ANSI ATIS 0100503-2002 Network Performance Parameters for Dedicated Digital Services C Definitions and Measurements.pdf

《ANSI ATIS 0100503-2002 Network Performance Parameters for Dedicated Digital Services C Definitions and Measurements.pdf》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《ANSI ATIS 0100503-2002 Network Performance Parameters for Dedicated Digital Services C Definitions and Measurements.pdf（20页珍藏版）》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。

1、 AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARD FOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS ATIS-0100503.2002(R2011) Network Performance Parameters for Dedicated Digital Services Definitions and Measurements ATIS is the leading technical planning and standards development organization committed to the rapid development of global, market-dr

2、iven standards for the information, entertainment and communications industry. More than 250 companies actively formulate standards in ATIS 18 Committees, covering issues including: IPTV, Service Oriented Networks, Energy Efficiency, IP-Based and Wireless Technologies, Quality of Service, and Billin

3、g and Operational Support. In addition, numerous Incubators, Focus and Exploratory Groups address emerging industry priorities including “Green”, IP Downloadable Security, Next Generation Carrier Interconnect, IPv6 and Convergence. ATIS is the North American Organizational Partner for the 3rd Genera

4、tion Partnership Project (3GPP), a member and major U.S. contributor to the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) Radio and Telecommunications Sectors, and a member of the Inter-American Telecommunication Commission (CITEL). For more information, please visit . AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARD Appro

5、val of an American National Standard requires review by ANSI that the requirements for due process, consensus, and other criteria for approval have been met by the standards developer. Consensus is established when, in the judgment of the ANSI Board of Standards Review, substantial agreement has bee

6、n reached by directly and materially affected interests. Substantial agreement means much more than a simple majority, but not necessarily unanimity. Consensus requires that all views and objections be considered, and that a concerted effort be made towards their resolution. The use of American Nati

7、onal Standards is completely voluntary; their existence does not in any respect preclude anyone, whether he has approved the standards or not, from manufacturing, marketing, purchasing, or using products, processes, or procedures not conforming to the standards. The American National Standards Insti

8、tute does not develop standards and will in no circumstances give an interpretation of any American National Standard. Moreover, no person shall have the right or authority to issue an interpretation of an American National Standard in the name of the American National Standards Institute. Requests

9、for interpretations should be addressed to the secretariat or sponsor whose name appears on the title page of this standard. CAUTION NOTICE: This American National Standard may be revised or withdrawn at any time. The procedures of the American National Standards Institute require that action be tak

10、en periodically to reaffirm, revise, or withdraw this standard. Purchasers of American National Standards may receive current information on all standards by calling or writing the American National Standards Institute. Notice of Disclaimer T1A1.3 Chair Henri Suyderhoud, OKI America, Incorporated; T

11、1A1.3 Vice-Chair Organization Represented Name of Representative Oscar Avellaneda Nortel Networks Ken Biholar Alcatel USA John Boal MEGAXESS, Inc. Dick Bobilin Acterna David Brady BellSouth Rick Canaday AT Performance allocation among network elements; and Compatibility of performance measurements a

12、mong network users, providers, and equipment vendors. This document provides the framework for a companion document, T1.510-1999, Network performance parameters for dedicated digital services, which contains numerical specifications and allocations for the parameters and measurements discussed in th

13、is standard. End users may use the concepts developed in this standard to measure end-user-to-end-user performance and availability. 2 Normative References The following standard contains provisions, which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of this American National Standard. At

14、the time of publication, the edition indicated was valid. All standards are subject to revision, and parties to agreements based on this American National Standard are ATIS-0100503.2002 2 encouraged to investigate the possibility of applying the most recent editions of the standards indicated below.

