大学六级-1563及答案解析.doc
《大学六级-1563及答案解析.doc》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《大学六级-1563及答案解析.doc(53页珍藏版)》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。
1、大学六级-1563 及答案解析(总分:667.00,做题时间:90 分钟)一、Part Writing(总题数:1,分数:106.00)1.1有人认为应该放弃核能2有人则认为应该坚持发展核能3我的看法Should We Abandon Nuclear Power?(分数:106.00)_二、Part Reading Compr(总题数:4,分数:70.00)Obamas War on SchoolsThe No Child Left Behind Act has been deadly to public education. So why has the president embraced
2、 it?Over the past year, I have traveled the nation speaking to nearly 100,000 educators, parents, and school-board members. No matter the city, state, or region, those who know schools best are frightened for the future of public education. They see no one ina position of leadership who understands
3、the damage being done to their schools by federal policies.They feel keenly betrayed by President Obama. Most voted for him, hoping he would reverse the ruinous No Child Left Behind (NCLB) legislation of George W. Bush. But Obama has not sought to turn back NCLB. His own approach, called Race to the
4、 Top, is even more punitive than NCLB. And though over the past week the president has repeatedly called on Congress to amend the law, his proposed reforms are largely cosmetic (装点门面的) and would leave the worst aspects of NCLB intact.The theory behind NCLB was that schools would improve dramatically
5、 if every child in grades 3 to 8 were tested every year and the results made public. Texas did exactly this, and advocates claimed it had seen remarkable results: test scores went up, the achievement gap between students of different races was closing, and graduation rates rose. At the time, a few s
6、cholars questioned the claims of a “Texas miracle,“ but Congress didnt listen.In fact, the “Texas miracle“ never happened. On federal tests, the states reading scores for eighth-grade students were flat from 1998 to 2009. And just weeks ago, former first lady Barbara Bush wrote an opinion piece in t
7、he Houston Chronicle opposing education budget cuts on the grounds that Texas students ranked in the bottom 10 percent in math and literacy nationally. After two decades of testing and accountability, Texas students have certainly not experienced a miracle when judged by the very measures that were
8、forced on students across the nation.NCLB required that 100 percent of students be proficient in reading and math by 2014. Any school not on track to meet this utopian goalone never reached by any nation in the worldwould face a series of sanctions, culminating in the firing of the staff and the clo
9、sing of the school. As 2014 nears, tens of thousands of schools have been branded as failures, thousands of educators have been fired, and schools that were once the anchors of their communities are closing, replaced in many cases by privately managed schools. NCLB turns out to be a timetable for th
10、e destruction of public education.Because of the punitive character of the federal law, educators struggle to meet their testing targets. Many districts have reduced time for the arts, history, science, civics, foreign languages, physical education, literature, and geography. They devote more time t
11、o preparing students for the state tests in basic skills, which will determine the life or death of their schools. Some districts, such as Atlanta, have experienced cheating scandals. Some states, such as New York, lowered the passing mark on their tests to increase the number of students who were a
12、llegedly proficient.Standardized-test scores can provide useful information about how students are doing. But as soon as the scores are tied to firing staff, giving bonuses, and closing schools, the measures become the goal of education, rather than an indicator.So now come President Obama and Educa
13、tion Secretary Arne Duncan with their Race to the Top program. The administration invited the states to compete for $4.3 billion in a time of fiscal distress. To qualify, states had to agree to evaluate teachers by student test scores, to award bonuses to teachers based on student scores, to permit
14、more privately managed charter schools, and to “turn around“ low-performing schools by such methods as firing the staffs and closing the schools.Race to the Top went even beyond NCLB in its reliance on test scores as the ultimate measure of educational quality. It asserts that teachers alonenot stud
15、ents or families or economic statusare wholly responsible for whether test scores go up or down. Now teachers rightly feel scapegoated (被当作替罪羊) for conditions that are often beyond their control. They know that if students dont come to school regularly, if they are chronically ill, if they are homel
16、ess or hungry, their test scores will suffer. But teachers alone are accountable.The Obama agenda for testing, accountability, and choice bears a striking resemblance to the Republican agenda of the past 30 years, but with one significant difference. Republicans have traditionally been wary of feder
17、al control of the schools. Duncan, however, relishes the opportunity to promote his policies with the financial heft of the federal government.The confluence between the Obama agenda and the Republican agenda became clear in the fall of 2009, when Duncan traveled the country with Newt Gingrich to pr
18、omote Race to the Top. And on March 5 of this year, President Obama flew to Florida to celebrate the test-score gains at a high school in Miami with former governor Jeb Bush, one of the nations most vocal proponents of conservative approaches to education reform.In his recent State of the Union addr
19、ess, Obama rightly asserted that we must encourage innovation, imagination, and creativity so we can “win the future“. But the federal governments emphasis on standardized tests subverts (破坏) that lofty goal. Drilling children on how to take tests discourages innovation and creativity, punishes dive
20、rgent thinking, and prioritizes skills over knowledge. And the endless hours devoted to test preparation certainly deaden students interest in school.Emboldened (鼓励) by the Obama administration, as well as by hundreds of millions of dollars from the Bill in 2007 22% did.That represented a rise in so
21、cial mobility. But with it went an apparent decline in another aspect of mobility: more people seem to be marrying within their education and income bracket, especially at the top. The best educated and highest-earning husbands in 2007 were more likely to have the highest-income wives than was the c
22、ase in 1970. At the bottom of the education heap, too, men are less likely to have wives who earn a lot. Forty years ago, half of husbands who dropped out of high school had wives who earned more than the average for women; now just 30% do.That is an exception to the rule that, as the report says, “
23、the economic gains from marriage have accrued more to men than to women.“ But there is one other way in which the growing economic influence of women increases their power within marriage. According to Pew, in households where the husband earns more, women are still just as likely to make the final
24、decisions regarding household finances; where the wife earns more, she is more than twice as likely to do so.(分数:45.00)(1).The study by the Pew Research Centre shows that men are more likely to get_ from marriage now in America.(分数:9.00)填空项 1:_(2).Among Americans aged 30-44, female college graduates
- 1.请仔细阅读文档,确保文档完整性,对于不预览、不比对内容而直接下载带来的问题本站不予受理。
- 2.下载的文档,不会出现我们的网址水印。
- 3、该文档所得收入(下载+内容+预览)归上传者、原创作者;如果您是本文档原作者,请点此认领!既往收益都归您。
下载文档到电脑,查找使用更方便
2000 积分 0人已下载
下载 | 加入VIP,交流精品资源 |
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 大学 1563 答案 解析 DOC
