CEN TR 16041-2010 Bicycles - Replies to requests for interpretation of EN 14764《自行车 答复解释请求EN 14764》.pdf
《CEN TR 16041-2010 Bicycles - Replies to requests for interpretation of EN 14764《自行车 答复解释请求EN 14764》.pdf》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《CEN TR 16041-2010 Bicycles - Replies to requests for interpretation of EN 14764《自行车 答复解释请求EN 14764》.pdf(16页珍藏版)》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。
1、raising standards worldwideNO COPYING WITHOUT BSI PERMISSION EXCEPT AS PERMITTED BY COPYRIGHT LAWBSI Standards PublicationPD CEN/TR 16041:2010Bicycles Replies to requestsfor interpretation of EN 14764PD CEN/TR 16041:2010 PUBLISHED DOCUMENTNational forewordThis Published Document is the UK implementa
2、tion of CEN/TR16041:2010.The UK participation in its preparation was entrusted to TechnicalCommittee GME/25, Cycles.A list of organizations represented on this committee can beobtained on request to its secretary.This publication does not purport to include all the necessaryprovisions of a contract.
3、 Users are responsible for its correctapplication. BSI 2010ISBN 978 0 580 69602 2ICS 43.150Compliance with a British Standard cannot confer immunity fromlegal obligations.This Published Document was published under the authority of theStandards Policy and Strategy Committee on 31 October 2010.Amendm
4、ents issued since publicationDate Text affectedPD CEN/TR 16041:2010TECHNICAL REPORT RAPPORT TECHNIQUE TECHNISCHER BERICHT CEN/TR 16041 September 2010 ICS 43.150 English Version Bicycles - Replies to requests for interpretation of EN 14764 Bicyclettes - Rponses aux demandes dinterprtation sur lEN 147
5、64 Fahrrder - Antworten auf Anfragen fr die Auslegung der EN 14764 This Technical Report was approved by CEN on 29 May 2010. It has been drawn up by the Technical Committee CEN/TC 333. CEN members are the national standards bodies of Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denma
6、rk, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and United Kingdom. EUROPEAN COMMITTEE FOR STANDARDIZATION COMIT EUROPEN DE NORMALISAT
7、ION EUROPISCHES KOMITEE FR NORMUNG Management Centre: Avenue Marnix 17, B-1000 Brussels 2010 CEN All rights of exploitation in any form and by any means reserved worldwide for CEN national Members. Ref. No. CEN/TR 16041:2010: EPD CEN/TR 16041:2010CEN/TR 16041:2010 (E) 2 Contents Page Foreword 3Intro
8、duction .41 Scope 62 Agreed interpretations and no action decisions 62.1 Clause 4.3.1 Security of screws (interpretation) 62.2 Clause 4.6.4 Brake-block security test (no action) .62.3 Clauses 4.6.8.5.3.6 and 4.6.8.5.3.7 III a) Dry and wet brake performance (no action).72.4 Clause 4.7.2 Handlebar plu
9、gs (interpretation) 72.5 Clause 4.8.x Frame Fatigue test with horizontal forces (no action) 82.6 Clause 4.10.3.1 Requirement (no action) 82.7 Clauses 4.10.4.4 2) the rationale of the standard; 3) the history of the standard. b) A no action decision This is applicable when it is agreed that the stand
10、ard appropriately specifies how a cycle or a component shall be assessed. c) A proposal for an amendment of the standard This is applicable when it is agreed that the standard is deficient in some way. NOTE The interpretations and no-action decisions are published in this Technical Report, which wil
11、l be updated on a regular basis. Proposals for amendments will be progressed as new work item proposals in accordance with CEN rules. Answers to requests for interpretations Since requests for interpretations are submitted through a CEN member body, it is assumed that the member body will keep itsel
12、f informed about decisions concerning the request and its progress and will itself inform the originator of the request as appropriate. Disclaimer The interpretations have been derived by the Interpretation Panel Group. The information contained herein is for guidance only and does not reflect the f
