ITU-R F 106-2-1999 The use of diversity for voice-frequency telegraphy on HF radio circuits《高频无线电路中音频电报多样性的用途》.pdf

《ITU-R F 106-2-1999 The use of diversity for voice-frequency telegraphy on HF radio circuits《高频无线电路中音频电报多样性的用途》.pdf》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《ITU-R F 106-2-1999 The use of diversity for voice-frequency telegraphy on HF radio circuits《高频无线电路中音频电报多样性的用途》.pdf（4页珍藏版）》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。

1、 Rec. ITU-R F.106-2 1 RECOMMENDATION ITU-R F.106-2*The use of diversity for voice-frequency telegraphy on HF radio circuits (1953-1970-1999) The ITU Radiocommunication Assembly, considering a) that, when voice-frequency equipment is used on radio circuits at frequencies lower than about 30 MHz, the

2、quality of these circuits will, in general, be insufficient if no means of diversity reception is provided; b) that, in the presence of fading, space, polarization or frequency diversity gives comparable improvements in the quality of reception of telegraph signals transmitted over radio channels; c

3、) that, for adequate frequency diversity, it appears necessary that the frequencies which are used in combination to obtain this diversity should differ by at least 400 Hz; d) that space or polarization diversity needs only half the bandwidth and less power for each telegraph channel, as compared wi

4、th frequency diversity, but usually requires more equipment, recommends 1 that, when voice-frequency telegraph systems are used on radio circuits at frequencies lower than about 30 MHz, diversity reception should be used on the individual voice-frequency channels; 2 that, whenever practicable, space

5、 or, possibly, polarization diversity should be used in preference to frequency diversity; 3 that, for frequency diversity, the channel frequencies used in combination should have a separation of at least 400 Hz so that adequate diversity effects may be obtained; 4 that reference should be made to A

6、nnex 1 for additional information concerning diversity techniques. ANNEX 1 Use of coding diversity 1 Introduction There is a need for HF data transmission systems to provide reliable service in an efficient manner with multi-tone frequency shift keying (FSK) modems, as described in this Recommendati

7、on, or multi-tone phase shift keying (PSK) modems, as described in Recommendation ITU-R F.763. To _ *Radiocommunication Study Group 9 made editorial amendments to this Recommendation in 2001 in accordance with Resolution ITU-R 44. 2 Rec. ITU-R F.106-2 compensate for the unfavourable nature of the se

8、lective fading phenomenon of the transmission medium, in-band or other frequency diversity techniques are widely utilized. This Annex describes a coding technique that improves the in-band frequency diversity system. 2 System description The transmission scheme is shown in Fig. 1. The output m(t) fr

9、om a binary information source is fed into an encoder shift register of length K. After each shift of the register at the source data rate, the encoder generates two code bits, c1(t) and c2(t), which in turn drive corresponding data modulators. In practice, the centre frequency separation of these d

10、ata modulators is usually about 1 kHz. The combined output of the modulators is then fed into an HF single-sideband (SSB) transmission system. In frequency diversity operation, the system of Fig. 1 assumes its simplest form. The code bits are simply replicas of the information bit, i.e. c1(t) = c2(t

11、) = m(t). The decision on the value of a given information bit is based on the combined value of the outputs of the two demodulators. From an information theory context, frequency diversity can be described as a rate-half repetition coding technique that uses soft decisions. In frequency diversity t

12、ransmission, only two code bits contain information about any given information bit. With non-zero probability, both of these bits can be corrupted simultaneously by fading, interference or noise so that an incorrect decision is made on the information bit. When this occurs, there is no possibility

13、of correcting the error by using the values of the other code bits. It therefore appears desirable to encode the information sequence such that more than a single pair of code bits is related to any given information bit. The system of Fig. 1 does this by mapping the information sequence prior to tr

14、ansmission. 0106-01FIGURE 1General diversity structurem(t)+Decoder orcombinerShift registerModulator- demodulatorModulator- demodulatorABm(t)c (t)1c (t)2c (t)2m1m2mkc (t)1Any type of rate-half error correcting code could be used in coded frequency diversity transmission, but convolutional codes are

15、particularly suitable because their encoder structure fits the structure of frequency diversity transmission systems, and the Viterbi algorithm can be used efficiently to carry Rec. ITU-R F.106-2 3 out soft-decision decoding. The outputs of the demodulators are fed to A/D converters in a Viterbi dec

16、oder which replaces the combining operation of the frequency diversity system. 3 Experimental results An on-air performance comparison of frequency diversity and coding diversity has been made. Convolutional codes of constraint length K = 5 and 7 were chosen, and the output of the encoder was fed in

