欢迎来到麦多课文档分享! | 帮助中心 海量文档,免费浏览,给你所需,享你所想!
麦多课文档分享
全部分类
  • 标准规范>
  • 教学课件>
  • 考试资料>
  • 办公文档>
  • 学术论文>
  • 行业资料>
  • 易语言源码>
  • ImageVerifierCode 换一换
    首页 麦多课文档分享 > 资源分类 > PDF文档下载
    分享到微信 分享到微博 分享到QQ空间

    ITU-R P 1148-1-1997 Standardized Procedure for Comparing Predicted and Observed HF Sky-Wave Signal Intensities and the Presentation of Such Comparisons《预测和实际观察到的高频天波信号强度的对比的标准化程序以及.pdf

    • 资源ID:792154       资源大小:363.11KB        全文页数:9页
    • 资源格式: PDF        下载积分:10000积分
    快捷下载 游客一键下载
    账号登录下载
    微信登录下载
    二维码
    微信扫一扫登录
    下载资源需要10000积分(如需开发票,请勿充值!)
    邮箱/手机:
    温馨提示:
    如需开发票,请勿充值!快捷下载时,用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)。
    如需开发票,请勿充值!如填写123,账号就是123,密码也是123。
    支付方式: 支付宝扫码支付    微信扫码支付   
    验证码:   换一换

    加入VIP,交流精品资源
     
    账号:
    密码:
    验证码:   换一换
      忘记密码?
        
    友情提示
    2、PDF文件下载后,可能会被浏览器默认打开,此种情况可以点击浏览器菜单,保存网页到桌面,就可以正常下载了。
    3、本站不支持迅雷下载,请使用电脑自带的IE浏览器,或者360浏览器、谷歌浏览器下载即可。
    4、本站资源下载后的文档和图纸-无水印,预览文档经过压缩,下载后原文更清晰。
    5、试题试卷类文档,如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案,请知晓。

    ITU-R P 1148-1-1997 Standardized Procedure for Comparing Predicted and Observed HF Sky-Wave Signal Intensities and the Presentation of Such Comparisons《预测和实际观察到的高频天波信号强度的对比的标准化程序以及.pdf

    1、STD*ITU-R RECMN P*LLqB-L-ENGL 1997 W -I855212 0530820 T78 Rec. ITU-R P.1148-1 1 RECOMMENDATION ITU-R P. 1 148-1 STANDARDIZED PROCEDURE FOR COMPARING PREDICTED AND OBSERVED HF SKY-WAVE SIGNAL INTENSITIES AND THE PRESENTATION OF SUCH COMPARISONS* (Question ITU-R 22213) (1 995- 1997) The ITU Radiocommu

    2、nication Assembly, considering that the overall accuracy of prediction procedures needs to be assessed; that the effect of proposed changes to prediction procedures needs to be determined; that detailed information regarding the modal, spatial, temporal and related accuracies will assist with the a)

    3、 b) c) future development of such procedures, recommends that the following procedure given in Annex 1 be adopted for the comparison of predicted and observed HF that such comparisons be presented in the manner shown in Annex 2. 1 sky-wave signal intensities; 2 ANNEX 1 1 Introduction The method desc

    4、ribed is a standardized procedure for comparing predicted and observed sky-wave signal intensities at frequencies between 2 and 30 MHz. Such comparisons provide information on the accuracy of prediction methods and on desirable improvements to them. It is important that administrations and organizat

    5、ions keep the 1TU-R informed on the current status of their comparisons. Some sample results of comparisons are contained in this Recommendation. 2 General In order to obtain comparable results, the same data set and the same procedure should be applied when making comparisons between predicted and

    6、observed signal intensities. The most recent data base should be used. This is an ITU-R-agreed data set and provides a wide range of observations with respect to distance, month, sunspot number, frequency and geographical zone. The output from the comparisons should be: - count, - mean difference (d

    7、B), - standard deviation (dB). “Count” indicates the number of samples used in the comparisons. The “mean difference” provides a measure of the deviation between predicted and observed monthly median signal intensities. The most important parameter for assessing the accuracy of the monthly median si

    8、gnal intensities given by a particular prediction method is the standard deviation (see equations (I) and (2) but it should be noted that this provides no information about the accuracy on individual days. * A computer program associated with the procedure described in this Recommendation is availab