13、ormal approval by CEN or CEN member bodies. It PD CEN/TR 16041:2010CEN/TR 16041:2010 (E) 5 should be noted that the interpretations are neither part of any standard nor have been referenced in the Official Journal of the European Union. PD CEN/TR 16041:2010CEN/TR 16041:2010 (E) 6 1 Scope The purpose
14、 of this Technical Report is to provide replies to requests for interpretations of EN 14764:2005, City and trekking bicycles Safety requirements and test methods. 2 Agreed interpretations and no action decisions 2.1 Clause 4.3.1 Security of screws (interpretation) Question According to the text, loc
15、king devices are required for the following: suspension system; generator attachment; brake-mechanism to frame, fork or handlebar; mud-guards to frame or fork; saddle to seat-pillar (except in EN 14765). The requirement does not apply to: handlebar to handlebar stem; seat pillar to frame; luggage ca
16、rrier to frame or fork. What is a locking device (thread locking compound)? Interpretation The locking devices mentioned as examples in the standard shall not be considered to be an exhaustive list. Also other means of locking devices can be acceptable provided that they do not unintentionally becom
17、e unlocked. NOTE 1 Thread locking compound was discussed and considered as acceptable for locking of e.g. levers to handlebars. NOTE 2 This decision is also applicable to the corresponding clauses in the Technical Reports related to EN 14765, EN 14766 and EN 14781. REQ 004-10-2007 (Sweden) 2.2 Claus
18、e 4.6.4 Brake-block security test (no action) Question During the test the wheel will lock and the tyre will slip on the surface. A brake that does not fulfil this requirement will not fulfil the ordinary brake-performance test. The test can be carried out as follows PD CEN/TR 16041:2010CEN/TR 16041
19、:2010 (E) 7 apply the brakes according to the standard; rotate the wheel by hand forward and rearwards five times. Is the test meaningful? Should the testing procedure be revised? REQ 005-10-2007 (Sweden) Question Can brake pad security test be performed on a brake test machine? Is it acceptable if
20、the wheel skids? REQ 026-10-2007 (Germany), REQ 033-10-2007 (Germany) Reply The test mainly aims at checking if the brake-pad can be released when the bicycle is moved backwards with the brakes applied. This situation will not occur during the other brake tests. The test shall remain. NOTE This deci
21、sion is also applicable to the corresponding clauses in the Technical Reports related to EN 14765, EN 14766 and EN 14781. 2.3 Clauses 4.6.8.5.3.6 and 4.6.8.5.3.7 III a) Dry and wet brake performance (no action) Question What clamping force is required for machine testing? 4.6.8.5.3.6 says that suffi
22、cient force must be applied to prevent skidding. Then the test should stop if a lever force of 180 N is reached, or a braking force of 700 N but the test can be stopped if the wheel locks up (4.6.8.5.3.7 III a). Is there a difference in requirements between wet and dry? It is often difficult to prev
23、ent wheel skidding at high lever forces during wet testing (requires a very large clamping force). Reply There is no limit to the force. It can be increased to prevent skidding. NOTE This decision is also applicable to the corresponding clauses in the Technical Reports related to EN 14766 and EN 147
24、81. REQ 032-10-2007 (Germany) 2.4 Clause 4.7.2 Handlebar plugs (interpretation) Question Handlebar grips are no problem to test. For plugs it is difficult to apply 70 N without coming into contact with the handlebar. Should it be permitted e.g. to drill a hole in the plug? Interpretation Yes. PD CEN
- 1.请仔细阅读文档,确保文档完整性,对于不预览、不比对内容而直接下载带来的问题本站不予受理。
- 2.下载的文档,不会出现我们的网址水印。
- 3、该文档所得收入(下载+内容+预览)归上传者、原创作者;如果您是本文档原作者,请点此认领!既往收益都归您。
下载文档到电脑,查找使用更方便
10000 积分 0人已下载
下载 | 加入VIP,交流精品资源 |
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- CENTR160412010BICYCLESREPLIESTOREQUESTSFORINTERPRETATIONOFEN14764 自行车 答复 解释 请求 EN14764PDF

链接地址:http://www.mydoc123.com/p-592195.html