AASHTO SSFP-2016 SURVEY OF STATE FUNDING FOR PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION (Revision 10).pdf

《AASHTO SSFP-2016 SURVEY OF STATE FUNDING FOR PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION (Revision 10).pdf》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《AASHTO SSFP-2016 SURVEY OF STATE FUNDING FOR PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION (Revision 10).pdf（226页珍藏版）》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。

1、Survey of State Funding Public Transportation Final Report 2016FY 2014 Dataii 2016 by the American Association of State Highway and T ransportation Officials.All rights reserved. Duplication is a violation of applicable law .Characteristics of State Funding for Public TransportationFY 2010 Character

2、istics of State Funding for Public Transportation The following report provides a summary of state transit funding for the 50 states and the District of Columbia (DC). Information includes funding sources, amounts, programs, eligible uses and allocation, and per capita state transit funding. The rep

3、ort was prepared by East Mesa Research coordinating housing, land use, and transportation policy to support transit-friendly development; and using public transportation as a tool to accommodate increasing travel demand. Public transportation is essential to moving people in both urban and rural are

4、as and is a critical part of the nation s multimodal transportation system. Public transportation also provides basic mobility options for elderly individuals, individuals with disabilities, and low- income individuals. Public transportation continues to play a significant role in state and national

5、 efforts to mitigate traffic congestion, conserve fuel, enhance the efficiency of highway transportation, address air quality issues, and support security and emer gency preparedness activities. As our nation s population is expected to top 400 million by 2050 and the population of seniors is expect

6、ed to slightly more than double by this time, our member depart- ments of transportation must continue to provide public transportation as a mobility option.Historical funding patterns demonstrate the important role that state departments of transportation fulfill in public transportation finance an

7、d administration and the results you see in the Survey of State Funding for Publi- Transportation reflects this ongoing commitment. State DOT s spent approximately $17.2 billion on transit in FY 2014, which is an increase over the past five years when states spent $13.6 billion in FY 2010. It s impo

8、rtant that these investments continue in order to grow our public transportation system.The Survey of State Funding for Public Transportation is viewed by the public transportation industry , nation- al associations, Federal, and state governments as one of the most comprehensive resources on state

9、involvement in public transportation. On behalf of the Standing Committee on Public T ransportation, we would like to thank the AASHT O member departments for completing the survey .W e hope you find this report a useful reference as you continue to support public transportation in your state. Since

10、rely , Bud Wright Executive Director AASHTO Charles Zelle Chair, AASHTO Standing Committee on Public T ransportation Minnesota Deaparment of T ransportation 2016 by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. All rights reserved. Duplication is a violation of applicable l

11、aw. 2016 by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. All rights reserved. Duplication is a violation of applicable law.Survey of State Funding for Public Transportation v T able of ContentsPart I: Highlights of State Transit FundingFY 2014 .1-1State Funding of Public T

12、ransit 1-1Comparing State and Federal Funding of Public Transit 1-3State Transit Programs across the United States 1-5Sources of State Funds . 1-5Eligible Uses for State Transit Funding . 1-6Some Select Examples of State Transit Funds Usage . 1-6Changes in State Transit Funding 1-11T otal State and

13、Per Capita Funding 1-13T otal Transit Systems, Metropolitan Planning Organizations, and Types of Local Funding by State .1-16Inf ormation on Non-T ransit Specific State and F ederal Pr ograms .1-19 Part 2: State Transit Programs 2-1Methodology . 2-1Alabama 2-2Alaska 2-3Arizona . 2-6Arkansas . 2-7Cal

14、ifornia 2-10Colorado 2-16Connecticut .2-19Delaware 2-23District of Columbia .2-27Florida .2-32Georgia .2-37Hawaii .2-41Idaho .2-42Illinois 2-45Indiana.2-48Iowa .2-51Kansas .2-54Kentucky 2-58Louisiana 2-62Maine 2-65 2016 by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. All r

15、ights reserved. Duplication is a violation of applicable law.viMaryland 2-68Massachusetts .2-74Michigan .2-78Minnesota 2-82Mississippi 2-88Missouri 2-91Montana .2-94Nebraska 2-97 Nevada 2-100New Hampshire .2-103 New Jersey 2-107 New Mexico 2-110 New Y ork .2-113 North Carolina .2-121 North Dakota .2

16、-129 Ohio 2-132 Oklahoma 2-137 Oregon .2-141 Pennsylvania .2-146Rhode Island 2-152 South Carolina 2-157South Dakota 2-162Tennessee .2-165Texas .2-171Utah 2-174Vermont .2-175Virginia 2-178Washington .2-183W est Virginia .2-190 Wisconsin 2-193Wyoming 2-196 2016 by the American Association of State Hig

17、hway and Transportation Officials. All rights reserved. Duplication is a violation of applicable law.Survey of State Funding for Public Transportation vii List of T ablesTable 1-1 State Funding of Public Transit by Select Years 1-2Table 1-2 States with Increased Funding for Public Transportation by