15、 T1.510-1999, Network Performance Parameters for Dedicated Digital Services for Rates Up to and Including DS3 Specifications.13 Abbreviations, Acronyms, and Definitions 3.1 Abbreviations Auni(b,a): unidirectional availability for INIb INIa; Auni(A,B): unidirectional availability for NIA NIB; Auni(B,

16、A): unidirectional availability for NIB NIA. Auni(A,a): unidirectional availability for NIA INIa; and Auni(a,A): unidirectional availability for INIa NIA. Interactive services are bi-directional in nature and are unusable (i.e., unavailable) if either direction of transport is unavailable. For servi

17、ces that are bi-directional, end-to-end bi-directional service availability is defined as: Abi(AB): bidirectional availability for NIA NIBwhere Abi(AB)= Auni(A,B) Auni(B,A)and is the Intersection operator. Note that bi-directional availability is end-to-end and cannot be allocated. 5.2.2 Determinati

18、on of bidirectional availability There must be some method to determine the periods of time when both directions of a bidirectional service are in the available state. One method of providing this functionality is to require time-stamping of the transitions to available and unavailable states as a n

19、ew feature. Another method is to implement the bidirectional UAS register as specified in ITU-T Recommendation G.784.8Additional methods to assess bidirectional availability are for further study. 8For the title and availability information of this cross-reference, see Annex A ATIS-0100503.2002 8 6

20、Measurements 6.1 Measurement purposes The following measurements and tests are made to verify long-term service performance: a) Acceptance tests: These measurements verify that the value of the performance parameters are within prescribed limits after the completion of a new service installation. Th

21、e measurements for these tests are performed on an out-of-service basis. b) Trouble verification tests: These tests verify the need for maintenance activity, in response to a trouble report. The measurements for these tests are performed on either an in-service or an out-of-service basis. c) Repair

22、verification tests: These tests verify that the values of the performance parameters are within the prescribed limits after completion of a repair activity. The measurements for these tests are generally performed on an out-of-service basis. d) Service monitoring: These measurements verify that the

23、values of the performance parameters are within the prescribed limits. These in-service measurements are performed on a continuous or periodic basis. e) Characterization measurements: These measurements collect data for determining the performance of a specific population (defined by rate, facility

24、type, and other characteristics). These measurements are performed on either an in-service or an out-of-service basis. 6.2 Types of measurements The parameters can be measured in the following ways: a) Inservice measurements: These measurements are performed without disturbing user information trans

25、missions; and b) Out-of-service measurements: These measurements require the service to be made unavailable to the user. 6.3 Performance determination Performance determination is based on the following relationships: a) Z number of intervals of length Q are examined where: 1) Z is an integer value;

26、 and 2) Q is an interval of time or a fixed number of bits corresponding to the event under consideration. c) For each interval Q examined, a determination is made as to whether a threshold value W for the event has been exceeded where W is a threshold of transmission bit or block errors over interv

27、al Q corresponding to the event under consideration; d) Performance for the parameter under consideration is determined by the number of intervals (events) Y, out of Z intervals examined, which cross the threshold W. ATIS-0100503.2002 9 Table 1 shows the relationship of the accuracy events to the in

28、tervals and thresholds. Table 1 Relationship of the accuracy events to the intervals and thresholds Event Interval (Q) Threshold (W) Errored Unit of Time Unit time Zero Errors Errored Block Block length (time or number of bits) Zero Errors Severely Errored Unit of Time Unit time Block error count ov

29、er interval Q corresponding to 30% (see Note) errored blocks (where a suitable block is not available, 10-3BER) or 1 SDP Severely Errored Period 3 unit times while in the available state 100% SEUT (a non-SEUT stops the sequence) NOTE - The errored block threshold for defining an SES (SEUT where the

30、unit of time is 1 second) for SDH sections is different from 30% and typically lower. 6.4 In-service measurement of availability With availability defined in Availability parameters above, the monitoring points should be at INIs and NIs. 6.4.1 Measuring availability between two INIs To measure Avail

31、ability between INIs9, monitoring points are at the INI located at both ends of the transit portion of the transmission path. As shown in Figure 2, each end has two monitoring points: one for transmitting and one for receiving. Four monitoring points are available for measuring unidirectional availa

