欢迎来到麦多课文档分享! | 帮助中心 海量文档,免费浏览,给你所需,享你所想!
麦多课文档分享
全部分类
  • 标准规范>
  • 教学课件>
  • 考试资料>
  • 办公文档>
  • 学术论文>
  • 行业资料>
  • 易语言源码>
  • ImageVerifierCode 换一换
    首页 麦多课文档分享 > 资源分类 > PDF文档下载
    分享到微信 分享到微博 分享到QQ空间

    REG NASA-LLIS-5296-2012 Use of Physical Mockup Analysis to Improve Ground Processing.pdf

    • 资源ID:1019497       资源大小:90.74KB        全文页数:2页
    • 资源格式: PDF        下载积分:10000积分
    快捷下载 游客一键下载
    账号登录下载
    微信登录下载
    二维码
    微信扫一扫登录
    下载资源需要10000积分(如需开发票,请勿充值!)
    邮箱/手机:
    温馨提示:
    如需开发票,请勿充值!快捷下载时,用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)。
    如需开发票,请勿充值!如填写123,账号就是123,密码也是123。
    支付方式: 支付宝扫码支付    微信扫码支付   
    验证码:   换一换

    加入VIP,交流精品资源
     
    账号:
    密码:
    验证码:   换一换
      忘记密码?
        
    友情提示
    2、PDF文件下载后,可能会被浏览器默认打开,此种情况可以点击浏览器菜单,保存网页到桌面,就可以正常下载了。
    3、本站不支持迅雷下载,请使用电脑自带的IE浏览器,或者360浏览器、谷歌浏览器下载即可。
    4、本站资源下载后的文档和图纸-无水印,预览文档经过压缩,下载后原文更清晰。
    5、试题试卷类文档,如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案,请知晓。

    REG NASA-LLIS-5296-2012 Use of Physical Mockup Analysis to Improve Ground Processing.pdf

    1、Public Lessons Learned Entry: 5296 Lesson Info: Lesson Number: 5296 Submitting Organization: KSC Submitted by: Damon Stambolian Subject: Use of Physical Mockup Analysis to Improve Ground Processing Abstract: Physical mockups were used to perform a human factors analysis to improve the ground process

    2、ing of the Constellation Programs (CxP) Ares-1 and Orion, verify ground processing requirements for flight hardware, and validate ground activities. The inclusion of infrared motion capture analysis with the physical mockups improved the human factors analysis and also helped to facilitate developme

    3、nt of detailed work instructions and improve training materials. Analyses were accomplished by first developing a timeline of events that included each activity, and then each activity was analyzed by operability and human factors experts with spacecraft processing experience. A human factors analys

    4、is tool was adapted for this activity. Several human factors and operations experts were brought together in a small team to perform this analysis. Following each issue discovered during the analysis, the necessary analysis design engineers were brought into the process to address the issue for desi

    5、gn improvements. Description of Driving Event: CxP was composed of an array of vehicles for use to go to the Moon and Mars. The CxP vehicle was designed to go through several stages of processing before being launched at the Kennedy Space Center (KSC). To have efficient and effective ground processi

    6、ng inside and outside the vehicle, all of the ground processing activities should be analyzed. A timeline of events was developed that included each activity, and analysis of each activity by operability and human factors experts with spacecraft processing experience was performed on the hardware/hu

    7、man interactions affecting the human performance during assembly, maintenance, and inspection at KSC. The timeline analysis reviewed each step of the ground processing of the vehicle as it went through different stages of processing at KSC. The procedure used to gather data for analysis was accompli

    8、shed by observing human activities within physical mockups. The analysis data was used for training, and in development of detailed work instructions. When an issue was discovered in the timeline, applicable standards were married with the issue. These standards mainly came from the Federal Aviation

    9、 Administration (FAA) Human Factors Design Standards (HFDS). This process stripped out the applicable FAA requirements that applied to ground processing of the vehicle, based on the operations methodologies specially derived by the Ground Operations Project (GOP) to meet the CxP directives. Lesson(s

    10、) Learned: Physical mockups were a great way to analyze and verify the ground processing requirements for flight hardware and to validate the ground activities. Physical mockups can also be used for training and developing detailed work instructions and training tools. Video and infrared motion capt

    11、ure can improve the proactive training materials so that while designs are being evaluated and improved, knowledge gained and files collected from the same motion capture effort can be used to develop training and work instructions. The NASA CxP program-level human factors requirements document Huma

    12、n-Systems Integration Requirements (HSIR) greatly promoted better human factors systems engineering and integration. This improved the integration between ground systems and crewed vehicle designs for ground processing. Early collaboration and planning between the flight and ground hardware designer