17、to a multi-tone FSK modulator using centre frequencies 1 105 and 2 125 Hz with 42.5 Hz shift. The data rate of each synchronous channel was 75 bit/s. The eye signal from each demodulator was digitized by a sample taken from the centre of the eye period. The HF radio equipment used included a 100 W t

18、ransmitter, broadband antennas, and a synthesized communications receiver. Maximal ratio combining was used for the diversity reception experiments. A real-time Viterbi decoder, implemented in software with an 8-bit general purpose microprocessor, was used for the coding experiments. Three series of

19、 on-air tests were conducted from Ottawa: a short-range test over a distance of 60 km, which had a weak groundwave component, a medium-range distance of 400 km to Toronto, and a third test from a ship operating off the east coast of Canada. The ship travelled from Quebec City to the High Arctic, all

20、owing tests to be carried out over distances ranging from about 400 to 2 500 km. During the latter part of this test period, the HF link traversed the auroral belt and rapid fading was often present. The short and medium distance experiments were conducted using various frequencies in the 3-9 MHz ra

21、nge and the ship experiments were conducted in the 5-15 MHz frequency bands. The error patterns with frequency diversity and coding diversity were analysed. It was observed that both sets of data exhibited the burstiness characteristic of the HF channel, however in the case of diversity, transition

22、between bursts and periods of lower error ratios were gradual. The errors were random much of the time, with frequent isolated single errors. The data from the coding diversity system had dense bursts with relatively abrupt beginning and end, longer error-free gaps, and an absence of single and doub

23、le errors. The bursts tended to be longer than those in the diversity system. After a long burst the decoder requires some time to recover, thus the bit error ratio (BER) in the decoded sequence actually may be higher than that in the in-band frequency diversity system. This is not the case for the

24、block error ratio (BLER) performance. This system is intended to be used in an automatic repeat request (ARQ) protocol environment which precludes the use of interleaving or time diversity. These schemes have been shown to result in improvements in the BER, but they require delays corresponding to t

25、he transmission of the order of several hundred bits. In block transmissions, blocks are rejected due to single or multiple errors which is the case for frequency diversity combining, but in coding diversity the block rejection is reduced by the reduction of isolated errors. The tests were done for

26、block sizes of 128 and 512 bits, which are typical for a system that is going to utilize coding diversity. The BLERs of the two techniques were compared and are shown in Table 1. The table includes the percentage increase in probability of receiving an error-free block for the coding technique versu

27、s frequency diversity. The improvement obtained varied from good to insignificant, and a larger improvement for the 512-bit block size is observed. In some instances the in-band frequency diversity transmission was virtually error-free itself, and thus there was little room for 4 Rec. ITU-R F.106-2

28、improvement; in other cases, the channel was so poor that neither system provided a usable error ratio. It was observed that in no instance was the performance of the convolutional coding significantly worse than that of the in-band frequency diversity system. TABLE 1 Experimental BLER results 4 Imp

29、lementation considerations The coding technique described in this Annex has a number of practical limitations and it will not replace a general purpose frequency diversity combiner in all applications. For example, it is incompatible with asynchronous data transmissions systems. However, it is poten

30、tially useful with ARQ systems using synchronous transmissions provided that the transmissions are not so short that the improvement in throughput is nullified by the increase in overhead bits required for proper operation of the Viterbi decoder. The overhead is four times K bits (where K is the con

31、straint length) needed at the beginning of the transmission, plus there is a postamble of (K 1) bits at the end of the transmission. 5 Conclusions An error control scheme based on convolutionally coded frequency diversity has been tested and compared to in-band frequency diversity data transmission.

32、 Experimental results show that this system has better BLER performance than in-band frequency diversity systems. The coding technique is suitable for systems that presently use frequency diversity in combination with a synchronous ARQ protocol. a) Block size = 128 (bits) Test number Constraint leng

33、th Diversity BLER Coding BLER Total bits Throughput improvement (%) 1 2 3 4 5 K = 7 K = 7 K = 5 K = 7 K = 7 0.293 0.217 0.321 0.084 0.083 0.201 0.127 0.227 0.015 0.019 1 430 000 506 000 352 000 217 000 217 000 13.0 11.5 13.8 7.5 6.5 b) Block size = 512 (bits) Test number Constraint length Diversity BLER Coding BLER Total bits Throughput improvement (%) 6 7 8 K = 7 K = 7 K = 5 0.548 0.378 0.570 0.406 0.223 0.420 1 430 000 506 000 352 000 31.4 24.9 34.9