欢迎来到麦多课文档分享! | 帮助中心 海量文档,免费浏览,给你所需,享你所想!
麦多课文档分享
全部分类
  • 标准规范>
  • 教学课件>
  • 考试资料>
  • 办公文档>
  • 学术论文>
  • 行业资料>
  • 易语言源码>
  • ImageVerifierCode 换一换
    首页 麦多课文档分享 > 资源分类 > PDF文档下载
    分享到微信 分享到微博 分享到QQ空间

    REG NASA-LLIS-5256-2011 Lessons Learned JPL Emergency Response The Station Fire.pdf

    • 资源ID:1019495       资源大小:231.49KB        全文页数:4页
    • 资源格式: PDF        下载积分:10000积分
    快捷下载 游客一键下载
    账号登录下载
    微信登录下载
    二维码
    微信扫一扫登录
    下载资源需要10000积分(如需开发票,请勿充值!)
    邮箱/手机:
    温馨提示:
    如需开发票,请勿充值!快捷下载时,用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)。
    如需开发票,请勿充值!如填写123,账号就是123,密码也是123。
    支付方式: 支付宝扫码支付    微信扫码支付   
    验证码:   换一换

    加入VIP,交流精品资源
     
    账号:
    密码:
    验证码:   换一换
      忘记密码?
        
    友情提示
    2、PDF文件下载后,可能会被浏览器默认打开,此种情况可以点击浏览器菜单,保存网页到桌面,就可以正常下载了。
    3、本站不支持迅雷下载,请使用电脑自带的IE浏览器,或者360浏览器、谷歌浏览器下载即可。
    4、本站资源下载后的文档和图纸-无水印,预览文档经过压缩,下载后原文更清晰。
    5、试题试卷类文档,如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案,请知晓。

    REG NASA-LLIS-5256-2011 Lessons Learned JPL Emergency Response The Station Fire.pdf

    1、Public Lessons Learned Entry: 5256 Lesson Info: Lesson Number: 5256 Submitting Organization: JPL Submitted by: David Oberhettinger Subject: JPL Emergency Response: The Station Fire Abstract: The largest fire in the recorded history of Los Angeles County, the August 2009 Station Fire burned to within

    2、 one meter of the JPL perimeter and closed the Laboratory. Due to planning and effective leadership by JPL management and JPL incident response teams, the Laboratory came out nearly unscathed, but JPLs vulnerability to natural disasters mandates further improvements. Description of Driving Event: Th

    3、e Station Fire ignited in the Angeles National Forest 3 to 4 miles northwest of the NASA/Caltech Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) on the afternoon of Wednesday, August 26, 2009. The largest fire in the recorded history of Los Angeles County, the flames consumed 160,000 acres. During August 27 and 28,

    4、 the fire continued to grow and move toward JPL (Figures 1 and 2) through extremely steep and inaccessible terrain (Figure 3), and approached within one meter of the JPL perimeter. Friday was a non-workday for 75% of JPL personnel; the JPL Management Operation Committee (MOC) decided to close JPL to

    5、 non mission-critical personnel over the weekend and to activate the JPL Emergency Operations Center (EOC). By August 30, the flames moved to the west and east and no longer posed an imminent threat to JPL, although the air quality ranged from “unhealthy” to “hazardous.“ JPL remained closed on the M

    6、onday, August 31 workday, and reopened for normal operations on September 1. Figure 1. The Station Fire grew in size and intensity while moving south toward JPL. Figure 2. Detail from Figure 1 showing the JPL campus. JPL was well prepared for the Station Fire, having made steady progress in developi

    7、ng emergency response protocols and processes over several prior years. Fortuitously, JPL preparedness was enhanced because JPL had spent the prior 3 months planning a full scale exercise with a wildfire scenario that was scheduled to be held on September 10. Also, there were no launches or special

    8、mission-critical activities scheduled when the fire broke out. No JPL personnel were injured by the fire, and the impact to Laboratory facilities and activities was minimal. Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-Figure 3. The JPL Fire Depar

