ATIS 0100012-2013 Standard Outage Classification.pdf
《ATIS 0100012-2013 Standard Outage Classification.pdf》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《ATIS 0100012-2013 Standard Outage Classification.pdf(22页珍藏版)》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。
1、 AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARD FOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS ATIS-0100012.2013 STANDARD OUTAGE CLASSIFICATION As a leading technology and solutions development organization, ATIS brings together the top global ICT companies to advance the industrys most-pressing business priorities. Through ATIS committees an
2、d forums, nearly 200 companies address cloud services, device solutions, emergency services, M2M communications, cyber security, ehealth, network evolution, quality of service, billing support, operations, and more. These priorities follow a fast-track development lifecycle from design and innovatio
3、n through solutions that include standards, specifications, requirements, business use cases, software toolkits, and interoperability testing. ATIS is accredited by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI). ATIS is the North American Organizational Partner for the 3rd Generation Partnership
4、Project (3GPP), a founding Partner of oneM2M, a member and major U.S. contributor to the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) Radio and Telecommunications sectors, and a member of the Inter-American Telecommunication Commission (CITEL). For more information, visit . AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARD
5、 Approval of an American National Standard requires review by ANSI that the requirements for due process, consensus, and other criteria for approval have been met by the standards developer. Consensus is established when, in the judgment of the ANSI Board of Standards Review, substantial agreement h
6、as been reached by directly and materially affected interests. Substantial agreement means much more than a simple majority, but not necessarily unanimity. Consensus requires that all views and objections be considered, and that a concerted effort be made towards their resolution. The use of America
7、n National Standards is completely voluntary; their existence does not in any respect preclude anyone, whether he has approved the standards or not, from manufacturing, marketing, purchasing, or using products, processes, or procedures not conforming to the standards. The American National Standards
8、 Institute does not develop standards and will in no circumstances give an interpretation of any American National Standard. Moreover, no person shall have the right or authority to issue an interpretation of an American National Standard in the name of the American National Standards Institute. Req
9、uests for interpretations should be addressed to the secretariat or sponsor whose name appears on the title page of this standard. CAUTION NOTICE: This American National Standard may be revised or withdrawn at any time. The procedures of the American National Standards Institute require that action
10、be taken periodically to reaffirm, revise, or withdraw this standard. Purchasers of American National Standards may receive current information on all standards by calling or writing the American National Standards Institute. Notice of Disclaimer that is, the value in one category does not preclude
11、or exclude the use of a value in another category. Outage databases constructed using this concept can be perceived as having one field for Category 1 (What), two fields for Category 2 (Why-Primary and Why-Secondary), and one field for Category 3 (Who). The concept of decomposing the outage cause in
12、to categories facilitates the statistical analysis of outage data. The category values presented in this standard address the highest level of outage cause description with the broadest applicability across the industry. It is likely that individual companies or organizations may wish to provide mor
13、e in-depth outage cause descriptions to focus on their own individual needs. The standard presented here provides a basis and structure for doing so. The decomposition concept allows additional fields to be added if needed where more precision is desired in the description. For example, Category 1 (
14、What) could have an added field describing specific types of hardware and software elements that were the source of the outage. Such a level of description is beyond the scope of this standard, but the system described here provides a structure for such expansion of detail if desired. 4.3 Examples o
15、f Application The examples provided in Table 1 provide guidance on the application of the classification system to various outage scenarios. In particular, note should be made of scenarios involving acts of nature such as lightning or storms. It is often simplest to ascribe service outages arising f
16、rom such events exclusively to Acts of Nature. However, in many cases, a thorough outage cause analysis will often find that true responsibility for these outages lies elsewhere (e.g., with the service provider if proper precautions were not made, or with the vendor if the event was within the desig
17、n tolerance of the failed equipment); several scenarios in Table 1 address the differences in classification for such outages. ATIS-0100012.2013 5 Table 5: Examples of Application to Various Outage Scenarios Description Category 1 - What Category 2 - Why Category 3 - Who Primary Secondary DS3s faile
18、d due to a fiber cut caused by a private land owner who was digging and cut the fiber. Cable Damage Accident Public individual/organization Cable was accidentally cut by a construction contractor (working for the reporting service provider), although locates were done and were accurate. Cable Damage
19、 Accident Contractor of Reporter Loss of service was incurred by the reporting service provider when a leased cable was accidentally cut by the leasing service provider. Cable Damage Accident Other Service Provider Cable was cut when lightning struck a utility pole. Cable Damage External Environment
20、 Act of Nature Cable was cut by a contractor for a private firm. Service provider failed to process the cable locate request from the contractor. Cable Damage Procedure Violation Reporting Service Provider Cable was cut by a contractor installing a drainage pipe for a restaurant. No cable locate req
21、uest was made. Cable Damage Procedure Violation Public individual/organization Cable cut was caused by the county highway department which did not request a cable locate. Cable Damage Procedure Violation Government High call volume in anticipation of an approaching hurricane resulted in network cong
22、estion. Capacity Traffic/System Overload External Environment Customer Lightning strike exceeding the design tolerance of a receiver caused the failure of the receiver, which had to be replaced to restore service. Hardware Damage External Environment Act of Nature ATIS-0100012.2013 6 Description Cat
23、egory 1 - What Category 2 - Why Category 3 - Who Primary Secondary Lightning strike caused the failure of the receiver, which had to be replaced to restore service. The receiver was improperly grounded. Hardware Damage Procedure Violation Reporting Service Provider Lightning strike within the design
24、 tolerance of a receiver caused the failure of the receiver, which had to be replaced to restore service. Hardware Damage External Environment Vendor High winds caused loss of service by satellite dish. Wind strength was within the design tolerance of dish. Hardware Failure External Environment Vend
- 1.请仔细阅读文档,确保文档完整性,对于不预览、不比对内容而直接下载带来的问题本站不予受理。
- 2.下载的文档,不会出现我们的网址水印。
- 3、该文档所得收入(下载+内容+预览)归上传者、原创作者;如果您是本文档原作者,请点此认领!既往收益都归您。
下载文档到电脑,查找使用更方便
10000 积分 0人已下载
下载 | 加入VIP,交流精品资源 |
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- ATIS01000122013STANDARDOUTAGECLASSIFICATIONPDF

链接地址:http://www.mydoc123.com/p-540848.html