1、INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMU N CATION UN ION ITU-T TELECOMMUNICATION STANDARDIZATION SECTOR OF ITU X.486 (06/99) SERIES X: DATA NETWORKS AND OPEN SYSTEM COMMUNICATIONS Message Handling Systems Message Handling Systems - Pedi protocol PICS proforma ITU-T Recommendation X.486 (Previously CCIT Recommendatio
2、n) ITU-T X-SERIES RECOMMENDATIONS DATA NETWORKS AND OPEN SYSTEM COMMUNICATIONS PUBLIC DATA NETWORKS Services and facilities Interfaces Transmission, signalling and switching Network aspects Maintenance Administrative arrangements OPEN SYSTEMS INTERCONNECTION Model and notation Service definitions Co
3、nnection-mode protocol specifications Connectionless-mode protocol specifications PICS proformas Protocol Identification Security Protocols Layer Managed Objects Conformance testing INTERWORKING BETWEEN NETWORKS General Satellite data transmission systems MESSAGE HANDLING SYSTEMS DIRECTORY OS1 NETWO
4、RKING AND SYSTEM ASPECTS Networking Efficiency Quality of service Naming, Addressing and Registration Abstract Syntax Notation One (ASN.1) Systems Management framework and architecture Management Communication Service and Protocol Structure of Management Information Management functions and ODMA fun
5、ctions OS1 MANAGEMENT SECURITY OS1 APPLICATIONS Commitment, Concurrency and Recovery Transaction processing Remote operations OPEN DISTRIBUTED PROCESSING X. l-X. 19 X.20-X.49 X.50-X.89 X.90-X.149 X. 150-X. 179 X.180-X.199 X.200-X.209 X.210-X.219 X.220-X.229 X.230-X.239 X .24O-X. 25 9 X.260-X.269 X.2
6、70-X.279 X.280-X.289 X.290-X.299 X.300-X.349 x.350-x.399 X.400-X.499 X.500-X.599 X.600-X.629 X.630-X.639 X.640-X.649 X.650-X.679 X.680-X.699 X.700-X.709 X.7 10-X.719 X.720-X.729 x.730-x.799 X.800-X.849 X.850-X.859 X.860-X.879 X. 880-X.899 X.900-X.999 For further details, please refer to ITU-T List o
7、f Recommendations. STD-ITU-T RECMN X.4Bb-ENGL 3999 4862573 Obb7425 380 ITU-T RECOMMENDATION X.486 MESSAGE HANDLING SYSTEMS - Pedi PROTOCOL PICS PROFORMA Summary This Recommendation provides the Protocol Implementation Conformance Statement (PICS) proforma for the Message Handling Systems (MHS) Pedi
8、protocol specified in ITU-T Rec. X.435 I ISOAEC 10021-9. The PICS proforma presents in tabular form the mandatory and optional elements of the Pedi protocol. Source ITU-T Recommendation X.486 was revised by ITU-T Study Group 7 (1997-2000) and was approved under the WTSC Resolution No. 1 procedure on
9、 the 25th of September 1998. As a result of Study Group 7 decision to publish a consolidated new edition of the set of Message Handling Recommen- dations, it was decided that, in agreement with the TSB Director, X.481, X.482, X.483, X.484 and X.486 will also be published with 1999 dates. Recommendat
10、ion X.486 (06/99) 1 STD-ITU-T RECMN XoqBb-ENGL 1999 48b259L Obb742b 017 = FOREWORD ITU (International Telecommunication Union) is the United Nations Specialized Agency in the field of telecommuni- cations. The ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) is a permanent organ of the ITU. The
11、ITU-T is responsible for studying technical, operating and tariff questions and issuing Recommendations on them with a view to standardizing telecommunications on a worldwide basis. The World Telecommunication Standardization Conference (WTSC), which meets every four years, establishes the topics fo
12、r study by the ITU-T Study Groups which, in their turn, produce Recommendations on these topics. The approval of Recommendations by the Members of the ITU-T is covered by the procedure laid down in WTSC Resolution No. 1. In some areas of information technology which fall within ITU-Ts purview, the n
13、ecessary standards are prepared on a collaborative basis with IS0 and IEC. NOTE In this Recommendation the term recognized operating agency (ROA) includes any individual, company, corporation or governmental organization that operates a public correspondence service. The terms Administration, ROA an
14、d public correspondence are defined in the Constitution of the ITU (Geneva, 1992). INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS The IT draws attention to the possibility that the practice or implementation of this Recommendation may involve the use of a claimed Intellectual Property Right. The ITU takes no position
15、 concerning the evidence, validity or applicability of claimed Intellectual Property Rights, whether asserted by ITU members or others outside of the Recommendation development process. As of the date of approval of this Recommendation, the ITU had not received notice of intellectual property, prote
16、cted by patents, which may be required to implement this Recommendation. However, implementors are cautioned that this may not represent the latest information and are therefore strongly urged to consult the TSB patent database. O ITU 2000 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be repr
17、oduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from the ITU, except as noted in footnote 2) in Annex A. 11 Recommendation X.486 (06/99) INDEX 1 Scope 2 . Normative references Identical Recommendations 1 In
