1、Designation: F 1915 05Standard Test Methods forGlazing for Detention Facilities1This standard is issued under the fixed designation F 1915; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year oforiginal adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in pare
2、ntheses indicates the year of last reapproval. Asuperscript epsilon (e) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.1. Scope1.1 These test methods, including a fire test responsemethod, cover the apparatus, procedures, and acceptanceconditions for evaluating the normal operat
3、ional performanceand the performance characteristics under assault conditions ofdetention glazing used in window and door assemblies indetention and correctional facilities; thus, these test methodsonly give an indication of the performance characteristics ofdetention glazing in actual service. Such
4、 variables as installa-tion and maintenance conditions are not considered except asotherwise included in this test method.1.2 It is the intent of these test methods to help ensure thatdetention glazing performs at or above minimum acceptablelevels to restrict inmate passage to unauthorized areas, to
5、confine inmates, to delay and frustrate escape attempts and toresist vandalism.1.3 Tools defined in these test methods are representative ofsimilar tools or materials, which may become available toinmates within the secure perimeter of detention and correc-tional facilities, and which could be used
6、to inflict similarproduct damage.1.4 These test methods should not be used to establish orconfirm the absolute prevention of forced entries or exits.These test methods define five factors (tool, temperature,techniques, time, and number of impacts) used to determineresistance to defined attacks.1.5 T
7、he values stated in inch-pound units are to be regardedas the standard. The SI values in stated parentheses are forinformation only.1.6 In these test methods, the specimens are subjected to oneor more specific sets of laboratory test conditions. If differenttest conditions are substituted or the end
8、-use conditions arechanged, it is not always possible by or from these test methodsto predict changes in the physical attack, or fire-test-responsecharacteristics measured, or both; therefore, the results arevalid only for the physical attack, or fire-test-exposure condi-tions, or both, described in
9、 these test methods.1.7 This standard does not purport to address all of thesafety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is theresponsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-priate safety and health practices and determine the applica-bility of regulatory limitations prior to
10、 use.2. Referenced Documents2.1 ASTM Standards:2F 1233 Test Method for Security Glazing Materials andSystemsF 1450 Test Methods for Hollow Metal Swinging DoorAssemblies for Detention FacilitiesF 1577 Test Methods for Detention Locks for SwingingDoorsF 1592 Test Methods for Detention Hollow Metal Vis
11、ionSystemsF 1643 Test Methods for Detention Sliding Door LockingDevice AssemblyF 1758 Test Methods for Detention Hinges Used onDetention-Grade Swinging Doors2.2 UL Standard:3UL 752 Bullet Resisting Equipment2.3 NIJ Standard:4NIJ 0108.1 Ballistic Resistant Protective Materials3. Terminology3.1 Defini
12、tions of Terms Specific to This Standard:3.1.1 benchmark, nendpoint or intermediate point in thetest sequence as determined by the certification agency.3.1.2 detention security, nassurance of the restriction ofmobility of inmates to designated areas within a correctional ordetention facility.3.1.3 f
13、orcible egress, nability to passa5by8by8-in.(127 by 203.2 by 203.2-mm) rigid box through an opening inthe test sample created by destructive testing procedures withno more than 10 lb (44.48 N) of force.3.1.4 frame, nassembly of members surrounding andsupporting a window or windows.1These test method
14、s are under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee F33 onDetention and Correctional Facilities and are the direct responsibility of Subcom-mittee F33.02 on Physical Barriers.Current edition approved Feb. 1, 2005. Published February 2005. Originallyapproved in 1998. Last previous edition approved in 2003
15、 as F 1915 03.2For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, orcontact ASTM Customer Service at serviceastm.org. For Annual Book of ASTMStandards volume information, refer to the standards Document Summary page onthe ASTM website.3Available from Underwriters Laboratories (UL),
16、 Corporate Progress, 333Pfingsten Rd., Northbrook, IL 60062.4Available from National Institute of Justice (NIJ), 810 7th St., NW, Washing-ton, DC 20531.1Copyright ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States.3.1.5 glazing, nany infill materi
17、al, usually transparent ortranslucent glass, polycarbonate, or combination thereof, usedin a security detention frame.3.1.6 glazing stop, nformed metal section used to secureglazing or panel in a frame.3.1.7 head or header, nhorizontal member that forms thetop of a frame.3.1.8 hollow metal, nterm us
18、ed in reference to such itemsas doors, frames, partitions, enclosures, and other items that arefabricated from metal sheet, usually carbon steel.3.1.9 jamb, nvertical member forming the side of a frame.3.1.10 manufacturer, nparty responsible for the fabrica-tion of the test samples.3.1.11 performanc
19、e characteristic, nresponse of the glaz-ing sample in any one of the tests described herein.3.1.12 tamper-resistant security screw, nscrew that isdesigned to be removed only by special tools kept by facilitymaintenance personnel.3.1.13 test completion, nconduct of one test sequence foreach of the gl
20、azing samples resulting in either successfulcompletion of the test sequence or the attainment of forcibleegress.3.1.14 testing laboratory, nindependent materials testinglaboratory not associated with any manufacturer.3.1.15 vision system frame, nan assembly of memberssurrounding and supporting glazi
