API PUBL 348 V3-1997 Air Toxics Emission Factors for Combustion Sources Using Petroleum-Based Fuels - Volume 3 Development of Emission Factors Using API WSPA Approach《使用石油基燃料燃烧源的有毒.pdf

《API PUBL 348 V3-1997 Air Toxics Emission Factors for Combustion Sources Using Petroleum-Based Fuels - Volume 3 Development of Emission Factors Using API WSPA Approach《使用石油基燃料燃烧源的有毒.pdf》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《API PUBL 348 V3-1997 Air Toxics Emission Factors for Combustion Sources Using Petroleum-Based Fuels - Volume 3 Development of Emission Factors Using API WSPA Approach《使用石油基燃料燃烧源的有毒.pdf（274页珍藏版）》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。

1、 and if they are not reported, circle “bk Other Comments Revised: May 3, 1995 3-2 CARB 11 11 JUNE83.XLS Device ID: SAMPUNO EQUIPME“ Field Ow Gas Meter 1.) Not checked pre- and post-test? 2.) Pre- and post-test Y not within (+/-) 5%? SAMWNOPCEWRES *Sample Time gmla gmlb M gm2a gm2b M 3-3 SOURCE TEST

2、METHOD DETAILED VALIDATION CHECKLIST TestMethod: CARB 12-Marck 1986 Substance: Inorganic Lead Report ID Number: Reviewer: Review Date: - Method Description and Applicability sources. Particulate and gaseous Pb emissions are withdrawn isokinctically and collected on a filter and/or in dilute nitric a

3、cid nie samples are then digested and analyzed by atomic absorption spectrometry using an air acetylene flame. This method is applicable to the determination of inorganic lead emissions from stationary Quality AssurancdQuality Control Ckcks Please complete the detaiied checklist provided in attached

4、 Tabk. If the s and if they an not reported, circle “bs. in addition to completing the checklist please answer the following questions: 1 .) 2.) Enter the digestion date). 3 .) What digestion method was used? Number of impingas: O. 1 “03 (2) - Empty ( 1)- Silica Gel ( 1) - Blank Procedure method, th

5、e abnhnce reading from the sample needs to be corrected for the absorbance readings from the filter auci nitric blanks. Then is no criteria for the blank levels, they just need to be perfod and Please be sure that the blank data was applied and considered comctly. For this particular for in the samp

6、le values. Other Comments Revised: November U, i994 CAM 12 3-4 12MAR86.XLS Device ID: 1 .) Atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS) not used? 2.) Not conducted in triplicate? mtl a mtlb M m t2a mt2b M 3-5 CALCULATION CHECK FR CARB METHOD 12 Device ID: RECANGULAR STACK. LENGTH 0.44Cco2.m)+.UII 1oo1Co2nXc

7、cozm)l I Md lug -moicl 28.00 WFT STACK GAS MOLECULAR WEKiHF. I I I I = 13.61 7s*VmSod/n %smAnomia*( I -8ws DATA CNIR Y-ANALYTICAL mAL MASS OF LEAD IS SAMPLE TRAIN CALCULATED DATA-WERAU CONCENTRAIION OF LEAD Revised: 11/14/94 3-6 SOURCE TEST METHOD DETAILED VALIDATION CHECKLUT Test Meth and if they a

8、re not reported, circle “b“s. Other Comments Revised: November 14. L994 cm IS 3-8 15JUN83.XLS Device ID: This table applies only to on-site OC analysis. M-Method a-True R-RUn b-Not reported S-Substance 3-9 SOURCE TEST METHOD DETAILED VALIDATION CHECKLIST Test Method:- CARB 10lA - March, 1986 Substan

9、ce: Mercury Report ID Number: Reviewer: Review Date: Method Description and Applicabiliv This method is applicable to the determination of mercury emissions from stationary sources. Particulate and gaseous mercury emissions are withdrawn isokinetically from the source and collected in acidic potassi

10、um permanganate (KMn4) solution. The Hg collected (in the mercuric form) is reduced to elemental Hg which is then aerated from the solution into an optical cell and measured by atomic absorption spectrometry. Quality AssurancdQuulity Control Checks - Please complete the detailed checklist provided i

11、n the attached Table. If the statements are true, please circle “a“s or the corresponding run numbers; and if they are not reported, circle “a”s. In addition to completing the checklist please answer the following questions: _. 1 .) 2.) Enter the digestion date). 3 .) What digestion method was used?

