ASCE MOP 137-2018 SUSTAINABILITY AND ENERGY MANAGEMENT FOR WATER RESOURCE RECOVERY FACILITIES.pdf

《ASCE MOP 137-2018 SUSTAINABILITY AND ENERGY MANAGEMENT FOR WATER RESOURCE RECOVERY FACILITIES.pdf》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《ASCE MOP 137-2018 SUSTAINABILITY AND ENERGY MANAGEMENT FOR WATER RESOURCE RECOVERY FACILITIES.pdf（75页珍藏版）》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。

1、 SUSTAINABILITY AND ENERGY MANAGEMENT FOR WATER RESOURCE RECOVERY FACILITIESWEF Manual of Practice No. 38 ASCE Manuals and Reports on Engineering Practice No. 1372018Water Environment Federation American Society of Civil Engineers/601 Wythe Street Environmental and Water ResourcesAlexandria, VA 2231

2、4-1994 USA Institutehttp:/www.wef.org 1801 Alexander Bell DriveReston, VA 20191-4400http:/www.asce.orgIMPORTANT NOTICEThe material presented in this publication has been prepared in accordance with generally recognized engineering principles and practices and is for general information only. This in

3、formation should not be used without first securing competent advice with respect to its suitability for any general or specific application.The contents of this publication are not intended to be a standard of the Water Environment Federation (WEF) or the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)/

4、Environmental and Water Resources Institute (EWRI) and are not intended for use as a reference in purchase specifications, contracts, regulations, statutes, or any other legal document.No reference made in this publication to any specific method, product, process, or service constitutes or implies a

5、n endorsement, recommendation, or warranty thereof by WEF or ASCE/EWRI.WEF and ASCE/EWRI make no representation or warranty of any kind, whether expressed or implied, concerning the accuracy, product, or process discussed in this publication and assumes no liability.Anyone using this information ass

6、umes all liability arising from such use, including but not limited to infringement of any patent or patents.About WEFThe Water Environment Federation (WEF) is a not-for-profit technical and educational organization of 33,000 individual members and 75 affiliated Member Associations representing wate

7、r quality professionals around the world. Since 1928, WEF and its members have protected public health and the environment. As a global water sector leader, our mission is to connect water professionals; enrich the expertise of water professionals; increase the awareness of the impact and value of w

8、ater; and provide a platform for water sector innovation. To learn more, visit www.wef.org.About ASCE/EWRIFounded in 1852, the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) represents more than 150,000 members of the civil engineering profession worldwide and is Americas oldest national engineering soc

9、iety. Created in 1999, the Environmental and Water Resources Institute (EWRI) is an Institute of ASCE. EWRI services are designed to complement ASCEs traditional civil engineering base and to attract new categories of members (non-civil engineer allied professionals) who seek to enhance their profes

10、sional and technical development.For information on membership, publications, and conferences, contactASCE/EWRI1801 Alexander Bell DriveReston, VA 20191-4382(703) 295-6000http:/www.asce.orgCopyright 2018 by the Water Environment Federation and the American Society of Civil Engineers/ Environmental a

11、nd Water Resources Institute. All rights reserved. Except as permitted under the United States Copyright Act of 1976, no part of this publication may be reproduced or distributed in any form or by any means, or stored in a data base or retrieval system , without the prior written permission of WEF a

12、nd ASCE/EWRI. Permission to copy must be obtained from both WEF and ASCE/EWRI.ISBN: 978-1-57278-341-6Water Environment Research, WEF, and WEFTEC are registered trademarks of the Water Environment Federation. American Society of Civil Engineers, ASCE, Environmental and Water Resources Institute, and

13、EWRI are registered trademarks of the American Society of Civil Engineers.Terry L. Krause, P.E., BCEE, WEF Fellow, ChairJeanette Brown, P.E., DEE, D. WRE; Mark E. Lang, P.E., BCEE; and Kendra D. Sveum, P.E., Volume LeadersJennifer L. Strehler, P.E., MBA, BCEE, ENV-SP; Rebecca Gauff; Elizabeth Miner;

14、 Jason Turgeon; and David Valero, AuthorsMalarmagal AhilanRafid Alkhaddar (ASCE Blue Ribbon Review Panel)Naomi Eva AndersonRich AtoulikianEric AuerbachJeovanni Ayala-Lugo, P.E.Amber Batson, P.E.Paul Bizier, P.E., F.ASCE, D.WRELucas Botero, P.E., BCEE, ENV SPAkram Botrous, Ph.D., P.E., BCEELisa Boude

