REG NASA-LLIS-0717--2000 Lessons Learned Guideline for Use of Fizeau Interferometer in Optical Testing.pdf

《REG NASA-LLIS-0717--2000 Lessons Learned Guideline for Use of Fizeau Interferometer in Optical Testing.pdf》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《REG NASA-LLIS-0717--2000 Lessons Learned Guideline for Use of Fizeau Interferometer in Optical Testing.pdf（12页珍藏版）》请在麦多课文档分享上搜索。

1、Best Practices Entry: Best Practice Info:a71 Committee Approval Date: 2000-03-17a71 Center Point of Contact: GSFCa71 Submitted by: Wilson HarkinsSubject: Guideline for Use of Fizeau Interferometer in Optical Testing Practice: The Fizeau interferometer is the most commonly used interferometer for tes

2、ting optical components and systems used aboard spaceborne or space-related instrumentation. This guideline provides information on the proper use of this instrument.Programs that Certify Usage: N/ACenter to Contact for Information: GSFCImplementation Method: This Lesson Learned is based on Reliabil

3、ity Guideline Number GT-TE-2404 from NASA Technical Memorandum 4322A, NASA Reliability Preferred Practices for Design and Test.Benefit:The Fizeau interferometer is used to measure the quality of optical components and systems. It provides a guide for the manufacturing of components, an aid for align

4、ment, and a validation of system performance.Implementation Method:Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-Description of Fizeau InterferometerThe basic layout of a Fizeau interferometer is shown in Figure 1 (Reference 1.). A laser source is

5、spatially filtered via a microscope objective and a pinhole. This pinhole is located at the focal point of a collimating lens. Between the pinhole and lens is a beam-splitter. The collimated beam encounters a slightly wedged glass plate. This is the heart of the interferometer. The surface adjacent

6、to the collimating lens is of good optical quality. However, the next surface is of exceptional optical quality, l/20 peak to valley (PV) or better. This is the reference surface and part of the collimated beam is reflected by this surface. Part of the collimated beam continues on to interrogate the

7、 optic being tested. The return beam contains information on aberration introduced by the test optic. The two wavefronts recombine inside the interferometer. The beam-splitter diverts the combined beams toward a recording medium, either film or a TV (CCD or vidicon). An intermediate lens together wi

8、th the collimating lens forms an image of the test surface onto the recording plane. An observer will see a sharp image of the test surface with an interference (or fringe) pattern running through it.refer to D descriptionD Application of Fizeau Interferometer1. Testing a FlatSuppose the test object

9、 is a plane glass surface whose quality (flatness) we wish to inspect. We must first align the test surface to the interferometer. Most commercial Fizeau interferometers have an “align mode.“ This requires the user to center a bright dot (the reflected return) on a crosshair on some viewing screen.S

10、uppose the test surface has a depression in it as illustrated in Figure 2. The flat wavefront from the interferometer is incident on the test surface and reflected back into the interferometer. Note that the reflected portion shown in Figure 2 has picked up twice the surface error inherent in the te

11、st surface. Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-This aberrated wavefront returns through the reference plate to combine with the reflected reference.refer to D descriptionD Wherever two coherent wavefronts overlap they interfere with each

12、 other. The equation describing interference (Reference 2) is as follows:refer to D descriptionD To obtain good high contrast fringes requires that the reflection off the reference and off the test piece must be equivalent in intensity. Maximum fringe contrast occurs when I1= I2. For example, a bare

13、 glass test surface reflects 4%. To maximize fringe contrast the reference surface must also reflect 4%.If a 4% reference surface is used to test a mirror (with 90% plus reflectivity), then a very thin beam-splitter (e.g., a pellicle) can be used to reduce the intensity from the test optic. Alternat

14、ively, a reference surface having a much higher reflectivity can be used to improve fringe contrast. In the latter case, one will notice that the dark fringes become much thinner, like sharp pencil lines.A sample interferogram of a supposed “flat“ mirror is shown in Figure 3. If the mirror were flat

