欢迎来到麦多课文档分享! | 帮助中心 海量文档,免费浏览,给你所需,享你所想!
麦多课文档分享
全部分类
  • 标准规范>
  • 教学课件>
  • 考试资料>
  • 办公文档>
  • 学术论文>
  • 行业资料>
  • 易语言源码>
  • ImageVerifierCode 换一换
    首页 麦多课文档分享 > 资源分类 > PDF文档下载
    分享到微信 分享到微博 分享到QQ空间

    CEPT T R 25-03 E-1976 Co-Ordination of Frequencies for the Land Mobile Service in the 80 160 and 460 MHz Bands and the Methods to Be Used for Assessing Interference《80、160和460 MHz频.pdf

    • 资源ID:593214       资源大小:396.54KB        全文页数:8页
    • 资源格式: PDF        下载积分:10000积分
    快捷下载 游客一键下载
    账号登录下载
    微信登录下载
    二维码
    微信扫一扫登录
    下载资源需要10000积分(如需开发票,请勿充值!)
    邮箱/手机:
    温馨提示:
    如需开发票,请勿充值!快捷下载时,用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)。
    如需开发票,请勿充值!如填写123,账号就是123,密码也是123。
    支付方式: 支付宝扫码支付    微信扫码支付   
    验证码:   换一换

    加入VIP,交流精品资源
     
    账号:
    密码:
    验证码:   换一换
      忘记密码?
        
    友情提示
    2、PDF文件下载后,可能会被浏览器默认打开,此种情况可以点击浏览器菜单,保存网页到桌面,就可以正常下载了。
    3、本站不支持迅雷下载,请使用电脑自带的IE浏览器,或者360浏览器、谷歌浏览器下载即可。
    4、本站资源下载后的文档和图纸-无水印,预览文档经过压缩,下载后原文更清晰。
    5、试题试卷类文档,如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案,请知晓。

    CEPT T R 25-03 E-1976 Co-Ordination of Frequencies for the Land Mobile Service in the 80 160 and 460 MHz Bands and the Methods to Be Used for Assessing Interference《80、160和460 MHz频.pdf

    1、. m 2326434 0006865 3 m TR25-03 Page E 1 Recommendation TIR 25-03 (Stockholm 1976) CO-ORDINATION OF FREQUENCIES FOR THE LAND MOBILE SERVICE IN THE 80,160 AND 460 MHZ BANDS AND THE METHODS TO BE USED FOR ASSESSING INTERFERENCE Recommendation proposed by “Radiocommunications” Working Group T/WG 3 (R)

    2、Text of the Recommendcition adopted by the “Telecommurtications” Commission : “The European Conference of Posts and Telecommunications Administrations, considering (a) that it is necessary to harmonize procedures for the Co-ordination of frequencies for the land mobile service in frontier regions, (

    3、b) that it is important that a simple method of Co-ordination be established which Administrations will be able to implement as widely as possible, (c) that it is a matter of utmost necessity that the available spectrum be used with maximum efficiency, in particular avoiding according land mobile se

    4、rvice radio stations greater protection than justified by operating requirements, (d) that exceptionally some stations require increased protection, for example stations of the public land mobile radio telephone service, (e) that in practice it is advantageous both for determining the field strength

    5、 of the wanted signal and for determining that of the interfering signal to use the same propagation curves, (f) that it may be very useful to determine a maximum permissible value for the field strength of the interfering signal, (g) that account needs to be taken of the variable nature of propagat

    6、ion phenomena, which depend on location and (h) that the use of certain selective calling devices can to a certain extent improve the quality of the service by O time, eliminating a large amount of interference, recommends that in Co-ordinating frequencies in frontier regions for the land mobile ser

    7、vice Administrations should be guided by the foilowing provisions: 1. for determining field strength, the CCIR propagation curves valid for 50% of locations and 50% of the time shall be used in every case, 2. calculations shall be made following the procedure set out in part A of the Annex to this R

    8、ecommendation, 3. the parameters contained in part B of the Annex shall be used to determine the need for Co-ordination and for dealing with practical cases of Co-ordination, 4. .Administrations sha divide stations into 3 groups: Group 1 : stations requiring an exceptional quality of service and con

    9、sequently a high level of protection; Group 2: stations requiring a normal quality of service; Group 3: stations requiring no protection, 5. Administrations shall classify under group 2 the largest possible number of stations not classified under group 3. For this purpose users may, for example, be