18、temational Standards Paired Recommendations I International Standards equivalent in technical content 3 Definitions 4 Abbreviations . 5 Conformance Annex A - PICS Proforma for ED1 messaging protocol (Pedi) A.0 Instructions and identification . 2.1 2.2 A.l Basic requirements A.2 Optional functional g
19、roups A.3 Additional information Annex B - Amendments and corrigenda . Page 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 6 14 14 19 . Recommendation X.486 (06/99) 111 Introduction This Recommendation is one in a set of Recommendations defining Message Handling in a distributed open system environment. Message Handling provide
20、s for the exchange of messages between users on a store-and-forward basis. A message submitted by one user (the originator) is transferred through the Message Transfer System (MTS) and delivered to one or more users (the recipients). The users access is through a User Agent (UA). To evaluate the cap
21、abilities of a particular implementation, it is necessary to have a statement of which capabilities and options have been implemented for a given OS1 protocol. Such statement is called a Protocol Implementation Conformance Statement (PICS). iv Recommendation X.486 (06/99) Recommendation X.486 MESSAG
22、E HANDLING SYSTEMS - Pedi PROTOCOL PICS PROFORMA 1 Scope This Recommendation provides the Protocol Implementation Conformance Statement (PICS) proforma for the Pedi protocol specified in ITU-T Rec. X.435 I ISOAEC 10021-9. The PICS proforma presents in tabular form the mandatory and optional elements
23、 of the Pedi protocol. This PICS proforma is based on the relevant guidance for PICS proformas given in ITU-T Rec. X.296 I ISOAEC 9646-7 2 Normative references The following ITU-T Recommendations, and other references contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of
24、 this Recommendation. At the time of publication, the editions indicated were valid. All Recom- mendations and other references are subject to revision; all users of this Recommendation are therefore encouraged to investigate the possibility of applying the most recent edition of the Recommendations
25、 and other references listed below. A list of the currently valid ITU-T Recommendations is regularly published. 2.1 Identical Recommendations I International Standards - ITU-T Recommendation X.402 (1999) I ISOAEC 10021-2: 1999, Information technology - Message Handling Systems (MHS): Overall archite
26、cture. - ITU-T Recommendation X.435 (1999) I ISO/IEC 10021-9: 1999, Information technology - Message Handling Systems (MHS): Electronic Data Interchange Messaging System. 2.2 Paired Recommendations I International Standards equivalent in technical content - ITU-T Recommendation X.290 (1993, OS1 conf
27、ormance testing methodology and framework for protocol Recommendations for ITU-T applications - General concepts. ISOAEC 9646- 1 : 1994, Information technology - Open Systems Interconnection - Conformance testing methodology and framework - Part 1: General concepts. - ITU-T Recommendation X.296 (199
28、5), OS1 conformance testing methodology and framework for protocol Recommendations for ITU-T applications - Implementation conformance statements. ISOAEC 9646-7: 1995, Information technology - Open Systems Interconnection - Conformance testing methodology and framework - Part 7: Implementation Confo
29、rmance Statements. Annex A of this Recommendation is technically aligned with Annex A of ISOAEC ISP 12063-2, Information technology - International Standardized Profiles AMH3n - Message Handling Systems - ED1 Messaging - Part 2: AMH3 1 - EDIMG Content. Recommendation X.486 (06199) 1 3 Definitions Te
30、rms used in this Recommendation are defined in the referenced Recommendations I International Standards. 4 Abbreviations This Recommendation uses the following abbreviations: ED1 ISP MHS MS MTA os1 PDU PICS UA 5 Electronic Data Interchange International Standardized Profile Message Handling Systems
31、Message Store Message Transfer Agent Open Systems Interconnection Protocol Data Unit Protocol Implementation Conformance Statement User Agent Conformance A conforming PICS proforma shall be technically equivalent to the text of the PICS proforma in this Recommendation and shall preserve the numberin
32、g and ordering of items in the PICS proforma in this Recommendation. A PICS which conforms to this Recommendation shall: a) b) describe an implementation which conforms to ITU-T Rec. X.435 I ISOfiEC 10021-9; be a conforming PICS proforma, which has been completed in accordance with the instructions
33、for completion given in Annex A; include the information necessary to uniquely identify both the supplier and the implementation. c) 2 Recommendation X.486 (06/99) Annex A2 PICS Proforma for ED1 messaging protocol (Pedi) (This annex forms an integral part of this Recommendation) Contents of the PICS
