ANSI ASME Y32.18-1972 Symbols for Mechanical and Acoustical Elements as Used in Schematic Diagrams《示意图用的机械和声学元件符号》.pdf
《ANSI ASME Y32.18-1972 Symbols for Mechanical and Acoustical Elements as Used in Schematic Diagrams《示意图用的机械和声学元件符号》.pdf》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《ANSI ASME Y32.18-1972 Symbols for Mechanical and Acoustical Elements as Used in Schematic Diagrams《示意图用的机械和声学元件符号》.pdf(28页珍藏版)》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。
1、, AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARD Symbols for Mechanical and Acoustical Elements as Used 0 In Schematic Diagrams ANSI Y32.18 - 1972 FOR CURRENT COMMITTEE PERSONNEL PLEASE SEE ASME MANUAL AS-I 1 SECRETARIAT INSTITUTE OF ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PUBL
2、ISHED BY THE AMERICAN S.OCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS United Engineering Center 345 East 47th Street New York, N. Y. 1001 7 No part of this document may be reproduced in any form, in an electronic retrieval system or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Copyright 8, 197
3、2, by THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS Printod in U.S.A. FOREWORD Ever increasing use has been made during recent decades of schematic diagrams in representing mechani- cal and acoustical systems. This development is a natural outgrowth of the same technique as was developed earlier for
4、electric networks. Such diagrams are important because of their usefulness in two connections. First, a mechanical or an acoustical system can be analyzed much more rapidly with a schematic diagram than without. Indeed, systematic methods have been developed in recent years which can generate correc
5、t descriptive equations for the system given its schematic diagram and specifications of the properties of each element in the system. Furthermore, the use of such methods tends to minimize blunders in analyses, such as wrong signs for terms, which even the most experienced analyst is apt to make fr
6、om time to time. Second, as an analyst gains experience with schematic diagrams he develops an insight into the character- istic performance of collections of interconnected elements. Thus he develops an ability to anticipate the performance of a system, at least in a qualitative way, based solely o
7、n a study of its schematic diagram. This is an attribute of schematic diagrams that is most useful, as was discovered earlier by electrical and elec- trical and electronics engineers. It is to be noted that each of the foregoing points concerns a determination of the performance of a system; i.e., a
8、n analysis of the system. It is not surprising, therefore, that schematic symbols are constructed primarily to make analyses easier and more straightforward. In recent years, however, there has developed a considerable interest in schematic diagrams in connection with the synthesis problem. From thi
9、s point of view one starts with a specification of the overall performance desired in a system. If some specifications are then assigned to the schematic diagram, such as the number of juri-ctions and branches in the diagram, it is conceivable that the constitutive equations for the elements can be
10、determined. Although techniques of this sort have not been worked out in detail as yet, they are receiving a lot of attention at the time of this writing and hold great promises for the future. Because this standard concerns a relatively new field, the Writing Group was forced to make some de- cisio
11、ns. The most important one concerned the question whether it is desirable to try to evolve some stand- ard symbols now rather than to wait a number of yearsin the hope that some fairly uniform practices m.?y evolve. It is recognized that standards are much easier to establish if a unanimity of opini
12、on exists. l3e Writing Group believed, however, that a significant contribution could be made to an evolving practice if some sort of a standard practice could be adopted now. No doubt, any user of this standard will find some things that he likes and some that he would like to see changed. Suggesti
13、ons for improvement based on experience gained in the use of this standard will always be welcome and should be mailed to the Secretary, American National Standards Committee Y32, in care of the ASME. This standard was prepared by a committee working under the auspices of the American National Stand
14、- ards Committee on Acoustics, S1, and the American National Standards Committee on Mechanical Shock and Vibration, S2. It was approved by the above American National Standards Committees and by American National Standards Committee Y32 on Graphic Symbols and Designations on November 23, 1971 when i
15、t was sent to American National Standard Institute for approval as an American National Standard. The ANSI approval was received on April 20, 1972 and it was designated ANSI Y32.18-1972. . Ill AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARDS COMMITTEE Y32 GRAPHIC SYMBOLS AND DESIGNATIONS OFFICERS C. A. Fricke, Choirman
16、J. L. Fisher, Vice Choirmon - Mechanical W. L. Hewetson, Vice Choirman - Chemical and Process L. A. Meadows, Vice Choirman - Government Lioison C. R. Muller, Vice Choirman - Electricol 5. I. Sherr, Secretory COMMITTEE MEMBERS ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA Laurence Batchelder, 983 Memorial Drive, Cam
17、bridge, Massachusetts 02138 H. F. Olson, R.C.A. Laboratories, Princeton, New Jersey AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY R. F. Schuerer, Linden, New Jersey AMERICAN GEAR MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION Gene L. Scott, American Gear Manufacturers Association, Washington, D.C. AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERS J
18、. R. Couper, IJniversity of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas W. L. Hewetson, American Institute of Industrial Engineers, New York, New York 1. R. Goldstein, Newark College of Engineering, Newark, New Jersey AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF MINING, METALLURGICAL AND PETROLEUM ENGINEERS J. W. Worren, The Anacond
19、a Company, Butte, Montana AMERICAN SOCIETY OF AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERS J. A. Basselman, American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St. Joseph, Michigan. P. L. Bellingel; Alternate, American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St. Joseph, Michigan AMERICAN SOCIELTY OF CIVIL ENGINEERS K. R. Jacobs, Geor
20、gia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia AMERICAN SOCIECTY FOR ENGINEERING EDUCATION 1. L. Hill, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois J. G. McGuire, Texas A Schematic Diagram 4 4.5 Perfect Coupler 4 4.6 Multi-Terminal Element . 4 4.7 Supplementary Symbols . 5 5 5.1 General . 5 .
21、Description of Symbols 5 5.2 Symbols for Pure Inertances . 5 5.3 Symbols for Pure Compliance . 5 5.4 Symbols for Pure Dissipations 5 5.5 Symbols for Pure Sources for Excitatjons (Generators) . 5 5.6 Symbols for Perfect Couplers . 5 5.7 Symbols for General Elements . 5 5.8 Supplementary Symbols . 5 A
22、ppendix . General Information on Construction of Schematic Diagrams . 6 xi Intentionally left blank ANSI Y32.18-1972 AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARD SYMBOLS FOR MECHANICAL AND ACOUSTICAL ELEMENTS AS USED IN SCHEMATIC DIAGRAMS 1. Scope This document presents standard symbols and definitions that may be us
23、ed in constructing schematic diagrams for mechanical and acoustical systems whose performances are describable by finite sets of scalar variables. The choice of symbols described herein is based upon the fol- lowing assumptions: a. A system can be divided conceptually into a finite set of elements e
24、ach of whose dynamical properties are known. b. To each such conceptual element there can be assigned a set of terminals. c. Symbols for the elements shall be inter- connected to form a schematic diagram for the whole system so that field equations shall be satisfied at every junction point and arou
- 1.请仔细阅读文档,确保文档完整性,对于不预览、不比对内容而直接下载带来的问题本站不予受理。
- 2.下载的文档,不会出现我们的网址水印。
- 3、该文档所得收入(下载+内容+预览)归上传者、原创作者;如果您是本文档原作者,请点此认领!既往收益都归您。
下载文档到电脑,查找使用更方便
5000 积分 0人已下载
下载 | 加入VIP,交流精品资源 |
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- ANSIASMEY32181972SYMBOLSFORMECHANICALANDACOUSTICALELEMENTSASUSEDINSCHEMATICDIAGRAMS 示意图 机械 声学 元件 符号 PDF

链接地址:http://www.mydoc123.com/p-432132.html