SAE AIR 1404-1976 DC Resistivity vs RF Impedance of EMI Gaskets《直流电阻率对电磁干扰衬垫的射频阻抗》.pdf

《SAE AIR 1404-1976 DC Resistivity vs RF Impedance of EMI Gaskets《直流电阻率对电磁干扰衬垫的射频阻抗》.pdf》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《SAE AIR 1404-1976 DC Resistivity vs RF Impedance of EMI Gaskets《直流电阻率对电磁干扰衬垫的射频阻抗》.pdf（2页珍藏版）》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。

1、AIR1404Issued 1976-03Reaffirmed 2009-11DC Resistivity vs RF Impedance of EMI GasketsFOREWORDChanges in this reaffirm are format/editorial only.1. SCOPE:This AIR discusses the DC resistivity property of EMI gaskets.2. INTRODUCTION:Periodically there have been misunderstandings by people in the electr

2、onic industry concerning what makes a good EMI gasket. Specifically, DC resistivity requirements are often mentioned incorrectly. This AIR discusses the significance of DC resistance.3. RESISTANCE REQUIREMENTS:3.1 Discussion:A low DC resistance is essential in order to have a properly functioning EM

3、I gasket. However, the purpose of this information report is to point out that a low RF impedance is also essential to have a properly functioning EMI gasket. The low DC resistance does not necessarily have any relationship to this low RF impedance. Thus, in determining the effectiveness of an EMI g

4、asket, the impedance at the frequencies of use needs to be evaluated.3.2 Experimental Observations:Following are several simple laboratory observations that have been performed that illustrate the above conclusion:SAE Technical Standards Board Rules provide that: “This report is published by SAE to

5、advance the state of technical and engineering sciences. The use of this report is entirely voluntary, and its applicability and suitability for any particular use, including any patent infringement arising therefrom, is the sole responsibility of the user.” SAE reviews each technical report at leas

6、t every five years at which time it may be reaffirmed, revised, or cancelled. SAE invites your written comments and suggestions. Copyright 2009 SAE International All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any mea

7、ns, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of SAE. TO PLACE A DOCUMENT ORDER: Tel: 877-606-7323 (inside USA and Canada) Tel: 724-776-4970 (outside USA) Fax: 724-776-0790 Email: CustomerServicesae.org SAE WEB ADDRESS: http:/www.sae.org SAE

8、values your input. To provide feedbackon this Technical Report, please visit http:/www.sae.org/technical/standards/AIR1404AEROSPACE INFORMATION REPORT SAE AIR1404 - 2 -3.2.1 A .32 cm x .32 cm copper strip was used as a gasket between two flat surfaces and provided a reference shielding insertion los

9、s. Small sections along the length of the strip were removed creating negligible change in the DC resistivity. However, the RF impedance increased by as much as 20dB. The shielding insertion loss decreased by a similar amount.3.2.2 A mesh gasket was used around the periphery of a cover. The gasket p

10、rovided a low DC resistance. Yet there was a considerable level of leakage. It was found that the 60 cm length of gasket had a .16 cm gap where the ends joined. Even though the gasket was effective over the area it covered, the opening essentially cancelled most of the effectiveness of the gasket. T

11、he extension of this point is that a low DC resistance is not sufficient assurance that the RF impedance will be low.3.2.3 A conclusion found in an article “Flat Gasket Materials” by Bakker and Cohen in Electronic Packaging and Production, March 1967 states; in “comparing the curve of resistivity vs pressure with the overall system attenuation results, it becomes apparent that there is no correlation possible”.PREPARED BY SAE COMMITTEE AE-4, ELECTROMAGNETIC COMPATIBILITY