ATIS 0500024-2013 Comparison of SIP Profiles.pdf
《ATIS 0500024-2013 Comparison of SIP Profiles.pdf》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《ATIS 0500024-2013 Comparison of SIP Profiles.pdf(24页珍藏版)》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。
1、 TECHNICAL REPORT ATIS-0500024 COMPARISON OF SIP PROFILES As a leading technology and solutions development organization, ATIS brings together the top global ICT companies to advance the industrys most-pressing business priorities. Through ATIS committees and forums, nearly 200 companies address clo
2、ud services, device solutions, emergency services, M2M communications, cyber security, ehealth, network evolution, quality of service, billing support, operations, and more. These priorities follow a fast-track development lifecycle from design and innovation through solutions that include standards
3、, specifications, requirements, business use cases, software toolkits, and interoperability testing. ATIS is accredited by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI). ATIS is the North American Organizational Partner for the 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), a founding Partner of oneM
4、2M, a member and major U.S. contributor to the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) Radio and Telecommunications sectors, and a member of the Inter-American Telecommunication Commission (CITEL). For more information, visit . Notice of Disclaimer Stage 3 (Release 10), March 15, 2013.12. ATIS-1
5、000009.2006 (R2011), IP Network - to -Network Interface (NNI) Standard for VOIP, May 2006.23. ATIS-0700015, ATIS Standard for Implementation of 3GPP Common IMS Emergency Procedures for IMS Origination and Esinet/Legacy Selective Router Termination pending publication.31This document is available fro
6、m the Third Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) at . 2This document is available from the Alliance for Telecommunications Industry Solutions (ATIS), 1200 G Street N.W., Suite 500, Washington, DC 20005 . 3Requests for information regarding this document should be made to the ATIS Document Center Ad
7、ministrator at . ATIS-0500024 2 2.2 Informative References 4. NENA 08-003 V1, Detailed Functional and Interface Specification for the NENA I3 Solution Stage 3, June 14, 2011.45. RFC 8661, Best Current Practice for Communications Services in Support of Emergency Calling, March 2013.53 Definitions, Ac
8、ronyms, & Abbreviations 3.1 Definitions NENA i3 NENA i3 describes the “end state” that has been reached after a migration from legacy TDM circuit-switched telephony, and the legacy E9-1-1 system built to support it, to an all IP-based telephony system with a corresponding IP-based Emergency Services
9、 IP network. ESInet An ESInet defined by NENA i3 and is a managed IP network that is used for emergency services communications, and which can be shared by all public safety agencies. Mm/Mx/Ici, These 3GPP reference points are defined in Reference 1 and are among the reference points that apply for
10、interconnections to the ESInet. 3.2 Acronyms & Abbreviations 3GPP 3rdGeneration Partnership Project ANSI American National Standards Institute ATIS Alliance for Telecommunications Industry Solutions ESIF Emergency Services Interconnection Forum IETF Internet Engineering Task Force IMS IP Multimedia
11、Subsystem NENA National Emergency Numbering Association NNI Network to Network Interface SDO Standard Development Organization SIP Session Initiation Protocol TR Technical Report 4This document is available from the National Emergency Number Association. 5This document is available from the Internet
12、 Engineering Task Force (IETF). ATIS-0500024 3 4 SIP Profile Comparison This Technical Report (TR) compares the INVITE SIP profiles that have been defined in ATISs IP Network to Network (NNI) Standard 2, ATISs Standard for Implementation of 3GPP Common IMS Emergency Procedures for IMS Origination an
13、d ESInet/Legacy Selective Router Termination, 3GPP IMS Stage 3 1, and NENAs i3 Stage 3 specification 4. NENAs i3 specification does not define a formal profile, so the inclusion of NENA proposed SIP headers have been extracted from the text the NENA i3 stage 3 specification and IETF RFC 6881 5. This
14、 TR contains four profile comparisons. The first comparison table shows the combined headers provided by all organizations. The 3GPP profile was used as the baseline since it included the most headers. The second comparison table compares the ATIS NNI with the ATIS Standard for Implementation of 3GP
15、P Common IMS Emergency Procedures for IMS Origination and ESInet/Legacy Selective Router Termination. The ATIS Standard for Implementation of 3GPP Common IMS Emergency Procedures for IMS Origination and ESInet/Legacy Selective Router Termination used the ATIS NNI as a baseline and adapted the profil
16、e to support emergency services. The third comparison table compares the ATIS Standard for Implementation of 3GPP Common IMS Emergency Procedures for IMS Origination and ESInet/Legacy Selective Router Termination with the 3GPP specification. Note that 3GPP has not defined the Mm interface which woul
17、d support emergency services. Therefore, the 3GPP profile is not specific for emergency services. The fourth comparison table compares the ATIS Standard for Implementation of 3GPP Common IMS Emergency Procedures for IMS Origination and ESInet/Legacy Selective Router Termination with the NENA i3 spec
18、ification. Again, NENA did not provide a formal profile so the header support was extracted from the text. The following table identifies the coding used in the ATIS standards. Table 1 - ATIS NNI Legend Code Code name Sending side Receiving side M Mandatory See Reference 2 for definition. See Refere
19、nce 2 for definition. ND Not Defined Header is not explicitly defined in standard. Header is not explicitly defined in standard. O Optional See Reference 2 for definition. See Reference 2 for definition. - Not Supported See Reference 2 for definition. See Reference 2 for definition. S Recommended Se
20、e Reference 2 for definition. See Reference 2 for definition. ATIS-0500024 4 The following table identifies the coding used in the 3GPP standards. Table 2- 3GPP Legend Status code Status name MeaningM Mandatory See Reference 1 for definition. O Optional See Reference 1 for definition. N/A Not Applic
21、able See Reference 1 for definition. X Prohibited (excluded) See Reference 1 for definition. C Conditional See Reference 1 for definition. O. Qualified optional See Reference 1 for definition. I Irrelevant See Reference 1 for definition. The following table shows the use of headers from the four spe
22、cifications. ATIS and 3GPP specified the needs for both the sender and receiver. Since the NENA i3 information was extracted from the text, no assumptions were made regarding differences between the sender and receiver. ATIS-0500024 5 Table 3 - Combined Profile Comparison Item Header field Send Send
23、 Send Receive Receive Receive3GPP Profile status ATIS ici6ATIS NNI IETF 3GPP Profile status ATIS ici ATIS NNI NENA I3 1 Accept C47 M M O M M M O 1A Accept-Contact C24 ND ND O C32 ND ND O 2 Accept-Encoding O O O O M M M O 3 Accept-Language O S S O M M M O 4 Alert-Info O O O O C1 O O O 5 Allow O M M O
24、 M M M O 6 Allow-Events C2 O ND O C53 O ND O 7 Answer-Mode C49 ND ND O C50 ND ND ND 8 Authorization C3 - O O C3 - O O 8A Authentication-Info ND ND O O ND ND O O 9 Call-ID M M M M M M M M 10 Call-Info O O O O O O O M711 Contact M M M M M M M M 12 Content-Disposition O O O O M M M O 13 Content-Encodin
- 1.请仔细阅读文档,确保文档完整性,对于不预览、不比对内容而直接下载带来的问题本站不予受理。
- 2.下载的文档,不会出现我们的网址水印。
- 3、该文档所得收入(下载+内容+预览)归上传者、原创作者;如果您是本文档原作者,请点此认领!既往收益都归您。
下载文档到电脑,查找使用更方便
10000 积分 0人已下载
下载 | 加入VIP,交流精品资源 |
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- ATIS05000242013COMPARISONOFSIPPROFILESPDF