15、manKeith Bourgeous, Ph.D, P.E.Gregory A. BowdenJohn R. Bratby, Ph.D., P.E.Kari Fitzmorris Brisolara, ScD, MSPH, QEPJohn P. Brito, P.E.Lewis Bryant, P.E.Marie S. Burbano, Ph.D., P.E., BCEEMisti BurkmanChris ByeJennifer CallahanOnder Caliskaner, Ph.D., P.E.Leonard W. Casson, Ph.D., P.E., BCEEStan Chil

16、sonS. Rao Chitikela, Ph.D., P.E., P.Eng, BCEE (ASCE Blue Ribbon Review Panel)Timothy A. ConstantineBruce L. Cooley, P.E.Emma CooneyChris D. Cox, Ph.D., P.E. (ASCE Blue Ribbon Review Panel)Glen T. Daigger, Ph.D., P.E., BCEE, NAE (ASCE Blue Ribbon Review Panel)Chris DeBarbadillo, P.E.Adam DellingerTim

17、ur Deniz, Ph.D., P.E., BCEECarlos DiazBruce DiFrancisco, P.E.Ludwig DinklohAlexandra Doody, P.E.Leon DowningBertrand DussertNa-Asia EllisAdam Evans, P.E.Richard FingerWilliam FloresKristin FredericksonDaniel Freedman, P.E.Val S. Frenkel, Ph.D., P.E., D. WREJohn Friel, P.E.Edward W. FritzRebecca Gauf

18、fPrepared by Design of Water Resource Recovery Facilities Task Force of the Water Environment Federation and the American Society of Civil Engineers/Environmental and Water Resources InstituteHany Gerges, Ph.D., P.E., P. EngMatthew Goss, P.E., CEM, CEA, CDSM, LEEDAP (BD+C)Linda GowmanSamantha Graybi

19、ll, P.E.Bently Green, P.E.William Dana Green, P.E.Jim GromanRashi Gupta, P.E.Drew HansenVaughan Harshman, P.E.Jeff HauserMichael Hines, P.E.Angela Hintz, P.E.Anthonie Hogendoorn, MSc.Greg Homoki, P.E.William HotzBrian HuangChristopher Hunniford, P.E.Gary L. Hunter, P.E., BCEE, ENV SPJinsheng (Jin) H

20、uo, Ph.D. P.E., BCEE (Chair, ASCE Blue Ribbon Review Panel)Joseph A. HusbandSamuel S. Jeyanayagam, Ph.D., P.E., BCEEJose JimenezAndrew JonesJim JoyceJohn C. Kabouris, Ph.D., P.E.Dimitri KatehisMorgan KnightonKyle Kubista, P.E.Satej KulkarniLouis LefebvreWayne LemKevin S. Leung, Ph.D., P.E., BCEEF. M

21、ichael LewisPeter Loomis, P.E.Dusti F. LowndesLee A. Lundberg, P.E.Jose Christiano Machado Jr., Ph.D., P.E.Laura Marcolini, P.E.Samir Mathur, P.E., BCEEWilliam C. McConnellLauren McDaniel, MPHCharles M. McGinley, P.E.Michael A. McGinley, P.E. Anna Mehrotra, Ph.D., P.E.Henryk MelcerBaoxia Mi (ASCE Bl

22、ue Ribbon Review Panel)Mark W. Miller, Ph.D.Elizabeth MinerRichard O. Mines, Jr., Ph.D., P.E. (ASCE Blue Ribbon Review Panel)Indra N. Mitra, Ph.D., P.E., MBA, BCEEManny MoncholiRay P. Montoya, P.E.Steve Mustard, P.E., CAP, GICSPGarrison W. MyerVincent NazarethMaureen D. Neville, P.E.Robert A. (Randy

23、) NixonIng. Daniel NolascoHelena OchoaDavid W. Oerke, P.E.Andres F. Onate CalderonTim Page-Bottorff, CSP, CETAna J. Pena-Tijerina, Ph.D., P.E.Heather M. Phillips, P.E.Ashley Pifer, Ph.D., P.E.Marcel PomerleauRay PorterCoenraad Pretorius, P.E.Pusker Regmi, Ph.D., P.E.Leiv RiegerJoel C. Rife, P.E.Adam

24、 Rogensues, P.E.A. Robert Rubin, Ph.D.Andrew Salveson, P.E.Domenico SantoroPatricia A. ScanlanKimberly SchlauchHarold E. Schmidt, Jr., P.E., BCEEKenneth Schnaars, P.E.Megan Yoo SchneiderSandra SchulerMatt Seib, Ph.D.Douglas Sherman, P.E.Toshio Shimada, Ph.D., P.E.Jim E. Smith, Jr, D.Sc, MASCE, BCEEM