    9、le; for details, contact the ITU Radiocommunication Bureau. COPYRIGHT International Telecommunications Union/ITU RadiocommunicationsLicensed by Information Handling Services STD-ITU-R RECMN P.114B-L-ENGL 1777 4855212 0530821 724 2 Rec. TU-R P.1148-1 In order to find systematic deviations (e.g. as a

    10、function of distance or geographical zone) of a particular prediction method, comparisons should be made for a variety of different subsets or combinations of subsets of data. The purpose of the detailed subsets of comparisons is to give hints for the detection of systematic weaknesses of the method

    11、 under consideration. The choice of a certain prediction method should not be based on favourable results obtained for a particular subset (e.g. distance range). 3 Different comparisons, .e. the calculation of mean difference and standard deviation (see Annex 2), should be made for the following par

    12、ameters: Subsets for which comparisons should be made 3.1 Frequencies,f - single frequency, - - frequency groups: all frequencies of the same circuit, I f I 5MH 60“ 3.4 Sunspot numbers, R12 COPYRIGHT International Telecommunications Union/ITU RadiocommunicationsLicensed by Information Handling Servi

    13、ces3.5 Season (at path midpoint) November, December, January, February I Season Month I 1 Northern Hemisphere Southern Hemisphere Winter Summer May, June, July, August September, October I March, April I Spring I Autumn I Summer Winter Autumn Spring 3.6 Local time h (at path midpoint) Intervals of 1

    14、 h throughout the 24 h; e.g. O0 - mean difference = n where: p : predicted rn : measured n : count. V n-1 - standard deviation = Table 2 provides an example of the type of output produced by the comparison computer program. 4.3 Graphic representation In the histograms in Figures 1 and 2, columns of

    15、5 dB are generated (e.g. -2.5 to 2.5 dB, 2.6 to 7.5 dB, 7.6 to 12.5 dB .) in the range -32.5 dB to +37.5 dB. Each subset listed in 5 3 should be accompanied by a histogram. 4.4 Measures to be taken if a prediction does not give the median signal intensity for all days of the month In some cases wher

    16、e predictions give the median signal intensity only for a certain “fraction of days” per month (expressed as a percentage (see 4.1 c), the measured and predicted values cannot be compared directly. Only when the fraction of days is at least 99% are the measured and predicted values directly comparab

    17、le. In all other cases a conversion procedure must be applied to the measured values. If the fraction of days is, for example, 50%, proper ionospheric reflection occurs on 15 days of the month and the predicted median signal intensity is valid for those I5 days only. The prediction does not give any

    18、 information on the signal intensity on the other 15 days of the month. A measured monthly median, however, is derived from 30 daily values (including the 15 days without proper reflection). Consequently, the measured monthly median is likely to be lower than the predicted median. If a data bank con

    19、tains all daily values the measured value corresponding to the predicted fraction of days can be derived by determining the median value for the predicted fraction of days. (Note that Data Bank DI does not contain daily values.) The following procedure describes how the measured (30 day) monthly med

    20、ian signal intensity can be converted to the same fraction of days per month as that given for the predicted signal intensity: Step i: Calculate thef/(path basic MUF) ratio. Skp 2: If the data bank does not contain deciles (Data Bank DI does not) take the measured value as the 50% value and calculat

    21、e 10% and 90% values by means of Table 1. This table requires information about the ratio f(path basic MUF) and whether or not the great circle path crosses the 60” corrected geomagnetic latitude (north or south). The actual ratio should be interpolated linearly between the values contained in the t

    22、able. COPYRIGHT International Telecommunications Union/ITU RadiocommunicationsLicensed by Information Handling ServicesRec. TU-R P. 1 148-1 5 Corrected geomagnetic latitude() TABLE I = - .i= I I wherey, i = 1,2, N, NI 3 1, are the daily samples of the measured quantity. Step 3: respectively, the mea

    23、n M(z), variance V(z) and standard deviation S(z) of the difference z = x -y are calculated by: Given the monthly means M(x), MO.), and variances V(x), Vb), of the predictions and measurements, and: Given the means M,(z), variances b(z) and numbers of samples NJ for an individual month j, the mean M

    24、(z), variance V(z) and standard deviation S(z) of a subset of values including a range of m months are calculated by: tn 1 CNj-l V(2) = m j=i 1 j= I L and: COPYRIGHT International Telecommunications Union/ITU RadiocommunicationsLicensed by Information Handling ServicesRec. ITU-R P.1148-1 ANNEX 2 TAB