18、Amount of Increase . 1-3Table 1-3 Federal and State Funding for Public Transit by Select Years 1-5Table 1-4 Major Sources for Overall Transit Funding 1-8Table 1-5 Eligible Uses for State Transit Funding 1-10Table 1-6 Changes in State Transit Funding Levels for FY 2014 and FY 2010 1-12Table 1-7 Repor

19、ted Investment for 51 DOTs by T otal Funding 1-14Table 1-8 Reported Investment for 51 DOTs by Per Capita Funding .1-15Table 1-9 Number of Transit Systems and MPOs .1-17Table 1-10 Sources of Local Transit Funding 1-18 List of FiguresFigure 1-1 State and Federal Funding for Public Transit 1-4Figure 1-

20、2 Per Capita Funding by Population and Transit Operator Status, 2014. 1-13 2016 by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. All rights reserved. Duplication is a violation of applicable law.Survey of State Funding for Public Transportation 1-1 PART 1 Highlights of Stat

21、e Transit FundingFY 2014Survey of State Funding for Public Transportation 1-1 1.0 Highlights of State Transit FundingFY 2014 This report, the 34 thcompilation of information on state funding for public transportation, was prepared under the auspices of the American Association of State Highway and T

22、ransportation Officials (AASHTO). State Funding of Public Transit Table 1-1 (on the next page) shows that state funding for public transit for the last five years has steadily increased from $13.6 billion in FY 2010 to $17.2 billion in FY 2014. Twenty states increased their public transit funding by

23、 a total of $3.0 billion over FY 2013 levels (see Table 1-2) including Illinois up $2.2 billion (included capital funding for the whole state this year, not just downstate funding), New York up $320 million, Massachusetts up $158 million, and Minnesota up $110 million. Seven DOTs account for 99 perc

24、ent of all funding increases: Illinois, New York, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Pennsylvania, District of Columbia, and Florida. Nineteen states showed a decline in funding and 12 showed no change in funding levels, including five states that do not fund public transit. 2016 by the American Association

25、of State Highway and Transportation Officials. All rights reserved. Duplication is a violation of applicable law.1-2Survey of State Funding for Public Transportation 1-2 Table 1-1. State Funding of Public Transit by Select Years State FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 Alabama $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Alaska

26、$98,131,650 $169,270,513 $179,978,475 $181,562,047 $187,652,905 Arizona $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Arkansas $4,022,623 $3,250,078 $3,476,547 $3,481,243 $3,550,045 California $1,731,332,723 $1,731,332,723 $1,849,193,635 $3,040,697,663 $2,259,430,056 Colorado $12,673,390 $12,350,000 $12,350,000 $14,000,000 $14,00

27、0,000 Connecticut $307,341,611 $411,810,210 $453,476,446 $474,333,253 $465,086,221 Delaware $81,526,200 $83,942,400 $82,731,400 $95,272,500 $100,601,100 DC $322,038,009 $387,362,000 $484,165,796 $454,788,000 $507,890,000 Florida $184,515,903 $174,895,126 $217,309,774 $189,254,448 $229,673,093 Georgi

28、a $2,172,519 $3,721,358 $2,920,272 $2,949,962 $3,342,964 Hawaii $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Idaho $312,000 $312,000 $312,000 $312,000 $312,000 Illinois $589,000,000 $1,323,000,000 $814,447,610 $854,683,301 $3,118,234,749 Indiana $54,670,617 $55,177,788 $56,018,794 $57,909,868 $57,909,867 Iowa $10,888,954 $12,744

29、,547 $12,898,990 $12,898,990 $12,723,031 Kansas $6,000,000 $6,000,000 $6,000,000 $6,000,000 $11,000,000 Kentucky $1,411,941 $1,472,766 $1,489,991 $1,745,712 $1,867,907 Louisiana $4,955,000 $4,955,000 $4,955,000 $4,955,000 $4,955,000 Maine $530,026 $530,026 $530,026 $547,845 $1,147,845 Maryland $889,

30、306,199 $1,049,499,695 $1,086,510,064 $1,522,123,479 $906,699,174 Massachusetts $1,376,366,390 $1,206,947,412 $1,245,380,962 $1,392,854,042 $1,550,905,555 Michigan $198,429,976 $214,975,143 $240,436,975 $271,830,940 $245,125,303 Minnesota $270,639,000 $263,250,400 $309,427,000 $307,652,000 $418,061,

31、000 Mississippi $1,600,000 $1,600,000 $1,600,000 $1,600,000 $1,600,000 Missouri $6,247,415 $2,993,658 $2,993,658 $560,875 $3,417,258 Montana $447,258 $319,862 $319,142 $546,025 $377,895 Nebraska $3,000,000 $2,900,000 $2,900,000 $2,900,000 $4,872,884 Nevada $0 $666,819 $107,115 $37,501 $0 New Hampshi

