大学六级-921及答案解析.doc
《大学六级-921及答案解析.doc》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《大学六级-921及答案解析.doc(45页珍藏版)》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。
1、大学六级-921 及答案解析(总分:667.00,做题时间:90 分钟)一、Part Writing(总题数:1,分数:106.00)1.虚假广告泛滥2. 虚假广告的危害3. 如何杜绝虚假广告False Advertisements_ _(分数:106.00)_二、Part Reading Compr(总题数:4,分数:70.00)Why Winners Win atThe new science of triumph in sports, business, and life.As a quickly rising new star in professional tennis, Andre
2、 Agassi had undergone bitter failure by the early 1990s,losing games again and again. Things have changed since he hired the coach, Brad Gilbert. Gilbert criticized him for trying to play with perfection. Instead of risking a killer shot on every point, why not keep the ball in play and give the oth
3、er guy a chance to lose? Gilbert told Agassi “Its all about your head. With your talent, if youre fifty percent game-wise, but ninety-five percent head-wise, youre going to win.“ Since that, Agassi began to pull out wins in matches that the old Agassi would have lost and got No.1 ranking at last. Be
4、cause he had learned how to win.What is it that separates winners from losers? The proper answer is that, in sports at least, winners simply have certain things that mortals dont, such as better physical conditions. But fitness doesnt tell the full story.“ There are more players that have the talent
5、 to be the best in the world than there are winners,“ says Timothy Gallwey, the author of several books about the mental side of tennis, golf, and other pursuits. “One way of looking at it is that winners get in their own way less. They interfere with the raw expression of talent less. And to do tha
6、t, first they win the war against fear, against doubt, against insecurity-which are no minor victories. “Defined that way, winning becomes translatable into areas beyond the physical: chess, spelling bees, the corporate world, even combat. The breadth of our definition for winning means that there i
7、s no single gene for victory across all fields. But neuroscientists(神经科学家) ,psychologists, and other researchers are beginning to better understand the highly interdisciplinary concept of winning, finding surprising links between brain chemistry, social theory, and even economics, which together giv
8、e new insight into why some people come out on top again and again.One area relating to winning is being disrupted. Scientists have long thought that dominance is largely determined by testosterone(睾丸激素); the more you have, the more likely you are to prevail. and not just on the playing field.Last A
9、ugust, though, researchers at the University of Texas and Columbia found that testosterone is helpful only when regulated by small amounts of another hormone called cortisol(皮质醇).Across Columbias campus, professors at the business school are putting this dominance science into practice, collecting s
10、aliva (唾液) samples from M. B. A. students to measure both hormones. Each subject is then given a prescription to get the two steroids(类固醇)into ideal balance. The ideal leader, says Prof. Paul Ingram, is “calm, but with an urge towards dominance.“ Its true for both men and women, and in theory it all
11、 adds up to winning a contract, winning a promotion, winning the quarter.New science like this illuminates winners of the past. Its a glance inside the blood stream of perhaps the most thrilling competitor to ever destroy his opponents at a task: Bobby Fischer, the chess champion.“ For Fischer, ther
12、e was a cruel desire to beat his opponent,“ says Liz Garbus, the director of the new documentary Bobby Fischer Against the World.“Bobby took delight in how he made his opponent ill. “ Before his legendary final match with the Russian player Boris Spassky in Iceland in 1972,which would determine the
13、worlds No.1 player, Fischer underwent extensive weight and endurance training; he told a strength coach that he wanted to physically break Spasskys hand the first time they shook. As the match approached, Fischer hesitated and would not show up, issuing increasingly bizarre demands and irritating hi
14、s foe before play had even begun.With the world watching, he did eventually arrive in Reykjavik (雷克雅未克=冰岛首都),and with the match tied 2 to 2,Fischer changed the move that he always opened with, which was the only structure Spassky had prepared for, and in this unfamiliar territory the Russian was hel
15、pless. Fischer followed with further aggression, Spassky never recovered. He managed just one win in the next 15 games, and Fischer and his mind and the testosterone-cortisol cocktail within were No.1 in the world.Whats better than winning? Doing it while someone else loses. An economist at the Univ
16、ersity of Bonn has shown that test subjects who receive a given reward for a task enjoy it significantly more if other subjects fail or do worse-a finding that overthrew traditional economic theories that absolute reward is a persons central motivation.Neuroeconomic studies often involve the dopamin
17、e(多巴胺)system, a part of the brain that is highly involved with rewards and reward anticipation. Dopamine receptors seem to track possibilities and how expected or unexpected they are. For fans, it helps to explain why a win by a No.1 seed over an unranked challenger is no big deal, while weak-side w
18、inners like the 1980 U.S. Olympic hockey team are so exciting.A similar kind of expectation management occurs in the minds of athletes themselves, says Scott Huettel, the director of Duke Universitys Center for Neuroeconomic Studies. If you ranked an Olympic events three medalists by happiness, the
19、athlete winning gold obviously comes first. Whats fascinating, Huettel says, is that the bronze medalist is second-most delighted, and the silver finisher is most frustrated. “Peoples brains are constantly comparing what happened with what could have happened,“ he says.“ A bronze medalist might say,
20、 Wow, I almost didnt get a medal. Its great to be on the stand!” And the silver medalist is just thinking about all the mistakes he made that prevented him from winning gold.“All countries love winning, of course. But America, a nation born through victory on the battlefield, has a special relations
21、hip with the practice. “When you here, every one of you, were kids, you all admired the fastest runner, the toughest boxer, the big-league ballplayers, and the All-American football players.“ General George S. Patton once told a gathering of U.S. Army troops in England.“ Americans love a winner,“ Pa
22、tton said loudly. “Americans will not tolerate a loser.“ The next day was June 6,1944,D-Day,and these were the men who would invade Normandy. We know where that one goes in the win-loss column.But why do we admire winners-and put so much of our own happiness at risk when watching them compete? At so
23、me level of the brain, we think we are the guys in the competition. On Nov. 4.2008,the night of the most recent presidential election, neuroscientists at Duke and the University of Michigan gave a group of voters some chewing gum. They collected samples at 8 p.m. ,as the polls closed, and again at 1
24、1:30,as Barack Obama was announced the winner. Testosterone levels normally drop around that time of night, but not among Obama supporters-while testosterone declined in gum taken from the men who had voted for John McCain.Vicarious(感同身受的) participation, the scientists concluded, mirrors what happen
- 1.请仔细阅读文档,确保文档完整性,对于不预览、不比对内容而直接下载带来的问题本站不予受理。
- 2.下载的文档,不会出现我们的网址水印。
- 3、该文档所得收入(下载+内容+预览)归上传者、原创作者;如果您是本文档原作者,请点此认领!既往收益都归您。
下载文档到电脑,查找使用更方便
2000 积分 0人已下载
下载 | 加入VIP,交流精品资源 |
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 大学 921 答案 解析 DOC