    10、invited to use, as appropriate, selective calling devices and effective methods of coding so as to reduce the effects of interference in the absence of the wanted signal.” Edition of September 15, 1988 - = 2326434 0006866 3 - TIR 25-03 E Page 3 Annex A. CALCULATION OF FIELD STRENGTH 1. PRINCIPLE The

    11、 sensitivity of a receiver is determined by the electromotive force which enables a given value for the output signal to noise ratio to be obtained; if the gain of the antenna and the feed line losses are known, the minimum value Co of the electrical field can be deduced from this. The electrical fi

    12、eld produced at a distance by a radio-electrical transmitter of known characteristics is subject to propagation variations and its strength varies with time and according to the location. It is accepted that, according to the laws of probability, its value will follow a normal distribution in dB. In

    13、 that case, if the value of the standard deviation is known, it is possible to determine the median value of the field so as to obtain the value Co with a given probability P. The median value must be where o is the value of the standard deviation and x a coefficient. The relationship between P and

    14、x is given by tables or curves. Given the random nature of the distribution of the field, a service quality may be characterised by the percentage of locations where, in a given zone, the field exceeds the value Co. However, this is inadequate if unwanted transmissions reach the receiver, thus causi

    15、ng interference. If reception of the wanted signal is not to be disturbed by the interfering signal, the ratio between their values at any given time must be sufficiently high. The minimum value of this ratio is the protection ratio (Ro). Given that the variations in the interfering field obey the s

    16、ame statistical laws as those affecting the wanted field, the ratio between them also varies according to a statistical law of the same kind, in accordance with the following rules: - the median value of the ratio between the wanted field and the interfering signal, expressed in dB, is equal - the v

    17、alue of the standard deviation for the statistical-distribution of this ratio is: where o, = standard deviation for the wanted field ob = standard deviation for the interfering field Since the nature of the two fields is the saine, o, = ob = o and o? = fi In order to arrive at a complete definition

    18、of a quality of service it is therefore necessary not only to define the percentage of locations in which the zone to be served must be covered, but also at what percentage of locations protection against interference must be provided, in other words, for what percentage of locations the ratio betwe

    19、en the wanted field and the interfering field must be greater than Ro in dB. If this probability is fixed at P, the median value for this ratio must be Since C, the median value of the wanted field, has been determined by the quality of service, the level of protection enables R, to be determined, t

    20、hus giving the median value for the interfering field: c, = Co + xo to the difference between the median values of these fields; o? = 4- R, = Ro + x o? B, = C, - R, 2. SENSITIVITY OF RECEIVERS The sensitivity to be taken into account for co-ordination at frontiers shall be 6 dB in relation to one mi

    21、crovolt (e.m.f.). Previous page is blank Edition of September 15, 1988 ?- W 232b414 000bBb7 5 TIR 25-03 E Page 4 3. CORRESPONDING VALUE OF THE FIELD Power received p, = - gi c2 A2 120n 4n which gives P, = C + Gd - 20 log f - 105 If the antenna and the receiver have the same impedance of 75 ohms the

    22、power received is therefore e e2 p=-=- 4 Z 300 (3) which gives It follows that P, = E - 145 C = E + 20 hg f - Gd - 40 (5) Account is taken of mismatching loss caused by using antennas and receivers with different input impedances by making a correction D, and of antenna inefficiency by making a corr

    23、ection A, depending on the type of installation. We then obtain For example, in the case of an antenna h/4 and receiver input impedance of 50 ohms, we can admit from which it follows that This gives the following values for the field C in the different frequency bands: C = E + 20logf - Gd - 40 + D +

    24、A (6) Gd= 3dB D=2dB A= 3dB C = E + 20 log f - 38 80 MHz 160 MHz 460 MHz 6 dB 12 dB 21 dB pr = power received in watts P, = power received in dB in relation to the watt c = field in volts per metre C = field in dB in relation to pV/m gi = isotropic gain Gd = gain in relation to h/2 dipole in dB h = w

    25、avelength in metres f = frequency in MHz e E Z = receiver input impedance D = antenna mismatch correction A = antenna efficiency correction = electromotive force in volts = electromotive force in dB in relation to pV 4. EFFECT OF EXTERNAL NOISE SOURCES The effect of external noise sources is negligi