34、 proforma A.3.1 A.3.2 A.3.3 A.3.4 A.3.5 A.0 Instructions and identification A.O.l Instructions A.0.2 Identification of PICS proforma comgenda A.0.3 Identification of the implementation . A.l Basic requirements . A.l.l General objects and data types A.1.2 EDIM heading fields . A.1.3 Body A.1.4 EDIN f
35、ields . A.1.5 Body part types . A. 1.6 OR-name forms . Optional functional groups . Additional information . Element of Service support . Miscellaneous information Information related to forwarding . Externally defined body parts . ED1 body part types for Privately defined syntaxes A.2 A.3 Subc.,use
36、 A. Page 3 3 4 5 6 6 7 11 12 14 14 14 14 14 17 18 18 18 specifies the basic requirements for conformance to this Recommendation. Subclause A.2 is allocated but not used, it is present to keep the numbering alignment with the corresponding ISP. Subclause A.3 allows additional information to be provid
37、ed for certain aspects of an implementation where no specific requirements are included in the base specifications. All subclauses shall be completed as appropriate. NOTE -The numbering of subclauses and items in this annex is identical to that in ISOIIEC 12063-2 “Information technology - Internatio
38、nal Standardized Profiles AMH3n - Message Handling Systems - ED1 Messaging - Part 2: AMH31 - EDIMG Content“. A.0 Instructions and identification A.O.l Instructions A.0.1.1 Purpose of the proforma The purpose of the PICS proforma is to provide suppliers of implementations of the Pedi protocol with a
39、consistent means of stating which proforma has been implemented. The proforma is in the form of a questionnaire and consists of a set of items. An item is provided for each capability for which an implementation choice is allowed. Items are also provided for mandatory capabilities for which no imple
40、mentation choice is allowed. Each item includes an item number, an item description, a status value specifying the support requirement, and room for a support answer to be provided by the supplier. A.0.1.2 Item numbering Each line in the PICS proforma which requires implementation detail to be enter
41、ed is given a number in the first column. The item number column provides a means of uniquely referencing each possible answer within the PICS proforma. * Copyright release for PICS proformas Users of this Recommendation may freely reproduce the PICS proforma in this annex so that it can be used for
42、 its intended purpose, and may further publish the completed PICS. Recommendation X.486 (06/99) 3 A.0.1.3 Base column In each table, the “Base“ column reflects the level of support required for conformance to the base standard. The following classifications are used in this PICS to specify static co
43、nformance requirements - i.e. capability. NOTE - The Profile column is used for functional profiles and uses the same classification. The classification of information objects and items (elements) is relative to that of the containing information element, if any. Where the constituent elements of a
44、non-primitive element are not individually specified, then each shall be considered to have the classification of that element. Where the range of values to be supported for an element is not specified, then all values defined in the MHS base standards shall be supported. mandatory support (m): The
45、element shall be supported. An implementation shall be able to generate the element, and/or receive the element and perform all associated procedures (Le. implying the ability to handle both the syntax and the semantics of the element) as relevant, as specified in the MHS base standards. Where suppo
46、rt for origination (generation) and reception are not distinguished, then both capabilities shall be assumed. Where required by the base standards, mandatory support also implies that the EDI-UA implementation is able to pass the element on the origination podreception port to/from the corresponding
47、 element on the submission port/delivery podretrieval port. optional support (o): An implementation is not required to support the element. If support is claimed, then the element shall be treated as if it were specified as mandatory support. If the element is not supported on reception, then it sha
48、ll be ignored. conditional support (c): The element shall be supported under the conditions specified in this Recommendation. If these conditions are met, the element shall be treated as if it were specified as mandatory support. If these conditions are not met, the element shall be treated as if it
49、 were specified as optional support (unless otherwise stated). out of scope (i): The element is outside the scope of this Recommendation -i.e. it will not be the subject of a conformance test. not applicable (-): The element is not applicable in the particular context in which this classification is used. A.0.1.4 Support column The “Support“ column is provided for completion by the supplier of the implementation as follows: Y N The element or feature is fully supported (Le. satisfying the requirements of the m support classification). The element or feature is not supported, further q