21、ng panels, steel panels, orcombinations thereof, that are located in an interior partition orexterior wall.4. Significance and Use4.1 The predictable and reliable performance of detentionglazing used in detention and correctional facilities is a majorconcern. These test methods aid in assigning a le
22、vel of physicalsecurity to glazing used in window and door assemblies basedupon objective tests which can be consistently duplicated.4.2 These test methods identify four security grades, corre-sponding to the four security grades established in TestMethods F 1450. The intent is to establish a compar
23、able levelof performance for opening assemblies which incorporatedetention glazing in conjunction with window and door assem-blies. Test methods for detention glazing differ in sequencing avariety of attack tools and temperatures.4.3 These test methods evaluate the resistance of detentionglazing to
24、attacks using blunt and sharp impact devices andfire. These test methods evaluate the performance of glazing inhot and cold environments. These test methods do not providea measure of the resistance or performance of glazing subjectedto attack by ballistics, chemical agents, explosives or otherextre
25、me methods of attack. Where such elements are a factor,consult the manufacturer.4.4 The primary purpose of these test methods is to approxi-mate the levels of abuse and operating conditions to whichdetention glazing is subjected in detention and correctionalinstitutions. The desired result of these
26、test methods is toprovide a measure of assurance of protection to the correctionalpersonnel, public, and inmates.4.5 Detention and correctional facility administrative staffare encouraged to provide adequate training, supervision, andpreventative maintenance programs to enable detention glazingassem
27、blies to function as intended.5. Sample Selection, Size, and Specimen Preparation5.1 Samples manufactured for testing purposes shall berepresentative of the types and styles intended for use in theapplication of these test methods. The manufacturer shallprovide three test samples of each product, on
28、e for each test.The test size shall be a nominal 3 ft, 0 in. (914.4 mm) wide by4 ft, 0 in. (1219.2 mm) high.5.2 Test reports shall include complete details as identifiedin Section 8.5.3 Fig. 1 shows an acceptable test fixture and the locationof the strike points described in Tables 1 and 2.5.4 For N
29、onsymmetrical MaterialsThe “threat side” ofthe product shall be identified by the manufacturer and attackedduring the test procedure.6. Test Methods6.1 Cold Temperature Impact Test:6.1.1 ScopeThese test methods are designed to evaluatethe capability of detention glazing to resist repeated impactforc
30、es from both a blunt and sharp impactor under coldtemperature conditions.6.1.2 Significance and UseThese test methods are in-tended to closely simulate a sustained battering ram style orpounding type attack and provide an evaluation of the capa-bility of the glazing to prevent, delay, or frustrate e
31、scape oraccess to unauthorized areas under cold temperature condi-tions. These test results are intended to aid in assigning a levelof physical security to various configurations of detentionglazing. An impact test of this design performed on detentionglazing evaluates the impact strength of the gla
32、zing and itscomponents as well as the quality of fabrication techniques.6.1.3 Apparatus:6.1.3.1 Large Blunt ImpactorThe blunt impactor shallconsist of a hinged or pivoted system with a mass of 80 lbs(36.32 kg) capable of delivering impacts of 200 ft-lbf (271.2 J)to a glazing specimen mounted in a fr
33、ame assembly. Thestriking surface of the impactor shall be made fromC1010C1020 carbon steel and have a striking surface of 4 6.04 in.2(101.6 6 1.016 mm2) with rounded edges similar to a10-lb (4.54-kg) sledge hammer head. See Fig. 2a.6.1.3.2 Sharp ImpactorThe sharp impactor shall consistof a hinged o
34、r pivoted system with a mass of 80 lbs (36.32 kg)capable of delivering impacts of 100 ft-lbf (135.6 J) to aglazing specimen mounted in a frame assembly. The strikingsurface of the impactor shall be made from C1010C1020carbon steel and sharpness of the impacting point similar to theend of a new firem
35、ans axe at the beginning of a test sequence.See Fig. 2b.6.1.4 Procedure:6.1.4.1 ConditioningThe panel shall be subjected to acold soak of 20F (28.89C) for a period not less than 4 h,gradually reducing the surface temperature to 20 6 5F(28.89 6 2.78C). The nonthreat surface temperature shall bemainta
36、ined at 20 6 5F (28.89 6 2.78C), 2 in. (50.8 mm)F1915052from edge, during the test until an opening is created. Periodicmeasurements shall be taken by the test laboratory to maintainsurface temperature.6.1.4.2 InstallationThe panel shall be installed into thetest fixture with a minimum 1-in. (25.4-m
37、m) edge engagement.Appropriate gasketing material shall be used to keep glazingmaterial from contacting frame. Refer to manufacturers rec-ommendations.6.1.4.3 ProcedureUsing the test apparatus in accordancewith 6.1.3, begin a series of strikes against the center of thepanel for the number of require
38、d impacts, first with the bluntimpactor followed by the sharp impactor on the pendulum. Thestrikes shall be uniformly made with 9-s intervals. Changing ofblunt and sharp impactors during the test shall not exceed 90 s.During the test, reposition the pendulum as necessary toproduce the maximum possib
39、le duress on the panel, leading topanel failure. Record the number of strikes required to producethe first penetration of the panel, and the number of strikesrequired to produce an opening large enough to passa5by8by 8-in. (127 by 203.2 by 203.2-mm) rigid rectangular boxwith no more than 10 lbf (44.