    26、ble in the 460 MHz band. However, it is very considerable in the 80 MHz and 160 MHz bands in high-density urban area. Measurements have shown that to obtain the same quality of reception as is obtained in the absence of external noise, the e.m.f. of the signal must be 10 pV at 80 MHz and 5 pV at 160

    27、 MHz. Since these figures apply only to particular areas, no account will be taken of them below, in view of the statistical nature of the problem. Edition of September 15, 1988 TIR 25-03 E Page 5 Wanted field Protection ratio Interfering field 5. QUALITY OF SERVICE AND NECESSARY FIELD In the case o

    28、f group No. 1, if at 75% of locations the field must be greater than the minimum value for Co, the corresponding value for x is 0.675. In the view of the CCIR, the standard deviation assumes the foliowing values: 8 dB 460 MHz band (A h = 50 m): 10 dB This gives the following median values for the wa

    29、nted field: 80 and 160 MHz bands: 80 MHz 160 MHz 460 MHz (A h = 50 m) In the case of group No. 2, where the percentage of locations is 50%, x is equal to O and the median values for the field are respectively : 80 MHz 160 MHz 460 MHz 6 dB 12 dB 21 dB 6 + 0.675 x 8 = 11.4dB 12 + 0.675 x 8 = 17.4dB 21

    30、 + 0.675 x 10 = 27.7 dB 6 dB 12 dB 21 dB 8 dB 8 dB 8 dB -2 dB 4 dB 13 dB 6. PROTECTION RATIO Where the wanted transmission and the interference are both in class F3, which is the most usual case, an instantaneous value of 8 dB is admitted for the protection ratio. If reception has to be protected fo

    31、r 75% ) of locations in the case of group 1, the median value must therefore be R, = Ro + 0.675 G. It follows that for 80 MHz 160 MHz G = GA = 11.3 R, = 8 + 0.675 x 11 = 15.6 dB G = O& = 11.3 R, = 8 + 0.675 x 11 = 15.6 dB 460 MHz O = O& = 14.1 R, = 8 + 0.675 x 14 = 17.5 dB In the case of group 2, th

    32、e median value of the protection ratio is 8 dB since x = O. 7. THEORETICALLY TOLERABLE INTERFERING FIELDS (median values) Group 1 I I 80MHz 1 160 MHz 1 460 MHz Wanted field Protection ratio 17.5 dB Interfering field -4.2 dB 10.2 dB Group 2 I I 80MHz I 160MHz I 460MHz I The values for the to 1 )A pro

    33、tection probability of P% means that for a link operating alternately on two frequencies, the probability of interference is (100-P)% for a call to a mobile unit at the edge of the service zone, assuming that the interfering base station is permanently on the air (1 trafic unit). If the stations tra

    34、fic is t traffic units, the probability of interference will bet x (100-P)%. Edition of September 15, 1988 -=a TIR 25-03 E Page 6 8. EFFECT OF RELIEF AND OF STATISTICAL DISTRIBUTION OVER TIME Generally speaking, if the field has a normal distribution in relation to location and to time, with standar

    35、d deviations of o, and o, respectively, the resulting standard deviation for distribution is o= Jm It is dependent on frequency and distance. The effect of the effective antenna height is negligible for the heights involved in the land mobile service. For group 2 stations, the maximum tolerable inte

    36、rference field is indepen- dent of ot and of A h. For group 1 stations, the median value of the tolerable interference field for A h x 50 m and q = O is B,Io = Bmz - 0.675 oc,o (JZ - 1. where Bm, = the median value of the tolerable interference field for group 2 stations and The reference median val

    37、ues for the tolerable interference field are given in paragraph 7. The effect of different types of relief (A h) and of the standard deviation in relation to time of the interfering signal (ot) are accounted for by a correction factor. whereB, = median value of the tolerable interference field for g

    38、roup 1 stations where o,o = standard deviation for the distribution in relation to location for A h = 50 m e, = mi - mio 1 = x ,o (JZ - 1) - JO,: + ob,: + ob,? + ou,e = standard deviation of the distribution of the wanted field in relation to the locations ob,e = standard deviation of the distributi

    39、on of the interfering field in relation to the locations ob, = standard deviation of the distribution of the interfering field in relation to time For P = 75% (x = 0.675), the correction factors are given in the following table: = ob,e (i.e. where the wanted field and the interfering field cross the