25、Eric Spargimino, P.E., LEED APEric T. Staunton, Ph.D.Jennifer L. Strehler, P.E., MBA, BCEE, ENV-SPTimothy H. Sullivan, P.E.Alex Szerwinski, P.E.Steven SwanbackJay L. Swift, P.E.Alex TabbBerrin Tansel, Ph.D., P.E., BCEE, FASCE, FEWRI (ASCE Blue Ribbon Review Panel)Anthony Tartaglione, P.E., BCEEGeorg

26、e Tchobanoglous (ASCE Blue Ribbon Review Panel)Matt Tebow, P.E.Rachelle TippettsDavid TomowichK. Richard Tsang , Ph.D., P.E., BCEEJason TurgeonAndrea Turriciano White, P.E.David UbertDavid ValeroDon Vandertulip, P.E., BCEEAles Volcansek, P.E.Tanush Wadhawan, Ph.D.Trevor Wagenmaker, P.E.Kristen Waksm

27、anSteve Waters, P.E., P. EngDavid G. Weissbrodt, Asst. Prof., Ph.D., M.Sc., Dipl.-Ing.Jianfeng WenCurt Wendt, P.E., CAPClaes WestringJason J. Williams, P.E.Matthew J. Williams, P.E.Hannah T. Wilner, P.E., PMPMelissa K. Woo, P.E.Paul WoodWade Wood, P.E.Thomas Worley-Morse, Ph.D.Usama Zaher, Ph.D., P.

28、E.Tian C. Zhang, Ph.D., P.E., BCEE, F.ASCE (ASCE Blue Ribbon Review Panel)Under the Direction of the Municipal Subcommittee of the Technical Practice Committee2018Water Environment Federation601 Wythe StreetAlexandria, VA 22314-1994 USAhttp:/www.wef.orgviiContentsList of Tables ixList of Figures ix1

29、.0 INTRODUCTION 12.0 SUSTAINABILITY FRAMEWORKS 32.1 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Climate Ready Water Utilities Initiative 52.2 Envision 62.3 Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design 62.4 American Society for Testing and Materials 82.5 Customized Frameworks for Environmental and Energy M

30、anagement Systems 92.5.1 ISO 14001: Environmental Management Systems 92.5.2 ISO 50001: Energy Management Systems 112.6 Projects Seeking Awards Under Multiple Frameworks 113.0 PRACTICAL APPLICATION 123.1 Planning Phase 123.1.1 Goal Setting 123.1.1.1 Goal Setting Tools 133.1.1.1.1 Policy Directives 13

31、3.1.1.1.2 Benchmarking and Gap Analysis 133.1.1.1.3 Energy Audits 153.1.1.1.4 Eco-Charrettes 203.1.1.2 Sample Set of Sustainability-Oriented Goals and Objectives 213.1.2 Siting Decisions 223.1.3 Community Integration 223.1.4 Opportunity Components 233.2 Preliminary Design Phase 24viii Contents3.2.1

32、Integrated Design for Sustainability 243.2.2 Technology Selections 253.2.2.1 Energy Conserving Technologies 253.2.2.2 Energy Producing Technologies 293.2.2.3 Key Factors in Selecting Technologies and Preferred Alternatives 303.3 Final Design Phase 313.3.1 Energy Modeling 323.3.2 Greenhouse Gas Model

33、ing 333.3.3 Life Cycle Costing 383.3.4 Equipment Selection 383.3.4.1 Energy Management Information Systems 383.3.4.2 Pumping 393.3.4.3 Aeration 403.3.4.4 Solids Handling 403.3.4.5 Ultraviolet Disinfection 413.3.5 Materials Selection 423.3.5.1 Durability and Reliability 423.3.5.2 Content and Producti

34、on 423.3.5.3 Sustainable Sourcing 443.3.5.4 End of Life Considerations 443.3.6 Future Proofing 453.3.6.1 Regulatory Change 453.3.6.2 Resilience to Climate Change 453.3.6.3 Technology Migration Pathways 453.3.7 Other Sustainability Considerations During Final Design 463.4 Bidding Phase 473.4.1 Financ

35、ing Energy and Sustainability Projects 483.4.2 Emphasizing Sustainability and Energy Management for Competitive Bid Procurement 503.5 Construction Phase 503.6 Operations and Maintenance Phase 524.0 REFERENCES 535.0 SUGGESTED READINGS 56ixList of Tables1 Summary of sustainability frameworks 42 Summar

