欢迎来到麦多课文档分享! | 帮助中心 海量文档,免费浏览,给你所需,享你所想!
麦多课文档分享
全部分类
  • 标准规范>
  • 教学课件>
  • 考试资料>
  • 办公文档>
  • 学术论文>
  • 行业资料>
  • 易语言源码>
  • ImageVerifierCode 换一换
    首页 麦多课文档分享 > 资源分类 > PDF文档下载
    分享到微信 分享到微博 分享到QQ空间

    ASTM F1886-1998(2004) Standard Test Method for Determining Integrity of Seals for Medical Packaging by Visual Inspection《用目视检验测定医疗包装密封完整性的标准试验方法》.pdf

    • 资源ID:535947       资源大小:67.03KB        全文页数:4页
    • 资源格式: PDF        下载积分:5000积分
    快捷下载 游客一键下载
    账号登录下载
    微信登录下载
    二维码
    微信扫一扫登录
    下载资源需要5000积分(如需开发票,请勿充值!)
    邮箱/手机:
    温馨提示:
    如需开发票,请勿充值!快捷下载时,用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)。
    如需开发票,请勿充值!如填写123,账号就是123,密码也是123。
    支付方式: 支付宝扫码支付    微信扫码支付   
    验证码:   换一换

    加入VIP,交流精品资源
     
    账号:
    密码:
    验证码:   换一换
      忘记密码?
        
    友情提示
    2、PDF文件下载后,可能会被浏览器默认打开,此种情况可以点击浏览器菜单,保存网页到桌面,就可以正常下载了。
    3、本站不支持迅雷下载,请使用电脑自带的IE浏览器,或者360浏览器、谷歌浏览器下载即可。
    4、本站资源下载后的文档和图纸-无水印,预览文档经过压缩,下载后原文更清晰。
    5、试题试卷类文档,如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案,请知晓。

    ASTM F1886-1998(2004) Standard Test Method for Determining Integrity of Seals for Medical Packaging by Visual Inspection《用目视检验测定医疗包装密封完整性的标准试验方法》.pdf

    1、Designation: F 1886 98 (Reapproved 2004)Standard Test Method forDetermining Integrity of Seals for Medical Packaging byVisual Inspection1This standard is issued under the fixed designation F 1886; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year oforiginal adoption or, in the case

    2、 of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. Asuperscript epsilon (e) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.1. Scope1.1 This test method covers the determination of channels inthe package seal down to a width of

    3、 75 m (0.003 in.) with a60100 % probability (see Section 8).1.1.1 The ability to visually detect channel defects inpackage seals is highly dependent on the size of channel, thedegree of contrast from sealed and unsealed areas, the amountand type of adhesive between the two package layers, reflect-in

    4、g light angle, types of material used, the use of magnification,and the inspectors level of training and experience.1.2 This test method is applicable to flexible and rigidpackages with at least one transparent side so that the seal areamay be clearly viewed.1.3 The values stated in SI units are to

    5、be regarded as thestandard. The values given in parentheses are for informationonly.1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of thesafety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is theresponsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-priate safety and health practices and

    6、 determine the applica-bility of regulatory limitations prior to use.2. Referenced Documents2.1 ASTM Standards:2F17 Terminology Relating to Flexible Barrier Materials3. Terminology3.1 Definitions of Terms Specific to This Standard:3.1.1 channel, nany unimpaired pathway across the entirewidth of the

    7、intended seal.3.1.2 sterile package integrity, nproperty of the packageseal and material, which ensures that it presents a microbialbarrier. (see also Terminology F17, microbiological packageintegrity).4. Summary of Test Method4.1 This test method provides a qualitative (accept/reject)visual inspect

    8、ion method to evaluate the appearance character-istics of unopened, intact seals in order to determine thepresence of defects that may affect the integrity of the package.5. Significance and Use5.1 Seal attributes can be linked directly to a number ofvariables in process parameters, equipment, or ma

    9、terial, as wellas environmental (room temperature and relative humidity).Visual seal characteristics and defects can provide evidence ofsterile package integrity and production sealing problems.5.2 Visual seal defects often will be the first indication ofheat sealing process variation. They also wil

    10、l indicate a lack of,or potential compromise to, package integrity after physicalpackage performance testing.6. Apparatus6.1 Illuminant, lighting arrangements to give about 540lumens/m2(50 fc) of white light or daylight on the specimens.6.2 Indelible Marking Pen.7. Procedure7.1 Visual acuity shall b

    11、e such that the inspection of the sealmay be performed at a distance of 30 to 45 cm (12 to 18 in.)NOTE 1Magnification devices, such as eyeloops, may be used as ananalytical tool to characterize identified seal defects.7.2 Inspect the entire sealed area of the package for com-pleteness and uniformity

    12、.NOTE 2Different package sizes and shapes may require differinglengths of time to adequately inspect the entire seal perimeter. Any timerequirement associated with visual inspection should allow for completeseal inspection.1This test method is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee F02 on Flexible