15、, equally spaced straight line fringes should be observed (depending on the relative tilt between the reference surface and the test surface). Obviously, the mirror is not very flat at all. Each fringe is a Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS

16、-,-,-height contour as in a topographical map. (The metric or unit of measure in most Fizeau interferometers is the wavelength of the source. For example, the helium near laser wavelength is 0.6328 microns.) The height difference between each contour or fringe is 1 wave. If knowledge of the surface

17、error or its departure from flatness is desired, we must interpret these fringes as representing half-wave contours!refer to D descriptionD In addition we must know whether the pattern seen in Figure 3 is a hill or a valley on the mirror surface. This can be determined by placing your finger on the

18、front of the reference surface metal support ring (Figure 1) and pressing lightly toward the interferometer housing. If the fringe patterns collapse or contract, the pattern represents a hill or bump. If they expand, the pattern represents a valley.2. Testing a LensThe setup for testing a lens is il

19、lustrated in Figure 4. The lens is carefully aligned to the Fizeau beam. The beam is focused by the lens to an image point. To return the beam back to the interferometer another auxiliary reference surface is needed. In this example a small concave spherical mirror is used. This sphere should be mou

20、nted so that X,Y, and Z translation degrees of freedom are available. The center of curvature of the sphere is then made coincident with the focal point of the lens. (Be carefulmake sure that the focussed beam is not on the surface of the small retro sphere). The beam is reflected by the reference s

21、phere and returned through the system.Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-refer to D descriptionD The interferogram that is initially seen is likely to be an off-center bulls eye pattern. This means that the reference spheres center of cu

22、rvature is not axially coincident with the lens focal point. Use the tip and tilt adjustments on the Fizeau reference surface to center the bulls eye as shown in Figure 5(a), then use the axial translation on the concave sphere to move the interferogram into a best null condition (i.e., minimizing t

23、he number of fringes seen over the interferogram), Figure 5(b). Now use the adjustments on the reference flat to introduce tilt fringes as shown in Figure 5(c). It should be noted that the test system has significant spherical aberration.Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking per

24、mitted without license from IHS-,-,-refer to D descriptionD An alternate setup for testing a lens is shown in Figure 6. Here the Fizeau reference surface is a sphere. It is a specially designed positive power lens where rays emerging from the last surface of the lens are normal to that surface. The

25、test lens is aligned to the test beam and oriented so its rear focal point is coincident with the transmission spheres focal point. The beam emerges from the lens as collimated light. A flat auxiliary referencesurface is needed to retro-reflect the test beam back to the interferometer.Provided by IH

26、SNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-refer to D descriptionD We note that transmission spheres come in a variety of F-numbers. Since your test lens has a certain F-number, pick a transmission sphere whose F-number provides a beam that either fills or ov

27、erfills the test lens. Never pick a transmission sphere that underfills because then you are not testing the lens over its full aperture. Aberration content will appear lower than it actually is.Configurations for testing a wide variety of other systems are illustrated in Figure 7.Provided by IHSNot

28、 for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-refer to D descriptionProvided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-D 3. Retrace ErrorThe purpose of the reference sphere in Figure 4 is to return the incoming ray back

29、 upon itself so that it follows the same path on the second pass as it did on the first pass. This occurs exactly only when the incoming beam happens to be perfect, i.e. exhibits a spherical wavefront. As aberration accumulates on the first pass through the test system, the match to the reference sp

30、here becomes less perfect. Path deviations appear on the return ray, which is now no longer coincident with the first pass ray. The optical path difference picked up by the second pass ray is not the same as the first pass ray. This is retrace error (also called ray-mapping error) (References 1, 3 a

31、nd 4). As a consequence, it is no longer true that we can simply divide the results by two to obtain the single pass wavefront aberration from double pass fringe data.There are some visual clues to indicate if retrace error is significant. First, with the room darkened, check to see that the beam di

32、ameter of the light returning through the test optic on the second-pass is the same as that for the first pass after setting the null-fringe. Second, examine the irradiance distribution of this second-pass beam at the test optic. If the second-pass beam overfills or underfills the test optic apertur

