ITU-T S 23-1993 Automatic Request of the Answerback of the Terminal of the Calling Party by the Telex Terminal of the Called Party or by the International Network - Telegraphy AlphGro.pdf

《ITU-T S 23-1993 Automatic Request of the Answerback of the Terminal of the Calling Party by the Telex Terminal of the Called Party or by the International Network - Telegraphy AlphGro.pdf》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《ITU-T S 23-1993 Automatic Request of the Answerback of the Terminal of the Calling Party by the Telex Terminal of the Called Party or by the International Network - Telegraphy AlphGro.pdf（4页珍藏版）》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。

1、 ITU-T RECMN*S*23 93 4862591 O586180 380 INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION ITU-T TELECOM MUN CATION STANDARDIZATION SECTOR OF ITU TELEGRAPHY ALPHABETICAL TELEGRAPH TERMINAL EQUIPMENT S.23 (03/93) AUTOMATIC REQUEST OF THE ANSWERBACK OF THE TERMINAL OF THE CALLING PARTY, BY THE TELEX TERMINAL OF T

2、HE CALLED PARTY OR BY THE INTERNATIONAL NETWORK ITU-T Recommendation S.23 (Previously “CCITT Recommendation”) FOREWORD The ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) is a permanent organ of the International Telecom- munication Union. The ITU-T is responsible for studying technical, operat

3、ing and tariff questions and issuing Recommendations on them with a view to standardizing telecommunications on a worldwide basis. The World Telecommunication Standardization Conference (WTSC), which meets every four years, established the topics for study by the ITU-T Study Groups which, in their t

4、urn, produce Recommendations on these topics. ITU-T Recommendation S.23 was revised by the ITU-T Study Group IX (1988-1993) and was approved by the WTSC (Helsinki, March 1-12, 1993). NOTES 1 As a consequence of a reform process within the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), the CCITT ceased

5、 to exist as of 28 February 1993. In its place, the ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) was created as of 1 March 1993. Similarly, in this reform process, the CCIR and the IFRB have been replaced by the Radiocommunication Sector. In order not to delay publication of this Recommendat

6、ion, no change has been made in the text to .references containing the acronyms “CCIT, CCIR or IFRB” or their associated entities such as Plenary Assembly, Secretariat, etc. Future editions of this Recommendation will contain the proper terminology related to the new ITU structure. 2 telecommunicati

7、on administration and a recognized operating agency. In this Recommendation, the expression “Administration” is used for conciseness to indicate both a O ITU 1994 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, inc

8、luding photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from the ITU. ITU-T RECflN*S.23 93 4862591 0586382 353 Recommendation S.23 AUTOMATIC REQUEST OF THE ANSWERBACK OF THE TERMINAL OF THE CALLING PARTY, BY THE TELEX TERMINAL OF THE CALLED PARTY OR BY THE INTERNATIONAL NETWORK (Melbourne,

9、1988; modified at Helsinki, 1993) The CCITT, considering (a) that a telex automatic emitting device (TAED), store and forward unit (SFU) or conversion facility (CF) - when called - may automatically request the identification of the calling partys telex terminal, after having supplied its own answer

10、back; (b) you” signal from the called partys terminal immediately follows the called partys answerback at automatic speed; that a mismatch of answerback may be detected by the calling partys terminal, or SFLJ or CF, if the “Who are (c) answerback without waiting for a possible “Who are you” signai f

11、rom the distant network; that the calling partys telex terminal, or equivalent, may commence text transmission on receipt of a valid (d) transmitting text; that corruption of text may occur if the “Who are you” signal from the distant network is received when (e) that automatic telex terminals, an S

12、FU or CF may detect a mismatch between the initial answerback - with an integrated “Who are you” signal -and the answerback at the end of the message. In this case, the message may be delivered several times, but the calling party could be advised of an unsuccessful message delivery; (f) unstandard

13、characters, including an unexpected “Who are you” signal, are received at the time of call establishment; that an Administration, or ROA, may on an outgoing international call, request a second answerback, if (8) that an Administration or ROA may not permit “Who are you” signals to be generated from

14、 any TAED under their control, but that future designs of TAEDs should be in a position to receive “Who are you” signals on originated international telex calls; (h) that this Recommendation recognizes that currently implemented terminal devices are not required to conform to these provisions. Howev

15、er, there would be advantages if existing equipment complies with the requirement of this Recommendation. unanimously declares the view that the following procedures should be adopted as follows: 1 Originating telex terminals (TAED), store-and-forward units or conversion facilities, should use stand

16、ard telex procedures, (e.g. those shown in Recommendation U.75) to identify the answerback of the called party from the string of characters sent from the network. Having verified this as being the expected answerback: 1.1 It should pause a minimum of 1.5 seconds. 1.2 transmission. If no “Who are yo

17、u” signal is received during this period, it may send its own answerback and commence text 1.3 answerback. In this 1.5 second period, it should be prepared to respond to a “Who are you” signal by generating its own 1 Recommendation S.23 (03193) ITU-T RECMN*S-23 93 4862591 O586183 09T 1.4 If a “Who a

18、re you” signal is received, it should generate the answerback of the calling party within 150 milliseconds to 600 milliseconds of recognition of the “Who are you” signal (refer to Recommendation S.6). After the answerback has been sent, text transmission should be delayed for at least 1.5 seconds. T

19、his period is to allow the terminating network sufficient time to examine the answerback of the calling party, and to send a further “Who are you” signal, if necessary. After this delay, text transmission may commence, without having to repeat the answerback of the calling party. However, if a secon

20、d “Who are you” signal is received in this 1.5 second period, rhe terminal should send a further answerback and then commence text transmission. 1.5 string of the called party, then the action to be taken is at the discretion of the calling party. If signals, other than a “Who are you” signal, are r

21、eceived within 1.5 seconds from the end of the answerback 1.6 network by generating a “Who are you” signal if An Administration, or ROA, may, as a national matter choose to request a second answerback from the distant a) the received character string (at automatic speed) consists of more than 20 cha

22、racters and includes a “Who are you” signal; b) a “Who are you” signal is received within a period less than 800 milliseconds from the end of the answerback string. 2 switching centre (MSSC) or distant international network, when called, should react as follows: A terminating automatic terminal, sto

23、re-and-forward unit (SFU), conversion facility (CF), maritime satellite 2.1 of the answerback string of the called party, provided that the forward path remains idle. The called terminal or network may return a WRU signal to the calling party, 800 milliseconds after the return 2.2 It is not permitte

24、d to return the WRU signal once the text transmission from the calling party has commenced. 2.3 The WRU signal may be repeated only once: a) 2 seconds after the first WRU if a response to the first WRU was not received; or b) 300 milliseconds after the receipt of a sequence which could not be identi

25、fied as a valid answerback. In any event, if the answerback of the calling party is not detected correctly after two WRU attempts, the call should not be cleared by the called party, or the distant network with the exception of called devices (such as a CF) which are required to capture the calling

26、answerback for administration reasons. 2.4 Some Administrations or ROAS may not allow WRU signals to be generated from terminals in their countries. 2.5 answerback after the call connect signal. The mechanism for achieving this is for further study. It is preferable that one uniform procedure be developed for the exchange of the called and calling partys 2 Recommendation S.23 (03193)