ASHRAE LV-11-C061-2011 Application Issues for Chilled Beam Technologies.pdf
《ASHRAE LV-11-C061-2011 Application Issues for Chilled Beam Technologies.pdf》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《ASHRAE LV-11-C061-2011 Application Issues for Chilled Beam Technologies.pdf(8页珍藏版)》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。
1、Boggarm S. Setty, P.E., ASHRAE Fellow ABSTRACT Recently, many discussions and papers relating to chilled beams have been published. Chilled beams usage has become rampant along with Dedicated Outside Air Systems (DOAS). The paper discusses the design issues relating to filtration, induction effect,
2、certification and energy consumption. In most cases, only the energy savings relating to reduced air qualities may not be real. The paper discusses the application issues for chilled beam technologies, its usages and cost effectiveness. GENERAL Chilled beam technologies rely on direct heat transfer
3、within a space by circulating liquids (usually chilled or hot water) through a heat transfer surface or coil that in-turn cools space through radiation and convection. In commercial applications, in order to maximize cooling effects and to control moisture, chilled beam solutions can feature a separ
4、ate ventilation (Dedicated Outside Air, DOA) system, to accommodate not only code required air exchange rates, but to provide a means to pressurize and dehumidify space conditions: Such configurations are often referred to as an Active Chilled Beam (ACB) system. There are issues to consider in apply
5、ing these systems. BACKGROUND Chilled beam technologies are not that new. Todays ACB systems are adaptations of the floor and ceiling mounted induction units used in the mid-1900s. Like the older induction units, coils are included to further temper induced air. Rather than being only a heating coil
6、, the ACB system offers either 2-pipe or 4-pipe cooling and heating capabilities. The older induction technology became less favored in the late 1960s - 1970 due to energy efficiency, maintenance issues, and high initial cost. Early induction air units were often associated with high-pressure air su
7、pplies, which resulted in significant fan energy use. It was also the case that surface temperatures within induction units could allow condensation on exposed surfaces, and such also required regular maintenance to keep primary air nozzles clean. Induction systems were also relatively expensive due
8、 to required high-pressure ductwork construction and costly components. By the mid-1970s, the use of such systems virtually stopped with the introduction of lower cost and more efficient Variable Air Volume (VAV) system technologies. NEW TECHNOLOGIES The recent resurgence of interest of ACB technolo
9、gies is based upon assessments that such systems are more energy efficient: It is argued that because the majority of space conditioning energy is moved in water, not air, there are inherent energy savings. Care must be taken in relating to performance expectations, as many assessments do not take i
10、nto consideration water flow (pump) energy use and its associated cost. Also, the energy needed to induce air movement in the space is still felt back at the primary supplys air handling unit in this case, a DOA ventilation unit. Current chilled beam technologies utilize linear horizontal air grille
11、s, located at the ceiling plane, with air supply LV-11-C061Application Issues for Chilled Beam Technologies 494 ASHRAE Transactions2011. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc. (www.ashrae.org). Published in ASHRAE Transactions, Volume 117, Part 1. For persona
12、l use only. Additional reproduction, distribution, or transmission in either print or digital form is not permitted without ASHRAES prior written permission.delivered across the ceiling. Primary air supply “outlets” within the chilled beam do require less pressure than their induction unit predecess
13、ors. Induction Nozzle Pressure (INP) is often referenced as low as 0.5 0.75 inches WG, but may require higher values. This combination of ventilation air delivery and water energy movement provides the cooling and/or heating energy required for space conditioning. Such technology applications are pe
14、rhaps considered in comfort space-conditioning applications that have minimal latent loads and continuous operation. Deep row coils, which are normally associated with high latent load control, are not supported by current ACB unit technologies, requiring the consideration of supplementary dehumidif
15、ying equipment when addressing high latent loads. Existing (older) buildings have additional challenges associated with heavy infiltration loads for spaces with envelope or entrance elements. In these and other high latent load situations, chilled beams could have issues with temperature and humidit
16、y control, and resulting condensation. This paper specifically compares two air conditioning system applications: a conventional VAV system with Dedicated Outdoor Air (DOA) and perimeter fan coil units, against an Active Chilled Beam (ACB) system. To be sure, there are numerous variations in system
17、configurations that can be associated with such systems. Also, there can be many space load conditions besides the ones assumed; so this papers analysis is not intended to offer a definitive comparison of the two technologies, but to show possible performance issues. To be somewhat definitive, our a
18、nalysis did consider three different city locations to address climate impacts, and different INPs were also considered. ACTIVE CHILLED BEAMS Chilled beams can be characterized as in-room terminal units. Because passive chilled beams do not provide for ventilation, they cant directly be compared an
19、alternative to a VAV system. As an ACB system provides for ventilation, it can be directly compared in function and performance as an alternative to a VAV system. Figure 1 represents a 100 percent DOA system that provides primary air to ACB terminals. In this particular case, the DOA - ACB unit gene
20、rates 4.5” WG static pressure to provide an induction ratio of 3-4 at the terminal. Figure 1 Integrated DOA - Active Chilled Beam System 2011 ASHRAE 495Figure 2 Active Chilled Beam Terminal As shown in Figure 2, an active chilled beam consists of a cooling/heating (i.e., two-pipe or four pipe) finne
21、d coil and a primary air supply (Ventilation air) duct through the length of the beam with nozzles that induce room air across the coil and diffuses it back into the room. Some ACB terminals may also include illumination functions. Note there are no filters to clean secondary air. CHILLED BEAM DESIG
22、N ISSUES Leakage Air and moisture leakage through a buildings envelope can be high in both new and existing buildings. In older buildings, the infiltration rate can be particularly high, likely to exceed 1.0 1.5 cfm/sf of wall area. In such cases, significant rates of primary airflow through the ACB
23、 terminals would be needed to pressurize the building and to impede water vapor transfer (i.e., water vapor transfer through infiltration). Chilled beams must address infiltration loads when considering both heating-cooling operations, especially latent loads. High Occupancy Areas of potentially hig
24、h occupant density must also be carefully addressed. The magnitude of the changes in sensible and latent loads due to varying occupancy loads and increased ventilation requirements can be significant for spaces; such as conference rooms, courtrooms, auditoriums and training rooms. In particular, dur
- 1.请仔细阅读文档,确保文档完整性,对于不预览、不比对内容而直接下载带来的问题本站不予受理。
- 2.下载的文档,不会出现我们的网址水印。
- 3、该文档所得收入(下载+内容+预览)归上传者、原创作者;如果您是本文档原作者,请点此认领!既往收益都归您。
下载文档到电脑,查找使用更方便
10000 积分 0人已下载
下载 | 加入VIP,交流精品资源 |
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- ASHRAELV11C0612011APPLICATIONISSUESFORCHILLEDBEAMTECHNOLOGIESPDF

链接地址:http://www.mydoc123.com/p-455464.html