ITU-R S 1556-2002 Methodology to determine the epfd downlink level corresponding to the loss of synchronization in geostationary fixed satellite service networks caused by interfer《方法.pdf

《ITU-R S 1556-2002 Methodology to determine the epfd downlink level corresponding to the loss of synchronization in geostationary fixed satellite service networks caused by interfer《方法.pdf》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《ITU-R S 1556-2002 Methodology to determine the epfd downlink level corresponding to the loss of synchronization in geostationary fixed satellite service networks caused by interfer《方法.pdf（7页珍藏版）》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。

1、 Rec. ITU-R S.1556 1 RECOMMENDATION ITU-R S.1556 Methodology to determine the epfdlevel corresponding to the loss of synchronization in geostationary fixed satellite service networks caused by interference from non-geostationary-satellite systems (Questions ITU-R 231/4 and ITU-R 73/4) (2002) The ITU

2、 Radiocommunication Assembly, considering a) that loss of synchronization in a geostationary fixed-satellite service (GSO FSS) satellite link can be extremely disruptive to the underlying service being supported; b) that loss of synchronization will directly impact the availability of the supported

3、service and that conservative satellite link budget design is dependent on the knowledge of the threshold at which loss of synchronization occurs; c) that the measure of unavailability of satellite networks is determined by the combined effects of equipment thresholds, interference and propagation e

4、ffects; d) that the C/N level, at which loss of synchronization occurs, may be of the order of 1 to 4 dB lower than the required C/N level corresponding to the availability threshold (i.e. shortest term objective); e) that, in the case of GSO networks which are integrated in terrestrial networks, th

5、e network may shut down the link at a higher level than would cause the modem to lose synchronization; f) that World Radiocommunication Conference (Istanbul, 2000) (WRC-2000) adopted downlink equivalent power flux-density (epfd) limits, including operational limits, applicable to non-GSO systems in

6、certain frequency bands; g) that GSO operators need to be able to identify climatological areas where the rain rate is such that links may be susceptible to interference peaks corresponding to the epfdoperational limits, and to evaluate the susceptibility to loss of demodulator synchronization, reco

7、mmends 1 that as a design guideline, the epfd levels corresponding to loss of synchronization in a GSO FSS earth station receiver may be determined by the methodology in Annex 1. Example results are given in Annex 2; 2 that the following Notes are part of the Recommendation. NOTE 1 The time duration

8、 and frequency of occurrence of interfering signals can contribute to the determination of the allowable maximum interference level. It is observed that multiple short interference events can result in a longer period of unavailability, due to the time needed to recover from the loss of synchronizat

9、ion, than fewer long events. 2 Rec. ITU-R S.1556 NOTE 2 If there is unacceptable interference due to epfdlevels which are not greater than the operational limits, the GSO network operator has the option of adjusting the link so that the interference is acceptable. NOTE 3 In case of GSO FSS networks

10、with lower data rates, the C/N level at which loss of synchronization occurs may be less than that of networks with higher data rates, while the time required for recovery of synchronization may be greater. Further study is needed to determine synchronization threshold levels for networks with data

11、rates higher than 34 Mbit/s. NOTE 4 Further study is needed to determine threshold levels for loss of synchronization in links that are integrated in terrestrial networks. ANNEX 1 This Annex provides a methodology that allows GSO operators to identify climatological areas that may have links that ar

12、e susceptible to loss of synchronization at interference levels corresponding to the epfdoperational limits. 1 Theoretical loss of synchronization epfd calculation Sensitivity to loss of synchronization due to rain is a global problem to GSO networks and non-GSO interference will increase the probab

13、ility of loss of synchronization in all rain zones. Loss of synchronization can be extremely disruptive to certain services that, under current circumstances, are adequately provided over satellite networks. Since GSO networks are designed to reduce synchronization losses to near zero per cent of th

14、e time, the additional interference from non-GSO systems must also be taken into account. A simple I/N calculation can be performed to demonstrate whether or not a GSO earth station, receiving a given rain rate, is susceptible to epfd induced loss of synchronization (sync loss). The calculation depe

15、nds on the received C/N: (C/N )sync loss= C/(N + I ), at which loss of synchro-nization occurs. (C/N)sync lossis typically in the range of 1 dB to about 4 dB below (C/N)requiredneeded for the minimum BER performance objective desired for the link (i.e. the availability threshold). A link where (C/N

16、) = (C/N )required (C/N )sync loss) = 1 dB is representative of 1/2 rate coding while (C/N ) = 3 dB is representative of 3/4 rate coding. Table 1 provides typical modulation and loss of synchronization information for systems with data rates less than 34 Mbits/s 1. _ 1This information, from Recommen

17、dation ITU-R S.1522, was used to calculate and evaluate the effects of epfd limits on GSO FSS networks operating in the 14/12 GHz band and whose availability is sensitive to synchronization timing recovery and interference emitted by non-GSO FSS networks. Rec. ITU-R S.1556 3 TABLE 1 Generally, the a

18、mount of C/N degradation to cause loss of synchronization is known (for a given link). Furthermore, the amount of margin needed to protect a network at a given rain rate in a specific frequency band can be estimated (see for example Table 2). This information can be used to calculate the interferenc

19、e levels that will cause a loss of synchronization for GSO links. For some sensitive links such levels may occur during some instances of the inline condition (i.e. GSO earth station, non-GSO satellite and GSO satellite are instantaneously in line). TABLE 2 Representative rain rate power compensatio

