilities should be harnessed to make these benefits more achievable.