[外语类试卷]专业英语四级(阅读)模拟试卷3及答案与解析.doc
《[外语类试卷]专业英语四级(阅读)模拟试卷3及答案与解析.doc》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《[外语类试卷]专业英语四级(阅读)模拟试卷3及答案与解析.doc(17页珍藏版)》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。
1、专业英语四级(阅读)模拟试卷 3及答案与解析 0 A fast-food restaurant within about 500 feet of a school may lead to at least a 5 percent increase in the overweight rate at that school, according to a study released on Friday. The study, conducted by economists at Columbia University and the University California , Berkel
2、ey, suggests that “ a ban on fast foods in the immediate proximity of schools could have a sizable effect on obesity rates among affected students. “ The researchers looked at how proximity to the restaurants affected obesity rates among 3 million ninth graders at California schools, and more than 1
3、 million pregnant women in Michigan, New Jersey and Texas. They focused on the ninth graders, typically about 14 years old, in part because the students get a fitness test in the spring about 30 weeks after starting school and exposure to fast food. The study, released by the American Association of
4、 Wine Economists, showed that “ the presence of a fast-food restaurant within a tenth of a mile of a school is associated with at least a 5. 2 percent increase in the obesity rate in that school. “ It also found that pregnant women who lived within a tenth of a mile of a fast-food restaurant had “a
5、4. 4 percent increase in the probability of gaining over 20 kilos(44 pounds). The study follows one presented last month at an American Stroke Association conference. Researchers from the University of Michigan found people who live in neighborhoods packed with fast-food restaurants are more likely
6、to suffer strokes. In December, a study found that youth who study within a half mile from a fast-food outlet eat fewer fruit and vegetables, drink more soda and are more likely to be obese than students at other schools. Janet Currie, lead researcher of the wine economists study, said that it might
7、 be a good policy to have a fast-food-free zone if fast food near schools causes obesity. “ It would not be so different in spirit from existing policies that aim to prohibit soft drinks and junk foods in schools or to improve the quality of school lunch, “ she said. A spokeswoman for Yum! Brands, t
8、he parent company of KFC, Pizza Hut, Taco Bell and Long John Silvers, declined to comment, saying she had not seen the study. Burger King did not return calls seeking comment. A McDonalds spokeswoman referred calls to the National Retail Federation, a trade group in Washington. “I think it would be
9、a dangerous precedent to limit the types of legitimate, important businesses and where theyre located in a city, “ federation spokeswoman Ellen Davis said. “Doesnt it make more sense for parents to limit a childs allowance or let them know when and where they cant eat certain things?“ Davis added th
10、at restaurants have changed their menus in the last five years, especially for childrens meals. “ We see many healthy options available slices of apple, milk instead of sodas. Its important to note that many chain restaurants have tried to diversify their menus and make them healthier. 1 Which of th
11、e following is INCORRECT about the study mentioned in Paragraph 2? ( A) It agreed that fast foods should be far away from school. ( B) It didnt research the people in Columbia. ( C) It proved that fast foods may lead to strokes. ( D) It showed that children had worse situation than pregnant women. 2
12、 “It“ in Paragraph 6 refers to_. ( A) obesity ( B) the above study ( C) fast food ( D) a good policy 3 Which of the following can we infer from the last three paragraphs? ( A) McDonalds shared the same opinion with Ellen Davis. ( B) Yum! Brands held different opinion from Burger King. ( C) Janet Cur
13、rie preferred new policy to present policies. ( D) Ellen Davis thought limiting childrens money made no sense. 4 According to the passage, which may NOT be the reason for childrens overweight? ( A) Eating fewer fruit and vegetables. ( B) Being unaware of self-control. ( C) School lunch of low qualit
14、y. ( D) Restaurants changing menus for children. 4 Student loans are based on a simple idea: that a graduates future flow of earnings will more than cover the costs of doing a degree. But with unemployment rates in parts of the rich world at post-war highs, that may no longer hold true for many peop
15、le. The consequences will be felt by everybody. All over the world student indebtedness is causing problems witness this months violent protests in Chile. In Britain, according to a recent parliamentary report, rising university fees mean that student debt is likely to treble to 70 billion by 2015.
16、But, partly because higher education there is so expensive, the scale of the problem is far greater in America. When the next official estimates of outstanding student debt there are published, it is expected to be close to $1 trillion, higher than credit-card borrowing. Credit quality in other clas
17、ses of consumer debt has been improving; delinquency rates on student loans are rising. Many of the anti-Wall Street protesters push the idea of blanket debt forgiveness as a solution. But that is the wrong answer. Higher education is not a guarantee of employment, but it improves the odds immensely
18、. Unemployment rates among university graduates stood at 4.4% on average across OECD countries in 2009. People who did not complete secondary school faced unemployment rates of 11.5%. Much of the debt that students are taking on is provided or guaranteed by the government. Imposing write-offs on all
19、 taxpayers to benefit those with the best job prospects is unfair; and ripping up contracts between borrowers and private lenders is usually a bad idea. That said, student-loan systems in America and elsewhere are often badly designed for an extended period of high unemployment. In contrast to the h
20、ousing crash, the risk from student debt is not of a sudden explosion in losses but of gradual financial suffocation. The pressure needs to be eased. One option is to change the bankruptcy laws. In America, Britain and elsewhere, these treat student debt as a special case: unlike other forms of debt
21、, it cannot be wiped out. If student debt is not to bound existing graduates and put off future ones, the rules could be changed so that it is dischargeable in bankruptcy. Yet the reasoning behind the current bankruptcy provisions is logical enough; education is an asset that cannot be repossessed a
22、nd that keeps on benefiting the individual through his or her lifetime. Some worry that graduates would rush to declare bankruptcy, handing losses to taxpayers. So a second option is preferable. Many countries, America included, have designed student debt primarily as a mortgage-like obligation: it
23、is repaid to a fixed schedule. Other places, like Britain and Australia, make student-loan repayments contingent(依情况而定的 )on reaching an income threshold so that the prospect of taking on debt is more acceptable to people from poorer backgrounds. That approach makes sense, especially when jobs are sc
24、arce. Barack Obama this week proposed to limit loan payments for some struggling American graduates to 10% of discretionary(任意的 )income and forgive outstanding debt after 20 years. Income-based repayment ought to become the norm. Both changes would lead to a repricing of student debt. That would be
- 1.请仔细阅读文档,确保文档完整性,对于不预览、不比对内容而直接下载带来的问题本站不予受理。
- 2.下载的文档,不会出现我们的网址水印。
- 3、该文档所得收入(下载+内容+预览)归上传者、原创作者;如果您是本文档原作者,请点此认领!既往收益都归您。
下载文档到电脑,查找使用更方便
2000 积分 0人已下载
下载 | 加入VIP,交流精品资源 |
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 外语类 试卷 专业 英语四 阅读 模拟 答案 解析 DOC
