[外语类试卷]大学英语六级模拟试卷825及答案与解析.doc
《[外语类试卷]大学英语六级模拟试卷825及答案与解析.doc》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《[外语类试卷]大学英语六级模拟试卷825及答案与解析.doc(48页珍藏版)》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。
1、大学英语六级模拟试卷 825及答案与解析 一、 Part I Writing (30 minutes) 1 For this part, you are allowed 30 minutes to write a short essay on the topic of Chinese Parenting VS Western Parenting. You should write at least 150 words according to the outline given below. 1 在教育孩子方面,有人认为中式教育 (从严 )更好 2有人则认为西式教育 (从宽 )更好 3我认为
2、Chinese Parenting VS Western Parenting 二、 Part II Reading Comprehension (Skimming and Scanning) (15 minutes) Directions: In this part, you will have 15 minutes to go over the passage quickly and answer the questions attached to the passage. For questions 1-4, mark: Y (for YES) if the statement agree
3、s with the information given in the passage; N (for NO) if the statement contradicts the information given in the passage; NG (for NOT GIVEN) if the information is not given in the passage. 1 Police Lesson: Social Network Tools Have Two Edges Officer Trey Economidy of the Albuquerque police now real
4、izes that he should have thought harder before listing his occupation on his Facebook profile as “human waste disposal“. After he was involved in a fatal on-duty shooting in February, a local television station dug up the Facebook page. Officer Economidy was placed on desk duty, and last month the A
5、lbuquerque Police Department announced a new policy to govern officers use of social networking sites. Social networking tools like Facebook and Twitter can be valuable assets for law enforcement agencies, helping them alert the public, seek information about crimes and gather evidence about the bac
6、kgrounds of criminal suspects. But the Internet can also get police departments into trouble. Public gaffes(失言 )like Officer Economidys his cynical job description on Facebook was “extremely inappropriate“, he said last week in an e-mail are only one of the risks. A careless posting on a networking
7、site, law enforcement experts say, can endanger an officers safety, as it did in Santa Monica, Calif., last year when the Police Department went to great lengths to conceal a wounded officers identity and location, only to have a retired officer carelessly reveal them on Facebook. And defense lawyer
8、s increasingly search social networking sites for evidence that could challenge the validity of a police officers testimony. In one case in New York, a jury dismissed a weapons charge against a defendant after learning that the arresting officer had listed his mood on MySpace as “devious“ and wrote
9、on Facebook that he was watching the film Training Day to “brush up on proper police procedure“. The problem is serious enough that departments across the country are scrambling to develop rules to govern what officers can and cannot do online. “This is something that all the police chiefs around th
10、e country, if youre not dealing with it, youd better deal with it,“ said Mark A. Marshall, chief of police in Smithfield, Va., and the president of the International Association of Chiefs of Police, which has developed its own model policy. His department, Chief Marshall said, has had a few embarras
11、sing episodes. In one, an officer who had been involved in a high-speed chase and ended up in “a little bit of a fight“ with a suspect posted a comment about what a good time he had during the dust-up(打架 ). In another, an officer posted a photo of a tattoo(纹身 )of St. Michael on her hip. Both were di
12、sciplined, Chief Marshall said. “Unfortunately, you have these extreme incidents that are out there,“ he said, “and, frankly, you ask yourself, What on earth were they thinking when they posted that?“ Most social media policies try to balance a police departments interests against First Amendment pr
13、otections for the officers. Many include prohibitions against posting any statements that could discredit or reflect badly on a department, that illustrate reckless behavior or that disparage(贬低 )people based on race, religion or sexual orientation. Posting crime scene photos or other evidence from
14、criminal cases online is also prohibited by most policies. Others go further. Albuquerques policy, for example, prohibits officers from identifying themselves as employees of the Police Department or posting photos of departmental insignia(标志 ) badges, uniforms, cruisers without permission. And a re
15、cent policy by the Police Department in Pueblo, Colo., bans gossiping online with outsiders about department affairs. Police officials say that the courts have generally upheld restrictions on the speech of government employees when the speech is job related. “The U.S. Supreme Court has spoken on it
16、 so often that the parameters are fairly well defined,“ said Martha Stonebrook, senior city attorney in Salt Lake City. In one famous 2004 case, the Supreme Court upheld the firing of an officer who filmed himself stripping off a police uniform and sold the video on eBays adults-only area. But David
17、 L. Hudson Jr., a scholar at the First Amendment Center at Vanderbilt University, said the lower courts were still sorting out the implications of the Supreme Courts decisions involving job-related speech. “The question of when employees can be disciplined for off-duty speech is vague,“ he said. “Pa
18、rt of our core nature is what we do for a living, and to prohibit somebody from engaging in any kind of expression related to their job is arguably too broad.“ In fact, the Albuquerque policy has met some resistance from the rank and file. Joey Sigala, president of the Albuquerque Police Officers As
19、sociation, said that while the department was entitled to dictate what officers wear and say on the clock, “I dont believe they have the right to tell us what to do outside of that.“ He said that requiring officers to get permission before posting pictures involving department insignia made it diffi
20、cult to share news about awards or honors spontaneously with family and friends. “Theyre taking away the ability to demonstrate the good, as well as the bad,“ he said. Chief Ray Schultz of the Albuquerque police said that department officials researched policies from around the nation before develop
21、ing their own. “You need to get a handle on this very quickly, because this has the potential to damage the reputation of the organization and also adversely affect you in the courtroom,“ Chief Schultz said, adding that some social media sites appeared to be “like the bathroom wall of 20 years ago,
22、except now the entire world can see it“. His department, he said, has hired a compliance officer to investigate the online presence of any police officer “who comes to the attention of the department“, by examining social network pages and running the officers name through Google. Media coverage is
23、often what prompts a department into action. The Indiana State Police initiated its policy after WTHR in Indianapolis discovered photos of drunken revels(狂欢 )on a troopers Facebook page. One showed the trooper, Chris Pestow, with a .357 Magnum pointed at his head. He also posted a comment about a ho
24、meless man beaten by police officers in California, saying, “These people should have died when they were young, anyway, Im just doing them a favor,“ according to the report by WTHR. After the controversy, Trooper Pestow resigned, said First Sergeant David Bursten, a spokesman for the State Police.
- 1.请仔细阅读文档,确保文档完整性,对于不预览、不比对内容而直接下载带来的问题本站不予受理。
- 2.下载的文档,不会出现我们的网址水印。
- 3、该文档所得收入(下载+内容+预览)归上传者、原创作者;如果您是本文档原作者,请点此认领!既往收益都归您。
下载文档到电脑,查找使用更方便
2000 积分 0人已下载
下载 | 加入VIP,交流精品资源 |
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 外语类 试卷 大学 英语六级 模拟 825 答案 解析 DOC
