NEMA AB-5-2011 Establishing Levels of Selective Coordination for Low Voltage Circuit Breakers《低压断路器选择性配合的级别建立》.pdf

《NEMA AB-5-2011 Establishing Levels of Selective Coordination for Low Voltage Circuit Breakers《低压断路器选择性配合的级别建立》.pdf》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《NEMA AB-5-2011 Establishing Levels of Selective Coordination for Low Voltage Circuit Breakers《低压断路器选择性配合的级别建立》.pdf（22页珍藏版）》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。

1、NEMA Standards PublicationNational Electrical Manufacturers AssociationNEMA AB 5-2011Establishing Levels of Selective Coordination for Low Voltage Circuit BreakersNEMA Standards Publication AB 5-2011 Establishing Levels of Selective Coordination for Low Voltage Circuit Breakers Published by: Nationa

2、l Electrical Manufacturers Association 1300 North 17th Street, Suite 1752 Rosslyn, Virginia 22209 www.nema.org Copyright 2011 by the National Electrical Manufacturers Association. All rights including translation into other languages, reserved under the Universal Copyright Convention, the Berne Conv

3、ention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works, and the International and Pan American Copyright Conventions. NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER The information in this publication was considered technically sound by the consensus of persons engaged in the development and approval of the document at th

4、e time it was developed. Consensus does not necessarily mean that there is unanimous agreement among every person participating in the development of this document. The National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) standards and guideline publications, of which the document contained herein i

5、s one, are developed through a voluntary consensus standards development process. This process brings together volunteers and/or seeks out the views of persons who have an interest in the topic covered by this publication. While NEMA administers the process and establishes rules to promote fairness

6、in the development of consensus, it does not write the document and it does not independently test, evaluate, or verify the accuracy or completeness of any information or the soundness of any judgments contained in its standards and guideline publications. NEMA disclaims liability for any personal i

7、njury, property, or other damages of any nature whatsoever, whether special, indirect, consequential, or compensatory, directly or indirectly resulting from the publication, use of, application, or reliance on this document. NEMA disclaims and makes no guaranty or warranty, expressed or implied, as

8、to the accuracy or completeness of any information published herein, and disclaims and makes no warranty that the information in this document will fulfill any of your particular purposes or needs. NEMA does not undertake to guarantee the performance of any individual manufacturer or sellers product

9、s or services by virtue of this standard or guide. In publishing and making this document available, NEMA is not undertaking to render professional or other services for or on behalf of any person or entity, nor is NEMA undertaking to perform any duty owed by any person or entity to someone else. An

10、yone using this document should rely on his or her own independent judgment or, as appropriate, seek the advice of a competent professional in determining the exercise of reasonable care in any given circumstances. Information and other standards on the topic covered by this publication may be avail

11、able from other sources, which the user may wish to consult for additional views or information not covered by this publication. NEMA has no power, nor does it undertake to police or enforce compliance with the contents of this document. NEMA does not certify, test, or inspect products, designs, or

12、installations for safety or health purposes. Any certification or other statement of compliance with any health or safetyrelated information in this document shall not be attributable to NEMA and is solely the responsibility of the certifier or maker of the statement. Page i Table of Contents Forewo

13、rd ii Introduction . iii 1. GENERAL . 1 1.1 Scope . 1 1.2 Referenced Standards 1 2. DEFINITIONS . 2 2.1 Energy Based Method 2 2.2 Let-Through Curve Method . 2 2.3 Line-Side Circuit Breaker . 2 2.4 Load-Side Circuit Breaker . 2 2.5 Overcurrent . 2 2.6 Overload Region . 2 2.7 Peak Current Point Method

14、 . 2 2.8 Selective Coordination . 2 2.9 Selective Coordination Level 3 2.10 Instantaneous Region 3 2.11 Waveform Recognition Method . 3 3. DETERMINING SELECTIVE COORDINATION. 4 3.1 OverviewTime-Current Curves and Selective Coordination Tables 4 3.1.1 Time Current Curves . 4 3.1.2 Selective Coordinat

15、ion Tools 5 4. DETERMINING SELECTIVE COORDINATION ANALYTICAL METHODS . 6 4.1 Peak Current Point Method . 6 4.2 Let-Through Curve Method . 6 4.3 Energy Based Method 8 4.4 Waveform Recognition Method . 8 5. DETERMINING SELECTIVE COORDINATION - DIRECT TESTING METHODS 9 5.1 Selection of Test Samples . 9

