大学六级-82及答案解析.doc
《大学六级-82及答案解析.doc》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《大学六级-82及答案解析.doc(46页珍藏版)》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。
1、大学六级-82 及答案解析(总分:713.00,做题时间:90 分钟)一、BPart Writing(总题数:1,分数:106.00)1.1. 自信心很重要; 2. 但是,很多人缺乏自信; 3. 如何建立自信。(分数:106.00)_二、BPart Reading (总题数:1,分数:70.00)Directions: In this part, you will have 15 minutes to go over the passage quickly and answer the questions on Answer Sheet 1. For questions 1-4 markY (
2、for YES) if the statement agrees with the information given in the passage;N (for NO) if the statement contradicts the information given in the passage ;NG (for NOT GIVEN) if the information is not given in the passage.For questions 5-10, complete the sentences with the information given in the pass
3、age.Americas Brain Drain CrisisLosing the Global EdgeWilliam Kunz is a self-described computer geek. A more apt description might be computer genius. When he was just 11, Kunz started writing software programs, and by 14 he had created his own video game. As a high school sophomore in Houston, Texas
4、, he won first prize in a local science fair for a data encryption (编密码) program he wrote. In his senior year, he took up prize in an international science and engineering fair for designing a program to analyze and sort DNA patterns.Kunz went on to attend Carnegie Mellon, among the nations highest-
5、ranked universities in computer science. After college he landed a job with Oracle in Silicon Valley, writing software used by companies around the world. Kunz looked set to become a star in his field. Then he gave it all up.Today, three years later, Kunz is in his first year at Harvard Business Sch
6、ool. He left software engineering partly because his earning potential paled next to friends who were going into law or business. He also worried about job security, especially as more companies move their programming overseas to lower costs. “Every time youre asked to train someone in India, you th
7、ink, Am I training my replacement?“ Kunz says.Things are turning out very differently for another standout in engineering, Qing-Shan Jia. A student at Tsinghua University in Beijing, Jia shines even among his gifted cohorts (一群人) at a school sometimes called “the MIT of China“. He considered applyin
8、g to Harvard for his PhD, but decided it wasnt worth it.His university is investing heavily in cutting-edge research facilities, and attracts an impressive roster of international professors. “I can get a world-class education here and study with world-class scholars,“ Jia says.These two snapshots (
9、快照) illustrate part of a deeply disturbing picture. In the disciplines underpinning the high-tech economymath, science and engineeringAmerica is steadily losing its global edge. The depth and breadth of the problem is clear: Several of Americas key agencies for scientific research and development wi
10、ll face a retirement crisis within the next ten years. Less than 6% of Americas high school seniors plan to pursue engineering degrees, down 36% from a decade ago. In 2000, 56% of Chinas undergraduate degrees were in the hard sciences; in the United States, the figure was 17%. China will likely prod
11、uce six times the number of engineers next year than America will graduate, according to Mike Gibbons of the American Society for Engineering Education. Japan, with half Americas population, has minted (铸造) twice as many in recent years.“Most Americans are unaware of how much science does for this c
12、ountry and what we stand to lose if we cant keep up,“ says Shirley Ann Jackson, president of Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute and chair of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. David Baltimore, president of the California Institute of Technology and a Nobel laureate, puts it blunt
13、ly: “We cant hope to keep intact our standard of living, our national security, our way of life, if Americans arent competitive in science. “ The Crisis Americans CreatedIn January 2001, the Hart-Rudman Commission, tasked with finding solutions to Americas major national security threats, concluded
14、that the failures of Americas math and science education and Americas system of research “Pose a greater threat . than any potential conventional war. “The roots of this failure lie in primary and secondary education. The nation that produced most of the great technological advances of the last cent
15、ury now scores poorly in international science testing. A 2003 survey of math and science literacy ranked American 15-year-olds against kids from other industrialized nations. In math, American students came in 24th out of 28 countries; in science, Americans were 24th out of 40 countries, tied with
16、Latvia. This test, in conjunction with others, indicates Americans start out with sufficient smartstheir fourth-graders score wellbut they begin to slide by eighth grade, and sink almost to the bottom by high school.Dont blame school budgets. Americans shell out more than $440 billion each year on p
17、ublic education, and spend more per capita than any nation save Switzerland. The problem is that too many of their high school science and math teachers just arent qualified. A survey in 2000 revealed that 38% of math teachers and 28% of science teachers in grades 7-12 lacked a college major or mino
18、r in their subject area. In schools with high poverty rates, the figures jumped to 52% of math teachers and 32% of science teachers. “The highest predictor of student performance boils down to teacher knowledge,“ says Gerald Wheeler, executive director of the National Science Teachers Association. T
19、o California Congressman Buck McKeon, a member of the House Committee on Education and the Workforce, it comes down to this: “How can you pass on a passion to your students if you dont know the subject?“Perhaps its no surprise that, according to a 2004 Indiana University survey, 18% of college prep
20、kids werent taking math their senior year of high school. “When I compare our high schools to what I see when Im traveling abroad, Im terrified for our workforce of tomorrow,“ Microsoft chairman Bill Gates told a summit of state governors earlier this year. “Our high schools, even when theyre workin
21、g exactly as designed, cannot teach our kids what they need to know today. “The Bush Administration has also proposed cutting the fiscal 2006 budget for research and development in such key federal agencies as the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the National Institute of Standard
22、s and Technology, the latter of which acts as a liaison (联络) with industry and researchers to apply new technology.“Funding cuts are job cuts,“ says Rep. Vernon J. Ehlers, Republican of Michigan and a member of the Science Committee in the House. Reduced funding has put the squeeze on research posit
23、ions, further smothering incentives (动机) for students to go into hard science. What Americans Must DoAmericans have done it before: the Manhattan Project, the technol6gy surge that followed Sputnik. Theyve demonstrated that they can commit themselves to daunting goals and achieve them. But they cant
24、 minimize the challenges theyre facing.Americans need out-or-the-box thinking, of the sort suggested by experts in a report released in October called “Rising above the Gathering Storm“, a study group within the National Academy of Sciences, which included the National Academy of Engineering and the
- 1.请仔细阅读文档,确保文档完整性,对于不预览、不比对内容而直接下载带来的问题本站不予受理。
- 2.下载的文档,不会出现我们的网址水印。
- 3、该文档所得收入(下载+内容+预览)归上传者、原创作者;如果您是本文档原作者,请点此认领!既往收益都归您。
下载文档到电脑,查找使用更方便
2000 积分 0人已下载
下载 | 加入VIP,交流精品资源 |
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 大学 82 答案 解析 DOC
