[外语类试卷]大学英语六级模拟试卷176及答案与解析.doc
《[外语类试卷]大学英语六级模拟试卷176及答案与解析.doc》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《[外语类试卷]大学英语六级模拟试卷176及答案与解析.doc(31页珍藏版)》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。
1、大学英语六级模拟试卷 176及答案与解析 一、 Part I Writing (30 minutes) 1 Directions: For this part, you are allowed thirty minutes to write a composition on the topic: My View on Part-time Jobs. You should write at least 150 words, and base your composition on the outline given below: 1.近年来越来越多的大学生都有社会兼职工作,人们对此现象有不同的看
2、法。 2.有人认为兼职工作最好事,可以 有人认为兼了只工作有一些弊端 3.你的看法 二、 Part II Reading Comprehension (Skimming and Scanning) (15 minutes) Directions: In this part, you will have 15 minutes to go over the passage quickly and answer the questions attached to the passage. For questions 1-4, mark: Y (for YES) if the statement ag
3、rees with the information given in the passage; N (for NO) if the statement contradicts the information given in the passage; NG (for NOT GIVEN) if the information is not given in the passage. 1 The most obvious difference between real essays and the things one has to write in school is that real es
4、says are not exclusively about English literature. Certainly schools should teach students how to write. But due to a series of historical accidents the teaching of writing has gotten mixed together with the study of literature. And so all over the country students are writing not about how a baseba
5、ll team with a small budget might compete with the Yankees, or the role of color in fashion, or what constitutes a good dessert, but about symbolism in Dickens. How did things get this way? To answer that we have to go back almost a thousand years. Around 1100, Europe at last began to catch its brea
6、th after centuries of chaos, and once they had the luxury of curiosity they rediscovered what we call “the classics.“ The effect was rather as if we were visited by beings from another solar system. These earlier civilizations were so much more sophisticated that for the next several centuries the m
7、ain work of European scholars, in almost every field, was to assimilate what they knew. During this period the study of ancient texts acquired great prestige. It seemed the essence of what scholars did. As European scholarship gained momentum it became less and less important; by 1350 someone who wa
8、nted to learn about science could find better teachers than Aristotle in his own era. But schools change slower than scholarship. In the 19th century the study of ancient texts was still the backbone of the curriculum. What tipped the scales, at least in the US, seems to have been the idea that prof
9、essors should do research as well as teach. This idea was imported from Germany in the late 19th century. Beginning at Johns Hopkins in 1876, the new model spread rapidly. Writing was one of the casualties. Colleges had long taught English composition, But how do you do research on composition? The
10、professors who taught math could be required to do original math, the professors who taught history could be required to write scholarly articles about history, but what about the professors who taught rhetoric or composition? What should they do research on? The closest thing seemed to be English l
11、iterature. And so in the late 19th century the teaching of writing was inherited by English professors. This had two drawbacks: (a) an expert on literature need not himself be a good writer, any more than an art historian has to be a good painter, and (b) the subject of writing now tends to be liter
12、ature, since thats what the professor is interested in. It s no wonder if this seems to the student a pointless exercise, because we re now three steps removed from real work: the students are imitating English professors, who are imitating classical scholars, who are merely the inheritors of a trad
13、ition growing out of what was, 700 years ago, fascinating and urgently needed work. The other big difference between a real essay and the things they make you write in school is that a real essay doesnt take a position and then defend it. That principle, like the idea that we ought to be writing abo
14、ut literature, turns out to be another intellectual hangover of long forgotten origins. Its often mistakenly believed that medieval universities were mostly seminaries. In fact they were more law schools. And at least in our tradition lawyers are advocates, trained to take either side of an argument
15、 and make as good a case for it as they can. Whether cause or effect, this spirit pervaded early universities. The study of rhetoric, the art of arguing persuasively, was a third of the undergraduate curriculum. And after the lecture the most common form of discussion was the disputation. This is at
16、 least nominally preserved in our present-day thesis defense: most people treat the words thesis and dissertation as interchangeable, but originally, at least, a thesis was a position one took and the dissertation was the argument by which one defended it. Defending a position may be a necessary evi
17、l in a legal dispute, but its not the best way to get at the truth, as I think lawyers would be the first to admit. It s not just that you miss subtleties this way. The real problem is that you can t change the question. And yet this principle is built into the very structure of the things they teac
18、h you to write in high school. The topic sentence is your thesis, chosen in advance, the supporting paragraphs the blows you strike in the conflict, and the conclusion - uh, what is the conclusion? I was never sure about that in high school. It seemed as if we were just supposed to restate what we s
19、aid in the first paragraph, but in different enough words that no one could tell. Why bother? But when you understand the origins of this sort of “essay,“ you can see where the conclusion comes from. Its the concluding remarks to the jury. Good writing should be convincing, certainly, but it should
20、be convincing because you got the right answers, not because you did a good job of arguing. When I give a draft of an essay to friends, there are two things I want to know: which parts bore them, and which seem unconvincing. The boring bits can usually be fixed by cutting. But I don t try to fix the
21、 unconvincing bits by arguing more cleverly. The sort of writing that attempts to persuade may be a valid (or at least inevitable) form, but it s historically inaccurate to call it an essay. An essay is something you write to try to figure something out. Figure out what? You don t know yet. And so y
22、ou can t begin with a thesis, because you don t have one, and may never have one. An essay doesnt begin with a statement, but with a question. In a real essay, you don t take a position and defend it. You notice a door that s ajar, and you open it and walk in to see what s inside. In the things you
23、write in school you are, in theory, merely explaining yourself to the reader. In a real essay you re writing for yourself. You re thinking out loud. Questions arent enough. An essay has to come up with answers. They don t always, of course. Some- times you start with a promising question and get now
24、here. But those you don t publish. Those are like experiments that get inconclusive results. An essay you publish ought to tell the reader something he didnt already know. But what you tell him doesnt matter, so long as it s interesting. I m sometimes accused of meandering. In defend-a-position writ
- 1.请仔细阅读文档,确保文档完整性,对于不预览、不比对内容而直接下载带来的问题本站不予受理。
- 2.下载的文档,不会出现我们的网址水印。
- 3、该文档所得收入(下载+内容+预览)归上传者、原创作者;如果您是本文档原作者,请点此认领!既往收益都归您。
下载文档到电脑,查找使用更方便
2000 积分 0人已下载
下载 | 加入VIP,交流精品资源 |
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 外语类 试卷 大学 英语六级 模拟 176 答案 解析 DOC