12、 Number of Impinges 50 mi 4% KMn4 (1) - 100 ml 4% KMnO4 (1)- Empty (1 optional) -Silica Gel (1) - Bhk Procedure Please be sure that the blank data was applied and considered correctly. For this particular method, the average peak height (or peak area) of the blank should have been subtracted from th

13、e average peak height of the aliquot standards. Revised: May 3, 1995 CARB 101A 3-10 Other Comments Revised: May 3, 1995 y- CARB 101A 3-1 1 1 O1 AMAR86.XLS Device ID: M-Method a-Tme R-RW b-Not reported S-Substance 3-1 2 CALCULATION CHECK FOR CARB METHOD 101A MW = Md( 1-BWS)+18.O(BWS) ABSOLUTE STACK P

14、RESSURE, PS = Pbar + Pd13.6 STACK GAS VELOC“ Device iD: Mw glg -mole #DIVIO! R in. Hg 0.00 - - _- - - . DATA ENTRY-SAMPLING SYMBOL UNITS DATA RUN NUMBER ROUND STACK, DLAMETER inches vs = 85.49 Cp sqrt(dPLTs) /(Ps*Mw) 1 ACTUAL STACK GAS FLOW RATE, Q = M*vs*As DRY GAS STACK FLOW RATE (DRY,STP) RECTANG

15、ULAR STACK LENGTH vs fris #DIV/O! Q acflmin #DIVIO! 0.44(Cco2.m)+.28( 100-(Co2,m)-(Cco2.m)1 -mole I 28.00 WET STACK GAS MOLECULAR WEIGHT. I I I MChg = (35.3 1 *Mhg)/Vmstd ARSENIC MASS EMISSION RATE Ehg = (Qsd8Mhg)Nmstd)*l.32e-4 MChg mg/dscm #DIVIO! Ehg 1Whr #DIVIO! Qsd = 17.64+Q*(l-Bws)*(P/T) I Qsd

16、Idscfrminl IYDIVIO! ISOKINETIC RATE, I I Revised: 5/3/95 3-1 3 SOURCE TEST METHOD DETAILED VALIDATION CHECKLIST Test Method- CARI3 104 - March, 1986 Substance: Beryllium Report ID Number: Reviewer: Review Date: Method Description and Applicability sources. Beryllium emissions are withdrawn isokineti

17、cally and the collected sample is digested in and acid solution and analyzed by atomic absorption spectrometry. This method is applicable to the determination of beryllium emissions from stationary Quality AssurancdQuality Control Checks Please complete the detailed checklist provided in the attache

18、d Table. If the statements are true, please circle “ars or the corresponding run numbers; and if they arenot reported, circle “a%. In addition to completing the checklist please answer the following questions: 1 .) 2.) Enter _. the digestion date(s). 3 .) What digestion method was used? Number of hn

19、pingers: H20 (2) - Empty (1)- Silica Gel (i) - Blank Procedure method, the total amount of beryllium detected in the sample is corrected for the total amount of beryllium detected in the acetone and water blanks. There is no criteria for the blank levels, they just need to be performed and corrected

20、 for the sample values. Please be sure that the blank data was applied and considered correctly. For this particular Other Comments Revised: May 3, 1995 CARB 104 3-1 4 104MAR86.XLS Device ID: M-Method a-True R-RUn b-Not reported S-Substance 3-1 5 MCbe = (35.3 I *Mbe)Nmstd ARSENIC MASS EMISSION RATE

21、Ebe = (Qsd*Mbe)Nmstd)* 1.32e-4 Revised: 5/3/95 3-1 6 MCbe mgidscm #DIV/O! Ebe Ibhr #DW/O! CAM 104 SOURCE TEST METHOD DETAILED VALIDATION CHECKLIST Test Method: CARE 106 - June, 1983 Substance: Vinyl Chloride Report iD Number: Reviewer: Review Date: Method Description and Applicability This method is

22、 applicable to the measurement of vinyl chloride in stack gases. An integrated bag sample of stack gas is subjected to chromatographic analysis, using a flame ionization detector. Quality AssurancdQuaiity Control Checks Please complete the detailed checklist provided in the attached Table . if the statements are true, please circle “a% or the componing run num; and if they an not nported circle “bs. -. Other Comments Revised: November 14,1994 3-17 CARB i06 106JUN83.XLS Device ID: M-Method a-True R-Rui b-Not reported S-Substance 3-1 8