    13、s for the human factors operability engineering analysis (HFEA) is necessary. Timeline analysis is a great way to analyze and improve the design of ground and flight hardware interfaces for ground processing of the ground equipment, as well as the flight and ground hardware interface. Although the H

    14、uman Factors Operability Engineering Analysis (HFOEA) was primarily applied to Orion and ground systems to improve the design of hardware for better human factors and operations, some areas of HFOEA can be used to improve the work operations documents and processes, e.g., for hazard warning signs be

    15、ing called out in the work steps. Recommendation(s): 1. Employ qualified human factors person/s on teams from the beginning of the project. 2. Promote more standardized and integrated mockup processes and designs across the Agency. 3. Share mockups across Centers, projects and commercial partners. 4

    16、. Embed mockup analysis as part of the engineering processes as one option for the appropriate HFEA. 5. Future mockups should also include more collaboration with the GSE. 6. Continue applying these processes and collaborations to future NASA missions, specifically the timeline option to the Human F

    17、actors Engineering Analysis Tool (HFEAT), where applicable. 7. Embed HFEA and HFOEA as part of the engineering processes as a decision tool to choose from for the appropriate human factors engineering analysis. 8. Continue using the design visualization process, where operations personnel meet with

    18、the design visualization personnel in the design visualization lab to review the flight and GSE designs for human factors. These important meetings with the operations personnel and design engineers using the actual flight and ground designs loaded into the design visualization tools were a great he

    19、lp. 9. Introduce motion capture analysis into applicable activities during the human factors operability engineering timeline analysis, especially where a worksite analysis is needed, or where two or more projects interface, e.g., Ares/Orion/GO. Motion capture allows for quicker, simpler, real-to-li

    20、fe simulations, and the computer models include the computer-aided design (CAD) flight hardware and human Avatar, in which the envelope spaces between the human and flight hardware can be viewed, and the stresses to the human can be computed. 10. Promote more HFEOA timeline analyses with the ground

    21、support equipment, such as the flight and ground interface at the umbilical plates and the ground commodity connections to flight hardware. 11. Use the design problems and solutions from this HFEOA effort to improve the NASA-STD-3001, NASA Space Flight Human System Standard Provided by IHSNot for Re

    22、saleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-Volume 1: Crew Health and Volume 2: Human Factors, Habitability, and Environmental Health., to promote better NASA human factors systems engineering and integration in future programs. Refer to the papers on Human Factors Analy

    23、sis to Improve the Processing of Ares-1 Launch Vehicle and Human Factors Operability Timeline Analysis to Improve the Processing Flow of the Orion Spacecraft for additional information and photographs. Evidence of Recurrence Control Effectiveness: N/A Documents Related to Lesson: Human Factors Analy

    24、sis to Improve the Processing of Ares-1 Launch Vehicle, Gregory M. Dippolito and Damon B. Stambolian, NASA, KSC, FL 32899; co-authors KSC/Bao Nguyen, MSFC/Charles Dischinger, KSC/Donald Tran, KSC/Gena Henderson, and NESC/Tim Barth. Human Factors Operability Timeline Analysis to Improve the Processin

    25、g Flow of the Orion Spacecraft, Roland Schlierf and Damon B. Stambolian, NASA Kennedy Space Center (KSC); co-authors: KSC/Darcy Miller, Juan Posada, Mike Haddock, Donald Tran, Gena Henderson; and NESC/Tim Barth. NASA-STD-3001, NASA Space Flight Human System Standard Volume 1: Crew Health and Volume

    26、2: Human Factors, Habitability, and Environmental Health, accessible at https:/standards.nasa.gov. Mission Directorate(s): Exploration Systems Additional Key Phrase(s): Missions and Systems Requirements Definition.Human factors impact on mission design Systems Engineering and Analysis.Human factors

    27、Engineering Design (Phase C/D).Human Factors/Habitability Mission Operations and Ground Support Systems.Ground processing and manifesting Additional Info: Project: Constellation Program Approval Info: Approval Date: 2012-09-12 Approval Name: mbell Approval Organization: HQ Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-


    注意事项

    本文(REG NASA-LLIS-5296-2012 Use of Physical Mockup Analysis to Improve Ground Processing.pdf)为本站会员(fatcommittee260)主动上传,麦多课文档分享仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知麦多课文档分享(点击联系客服),我们立即给予删除!




    关于我们 - 网站声明 - 网站地图 - 资源地图 - 友情链接 - 网站客服 - 联系我们

    copyright@ 2008-2019 麦多课文库(www.mydoc123.com)网站版权所有
    备案/许可证编号:苏ICP备17064731号-1 

    收起
    展开