欢迎来到麦多课文档分享! | 帮助中心 海量文档,免费浏览,给你所需,享你所想!
麦多课文档分享
全部分类
  • 标准规范>
  • 教学课件>
  • 考试资料>
  • 办公文档>
  • 学术论文>
  • 行业资料>
  • 易语言源码>
  • ImageVerifierCode 换一换
    首页 麦多课文档分享 > 资源分类 > PDF文档下载
    分享到微信 分享到微博 分享到QQ空间

    REG NASA-LLIS-5200-2012 Lessons Learned - Vehicle versus Ground Synchronization.pdf

    • 资源ID:1019490       资源大小:59.48KB        全文页数:2页
    • 资源格式: PDF        下载积分:10000积分
    快捷下载 游客一键下载
    账号登录下载
    微信登录下载
    二维码
    微信扫一扫登录
    下载资源需要10000积分(如需开发票,请勿充值!)
    邮箱/手机:
    温馨提示:
    如需开发票,请勿充值!快捷下载时,用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)。
    如需开发票,请勿充值!如填写123,账号就是123,密码也是123。
    支付方式: 支付宝扫码支付    微信扫码支付   
    验证码:   换一换

    加入VIP,交流精品资源
     
    账号:
    密码:
    验证码:   换一换
      忘记密码?
        
    友情提示
    2、PDF文件下载后,可能会被浏览器默认打开,此种情况可以点击浏览器菜单,保存网页到桌面,就可以正常下载了。
    3、本站不支持迅雷下载,请使用电脑自带的IE浏览器,或者360浏览器、谷歌浏览器下载即可。
    4、本站资源下载后的文档和图纸-无水印,预览文档经过压缩,下载后原文更清晰。
    5、试题试卷类文档,如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案,请知晓。

    REG NASA-LLIS-5200-2012 Lessons Learned - Vehicle versus Ground Synchronization.pdf

    1、Public Lessons Learned Entry: 5200 Lesson Info: Lesson Number: 5200 Submitting Organization: KSC Submitted by: Jenni Palmer Subject: Vehicle versus Ground Synchronization Abstract: During the Constellation Program, rework caused excessive costs and schedule slip. The rework resulted from a lack of c

    2、oordination in the design and development of flight hardware and ground support equipment. Synchronization of design engineering activities and baseline documentation would address this problem, and should be performed as a fundamental systems engineering best practice. Description of Driving Event:

    3、 The Constellation Program had a very aggressive development schedule, using a fast-track method. The vehicle design for the Ares I was being developed at the same time as the ground support equipment (GSE). Changes to the vehicle design were being made frequently. Because there was a program-to-pro

    4、ject acceptance delay (needed for communication back and forth across Centers for approval and then on to the Program office), it took a long time for the changes to be added to the program baseline. During that time, the Mobile Launcher Team was working on an older configuration while the flight ha

    5、rdware designers were working to the latest updates. The result was unnecessary and costly redesign and rework by Ground Operations projects. For example: (1) The distance from the launch tower to the vehicle was uncertain. If the distance between the tower and the launch vehicle was too close, ther

    6、e would be a greater chance that the launch vehicle would hit the tower during liftoff. (2) Uncertainty in the areas where access needed to be provided to the flight vehicle resulted in the use of flexible stairs. (Permanent stairs would be designed at a later date.) This produced a less-than-desira

    7、ble design for the stairs, involving multiple transitions to reach the platform level. Lesson(s) Learned: The baseline design configuration for the vehicle should be stabilized before Ground Operations projects, such as the Mobile Launcher and associated GSE, are developed. As the vehicle is being d

    8、eveloped, prior to Critical Design Review (CDR), design issues can be resolved early by integrating key people from the Ground Systems team on the Flight Systems Integrated Product Team (IPT). Fabrication of ground systems should not be initiated until a functional vehicle has been baselined and tes

    9、ting has been done to reach a 95% confidence level in the design. Portions of the design that show a low risk of rework can proceed to fabrication. However, portions of the design that show a high risk of rework should not proceed to fabrication until the risk of rework is reduced. Recommendation(s)

    10、: Although development of flight systems should take precedence, ensure that ground systems and vehicle development teams continuously share design input (i.e., real-time collaborative CAD models) with each other. One effective method to accommodate KSC ground processing requirements in the design o

    11、f the integrated flight hardware (JSC/MSFC) and ground hardware (KSC) is through remote collaborative real-time combined CAD/JACK/DELMIA modeling, such as the work done by the KSC Human Engineering Modeling and Performance (HEMAP) lab. If a staggered serial approach for development is taken, ensure

    12、that a stable configuration is available before the CDR. Allow portions of the design that show low risk of rework to proceed to fabrication. But do not allow portions of the design that show a high risk of rework to proceed to fabrication until the risk of rework is reduced. As the vehicle is being

    13、 developed (prior to CDR), integrate key people from the Ground Systems team into the Flight Systems IPT in order to flag potential problems. Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-Evidence of Recurrence Control Effectiveness: N/A Documents

    14、Related to Lesson: N/A Mission Directorate(s): Exploration Systems Additional Key Phrase(s): Program Management. Program Management.Program planning, development, and management Additional Info: Project: Constellation Approval Info: Approval Date: 2012-05-08 Approval Name: mbell Approval Organization: HQ Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-


    注意事项

    本文(REG NASA-LLIS-5200-2012 Lessons Learned - Vehicle versus Ground Synchronization.pdf)为本站会员(arrownail386)主动上传,麦多课文档分享仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知麦多课文档分享(点击联系客服),我们立即给予删除!




    关于我们 - 网站声明 - 网站地图 - 资源地图 - 友情链接 - 网站客服 - 联系我们

    copyright@ 2008-2019 麦多课文库(www.mydoc123.com)网站版权所有
    备案/许可证编号:苏ICP备17064731号-1 

    收起
    展开