16、 5.2 Instantaneous Trip Settings 9 5.3 Test Procedure 10 5.4 Closing Test 11 5.5 Interrupting Test . 11 5.6 Intermediate Current Level Test 12 5.7 Interpretation of Test Results 13 6. ADDITIONAL REFERENCES AND FOOTNOTES Page ii Foreword This is a new NEMA Standards Publication. To assure that a mean

17、ingful publication was being developed, draft copies were sent other NEMA Product Sections having an interest in this topic. Their resulting comments and suggestions provided vital input prior to final NEMA approval and resulted in a number of substantive changes in this publication. This publicatio

18、n will be periodically reviewed by the Molded Case Circuit Breaker Voting Classification of NEMA for any revisions necessary to keep it up to date with advancing technology. Proposed or recommended revisions should be submitted to: Vice President, Engineering National Electrical Manufacturers Associ

19、ation 1300 North 17th Street Rosslyn, Virginia 22209 This Standards Publication was developed by the Molded Case Circuit Breaker Voting Classification of the National Electrical Manufacturers Association. Approval of this standard does not necessarily imply that all voting classification members vot

20、ed for its approval or participated in its development. At the time it was approved, the Molded Case Circuit Breaker Voting Classification had the following members: ABB, Inc.New Berlin, WI Eaton CorporationPittsburgh, PA GE Industrial SolutionsPlainville, CT Schneider ElectricPalatine, IL Siemens I

21、ndustry Inc.Norcross, GA Page iii Introduction Circuit breaker manufacturers provide designers of electrical distribution systems with information that allows the designers to make decisions about choices in the types and ratings of these circuit breaker devices. Electrical system designers must sel

22、ect circuit breakers that satisfy overcurrent protection of the system, and also meet applicable National Electric Code (NEC) requirements for making sure these devices are selectively coordinated. In support of providing guidance in designing properly protected and selectively coordinated electrica

23、l systems, the informational tools that circuit breaker manufacturers provide are in the form of Time-Current Curves (TCCs) and selective coordination tables. These tools are made available directly from the manufacturer or from third-party companies in either printed or electronic/software media. E

24、xactly how the TCCs and selective coordination tools are to be used in designing electrical systems is outside the scope of this standard. (For an overview of the key system design considerations, refer to ABP-1). Circuit breaker manufacturers use a variety of methods for developing these selective

25、coordination tools. System designers must use this published information (TCCs and selective coordination tables) to conduct their selective coordination studies. In some cases, manufacturers conduct laboratory tests with fault currents flowing through pairs of circuit breakers connected together to

26、 determine the selective coordination relationship between the pair of circuit breakers. In other cases, test data from other laboratory tests are used in various analytical methods to establish a selective coordination relationship. Regardless of the methods used by circuit breaker manufacturers, c

27、urrently the only reliable and approved source of information for conducting overcurrent analysis and selective coordination analyses by electrical system designers is through the information provided in selective coordination tools. The primary purpose of this standard is to define the requirements

28、 for test procedures that shall be employed by circuit breaker manufacturers to validate the levels of instantaneous selective coordination data that are shown in selective coordination tools, for molded case, insulated case and low voltage power circuit breakers with instantaneous trip functions. I

29、n addition, the standard will briefly describe in general the acceptable analytical methods that may also be used to develop the data for selective coordination tools. The intent of this standard is to insure that circuit breaker manufacturers are consistent in the methods that they use in validatin

30、g the information that is published in selective coordination tools. In the Overload Current Region where fault currents are relatively low, selective coordination is fairly easy to accomplish between most devices. In the Overload Region, the Time-Current Curves of circuit breakers have for many yea

31、rs typically been an adequate tool for determining the Selective Coordination of devices. The standard will therefore instead focus specifically on the data for Selective Coordination tools. The standard is not intended to be used by electrical system designers as a guide in designing systems. For t

32、he purpose of system design, only the data from Selective Coordination tools should be used. The goal of selective coordination is to isolate the faulted circuit, while maintaining power to the balance of the electrical distribution system. NEC Article 100 definitions related to selective coordinati

33、on are as follows: Coordination (Selective)Localization of an overcurrent condition to restrict outages to the circuit or equipment affected, accomplished by the choice of overcurrent protective devices and their ratings or settings. OvercurrentAny current in excess of the rated current of equipment