33、e, and/or the intensity distribution is nonuniform, then retrace error is significant in the test setup.To minimize the effect of retrace error, a different retro optic is usually needed. If retrace error were significant in the case illustrated in Figure 4, then a longer radius of curvature retro s

34、phere is needed and it should be convex instead of concave. This is shown in Figure 8. The longer radius convex surface reduces the angular disparity between the incident and reflected rays. It also reduces the lateral offset between the first and second pass rays at surfaces in the test optic.Provi

35、ded by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-refer to D descriptionD 4. Collecting and Handling DataIt is not the purpose of this guideline to describe methods used to analyze interferograms. That deserves a guideline of its own. However, we will descr

36、ibe the various data collection schemes and how they interface with the analysis software. There are basically three options available to the user: 1) digitizing tablet, 2) automatic fringe following; 3) uniform grid phase measuring.The simplest and least expensive means of selecting and inputting d

37、ata to an analysis code is via a digitizing tablet. A hard copy of the interferogram is placed on the tablet. The user interfaces with the tablet (and the fringe analysis code) with a digitizing pen or mouse. The code first asks the user to define the pupil. Next, data points for each fringe are ent

38、ered in proper sequence from low to high contour. Once this data file is entered into the computer, the fringe code can proceed with its analysis and determine aberration content. To avoid the toil of hand digitizing, software packages are commercially available that incorporate a fringe following r

39、outine. The interferogram is imaged onto a CCD. A frame-grabber captures the fringe pattern and formats it for the computer. This intensity digitized image is then operated on by the fringe following software. It automatically generates data centered along a fringe. However, the user still must defi

40、ne the fringe order.An alternative approach to fringe following is a phase measuring interferometer (PMI). This is a highly automated data acquisition system. The reference plate of the Fizeau is mounted in a fixture which is piezoelectrically driven, i.e. minute cyclic axial shifts are introduced.

41、(This is equivalent to introducing a piston into the fringe pattern.) The pupil image (with fringes across it) is recorded on a CCD. The CCD is a uniform array of sensors. Each pixel monitors the variation in local irradiance as the reference plate is moved by the actuators. Data is acquired at ever

42、y pixel for four or five discrete positions of the reference plate during its sweep. This enormous amount of data is fed into a computer where the analysis software calculates the local phase at each pixel. Fringe ordering is done automatically. Plus, the huge amount of data collected on a uniform g

43、rid offers a dramatic improvement in accuracy and repeatability. Also note that this method allows the user to analyze the “null“ interference pattern, something the first two techniques cannot do.Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-For a

44、 particular test setup it is usually a good idea to take four separate interferograms with fringes tilt-biased top, bottom, right, and left respectively. Fringe codes usually have an option whereby several interferograms can be averaged. An interferogram from each fringe bias is entered into the cod

45、e, and the ensemble average obtained. This average is a better estimate of aberration content than any single interferogram.When testing imaging systems it is a good practice to repeat the test setup at least three times. This is because misalignments in the setup can introduce unwanted aberrations

46、(usually coma). For each setup obtain the four fringe biased data sets mentioned above and calculate the subaverage. Then average these subaverages.5. Environmental ConstraintsVibration, whether induced through the floor into the air-isolated optical table supporting the interferometer or coupled vi

47、a acoustics, is a major weakness of interferometers. This mechanical noise makes the fringe pattern unstable; it dances around at high frequency. It is hard to do meaningful interferometry under such shaky circumstances. Hence it is very important when establishing a metrology lab to locate it in a

48、quiet area. For example, you would not want to place it between a machine shop and an optical fabrication shop. At times it may even be necessary to come in at night, when everyone else is gone and all other machines are turned off, just to get stable fringes.Another source of trouble is air currents or turbulence from air vents, or thermals (from electronic equipment for example). The fringes dont dance as with mechanical vibration but actually change shape. They meander! When an interferogram is obtained under these circumstances you are not sure how much