ITU-R M 1731-2-2012 Protection criteria for Cospas-Sarsat local user terminals in the band 1 544-1 545 MHz《频段在1544-1545 MHz的卫星辅助搜救地方用户终端的保护标准》.pdf

《ITU-R M 1731-2-2012 Protection criteria for Cospas-Sarsat local user terminals in the band 1 544-1 545 MHz《频段在1544-1545 MHz的卫星辅助搜救地方用户终端的保护标准》.pdf》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《ITU-R M 1731-2-2012 Protection criteria for Cospas-Sarsat local user terminals in the band 1 544-1 545 MHz《频段在1544-1545 MHz的卫星辅助搜救地方用户终端的保护标准》.pdf（27页珍藏版）》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。

1、 Recommendation ITU-R M.1731-2(01/2012)Protection criteria for Cospas-Sarsat local user terminals in the band 1 544-1 545 MHzM SeriesMobile, radiodetermination, amateurand related satellite servicesii Rec. ITU-R M.1731-2 Foreword The role of the Radiocommunication Sector is to ensure the rational, e

2、quitable, efficient and economical use of the radio-frequency spectrum by all radiocommunication services, including satellite services, and carry out studies without limit of frequency range on the basis of which Recommendations are adopted. The regulatory and policy functions of the Radiocommunica

3、tion Sector are performed by World and Regional Radiocommunication Conferences and Radiocommunication Assemblies supported by Study Groups. Policy on Intellectual Property Right (IPR) ITU-R policy on IPR is described in the Common Patent Policy for ITU-T/ITU-R/ISO/IEC referenced in Annex 1 of Resolu

4、tion ITU-R 1. Forms to be used for the submission of patent statements and licensing declarations by patent holders are available from http:/www.itu.int/ITU-R/go/patents/en where the Guidelines for Implementation of the Common Patent Policy for ITU-T/ITU-R/ISO/IEC and the ITU-R patent information da

5、tabase can also be found. Series of ITU-R Recommendations (Also available online at http:/www.itu.int/publ/R-REC/en) Series Title BO Satellite delivery BR Recording for production, archival and play-out; film for television BS Broadcasting service (sound) BT Broadcasting service (television) F Fixed

6、 service M Mobile, radiodetermination, amateur and related satellite services P Radiowave propagation RA Radio astronomy RS Remote sensing systems S Fixed-satellite service SA Space applications and meteorology SF Frequency sharing and coordination between fixed-satellite and fixed service systems S

7、M Spectrum management SNG Satellite news gathering TF Time signals and frequency standards emissions V Vocabulary and related subjects Note: This ITU-R Recommendation was approved in English under the procedure detailed in Resolution ITU-R 1. Electronic Publication Geneva, 2012 ITU 2012 All rights r

8、eserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, by any means whatsoever, without written permission of ITU. Rec. ITU-R M.1731-2 1 RECOMMENDATION ITU-R M.1731-2*Protection criteria for Cospas-Sarsat local user terminals in the band 1 544-1 545 MHz (2005-2010-2011-2012) Scope This Recommendati

9、on provides protection criteria for Cospas-Sarsat local user terminals that receive 1 544-1 545 MHz downlinks from satellites in geostationary, medium-Earth and low-Earth orbits. The Cospas-Sarsat program receives and processes signals from emergency position indicating radio beacons (EPIRBs) and ot

10、her distress beacons operating on 406 MHz. In some cases the signals are delivered to ground stations via a downlink operating in the 1 544-1 545 MHz band. The ITU Radiocommunication Assembly, considering a) that Recommendation ITU-R SM.1535 calls for the protection of safety services from unwanted

11、emissions; b) that the Cospas-Sarsat global search and rescue satellite-aided system operates within the band 1 544-1 545 MHz which is limited by No. 5.356 of the Radio Regulations (RR) to distress and safety, space-to-Earth radiocommunications; c) that harmful interference to safety services can ca

12、use loss of life and property; d) that Cospas-Sarsat geostationary Earth orbit local user terminals (GEOLUTs) receive in the band 1 544-1 545 MHz emergency position indicating radio beacons (EPIRB) signals relayed from geostationary satellites (GOES and Electro) and Meteo-Sat second generation (MSG)