    25、LE 2 An example of the tabular output produced by the comparison computer program I I Subset Frequency groups (MHz): 2- 5 5-10 10-15 15-30 Distance (krn): o- 999 1000- 1999 2 000- 2 999 3 000- 3 999 4 000- 4 999 5 000- 6 999 7 000- 8 999 9 000- 1 1 999 12 000- 14 999 I5 000-1 7 999 I8 000-21 999 22

    26、000-40 O00 Geomagnetic latitude (degrees) at path midpoint: 0-20 20-40 40-60 60 Sunspot number: O- 14 15- 44 45- 74 75- 104 105-149 149 Season: Winter Spring Summer Autumn Local time at path midpoint (h): 00-04 04-08 08-12 12-16 16-20 20-24 Origin of data: Germany Japan China India Deutsche Welle BB

    27、CIE B U Australia All data: Count 4 030 4 004 5 270 2 964 6 439 I144 151 975 I26 2 785 59 2 223 607 1093 O 666 2 806 5 120 6 226 2116 1333 5 229 2 969 2 121 2 789 1827 3 919 4018 4 165 4 166 2 557 3 165 3 182 2 955 2 228 2 181 I O 499 4119 428 I82 783 161 96 16 268 Below and above MUF Mean differenc

    28、e (dB) -1.7 -0.3 -0.4 3.7 -0.3 1.5 o. I 3.8 1 .o -1.2 -0.9 -1 .o I .2 3.4 0.0 -2.0 1.5 -0.5 -0.3 0.3 I .2 2.5 -0.5 -3.4 -I .5 -0.7 0.6 0.3 -0.4 -0.2 -0.6 0.8 0.9 0.3 -1.6 -0. I 1.1 -2.3 1.4 -2.2 -1.4 -0.4 -0.7 0.0 Standard deviation dB) 9. I 10.6 9.9 12.1 7.1 7.4 6.9 13.6 7.4 14.5 7.3 11.1 9.6 9.2 0

    29、.0 12. I 10.7 8.9 9.0 16.0 9.7 10.3 10.3 10.8 9.9 10.4 11.2 10.5 9.7 10.4 11.2 9.7 9.8 10.0 10.6 11.6 11.4 7.5 7.7 9.0 10.0 10.7 5.9 10.5 7 COPYRIGHT International Telecommunications Union/ITU RadiocommunicationsLicensed by Information Handling ServicesSTD-ITU-R RECMN P.LL48-L-ENGL 1797 4855212 0530

    30、827 342 9 Rec. ITU-R P. 1 148- 1 FIGURE i An example of a histogram of predicted versus measured field strength produced by the comparison computer program 4 O00 3 500 3 O00 2 500 * 5 2000 o i 500 i O00 5 O0 O -30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 O All data below and above MUF: Count: 16 268 Mean difference: 0.0

    31、dB Standard deviation: 10.5 dB I i i IO 15 I 20 25 30 35 1148-01 Previous page is blank COPYRIGHT International Telecommunications Union/ITU RadiocommunicationsLicensed by Information Handling Services10 1 O00 900 800 700 600 * % 500 u 400 300 2 O0 1 O0 O FIGURE 2 A further example of a histogram of

    32、 predicted versus measured field strength produced by the program -30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 O All data for frequencies above MUF: 10 15 I- 20 25 30 35 Count: 4 707 Mean difference: 3.0 dB Standard deviation: 11.7 dB 1148-02 COPYRIGHT International Telecommunications Union/ITU RadiocommunicationsLicensed by Information Handling Services


    注意事项

    本文(ITU-R P 1148-1-1997 Standardized Procedure for Comparing Predicted and Observed HF Sky-Wave Signal Intensities and the Presentation of Such Comparisons《预测和实际观察到的高频天波信号强度的对比的标准化程序以及.pdf)为本站会员(progressking105)主动上传,麦多课文档分享仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知麦多课文档分享(点击联系客服),我们立即给予删除!




    关于我们 - 网站声明 - 网站地图 - 资源地图 - 友情链接 - 网站客服 - 联系我们

    copyright@ 2008-2019 麦多课文库(www.mydoc123.com)网站版权所有
    备案/许可证编号:苏ICP备17064731号-1 

    收起
    展开