大学六级-1566及答案解析.doc
《大学六级-1566及答案解析.doc》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《大学六级-1566及答案解析.doc(48页珍藏版)》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。
1、大学六级-1566 及答案解析(总分:667.00,做题时间:90 分钟)一、Part Writing(总题数:1,分数:106.00)1. (分数:106.00)_二、Part Reading Compr(总题数:4,分数:70.00)Think or Swim: Can We Hold Back the Oceans?As the world gets warmer, sea levels are rising. It has been happening at a snails pace so far, but as it speeds up more and more low-lyin
2、g coastal land will be lost. At risk are many of the worlds cities and huge areas of fertile farmland. The sea is set to rise a metre or more by the end of this century. And thats just the start. “Unless there is a rapid and dramatic about-face in emissions-which no one expects-the next century will
3、 be far worse than this century,“ says glaciologist (冰川学家) Bob Bindshadler of NASAs Goddard Space Flight Center, Maryland.Throwing trillions of dollars at the problem could probably save big cities such as New York and London, but the task of defending all low-lying coastal areas and islands seems h
4、opeless. Or is it? Could we find a way to slow the accelerating glaciers, drain seas into deserts or add more ice to the great ice caps of Greenland and Antarctica?These ideas might sound crazy but we have got ourselves into such a bad situation that maybe we should start to consider them. If we car
5、ry on as we are, sea levels will rise for millennia, probably by well over 10 metres. Slashing greenhouse gas emissions would slow the rise, but the longer we hesitate, the bigger the rise we will be committed to. Even if “conventional“ geo-engineering schemes for cooling the planet were put in plac
6、e and worked as planned, they would have little effect on sea level over the next century unless combined with drastic emissions cuts.In short, if coastal dwellers dont want their children and grandchildren to have to abandon land to the sea, now is the time to start coming up with Plan C. So New Sc
7、ientist set out in search of the handful of researchers who have begun to think about specific ways to hold back the waters.One of the reasons why the great ice sheets of Greenland and Antartica are already shrinking is that the ice is draining off the land faster. Ice floating on the surrounding se
8、as usually acts as a brake, holding back glaciers on land, so as this ice is lost the glaciers flow faster. The acceleration of the Jakobshavn glacier in Greenland is thought to be the result of warm currents melting the floating tongue of the glacier. Other outlet glaciers are being attacked in a s
9、imilar way.Mike MacCracken of the Climate Institute in Washington DC is one of those starting to think that we shouldnt just sit back and let warm currents melt ice shelves. “Is there some way of doing something to stop that flow, or cool the water?“ he asks.Last year, physicist Russel Seitz at Harv
10、ard University suggested that the planet could be cooled by using fleets of customised boats to generate large numbers of tiny bubbles. This would whiten the surface of the oceans and so reflect more sunlight. MacCracken says the bubbles might be better arranged in a more focused way, to cool the cu
11、rrents that are undermining the Jakobshavn glacier and others like it. A couple of degrees of chill would take this water down to freezing point, rendering it harmless. “At least that would slow the pace of change,“ MacCracken says.What about a more direct approach: building a physical barrier to ha
12、lt a glaciers flow into the sea by brute force? Bindshadler thinks that is a non-starter. “The ice discharge has many sources, mostly remote and in environments where barriers are not Likely to work,“ he says. “Taking just the one example I know best, the Pine Island glacier in Antarctica drains int
13、o an ice shelf that at its front is 25 kilometres across and 500 metres thick, and moves at over 10 metres per day. The seabed there is 1000 metres down and is made of sediment (沉淀物) hundreds of metres thick and the consistency of toothpaste.“ Not your ideal building site.A slightly more subtle sche
14、me to rein in the glaciers was proposed more than 20 years ago by Douglas MacAyeal of the University of Chicago. His idea is to fight ice with ice. The big outlet glaciers feed into giant floating shelves of ice, which break off into icebergs at their outer edges. MacAyeal suggested pumping water up
15、 from beneath the ice and depositing it on the upper surface, where it would freeze to form a thick ridge, weighing down the floating ice shelf. Add enough ice in this way, and the bottom of the ice shelf would eventually be forced down onto the seabed. Friction with the seabed would slow down the s
16、helfs movement, which in turn would hold back the glaciers feeding into it. It would be like tightening an immense valve.“I think its quite an inspired idea,“ says Bindshadler. But nobody has followed it up to work out how practical the scheme would be. “On the back of an envelope it has promise-but
17、 these ice shelves are big. You would need a lot of drilling equipment all over the ice shelf, and my intuition is that if you look at the energetics of it, it wont work,“ Bindshadler says.Even if we could apply brakes to glaciers, this would only slow down sea level rise. Could we do better than th
18、at and reverse it-actually make the sea retreat? If you think of the sea as a giant bathtub, then the most obvious way to lower its level is to take out the plug.“One of the oldest notions is filling depressions on the land,“ says MacCracken. Among the largest of these is the Qattara depression in n
19、orthern Egypt, wlrich at its lowest point is more than 130 metres below sea level. Various schemes have been proposed to channel water from the Mediterranean into the depression to generate hydroelectric (水力) power, and as a by-product a few thousand cubic kilometres of the sea would be drained away
20、. Unfortunately, thats only enough to shave about 3 millimetres off sea level: a drop in the ocean. And there would be grave consequences for the local environment. “The leakage of salt water through fracture systems would add salt to aquifers (含水层) for good,“ says Farouk El-Baz, a geologist at Bost
21、on University who has studied the region.Refilling the Dead Sea is no better. Because of surrounding hills, this depression could be filled to 60 metres above sea level, but even that would only offset the rise by 5 millimetres-and drown several towns into the bargain.The notion of engineering lower
22、 sea levels remains a highly abstract topic. “If the world doesnt control emissions, Im pretty sure that no geo-engineering solution will work-and it would potentially create other side effects and false promises,“ says MacCracken. “But if we do get on a path to curbing emissions dramatically-down 5
23、0 per cent by 2050, say-then the question becomes, can geoengineering help with the hump were going to go through over the next few centuries?/(分数:49.00)(1).Spending trillions of dollars at sea-level rise problem could _.A. probably save only a few cities B. defend all low-lying coastal areasC. defi
24、nitely find perfect solution D. do nothing to save our planet(分数:7.00)A.B.C.D.(2).The conventional geo-engineering schemes will have little effect if _A. it dont work out as planned B. there arent drastic emission cutsC. it isnt put into practice now D. there arent enough financial support(分数:7.00)A
- 1.请仔细阅读文档,确保文档完整性,对于不预览、不比对内容而直接下载带来的问题本站不予受理。
- 2.下载的文档,不会出现我们的网址水印。
- 3、该文档所得收入(下载+内容+预览)归上传者、原创作者;如果您是本文档原作者,请点此认领!既往收益都归您。
下载文档到电脑,查找使用更方便
2000 积分 0人已下载
下载 | 加入VIP,交流精品资源 |
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 大学 1566 答案 解析 DOC