13、 satellites; e) that Cospas-Sarsat low-Earth orbit local user terminals (LEOLUTs) receive in the band 1 544-1 545 MHz EPIRB signals relayed from search and rescue repeaters (SARR) on Cospas and Sarsat satellites; f) that Cospas-Sarsat LEOLUTs receive in the band 1 544-1 545 MHz a global processed da

14、ta stream (PDS) of EPIRB data processed by search and rescue processors (SARPs) on Cospas and Sarsat satellites; g) that Cospas-Sarsat medium-Earth orbit local user terminals (MEOLUTs) receive in the band 1 544-1 545 MHz EPIRB signals relayed from medium-Earth orbiting navigation satellites (GALILEO

15、 and GLONASS); h) that Annex 8 contains Cospas-Sarsat link budgets for low-Earth orbit (LEO), medium-Earth orbit (MEO) and geostationary orbit (GEO) operations using near to worst-case values referred to in this Annex as “low-level case”, recommends 1 that the analysis of interference to Cospas-Sars

16、at GEOLUTs that operate with GOES satellites should be based on Annex 1; *This Recommendation should be brought to the attention of Cospas-Sarsat, the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) and the International Maritime Organization (IMO). 2 Rec. ITU-R M.1731-2 2 that the analysis of inte

17、rference to Cospas-Sarsat LEOLUTs receiving global EPIRB PDS data should be based on Annex 2; 3 that the analysis of interference to Cospas-Sarsat LEOLUTs receiving 406 MHz EPIRB signals relayed by Cospas and Sarsat low-Earth orbiting satellites should be based on Annex 3; 4 that the analysis of int

18、erference to Cospas-Sarsat GEOLUTs that operate with MSG satellites should be based on Annex 4; 5 that the analysis of interference to Cospas-Sarsat MEOLUTs that operate with GALILEO satellites should be based on Annex 5; 6 that the analysis of interference to Cospas-Sarsat GEOLUTs that operate with

19、 Electro satellites should be based on Annex 6; 7 that the analysis of interference to Cospas-Sarsat MEOLUTs that operate with GLONASS satellites should be based on Annex 7. Annex 1 Protection criteria in the 1 544-1 545 MHz band for Cospas-Sarsat GEOLUTs that receive EPIRB signals relayed through G

20、OES satellites 1.1 Introduction Cospas-Sarsat search and rescue repeaters are onboard GOES. These repeaters receive signals from 406 MHz EPIRBs and relay the signals to Cospas-Sarsat GEOLUTs on downlink frequencies in the 1 544-1 545 MHz band. In accordance with the RR, the 1 544-1 545 MHz band is a

21、llocated to the mobile-satellite service (MSS), space-to-Earth, and is specifically limited by RR No. 5.356 to distress and safety communications. The analysis provided in this Annex establishes interference protection criteria for GEOLUTs that receive the GOES 1 544-1 545 MHz downlink. 1.2 Minimum

22、acceptable performance for detection of EPIRB signals relayed through the GOES satellite To reliably detect 406 MHz distress beacons using GOES 406 MHz satellite repeaters, the bit-error rate (BER) of the channel must not exceed 5 105. 1.3 Analysis of interference spectral power flux-density (spfd)

23、The BER of a communications channel is derived from the ratio of the energy contained in each data bit, Eb, to the noise density. The total noise density is comprised of the noise developed by Cospas-Sarsat equipment, N0, and noise caused by interference from other systems, I0. Figure 1 depicts the

24、GOES 406 MHz SARR channel with interference on the downlink. Rec. ITU-R M.1731-2 3 FIGURE 1 GOES SARR with interference on the downlink M.1731-011 544.5 MHzDemodulator/processorLNATsys= 165.96 KDownlinksignalInterferencespfdGain = 33.3 dBGOES SARRDistressbeaconsGEOLUT406 MHzLNA: low noise amplifierT

25、o achieve a BER of 5 105, the ratio of the energy per bit to noise plus interference density (Eb/(N0+ I0) at the GEOLUT demodulator must equal or exceed 8.8 dB. This analysis determines the maximum amount of broadband noise-like interference specified as an spfd referenced to the input to the GEOLUT