    9、tment supported over 190 fire fighting helicopter sorties from the Labs Mesa helipad. Reference (1) documents lessons learned from the JPL response to the Station Fire emergency. The following JPL measures worked well: The JPL leadership, the JPL Facilities Maintenance training and provisioning for

    10、sustained operations; EOC documentation (development of Incident Action Plans and tracking of “tickets”/calls), and better coordination with federal agencies. Continuous Lab-wide fire prevention and mitigation measures. References: 1. Regina Phelps, “Jet Propulsion Laboratory Station Fire After-Acti

    11、on Report,” November 4, 2009. 2. “Station Fire After-Action Report Recommendations,” October 20, 2009. 3. “Multihazard Emergency Response Plan, Rev. 4,” JPL Document No. DocID 28012, February 8, 2008. Lesson(s) Learned: Considering the scale, proximity, and ferocity (Figures 4 and 5) of the Station

    12、Fire, JPL came out with only minor damage. This was due to planning and effective leadership by JPL, but also due to external factors such as the massive state/local response, fortuitous timing, and the absence of strong winds. Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted wit

    13、hout license from IHS-,-,-spacespace Figures 4 developing a written EOC Incident Action Plan (IAP) for each operational period; and stocking special supplies such as satellite radios, battery powered TVs, direct outside landlines, and portable HEPA filters. o Assess the adequacy of the EOC to meet f

    14、uture emergency response needs, including facility location, size, configuration, and equipment colocation. o Enhance and improve emergency communications (e.g., processes, equipment, directories, communications templates, use of social media) for use within the EOC and for communicating to outside

    15、stakeholders and the external media. 2. Improve field response performance and safety: o Enhance field response support (i.e., logistic support, field communications, on-Lab reporting and tracking, provision of safety officer position) for all field responders including fire, safety, facilities, and

    16、 USAR. o USAR team improvements, including a plan and logistic support for sustained operations, pre-determined meeting locations, evaluation of personal protective equipment and specialized USAR equipment, review of check-in and check-out procedures, and assessment of team training based on the fir

    17、e experience. 3. Clarify the definition of “mission-critical personnel,“ and communicate to staff which personnel are mission-critical. Empower the staff who must be present during emergencies, and develop Human Resource policies for the staff who may not be working during the incident. 4. Develop a

    18、n on-going fire prevention and mitigation planning program, including such ongoing fire prevention measures as roof and gutter cleaning, and review of fire suppression products. Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-Reference (2) tracks JPL

    19、 progress in implementing the recommendations of Reference (1). Emergency response measures are also captured in Reference (3). Evidence of Recurrence Control Effectiveness: JPL is implementing the recommendations of Reference (1) in accordance with the schedule provided in Reference (2), and JPL wi

    20、ll continue to upgrade its incident response capabilities. Documents Related to Lesson: NFPA 1600: Standard On Disaster/Emergency Management And Business Continuity Programs, National Fire Protection Association, 2010. BS 25999-1:2006, Business Continuity Management. Code of Practice, British Standa

    21、rds Institution BS 25999-2:2007 Specification for Business Continuity Management, British Standards Institution Mission Directorate(s): N/A Additional Key Phrase(s): N/A Additional Info: Project: N/A Approval Info: Approval Date: 2011-02-10 Approval Name: mbell Approval Organization: HQ Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-


    注意事项

    本文(REG NASA-LLIS-5256-2011 Lessons Learned JPL Emergency Response The Station Fire.pdf)为本站会员(registerpick115)主动上传,麦多课文档分享仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知麦多课文档分享(点击联系客服),我们立即给予删除!




    关于我们 - 网站声明 - 网站地图 - 资源地图 - 友情链接 - 网站客服 - 联系我们

    copyright@ 2008-2019 麦多课文库(www.mydoc123.com)网站版权所有
    备案/许可证编号:苏ICP备17064731号-1 

    收起
    展开