32、bility performances. Figure 2 Monitoring points for availability between two INIs 9Multiple INIs are possible within the transit portion. The monitoring points shown in Figure 2 are applicable to any pair of INIs. ATIS-0100503.2002 10 Measuring availability from NI-to-NI Similarly, the Availability

33、from NI to NI (see Figure 3), could be measured using test access points at A, B, F, and H. However, in some instances, A, B, F, and H are not accessible to the service provider. For these situations, availability can only be measured if a Far-End Monitoring Capability is supported by the customer p

34、remise equipment. With only monitoring point C, D, E, and G accessible, performance primitives required for availability measurements (e.g., ES, SES, etc.) in the incoming direction are reported to the far-end via special messages embedded within the signal format (see T1.231-1997). Examples include

35、 the far-end block error (FEBE) indicators in SONET and DS3 C-bit applications, and the performance report message (PRM) in DS1-ESF. With such capability built into a transmission signal, part of the monitoring functions (derivation, storage, thresholding, and reporting of performance primitives and

36、 parameters) for transmission performance observed at the far-end can be provided at the near-end. Figure 3 Monitoring points for availability from NI-to-NI ATIS-0100503.2002 11 Annex A (informative) A Bibliography T1.101-1999, Synchronization interface standard.1T1.102-1993 (R1999), Digital Hierarc

37、hy- Electrical Interfaces.1T1.105-2001, Synchronous optical network (SONET) Basic description including multiplex structure, rates, and formats.1T1.107-2002, Digital hierarchy Formats specifications.1T1.231-1997, Digital hierarchy Layer 1 in-service digital transmission performance monitoring.1T1.41

38、0-2001, Carrier to Customer Metallic Interface - Digital Data at 64 kbit/s and Subrates.1T1.507-2002, Network performance parameters for circuit-switched digital services Definitions and measurements.1T1.514-2001, Network Performance Parameters and Objectives for Dedicated Digital Services SONET bit

39、 rates.1T1.TR.51-1996, A Technical Report on Changes in the Network Access Model.1ITU-T Recommendation G.701 (3/93), Vocabulary of digital transmission and multiplexing, and pulse code modulation (PCM) terms.10ITU-T Recommendation G.784 (07/99), Synchronous digital hierarchy (SDH) management.10ITU-T

40、 Recommendation G.821 (08/96), Error performance on an international digital connection forming part of an integrated services digital network.10ITU-T Recommendation G.821 Corrigendum 1 (07/01), Error performance on an international digital connection forming part of an integrated services digital n

41、etwork.10ITU-T Recommendation G.822 (11/88), Controlled slip rate objectives on an international digital connection.10ITU-T Recommendation G.826 (02/99), Error performance parameters and objectives for international, constant bit rate digital paths at or above the primary rate.10ITU-T Recommendation

42、 G.826 Corrigendum 1 (07/01), Error performance parameters and objectives for international, constant bit rate digital paths at or above the primary rate.1010This document is available from the International Telecommunications Union. ATIS-0100503.2002 12 ITU-T Recommendation G.827 (03/00), Availabil

43、ity parameters and objectives for path elements of international constant bit-rate digital paths at or above the primary rate.10ITU-T Recommendation G.827.1 (11/00), Availability parameters and objectives for path elements of international constant bit-rate digital paths at or above the primary rate

44、.10ITU-T Recommendation G.828 (03/00), Error performance parameters and objectives for international, constant bit rate synchronous digital paths.10ITU-T Recommendation G.828 Corrigendum 1 (07/01), Error performance parameters and objectives for international, constant bit rate synchronous digital paths.10ITU-T Recommendation X.21 (9/92), Interface between data terminal equipment and data circuit-terminating equipment for synchronous operation on public data networks.10ITU-T Recommendation X.140 (9/92), General quality of service parameters for communication via public data networks.10