26、 antenna that could be accommodated without degrading the overall link Eb/(N0+ I0) below 8.8 dB. As seen in Fig. 1, 406 MHz distress beacon signals are received by the GOES SARR and phase modulated onto a 1 544.5 MHz downlink carrier for detection and processing by GEOLUTs. The antenna gain and syst

27、em noise temperature for a GOES GEOLUT are 33.3 dB and 165.96 K, respectively. The EPIRB signal has an elevation angle of 5 with respect to the spacecraft. When no external sources of interference are present, the overall C/N0is 31.1 dB-Hz, which equates to an Eb/N0of 5.1 dB. Accounting for implemen

28、tation and beacon data demodulation losses and processing gains at the GEOLUT, results in an effective ratio of Eb/N0of 10.1 dB. Since the channel requires an overall Eb/(N0+ I0)of at least 8.8 dB to reliably meet minimum performance, the accumulation of broadband interference on the downlink that r

29、educes the overall carrier-to-noise plus interference density ratio by more than 1.3 dB cannot be accommodated. Since the overall C/N0in the absence of interference equates to 31.1 dB-Hz, broadband noise-like interference on the downlink that degrades it by 1.3 dB, would result in an overall carrier

30、-to-noise plus interference density ratio (C/(N0+ I0)overall of: (C/(N0+ I0)overall= (C/N0)overall 1.3 dB = 31.1 dB-Hz 1.3 dB = 29.8 dB-Hz 4 Rec. ITU-R M.1731-2 The (C/(N0+ I0)overallis calculated from the carrier-to-noise plus interference density ratios of the uplink and downlink as indicated belo

31、w: (C/(N0+ I0)overall= (C/(N0+ I0)1+ (C/(N0+ I0)1)1Since this analysis only concerns downlink interference, the above equation simplifies to: (C/(N0+ I0)overall= (C/N0)1+ (C/(N0+ I0)1)1Substituting 29.8 dB-Hz for (C/(N0+ I0)overalland 31.3 dB-Hz for (C/N0)results in a (C/(N0+ I0)of 35.1 dB-Hz (see b

32、elow): C/(N0+ I0)= (C/(N0+ I0)overall1 (C/N0)1)1 or C/(N0+ I0)= 10 log (1029.8/10 1031.3/10)1) then C/(N0+ I0)= 35.1 dB-Hz The noise power spectral-density of the downlink without interference at the input to the LNA is N0= k T, where k is Boltzmanns constant. Therefore, N0 = 228.6 + 22.2 = 206.4 dB

33、(W/Hz). The (C/N0)equals 43.8 dB and (N0)equals 206.4 dB(W/Hz), so the value of C is 162.6 dBW. The maximum permissible interference power spectral-density in the downlink from the aggregate of all interfering emitters, I0(max), measured at the input to the GEOLUT receiver LNA over the 1 544.5 MHz 1

34、00 kHz band is: I0, max = 10 log (10(C (C/(N0+ I0)/10 10(N0)/10) or I0, max= 10 log (10(162.6 35.1)/10 10206.4/10) then I0, max= 198.3 dB(W/Hz) It is desirable to characterize the protection criteria in terms of the spfd interference threshold specified in dB(W/(m2 Hz) at the input to the GEOLUT ant

35、enna. The effective aperture of an antenna, Ae, having a gain of G is Ae= G2/4. The GEOLUT antenna has a gain of 33.3 dB, therefore, the effective aperture is 6.42 m2. The maximum acceptable aggregate interference specified as an spfd is: spfd = I0, max LLine Ae Assuming LLine= 0. spfd = 198.3 0 10

36、log (6.42) = 206.4 dB(W/(m2 Hz) The maximum level of broadband noise-like interference in the 1 544.5 MHz 100 kHz GEOLUT channel shall not exceed 206.4 dB(W/(m2 Hz). 1.4 Procedure for computing level of interference to the GOES 406 MHz SARR channel downlink Interference to Cospas-Sarsat is most ofte