20、n margins for the 12 GHz band Modulation and coding C/(N + I ) (dB) QPSK rate 7/8 6.0 QPSK rate 3/4 5.3 QPSK rate 1/2 3.5 8-PSK 8.1 16-QAM 11.0 QPSK: quadrature phase-shift keying 16-QAM: 16-quadrature amplitude modulation. Downlink availability (%) Rain rates (mm/h) 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55

21、60 99.9 0.4 0.8 1.3 1.6 1.9 2.3 2.6 2.9 3.2 3.4 3.7 3.9 99.99 Downlink margin to counteract rate fade (dB) 1.3 2.9 4.1 5.2 6.2 7.1 7.9 8.8 9.5 10.2 10.9 11.6 NOTE 1 Rain margin calculated per Recommendation ITU-R P.618 for 99.9% and 99.99% availability. Assuming altitude of all earth stations at 0.2

22、5 km, with vertical polarization at latitude of 40 and an elevation angle of 20. 4 Rec. ITU-R S.1556 The performance degradation of a communications link can be expressed in terms of an equivalent increase in the system noise temperature as compared to a link without the degrading influence. That re

23、lationship can be expressed as: Degradation = 10 log(T + TI) / T ) dB It can also be shown that under clear sky conditions, for links designed such that the availability threshold margin is approximately equal to the rain margin, loss of synchronization will occur when: Degradation = MR+ (C/N ) dB w

24、here: T : system noise temperature, includes noise from all known sources (K) TI: system noise temperature increase due to added interference source (K) MR: clear-sky downlink rain margin (dB) (C/N ) : decrease in threshold C/N from the lowest performance objective to the loss of synchronization lev

25、el (dB). Accordingly then, under clear-sky conditions and for links designed such that the availability threshold margin is approximately equal to the rain margin, the relationship between the normal operating system noise temperature, the additional rain margin and the noise temperature increase du

26、e to interference which might cause loss of synchronization is given by equation (1) as follows: 10 log(T + TI) / T ) = MR+ (C/N ) dB (1) The level of received interference power that would cause loss of synchronization can be deter-mined by solving TIin equation (1). That resulting interference lev

27、el allows the determination of the epfd level that would cause loss of synchronization. Accordingly, the noise temperature increase due to non-GSO interference that would cause sync loss is given in equation (2) as follows: TI= (10(MR+ (C/N )/10 1) T K (2) The increase in noise temperature, TI, due

28、to non-GSO interference can then be used to calculate the resulting increase in received interference power, IT, with equation (3) as follows: IT= 10 log (k TIB) dBW (3) where: B : reference bandwidth (40 Hz) 10 log k : 10 log (Boltzmanns constant) = 228.6 dB(W/(Hz K ). The epfd of a non-GSO interfe

29、ring signal, IT, that will cause loss of synchronization if received on-axis can be determined from equation (3) by subtracting the equivalent antenna area as shown in equation (4): epfdsync loss= IT 10 log( D2/4) dB(W/(m2 40 kHz) (4) where: D : earth station antenna diameter : antenna efficiency. R

30、ec. ITU-R S.1556 5 ANNEX 2 This Annex gives some examples of the application of equations (2), (3) and (4) in Annex 1. Table 3 shows the combination of the earth station antenna sizes and system noise temperatures assumed in the application of this Recommendation. These combinations are realizable i

31、n some practical links. Figures 1 to 4 show epfdlevels that would cause loss of synchronization in such GSO FSS links unless additional margin was provided. These values can be compared to the values in Table 22-4A of the Radio Regulations. TABLE 3 Earth station antenna sizes and system noise temper

32、atures 1556-01516316216116015915810 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60Rain rate (mm/h)epfd(dB(W/(m240kHz)FIGURE 13 m diameter earth station antenna epfdlevels causing loss of synchronizationAvailability = 99.99%; (C/N) = 1 dBAvailability = 99.9%; (C/N) = 1 dBAvailability = 99.99%; (C/N) = 3 dBAvailabilit

33、y = 99.9%; (C/N) = 3 dBEarth station antenna diameter (m) System noise temperature (K) 3 350 4.5 450 6 600 10 800 6 Rec. ITU-R S.1556 1556-02516416316216116010 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60Rain rate (mm/h)FIGURE 24.5 m diameter earth station antenna epfdlevels causing loss of synchronizationAvailabi

34、lity = 99.99%; (C/N) = 1 dBAvailability = 99.9%; (C/N) = 1 dBAvailability = 99.99%; (C/N) = 3 dBAvailability = 99.9%; (C/N) = 3 dBepfd(dB(W/(m240kHz)1556-03516616516416316210 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60Rain rate (mm/h)FIGURE 36 m diameter earth station antenna epfdlevels causing loss of synchroniz

35、ationAvailability = 99.99%; (C/N) = 1 dBAvailability = 99.9%; (C/N) = 1 dBAvailability = 99.99%; (C/N) = 3 dBAvailability = 99.9%; (C/N) = 3 dBepfd(dB(W/(m240kHz)Rec. ITU-R S.1556 7 1556-04516816716616516416310 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60Rain rate (mm/h)FIGURE 410 m diameter earth station antenna epfdlevels causing loss of synchronizationAvailability = 99.99%; (C/N) = 1 dBAvailability = 99.9%; (C/N) = 1 dBAvailability = 99.99%; (C/N) = 3 dBAvailybility = 99.9%; (C/N) = 3 dBepfd(dB(W/(m240kHz)