[外语类试卷]大学英语四级模拟试卷963及答案与解析.doc
《[外语类试卷]大学英语四级模拟试卷963及答案与解析.doc》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《[外语类试卷]大学英语四级模拟试卷963及答案与解析.doc(44页珍藏版)》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。
1、大学英语四级模拟试卷 963及答案与解析 一、 Part I Writing (30 minutes) 1 Security or Privacy? 1近年来很多公共场合都安装了监控摄像头以保护人们的安全 2摄像头也对人们的隐私造成了一定的影响 3我的观点 二、 Part II Reading Comprehension (Skimming and Scanning) (15 minutes) Directions: In this part, you will have 15 minutes to go over the passage quickly and answer the ques
2、tions attached to the passage. For questions 1-7, mark: Y (for YES) if the statement agrees with the information given in the passage; N (for NO) if the statement contradicts the information given in the passage; NG (for NOT GIVEN) if the information is not given in the passage. 2 Watch Consequences
3、 Of US-Libyan Relations US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice announced on Monday that the United Stated decided to restore full diplomatic ties with Libya and clear the nation from the list of terrorism-supporting countries. The Libyan Government welcomed the decision. This means that the 25-year-
4、old US-Libyan confrontation comes to an end. Interpretation of this varies, the sudden announcement of the rapprochement is closely related to the issue of Irans nuclear bidding. Over a long period of time, Washington called Libya, together with Iran and others, a “rogue nation“, which allegedly sup
5、ported terrorism, and was one of the seven countries that could be subject to possible US nuclear strikes. The situation altered somewhat since the outbreak of the Iraqi War in 2003. The military forces of the United States and its allies toppled the Saddam Hussein regime with the excuse that Iraq w
6、ent in for weapons of mass destruction(WMD) programmes. They did so in hopes of making the regime a public example that would pressure others to give up their alleged WMD bidding. Iran took no heed of this and went on doing what it deemed should be done. Libya, however, was cooperative, abandoning i
7、ts so-called WMD programmes. For the co-operative attitude on the part of Libya, the United States gave some limited encouragement, restoring diplomatic representatives to the country in 2004. But restoration of full diplomatic relations did not occur because Libya, in the eyes of the United States,
8、 remained a “totalitarian“ country, running counter to Washingtons push for US-style freedom and democracy, even though Libyas co-operation in WMD issues was in the United States strategic interest. The deadlock over Irans nuclear bidding cornered the United States to a dilemma(进退两难的窘境 ): Military s
9、trikes are difficult to carry out right now and diplomatic means are yielding no significant results. It is in this context that US-Libyan ties were put on the agenda. The United States wanted to convey this message: US-Iranian ties could be restored if Iran follows Libyas example, despite the fact
10、that the United States dislikes the Iranian regime. The message is naturally not only for the ear of Iran and the Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea but also for other “rogue countries“Middle-East nations that are in the throes of transformation and some Latin American countries. The United States
11、, for instance, decided to impose arms embargo on Venezuela almost simultaneously while it announced rapprochement with Libya. The contrast between the punishment and reward helps bring home to other countries the intention that “those who obey survive, those do not perish“ in the US international s
12、trategy. To what extent this kind of “punishment and rewarding“ strategy would impact the Iran and DPRKs nuclear bidding and those “disobedient“ countries, such as Sudan and Venezuela, is worth keeping an eye on. Oil constitutes another important factor behind the rapprochement. As the second-larges
13、t oil producing country in Africa and an important nation located in the North, Libya enjoys unique geopolitical and economic value. Currently, the oil -rich Middle East is in chaos and the last thing the Bush administration wants is for the United States to become an “oil hostage“ to the Middle Eas
14、t, where the US Government is strenuously pushing for democratic transformation. The situation is compounded by the fact that some Latin American countries are increasingly tilting to the left, threatening to become an unstable energy-resources backyard for the United States. In view of all this, op
15、ening up new energy resources-supplying bases becomes a strategic imperative for the United States. More importantly, the United States could use Libya as its military and logistical foothold in the Middle East. So in this sense, both energy-strategy and geopolitical considerations loom large behind
16、 the restoration of US-Libyan diplomatic ties. But most importantly, both security interests and oil interests are at the service of a grander strategic goal-overhauling the United States African strategy. Since the end of the Cold War in the early 1990s, the US strategic focus has been shifting fro
17、m Europe and the Middle East to Central Asia and the Asia-Pacific region, but Africa, a kind of “strategic vacuum area,“ has gone largely ignored. In the latter half of the Clinton administration, the US Government made diplomatic attempts to strengthen US-African relations, manifested by former US
18、President Bill Clintons 12-day Africa tour. But the efforts were largely watered down by a new leader in the White House and the impacts of the terror attacks on September 11, 2001. As a result, US -African ties have made little progress over the last few years. By contrast, other major world countr
19、ies have made impressive advances in Africa, taking advantage of the United States non- action. Britain, France and Italy, which have traditional ties with African countries, enjoy inherent advantages in advancing relations there. China, traditionally friendly toward Africa, also enjoys a solid foun
20、dation in promoting Sino-African ties. The most pressing strategic task for the United States is, therefore, to attach great strategic importance to Africa. It is against this grand strategic backdrop that the restoration of full diplomatic ties with Libya, which still has defective human fights rec
21、ords by US standards, was effected. The United States overseas strategy puts strategic interests first, and sidelines other factors like involving values of democracy and human rights till later on. Libya naturally has its own strategic considerations-improving relations with the United States as so
22、on as possible so that its big-country status among African countries and in the Arab world can be restored. Where Africa is going is a question that haunts the international community. It poses a strategic question African countries themselves must answer as well. With the major world players, poli
23、tical as well as economic, casting their eyes on Africa, African countries face challenges and are also presented with historical opportunities. Will a chain reaction in African-US relations be triggered off by the restoration of US-Libyan diplomatic ties and by the United States increasing strategi
24、c input in the continent? This is a subject worth closely watching and following. 2 Libya had ever been regarded as one of the terrorism-supporting countries before. ( A) Y ( B) N ( C) NG 3 Before the announcement of the rapprochement to Libya, Libya together with Iran are the only two countries tha
- 1.请仔细阅读文档,确保文档完整性,对于不预览、不比对内容而直接下载带来的问题本站不予受理。
- 2.下载的文档,不会出现我们的网址水印。
- 3、该文档所得收入(下载+内容+预览)归上传者、原创作者;如果您是本文档原作者,请点此认领!既往收益都归您。
下载文档到电脑,查找使用更方便
2000 积分 0人已下载
下载 | 加入VIP,交流精品资源 |
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 外语类 试卷 大学 英语四 模拟 963 答案 解析 DOC
