大学四级-44及答案解析.doc
《大学四级-44及答案解析.doc》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《大学四级-44及答案解析.doc(59页珍藏版)》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。
1、大学四级-44 及答案解析(总分:713.00,做题时间:90 分钟)一、BPart Writing(总题数:1,分数:106.00)1.近年来,在全民炒股的热潮下,在校大学生也参与了进来2. 在校生炒股利弊3. 你的看法或建议On College Students Participation in the Stock Market_(分数:106.00)_二、BPart Reading (总题数:1,分数:70.00)Directions: In this part, you will have 15 minutes to go over the passage quickly and an
2、swer the questions on Answer Sheet 1. For questions 1-7, choose the best answer from the four choices marked A), B), C) and D ). For questions 8-10, complete the sentences with the information given in the passage.The Laws of NatureThe phrase “A law of Nature“ is probably rarer in modern scientific
3、writing than was the case some generations ago. This is partly due to a very natural objection to the use of the word “law“ in two different senses. Human societies have laws. In primitive societies there is no distinction between law and custom. Some things are done, others are not. This is regarde
4、d as part of the nature of things, and generally as an unalterable fact. If customs change, the change is too slow to be observed. Later on kings and prophets could promulgate (公布) new laws, but there was no way of revoking old ones. The Greek democracies made the great and revolutionary discovery t
5、hat a community could consciously make new laws and repeal old ones. So for us a human law is something which is valid only over a certain number of people for a certain period of time.Laws of Nature, however, are not commands but statements of facts. The use of the same word is unfortunate. It woul
6、d be better to speak of uniformities of Nature. This would do away with the elementary fallacy (谬论) that a law implies a law-giver. Incidentally, it might just as well imply a parliament or soviet of atoms. But the difference between the two uses of the word is fundamental. If a piece of matter does
7、 not obey a law of Nature it is not punished. On the contrary, we say that the law has been incorrectly stated, It is quite probable that every law of Nature so far stated has been stated incorrectly. Certainly many of them have. Nevertheless, these inaccurately stated laws are of immense practical
8、and theoretical value.They fall into two classes qualitative laws such as “All animals with feathers have beaks“, and quantitative laws such as “Mercury (汞) has 13,596 times the density of water“ (at 0 and 1 atmospheres pressure). The first of these is a very good guide. But it was probably not true
9、 in the past. For many birds which were certainly feathered had teeth and may not have had beaks. And it is quite possibly not today. There are about a hundred thousand million birds on our planet, and it may well be that two or three of them are freaks (怪胎) which have not developed a beak. But have
10、 lived long enough to grow feathers. It was thought tobe a law of Nature that female mammals (defined as warm-blooded vertebrates with hair) had mammary glands, until Prof. Crew of Edinburgh found that many congenitally hairless female mice lacked these organs, though they could bear young which oth
11、er females could then foster.And quantitative laws generally turn out to be inexact. Thus water is nothing definite. It is a mixture of at least six different substances. For in the molecule H2O, one or both of the hydrogen atoms may be either light or heavy, and so may the oxygen atom. Similarly, m
12、ercury consists of several different types of atom. Thus the ratio of the densities of mercury and water is not fixed, though in the case of ordinary samples the variation is too small to be detected. But it can be detected if the water happens to have been taken from an accumulator which has been u
13、sed for some time.In his Theory of Probability (Oxford, 1939) Jeffreys has something new to say about induction. Two contradictory theories are in vogue as to the laws of Nature. The older view is that they are absolute, though of course they may have been inaccurately formulated. The extreme positi
14、vistic view, enunciated by Vaihinger, is that we can only say that phenomena occur as if certain laws held. There is no sense in making any definite statements, though it is convenient to do so.Now Jeffreys points out that, if a number of observations have been found to conform to a law, it is highl
15、y probable that the next one will do so whether the law is true or not. In Jeffreys words: “A well-verified hypothesis will probably continue to lead to correct inferences (推论) even if it is wrong. “Positivists (实证主义者) and idealists (唯心主义者) have made great play with the fact that many laws of Nature
16、, as formulated by scientists, have turned out to be inexact, and all may do so. But that is absolutely no reason for saying that there are no regularities in Nature to which our statements of natural law correspond. One might as well say that because no maps of England give its shape exactly it has
17、 to shape.What is remarkable about the laws of Nature is the accuracy of simple approximations. One might see a hundred thousand men before finding an exception to the rule that all men have two ears, and the same is true for many of the laws of physics. In some cases we can see why. The universe is
18、 organized in aggregates (总数), with, in many cases, pretty wide gaps between them. Boyles law that the density of a gas is proportional to its pressure, and Charles law that the volume is proportional to the temperature, would be exact if gas molecules were points which had no volume and did not att
19、ract one another. These laws are very nearly true for gases at ordinary temperatures and pressures, because the molecules occupy only a small part of the space containing the gas, and are close enough to attract one another only during a very small part of any interval of time. Similarly, most of th
20、e stars are far enough apart to be treated as points without much error when we are considering their movements.And most men manage to protect themselves from injury so far as is needed to keep both ears. Whereas trees cannot protect themselves from the loss of branches. It is very rare to see a com
21、pletely unmutilated, and therefore completely regular, tree. Mendels laws, according to which two types occur in a ratio of 1:1 in some cases and 3:1 in others, are theoretically true if the processes of division of cell nuclei (原子核) are quite regular, and if neither type is unfit so as to die off b
22、efore counts are made. The first condition never holds, and the second probably never does. But the exceptions to the first condition are very rare. In one particular case a critical division goes wrong about one in ten thousand times. The effect of this on a 1:1 ratio or 3:1 ratio could be detected
23、 only by counting several hundred million plants or animals. Differences in relative fitness are more important. But even so the Mendelian ratios are sometimes fulfilled with extreme accuracy, and are generally a good rough guide.Jeffreys points out that in such cases it is often much better to stic
- 1.请仔细阅读文档,确保文档完整性,对于不预览、不比对内容而直接下载带来的问题本站不予受理。
- 2.下载的文档,不会出现我们的网址水印。
- 3、该文档所得收入(下载+内容+预览)归上传者、原创作者;如果您是本文档原作者,请点此认领!既往收益都归您。
下载文档到电脑,查找使用更方便
2000 积分 0人已下载
下载 | 加入VIP,交流精品资源 |
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 大学 44 答案 解析 DOC
