大学六级-472及答案解析.doc
《大学六级-472及答案解析.doc》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《大学六级-472及答案解析.doc(26页珍藏版)》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。
1、大学六级-472 及答案解析(总分:687.00,做题时间:90 分钟)一、BPart Writing(总题数:1,分数:106.00)1.BHow to Deal with Personal Crisis/B1.造成个人危机的起因; 2.应对个人危机的方法。(分数:106.00)_二、BPart Reading (总题数:1,分数:70.00)BGENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODS/BAre genetically modified crops an environmental dream come-true or a disaster in the making? Scie
2、ntists are looking for answers.The world seems increasingly divided into those who favor genetically modified (GM) foods and those who fear them Advocates assert that growing genetically altered crops can be kinder to the environment and that eating foods from those plants is perfectly safe. And, th
3、ey say genetic engineering which can induce plants to grow in poor soils or to produce more nutritious foods will soon become an essential tool for helping to feed the worlds burgeoning population. Skeptics contend that GM crops could pose unique risks to the environment and to health risks too trou
4、bling to accept placidly, Taking that view, many European countries are restricting the planting and importation of GM agricultural products. Much of the debate hinges on perceptions of safety. But what exactly does recent scientific research say about the hazards? The answers, too often lost in rep
5、orts on the controversy, are served up in the pages that follow. Two years ago in Edinburgh, Scotland, eco-vandals stormed a field, crushing canola plants. Last year in Maine, midnight raiders hacked down more than 3000 experimental poplar trees. And in Sun Diego, protesters smashed sorghum and spra
6、yed paint over greenhouse walls.This far-flung outrage took aim at genetically modified crops. But the protests backfired: all the destroyed plants were conventionally bred. In each case, activists mistook ordinary plants for GM varieties.Its easy to understand why. In a way, GM cropsnow on some 109
7、 million acres of farmland worldwideare invisible. You cant see, taste or touch a gene inserted into a plant or sense its effects on the environment. You cant tell, just by looking, whether pollen containing a foreign gene can poison butterflies or fertilize plants miles away. That invisibility is p
8、recisely what worries people. How, exactly, will GM crops affect the environment-and when will we notice?Advocates of GM, or transgenic, crops say the plants will benefit the environment by requiting fewer toxic pesticides than conventional crops. But critics fear the potential risks and wonder how
9、big the benefits really are. “We have so many questions about these plants,“ remarks Guenther Stotzky, a soil microbiologist at New York University. “Theres a lot we dont know and need to find out.“As GM crops multiply in the landscape, unprecedented numbers of researchers have started fanning into
10、the fields to get the missing information. Some of their recent findings are reassuring; others suggest a need for vigilance.B Fewer Poisons in the Soil?/BEvery year U.S. growers shower crops with an estimated 971 million pounds of pesticides, mostly to kill insects, weeds and fungi. But pesticide r
11、esidues linger on crops and the surrounding soil, leaching into groundwater, running into streams and getting gobbled up by wildlife. The constant chemical trickle is an old worry for environmentalists.In the mid-1990s agribusinesses began advertising GM seeds that promised to reduce a farmers use o
12、f toxic pesticides. Today most GM crops-mainly soybean, com, cotton and canola-contain genes enabling them to either resist insect pests or tolerate weed-killing herbicides. The insect-resistant varieties make their own insecticide, a property meant to reduce the need for chemical sprays. The herbic
13、idetolerant types survive when exposed to broad-spectrum weed killers, potentially allowing farmers to forgo more poisonous chemicals that target specific weed species. Farmers to limit the use of more hazardous pesticides when they can, but GM crops also hold appeal because they simplify operations
14、 ( reducing the frequency and complexity of pesticide applications) and, in some cases, increase yields.But confirming environmental benefit is tricky. Virtually no peer-reviewed papers have addressed such advantages, which would be expected to vary from plant to plant and place to place. Some infor
15、mation is available, however. According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, farmers who plant herbicidetolerant crops do not necessarily use fewer sprays, but they do apply a more benign mix of chemicals. For instance, those who grow herbicide-tolerant soybeans typically avoid the most noxious we
16、ed killer, turning instead to glyphosate herbicides (苷磷除草剂), which are less to toxic and degrade more quickly.Insect-resistant crops also bring mixed benefits. To date. insect resistance has been provided by a gene from the soil bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) (杆菌苏立菌) This gene directs cells t
17、o manufacture a Crystalline protein that is toxic to certain insects-especially caterpillars and beetles that gnaw on crops-but does not harm other organisms. The toxin gene m different strains of B. thuringiensis can affect different mixes of insects, so seed makers can select the version that seem
18、s best suited to a particular crop. Of all the crops carrying Bt genes, cotton has brought the biggest drop in pesticide use. According to the Environmental Protection Agency, in 1999 growers in states using high amounts of Bt cotton sprayed 21 percent less insecticide than usual on the crop. Thats
19、a “dramatic and impressive“ reduction, says Stephen Johnson, an administrator in the EPAs Office of Pesticide Programs. Typically, Johnson says, a farmer might spray insecticides on a cotton field 7 to 14 times during a single growing season. “If you choose a Bt cotton product, you may have little o
20、r no use for these pretty harsh chemicals,“ he notes. Growers of Bt com and potatoes report less of a pesticide reduction, partly because those plants normally require fewer pesticides and face fluctuating numbers of pests.Defining the environmental risks of GM crops seems even harder than calculati
21、ng their benefits. At the moment, public attention is most trained on Bt crops, thanks to several negative studies. Regulators, too, are surveying the risks intensely. This spring or summer the EPA is expected to issue major new guidelines for Bt crops, ordering seed producers to show more thoroughl
22、y that the crops can be planted safely and monitored in farm fields.B At What Cost to Wildlife?/BIn 1998 a Swiss study provoked widespread worry that Bt plants can inadvertently harm unlucky creatures. In this laboratory experiment, green lacewing(草蛉) caterpillars proved more likely to die after eat
23、ing European corn-borer caterpillars that had fed on Bt com instead of regular corn. The flames of fear erupted again a year later, when Cornell University entomologist John Losey and his colleagues reported that riley had fed milkweed (乳草属植物) leaves dusted with Bt corn pollen to monarch butterfly l
24、arvae in the lab and that those larvae, too, had died.“That was the straw that broke the camels back.“ says David Pimentel, also an entomologist at Cornell. Suddenly, all eyes turned to the organisms munching GM plant leaves, nipping modified pollen or wriggling around in the soil below the plants-o
- 1.请仔细阅读文档,确保文档完整性,对于不预览、不比对内容而直接下载带来的问题本站不予受理。
- 2.下载的文档,不会出现我们的网址水印。
- 3、该文档所得收入(下载+内容+预览)归上传者、原创作者;如果您是本文档原作者,请点此认领!既往收益都归您。
下载文档到电脑,查找使用更方便
2000 积分 0人已下载
下载 | 加入VIP,交流精品资源 |
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 大学 472 答案 解析 DOC