37、n a result of out-of-band emissions from services in adjacent or near adjacent bands such as MSS space-to-Earth allocations. Rec. ITU-R M.1731-2 5 The emission bandwidth must be examined to determine if energy is transmitted in the frequency range 1 544.5 MHz 100 kHz. Particular care must be taken w

38、hen analysing the impact of mobile systems (e.g. non-geostationary satellites and airborne transmitters) to take into account the effects of the Doppler shift generated by their movement. Compute the level of interference from all sources that transmit energy in the band expressed as an spfd level a

39、t the GEOLUT antenna. The aggregate level for all interfering sources must not exceed 206.4 dB(W/(m2 Hz) anywhere in this range. The above level is based on a GEOLUT antenna on-axis gain of 33.3 dBi. Depending upon the systems, involved antenna discrimination, polarization, and other engineering con

40、siderations should be used in establishing the impact of the interference. Annex 2 Interference protection criteria in the 1 544-1 545 MHz band for LEOLUTs that receive SARP 2.4 kbit/s processed data from Cospas and Sarsat satellites 1 General The Cospas and Sarsat SARP 2.4 kbit/s channel is located

41、 at 1 544.5 MHz 5 kHz on the LEOSAR payload downlinks. Because of the frequency spreading caused by the modulation process and the Doppler shift resulting from the movement of the satellite, the 2.4 kbit/s SARP channel is received at LEOLUTs over a frequency range of 1 544.5 MHz 50 kHz. Table 1 prov

42、ides recommended downlink power budgets for Cospas and Sarsat SARP channels that were developed to assist administrations design LEOLUTs for use in the Cospas-Sarsat system. The link budget shows that the Cospas SARP channel has a more robust communications link than the Sarsat SARP service; therefo

43、re, protection requirements suitable for the Sarsat SARP channel would also provide adequate protection for the Cospas SARP service. 2 Minimum acceptable performance for 2.4 kbit/s PDS data in the SARP channel In order to reliably detect and locate 406 MHz distress beacons, the BER of the SARP chann

44、el downlink must not exceed 1 106(see Table 1). 3 Analysis of spfd that causes interference The BER of a communications channel is derived from the ratio of the energy contained in each data bit, Eb, to the noise density. The total noise density is comprised of the noise developed by Cospas-Sarsat e

45、quipment, N0, and noise caused by interference from other systems, I0. This analysis will establish the level of interference, expressed as an spfd at the LEOLUT antenna, that would degrade the BER of the SARP channel downlink to one bit error in every million (1 106). 6 Rec. ITU-R M.1731-2 TABLE 1

46、Downlink power budget parameters for the Cospas and Sarsat PDS of the SARP Parameter Cospas nominal Sarsat nominal Source Carrier frequency (MHz) 1 544.5 Polarization (left hand circular) LHCP Elevation angle (degrees) 5 Satellite altitude (km) 1 000 850 Satellite e.i.r.p.(1)(dBW)6.2 7.1 Slant range

47、 5 (km) 3 200 2 900 Calculated from geometry Free-space path loss (Lp) (dB) 166.3 165.5 Calculated standard formula Short-term fading loss (Lf) (dB) 10 Other losses (Lo) (dB) 3.6(2)LUT-design and site-dependent Antenna (G/T)(3)(dB/K) 4.3 G = 26.7 dB, T = 22.4 dB(K) Boltzmanns constant, k (dB(W/(K Hz

48、) 228.6 Physical constant Data rate factor 2.4 kbit/s, r (dB-Hz) 33.8 Modulation loss (dB) 12.1 14.1 Desired maximum BER 106Calculated (Eb/N0) (dB) 13.3 13.0 Using above parameters Theoretical (Eb/N0)-th for BER of 106(dB) 10.6 Eb/N0 for required BER PDS link margin (dB) 2.7 2.4 LUT: local user term

49、inal (1)Equivalent isotropically radiated power. (2)Polarization mismatch, antenna pointing and demodulator implementation losses. (3)Antenna gain-to-noise temperature ratio, to include radome, if applicable, and cable losses.United States of America LUTs G/T = 4.3 dB. Table 1 shows the recommended downlink power budget for the SARP channel. The link budget has been completed using typical LEOLUT parameters. The link budget shows that the required BER of 1 106is achi