32、re $494,499 $422,153 $243,687 $52,597 $679,281 New Jersey $1,157,687,425 $773,423,628 $918,027,433 $1,076,490,515 $381,686,937 New Mexico $18,417,089 $11,187,647 $6,665,448 $7,610,500 $6,643,800 New York $4,352,344,700 $4,246,055,900 $4,465,883,700 $4,465,883,700 $4,786,084,700 North Carolina $74,94

33、7,962 $74,947,962 $73,574,654 $84,643,069 $79,356,533 North Dakota $3,150,000 $3,150,000 $3,151,595 $5,296,836 $5,216,175 Ohio $10,838,642 $10,638,436 $7,300,000 $7,300,000 $7,300,000 Oklahoma $6,082,500 $5,750,000 $5,750,000 $5,750,000 $5,750,000 Oregon $108,055,325 $132,292,392 $32,669,819 $40,394

34、,560 $32,669,819 Pennsylvania $1,225,108,058 $1,055,849,793 $1,091,936,432 $1,161,119,714 $1,237,148,591 Rhode Island $53,538,011 $56,940,909 $53,072,997 $51,629,898 $55,819,226 South Carolina $6,000,000 $6,000,000 $6,000,000 $6,000,000 $6,000,000 South Dakota $770,000 $770,000 $770,000 $770,000 $77

35、0,000 Tennessee $35,926,509 $44,349,000 $44,499,000 $40,060,100 $49,889,987 Texas $28,741,068 $28,741,068 $30,341,068 $31,941,067 $30,341,068 Utah $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Vermont $6,328,234 $6,842,927 $6,842,927 $7,482,900 $7,436,700 Virginia $189,478,095 $201,357,502 $239,202,753 $262,284,774 $251,381,851 W

36、ashington $57,212,206 $80,017,638 $52,775,879 $59,882,611 $52,956,037 West Virginia $2,832,932 $2,786,009 $2,786,009 $2,786,009 $2,677,058 Wisconsin $132,065,500 $115,724,700 $117,851,500 $106,478,300 $109,228,300 Wyoming $2,495,659 $2,615,350 $2,522,468 $2,696,122 $2,522,468 TOTALS $13,630,073,818

37、$13,985,142,538 $14,233,797,041 $16,322,049,966 $17,221,994,383 2016 by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. All rights reserved. Duplication is a violation of applicable law.Survey of State Funding for Public Transportation 1-3Survey of State Funding for Public Tr

38、ansportation 1-3 Table 1-2. States with Increased Funding for Public Transit by Amount of Increase State FY2013 FY2014 Increase % Increase Illinois $854,683,301 $3,118,234,749 $2,263,551,448 264.8% New York $4,465,883,700 $4,786,084,700 $320,201,000 7.2% Massachusetts $1,392,854,042 $1,550,905,555 $

39、158,051,513 11.3% Minnesota $307,652,000 $418,061,000 $110,409,000 35.9% Pennsylvania $1,161,119,714 $1,237,148,591 $76,028,877 6.5% DC $454,788,000 $507,890,000 $53,102,000 11.7% Florida $189,254,448 $229,673,093 $40,418,645 21.4% Tennessee $40,060,100 $49,889,987 $9,829,887 24.5% Alaska $181,562,0

40、47 $187,652,905 $6,090,858 3.4% Delaware $95,272,500 $100,601,100 $5,328,600 5.6% Kansas $6,000,000 $11,000,000 $5,000,000 83.3% Rhode Island $51,629,898 $55,819,226 $4,189,328 8.1% Missouri $560,875 $3,417,258 $2,856,383 509.3% Wisconsin $106,478,300 $109,228,300 $2,750,000 2.6% Nebraska $2,900,000

41、 $4,872,884 $1,972,884 68.0% New Hampshire $52,597 $679,281 $626,684 1191.5% Maine $547,845 $1,147,845 $600,000 109.5% Georgia $2,949,962 $3,342,964 $393,002 13.3% Kentucky $1,745,712 $1,867,907 $122,195 7.0% Arkansas $3,481,243 $3,550,045 $68,802 2.0% $9,319,476,284 $12,381,067,390 $3,061,591,106 C

42、omparing State and Federal Funding of Public Transit In FY2014, states provided $17.2 billion in transit funding, while Federal funds totaled $10.6 billion. Figure 1-1 shows the total of state and Federal transit funding for each of the 51 DOTs surveyed. The figure shows that there is a strong relat

43、ionship between state and Federal funding. Specifically the six states with the largest state funding amountsNew York, Illinois, California, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, and Maryland collectively allotted $13.8 billion in state funding. About $4.8 billionalmost half of all Federal funds spent on tra

44、nsitwent to these six states. The remaining 45 states allotted a total of $3.4 billion in state funding and shared about $5.7 billion in Federal funds. The difference between the relatively low percentage of Federal funding used by the selected larger states, compared to the larger percentage of Fed

45、eral funding used by the other smaller states, is largely the result of the Federal formula used to annually apportion available Federal funding. The strong relationship between state and Federal funding is, in large part, a function of state population served and for this reason, the relationship is not always apparent. Population is a 2016 by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. All rights reserved. Duplication is a violation of applicable law.