40、48 N).6.1.5 Test TerminationTerminate the test after the re-quired impacts, or when an opening in the test panel largeenough to passa5by8by8-in. (127 by 203.2 by 203.2-mm)FIG. 1 Test Assembly for Detention Glazing Systems and Elevation Location of Impact Strike PointTABLE 1 Impact Test Criteria: Lar
41、ge Blunt and Sharp ImpactorsSequence and ImpactsA1 2 3 TotalSecurityGradeTotal TimeBBluntImpactorSharpImpactorBluntImpactorNumber ofImpacts1 60 min 150 300 150 6002 40 min 100 200 100 4003 20 min 50 100 50 2004 10 min 25 50 25 100ATo be performed on both hot and cold conditioned samples.BSee Appendi
42、x X5, Element of Time.TABLE 2 Impact Test Criteria: Torch and Small Blunt ImpactorSecurity Grade Blunt ImpactsA1 1502 100375450ATo be performed on a room temperature sample only.F1915053rigid rectangular box with no more than 10 lbf (44.48 N) isproduced, whichever occurs first. Record the size of op
43、ening tothe nearest14-in. (6.35-mm), at test termination.6.1.6 Precision and BiasThe precision and bias of thesetest methods for evaluating the impact fatigue strength ofdetention glazing are being determined.6.1.7 See Table 1 for Impact Test Criteria: Large Blunt andSharp Impactor.6.2 Warm Temperat
44、ure Impact Test:6.2.1 ScopeThese test methods are designed to evaluatethe capability of detention glazing to resist repeated impactforces from both a blunt and sharp impactor under warmtemperature conditions.6.2.2 Significance and UseThese test methods are in-tended to closely simulate a sustained b
45、attering ram style orpounding type attack and provide an evaluation of the capa-bility of the glazing to prevent, delay, or frustrate escape oraccess to unauthorized areas, or combination thereof, underwarm temperature conditions. The test results are intended toaid in assigning a level of physical
46、security to variousconfigurations of detention glazing. An impact test of thisdesign performed on detention glazing evaluates the impactstrength of the glazing and its components as well as thequality of fabrication techniques.6.2.3 Apparatus:6.2.3.1 Large Blunt ImpactorThe blunt impactor shallconsi
47、st of a hinged or pivoted system with a mass of 80 lbs(36.32 kg) capable of delivering impacts of 200 ft-lbf (271.2 J)to a glazing specimen mounted in a frame assembly. Thestriking surface of the impactor shall be made fromC1010C1020 carbon steel and have a circular striking surfaceof 4 6 0.04 in.2(
48、101.6 6 1.016 mm2) with rounded edgessimilar to a 10-lb (4.54-kg) sledge hammer head. See Fig. 2a.6.2.3.2 Sharp ImpactorThe sharp impactor shall consistof a hinged or pivoted system with a mass of 80 lbs (36.32 kg)capable of delivering impacts of 100 ft-lbf (135.6 J) to aglazing specimen mounted in
49、a frame assembly. The strikingsurface of the impactor shall be made from C1010C1020carbon steel and sharpness of the impacting point similar to theend of a new firemans axe at the beginning of a test sequence.See Fig. 2b.6.2.4 Procedure:6.2.4.1 ConditioningThe panel shall be subjected to aheat soak of 120F (48.9C) for a period not less than 4 h,gradually increasing the surface temperature to 120 6 5F(48.9 6 2.78C). The nonthreat surface temperature shall bemaintained at 120 6 5F (48.9 6 2.78C), 2 in. (50.8 mm)from edge, during th