    40、 same type of relief) and, for I VHF (80 MHz, 160 MHz) I UHF (460 MHz) -0.3 100 - 1.4 150 -2.2 -2.5 - 3.8 - 5.2 land - 1.1 -2.2 O, = o 1.4 - 0.6 -1.9 I sea + Oe = 18 -2.3 9 -3.3 -2.6 14 -6.7 -2.9 20 -10.7 Edition of September 15, 1988 TIR 25-03 E Page 7 Minimum wanted field to be protected B. B.l. 8

    41、0MHz 160MHz 460MHz 6 dB 12 dB 21 dB If the path of the wanted field is characterised by the value oe, and the path of the interfering field by different values of q, the correction factors are those given in the following table: Protection ratio Maximum tolerable interfering field (80 MHz, 160 MHz)

    42、I UHF (460 MHz) 8dB 8dB 8 dB -2 dB 4 dB 13 dB sea land 1 I land 1 sea I 3 -0.3 1.9 2 -0.1 -2.7 -4.4 9 -0.5 7 -1.4 0.5 5 -0.6 -3.1 -4.8 14 -2.1 9 -2.2 -0.5 7 -1.1 -3.5 -5.1 20 -5.6 11 -3.0 -1.6 LIST OF VALUES TO BE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT IN CO-ORDINATION AGREEMENTS Administrations responsible for Co-ordi

    43、nation will adapt the values set out below to the various cases they encounter and, in particular, to the type of station concerned (base or mobile stations operating on one or two frequencies) and to the characteristics of their antennae (gain, height above ground level, polarisation and, where app

    44、ropriate, directivity diagram). A height above ground level other than 3 metres may be used in particular Co-ordination agreements where the consulting Administration is aware that the stations across the frontier likely to cause interference are base stations. Such agreements must enable the countr

    45、ies concerned to be aware of the distribution of base stations and mobile stations in the different frequency sub-bands. Interference to group 2 stations Co-ordination between the Administrations concerned is necessary where the following field strength values are exceeded at the frontier at a heigh

    46、t of 3 metres above ground level. 80 MHz 160 MHz 460 MHz -2 dB 4 dB 13 dB (Values expressed in relation to 1 pV/m.) The values taken into account for Co-ordination and which apply to cases using the antennae most frequently found are: Edition of September 15, 1988 W 2326434 0006873 7 W TIR 25-03 E P

    47、age 8 B.2. Interference caused to group 1 stations In this case, the percentage of locations and the protection probability to be taken into account are set at 90% (x = 1.3) for a type of relief corresponding to A h = 50 m. (See paragraph 6. of part A.) For other types of relief see paragraph 8. par

    48、t A. The field strength which must not be exceeded at the frontier at a height of 3 metres above ground level is: 80 MHz 160 MHz 460 MHz -6.2 dB -0.2 dB 7.7 dB (Values expressed in relation to 1 pV/m.) The values taken into account for Co-ordination and under the same conditions as for group 2 are:

    49、I I 80 MHz I 160 MHz I 460 MHz I I Wanted field to be protected I 16.3 dB I 22.3 dB I 33.8 dB I I Protection ratio I 22.5 dB I 22.5 dB I 26.1 dB I I Maximum tolerable interfering field I -6.2 dB I -0.2 dB I 7.7 dB I (The values of the wanted field and the interfering field are expressed in relation to 1 pV/m.) In order to avoid group 2 stations being too penalised by the increase in the repetition distance, it is very much to be desired that in frontier regions group networks should be operated in the same frequency sub-bands. B.3. Interference caused t


    注意事项

    本文(CEPT T R 25-03 E-1976 Co-Ordination of Frequencies for the Land Mobile Service in the 80 160 and 460 MHz Bands and the Methods to Be Used for Assessing Interference《80、160和460 MHz频.pdf)为本站会员(ideacase155)主动上传,麦多课文档分享仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知麦多课文档分享(点击联系客服),我们立即给予删除!




    关于我们 - 网站声明 - 网站地图 - 资源地图 - 友情链接 - 网站客服 - 联系我们

    copyright@ 2008-2019 麦多课文库(www.mydoc123.com)网站版权所有
    备案/许可证编号:苏ICP备17064731号-1 

    收起
    展开