[外语类试卷]大学英语四级模拟试卷387及答案与解析.doc
《[外语类试卷]大学英语四级模拟试卷387及答案与解析.doc》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《[外语类试卷]大学英语四级模拟试卷387及答案与解析.doc(24页珍藏版)》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。
1、大学英语四级模拟试卷 387及答案与解析 一、 Part I Writing (30 minutes) 1 For this part, you are allowed 30 minutes to write a composition on the topic Students Complaints. You should write at least 120 words based on the outline given below: 1. 学生对很多事抱怨不已 (对家长、学校、社会 ) 2学生和老师对此看法不同 3你的观点 二、 Part II Reading Comprehensio
2、n (Skimming and Scanning) (15 minutes) Directions: In this part, you will have 15 minutes to go over the passage quickly and answer the questions attached to the passage. For questions 1-7, mark: Y (for YES) if the statement agrees with the information given in the passage; N (for NO) if the stateme
3、nt contradicts the information given in the passage; NG (for NOT GIVEN) if the information is not given in the passage. 1 The Nanny State By the time they get to school, its too late. The realisation that neglectful parenting in a childs earliest years can ruin its chances for life is shaping a new,
4、 expensive and interventionist approach to families in Britain. The government has increased spending on financial support to children by 64%, to 24 billion( 41 billion), since Labour came to power in 1997. In the latest splurge, it announced an extra I billion for childcare, advice for struggling p
5、arents and cash benefits. Intervention in infancy is increasingly popular in America and in Europe, among all shades of opinion. Most leftwingers accept that bad parenting is not only about poverty; most conservatives accept that working mothers are not its sole cause. Disadvantage is clearly passed
6、 on early, and not just through the genes. There is evidence that, by the time they get to school, many dim two-year-olds from good homes have overtaken bright children from bad ones. Being read to, played with, properly fed and cuddled all hugely increase the likelihood of success in later life. Co
7、nversely, bad parenting increases the risk of everything from dropping out of school to illness, and eventually jail. The problems are working out what to do and then making it happen. The British approach, under file overall title of Sure Start, has several strands. One, aimed at 400,000 children i
8、n the poorest fifth of the country, is, in effect, supplemental parenting: free places in high-quality nurseries and creches, coupled with energetic advice-giving, a new network of childrens centres, and home visits from volunteers. Then there is the general expansion of nursery education. Already e
9、very four-yearold has the right to 2hours of state-financed nursery care a day. In 2004 that will include three-year-olds. Third is the plan to cut child poverty by a quarter by next year, and “end“ it in 2020. But poverty, like cruelty, is hard to define. The governments definition, based on 60% of
10、 the median income, is a shifting target: as earnings rise, so does poverty. Moreover, not all cash-strapped parents are bad at raising children. Nonetheless, the government has energetically raised family benefits and tax credits. The poorest 20% of families with children, it says, will be 2,900 a
11、year better off in real terms than before Labour took power in 1997. For single-earners with two or more children, policies are even more redistributive. The money and effort that have gone into improving life for Britains infants are the governments proudest boastespecially as other public-service
12、reforms are looking increasingly tattered and battered. But problems lurk behind the determination. For a start, these policies are net necessarily compatible. Generous benefits distort the labour market and may encourage feckless behaviour. Frank Field, an iconoclastic Labour MP, notes that benefit
13、s for single mothers penalise those in stable relationships, which are clearly associated with good parenting. Encouraging mothers of young children to find jobs is another good thing: it benefits both them and the family budget. But if it means their children are dumped in front of the telly at a c
14、heap childminder, the kids may be worse off than if they were at hone with mum. The governments unwillingness to pass judgment on bad parents also weakens this approach. The rhetoric around Sure Start is swathed with waffle about “inclusivity“ and being “non-judgmental“. “I dont have the right to ca
15、ll someone a bad parent,“ says Jane Cole, a senior Sure Start adviser. Dont blame parents, she says, but society. But studies of similar intervention in early childhood in America show it works best when programmes clearly tell parents what to do and why. Sure Start has almost nothing to say about t
16、he benefits of reading aloud, or the perils of too mnch television. According to a sceptic close to the scheme, there is too much about boosting parents self-esteem and too little attention to making a real difference to childrens lives. That leads on to the biggest question of all: whether this sor
17、t of intervention works. The statistical evidence from well-established programmes in America is at best mixed: the chihtren in greatest need tend to benefit least. A big study duc out in 2006 will answer the question definitively, but Krista Kafer of the Heritage Foundation, an American think-tank,
18、 fears that “all it really does is make us feel better as a society“. Scandinavian countries have spent heavily on infants for decades, and the inheritance of disadvantage seems to have decreasedthough it is difficult to prove that the two are connected. The British governments splurge on children i
19、s based on the hope that they are. 2 Intervention in infancy is increasingly popular in America and in Africa. ( A) Y ( B) N ( C) NG 3 Family planning in one of Chinas basic national policies. ( A) Y ( B) N ( C) NG 4 The problems are working out how to de and then making it happen. ( A) Y ( B) N ( C
20、) NG 5 The governments definition of poverty is a shifting target. ( A) Y ( B) N ( C) NG 6 Encouraging mothers of young children to find jobs is a good thing. ( A) Y ( B) N ( C) NG 7 Sure Start has almost nothing to say about the benefits of reading aloud. ( A) Y ( B) N ( C) NG 8 Scandinavian courtr
21、ies have spent little on infants for decades. ( A) Y ( B) N ( C) NG 9 The government has increased spending on financial support to child by _ since 1997. 10 For single-earners with two or more children ,policies are even more _. 11 The rhetoric around Sure Start is swathed with waffle about“_“ and
22、being “_“. Section A Directions: In this section, you will hear 8 short conversations and 2 long conversations. At the end of each conversation, one or more questions will be asked about what was said. Both the conversation and the questions will be spoken only once. After each question there will b
23、e a pause. During the pause, you must read the four choices marked A, B, C and D, and decide which is the best answer. ( A) Marks train has left earlier. ( B) Marks train has been delayed. ( C) Marks train is often late. ( D) Mark is likely to miss the train. ( A) He used to be rich. ( B) He used to
24、 be poor. ( C) He used to be very thin. ( D) He used to be a driver. ( A) At 9:00. ( B) At 9:30. ( C) At 7:30. ( D) At 8:00. ( A) The woman often, dreams a lot at night. ( B) The woman goes to work every night. ( C) The woman likes to stay up late. ( D) The woman is busy with housework. ( A) On Satu
- 1.请仔细阅读文档,确保文档完整性,对于不预览、不比对内容而直接下载带来的问题本站不予受理。
- 2.下载的文档,不会出现我们的网址水印。
- 3、该文档所得收入(下载+内容+预览)归上传者、原创作者;如果您是本文档原作者,请点此认领!既往收益都归您。
下载文档到电脑,查找使用更方便
2000 积分 0人已下载
下载 | 加入VIP,交流精品资源 |
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 外语类 试卷 大学 英语四 模拟 387 答案 解析 DOC