36、y of relevant ASTM standards .83 On-site energy production unit estimates 164 GHG modeling protocols by treatment process .37List of Figures1 Environmental management system cycle of continuous improvement .102 Alternatives development, evaluation, and selection process .123 Benchmarking by facility

37、 type and flow .154 Sankey diagram 1 345 Sankey diagram 2 35xAuthors and reviewers efforts were supported by the following organizations:AECOM, Piscataway, New Jersey; Buffalo, New YorkAmerican Water, Voorhees, New JerseyArcadis U.S., Inc., Highlands Ranch, Colorado; Buffalo, New York; White Plains,

38、 New YorkArvos Schmidtsche Schack LLC, Wexford, PennsylvaniaAutomation Federation, Raleigh, North CarolinaBarge, Waggoner, Sumner and Cannon, Nashville, TennesseeBedrock Enterprises, Inc., Baden, PennsylvaniaBlack Indianapolis, Indiana; Overland Park, Kansas; Kansas City, Missouri; St. Louis, Missou

39、ri; Memphis, TennesseeBrown and Caldwell, Maitland, Florida; Orlando, Florida; Charlotte, North Carolina; Nashville, Tennessee; Alexandria, Virginia; Seattle, WashingtonCarollo Engineers, Costa Mesa, California; Walnut Creek, California; Littleton, Colorado; Tampa, Florida; Dallas, Texas CDM Smith,

40、Carlsbad, California; Irvine, California; Los Angeles, California; Denver, Colorado; Bogota, Columbia; Maitland, Florida; Miami, Florida; Orlando, Florida; Boston, Massachusetts; Manchester, New Hampshire; Albany, New York; Raleigh, North Carolina; Providence, Rhode Island; Houston, Texas; Austin, T

41、exas; Dallas, Texas; Fairfax, Virginia; Leesburg, Virginia; Bellevue, WashingtonCH2M, Tampa, Florida; Chicago, Illinois; Albuquerque, New Mexico; Herndon, Virginia; Toronto, Ontario, CanadaCorrosion Probe, Inc., Centerbrook, ConnecticutDC Water, Washington, D.C.Donohue Frisco, TexasGray and Osborne,

42、 Seattle, WashingtonGREELEY and HANSEN, Chicago, Illinois, San Francisco, CaliforniaHazen and Sawyer, Raleigh, North CarolinaHDR Engineering, Inc., Walnut Creek, California; Calverton, Maryland; Cleveland, Ohio; Nashville, TennesseeHubbell, Roth Ocala, Florida; Tampa, Florida; West Palm Beach, Flori

43、da; Ft. Worth, Texas Laura Marcolini Denver, Colorado; Tampa, Florida; Portland OregonTesco Controls, Inc., Sacramento, CaliforniaTotal Safety Compliance, Mesa, Arizona University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PennsylvaniaURS Corporation, Buffalo, New YorkU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Boston, M

44、assachusettsV Rebecca Gauff; Elizabeth Miner; Jason Turgeon; and David Valero 1.0 INTRODUCTION Energy savings and sustainable design deserve special attention to be sure water resource recovery facilities (WRRFs) have long-term adaptability and resilience to global climate change, volatile energy pr

45、ices, and other predict-able change scenarios. Municipal WRRFs in the United States use approxi-mately 30.2 bil. kWh/yr, or approximately 0.8% of total electricity use in the United States (EPRI, 2013). Yet, of the approximately 14,780 WRRFs in the United States, only approximately 1268 (8.4%) inclu

46、de anaerobic diges-tion (which offers the potential to recovery chemical energy) and beneficially use this energy on site for production of power and/or heat (WEF, 2013). The umbrella of sustainability covers long-term provisions for resilient facilities to manage a wider range of stressors, and tre

47、atment process adapt-ability to accommodate changing regulations. Sustainability in this context refers to the ability to continue operating without causing immediate or long-term harm to the environment, society, or depleting natural resources. In the accounting sense, this means planning for the f

48、uture by making annual financial investments that seek to minimize the total life cycle cost of a WRRF across its full life and avoid deferring costs and negative effects to future gen-erations. The concept of sustainability has also expanded to include indirect effects to the greater community, and

49、 consider local industry partnerships and social justice issues. Optimizing the sustainability of a WRRF requires 2 Sustainability and Energy Management for Water Resource Recovery Facilitiessystems thinking and a willingness to make change. Using strong leader-ship, cultural buy-in, and an understanding of the best technical practices described in this publication, utility managers can make a big difference. Public expectations of todays wastewater utility have changed in recent years and are likely to