34、 or the ampacity of a conductor. It may result from overload, short circuit, or ground fault. OverloadOperation of equipment in excess of normal, full-load rating, or of a conductor in excess of rated ampacity that when it persists for a sufficient length of time, would cause damage or dangerous ove

35、rheating. A fault, such as a short circuit or ground fault, is not an overload. Page iv Other relevant definitions from The Authoritative Dictionary of IEEE Standards Terms, IEEE 100 include: Short Circuit CurrentAn overcurrent resulting from a fault of negligible impedance between live conductors h

36、aving a difference in potential under normal operating conditions. Ground FaultAn insulation fault between a conductor and ground or frame. With selective coordination, only the circuit breaker nearest to the fault should open to clear the fault. This overcurrent fault condition may be caused by an

37、overload, a short circuit or a ground fault. Page 1 1. GENERAL 1.1 Scope The scope of this standard includes all types of circuit breakers listed to: 1) The UL 489 Molded-Case Circuit Breakers, Molded-Case Switches and Circuit-Breaker Enclosures 2) The UL 1066 Standard for Safety Low-Voltage AC and

38、DC Power Circuit Breakers Used in Enclosures The standard specifically addresses achieving selective coordination at high levels of short circuit fault current in the instantaneous region of the circuit breaker time-current curve by use of selective coordination tools. This requires taking into cons

39、ideration more information than is typically found on conventional Time-Current Curves TCCs only. This includes molded case circuit breakers and insulated case circuit breakers. It specifically addresses instantaneous selective coordination as achieving selective coordination at high levels of fault

40、 current, and may require taking into consideration more information than is typically found on conventional Time-Current Curves TCCs only. 1.2 Referenced Standards In this publication, reference is made to the latest edition of the standards listed below. Copies are available from the indicated sou

41、rces. Other references are listed at the end of this standard. National Electrical Manufacturers Association 1300 North 17th Street Rosslyn, Virginia 22209 AB 1 Molded Case Circuit Breakers, Molded Case Switches and Circuit Breaker Enclosures1 ABP 1 Selective Coordination National Fire Protection As

42、sociation Batterymarch Park Quincy, MA 02269 NFPA 70 National Electrical Code Underwriters Laboratories, Inc. 333 Pfingsten Road Northbrook, IL 60062 UL 1066 Standard for Safety Low-Voltage AC and DC Power Circuit Breakers Used in Enclosures UL 489 Molded Case Circuit Breakers, Molded Case Switches

43、and Circuit Breaker Enclosures 1 NEMA AB 1 and UL 489 are the same standard Page 2 2. DEFINITIONS 2.1 Energy Based Method The energy based method utilizes trip mechanisms in circuit breakers that are actuated by the total amount of energy that passes through the circuit breaker pair during a fault.

44、2.2 Let-Through Curve Method The peak-let-through method involves using the known peak let-through current of the downstream circuit breaker and comparing it to the pickup setting, in peak amperes, of the upstream non-current limiting circuit breaker. When the peak-let-through is below (allowing for

45、 tolerance) the setting of the upstream device then the pair is selective. 2.3 Line-Side Circuit Breaker For a pair of circuit breakers to be selectively coordinated, the line-side circuit breaker is the one located closest to the power source. It is also referred to as the “upstream” circuit breake

46、r. 2.4 Load-Side Circuit Breaker For a pair of circuit breakers to be selectively coordinated, the load-side circuit breaker is the one located farthest from the power source. It is also referred to as the “downstream” circuit breaker. 2.5 Overcurrent The NEC defines selective coordination as, “Any

47、current in excess of the rated current of equipment or the ampacity of a conductor. It may result from overload, short circuit, or ground fault.” 2.6 Overload Region In the overload region, the circuit breaker has an inverse-time operating response, meaning that the response time for the device to o

48、pen decreases as the fault current level increases. Total clearing times are typically fairly longseconds to hours (see Figure 1). 2.7 Peak Current Point Method The peak current point involves converting the minimum instantaneous trip level of the line side circuit breaker from RMS to peak, allowing

49、 for negative side tolerance. This level is then compared to the peak let-through current of the load side circuit breaker to obtain the selective coordination level. 2.8 Selective Coordination The NEC defines selective coordination as, “Localization of an overcurrent condition to restrict outages to the circuit or equipment affected, accomplished by the choice of overcurrent protective devices and their ratings or settings.” A pair of circuit breakers can be considered totally selectively coordinated if only the load-side circuit breaker opens for all levels of overcurr