    13、Barrier Materials and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee F02.40 onPackage Integrity.Current edition approved June 1, 2004. Published June 2004. Originallyapproved in 1998. Last previous edition approved in 1998 as F 1886 98.2For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.o

    14、rg, orcontact ASTM Customer Service at serviceastm.org. For Annual Book of ASTMStandards volume information, refer to the standards Document Summary page onthe ASTM website.1Copyright ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States.NOTE 3Some p

    15、ackaging materials and adhesives may fluoresce underultraviolet light. Viewing the seal area in a UV light box will enhance thesealed-to-unsealed area contrast, and provide for easier defect identifica-tion.7.3 Identify and record any part of the seal where channelsappear across the entire seal widt

    16、h. Mark the location of thechannels.NOTE 4All other assessed defects (refer to Appendix X1) should becategorized according to user defined accept/reject criteria. Define theactions to be taken in the event defects are detected during normalproduction runs.7.4 Record the number and location of channe

    17、ls identifiedon each package.NOTE 5If confirmation of channels or incomplete seal areas inpeelable packages is necessary, hand peel such suspected packagecompletely separating the two material components and inspect the sealarea of the transferred adhesive for the same incomplete seal attributes ast

    18、he unopened package. Care should be taken to ensure a smoothcontinuous peeling motion so as not to cause any extraneous attributes.Heat seals should be cooled to ambient conditions before peeling open toallow for adhesive bonding to the opposite substrate to occur.In some instances, a channel or uns

    19、ealed area may be observed onlyafter the package is peeled open. Adhesive transfer is a qualitativemeasure of a materials ability to release the coating rather than conclusiveevidence that the seal has not been made. It is possible to have continuousseal integrity but fail to give complete transfer.

    20、 This is because the coatingmay have a stronger affinity for the substrate on which it is coated ratherthan the one to which it is sealed. In such cases, an additional physical sealintegrity test may be required to confirm if it is an unsealed area.8. Precision and Bias38.1 A round robin study was c

    21、onducted in 1997, whichincluded ten laboratories, four package types, and two differentchannel sizes randomly produced with 75 m (0.003 in.) and125 m (0.005 in.) diameter wire. The negative control consistsof the same type packages produced with no channels. The fourdifferent types of medical device

    22、 packages are:8.1.1 Open pouch (5 by 7 in.)clear film/coated paper;8.1.2 Open pouch (514 by 712 in.)clear film/uncoatedTYVEK4;8.1.3 Sealed rigid blister (812 by 514 in.)blue tintedblister/coated TYVEK; and,8.1.4 Open end pouch (6 by 812 in.)clear film/clear film(clear seal).8.2 The results of this s

    23、tudy are pass or fail; therefore, thedata is binomial with an expected average of np and anexpected variance of npg where n is the number of samples, pis the probability of an incorrect evaluation, and q is theprobability of a correct evaluation. A statistical analysis of thedata by means of a conti

    24、ngency table show significant differ-ences between all factors presented in the tables at a confidencelevel of better than 99 %. The results are presented in Tables1-4.9. Keywords9.1 channels; medical packaging; minimum seal width;spotty seals; sterile package integrity; visual seal inspection3Suppo

    25、rting data have been filed at ASTM International Headquarters and maybe obtained by requesting Research Report RR: F021013.4TYVEK is a trademark of Dupont, Wilmington DE.TABLE 1 Percent Incorrect by LaboratoryLab SamplesInspectedIncorrectAnalysisPercent (%)Incorrect1 117 0 0.002 117 24 20.513 117 5

    26、4.274 117 17 14.535 117 5 4.276 117 12 10.267 117 9 7.698 117 18 15.389 117 26 22.2210 117 10 8.55TABLE 2 Percent Incorrect by MaterialMaterialSamplesInspectedIncorrectAnalysisPercent (%)IncorrectFilm paper 300 14 4.67Film TYVEK 300 38 12.67PETG/TYVEK 290 59 20.34Film/film 280 15 5.36TABLE 3 Percent

    27、 Incorrect by Defect TypeDefect TypeSamplesInspectedIncorrectAnalysisPercent(%) IncorrectNo channels 370 20 5.4175 m channel 400 83 20.75125 m channel 400 23 5.75TABLE 4 Percent Correct by Material and Defect TypeMaterial Defect TypeSamplesInspectedCorrectAnalysisPercent (%)CorrectFilm/paper none 10

    28、0 97 9775 m 100 89 89125 m 100 100 100Film/TYVEK none 100 97 9775 m 100 69 69125 m 100 96 96PETG/TYVEK none 90 88 9875 m 100 60 60125 M 100 83 83Film/film none 80 68 8575 m 100 99 99125 m 100 98 98F 1886 98 (2004)2APPENDIX(Nonmandatory Information)X1. VISUAL SEAL APPEARANCE CHARACTERISTICS AND PROBA

    29、BLE CAUSESX1.1 This appendix will serve to review some of thecommon seal appearance characteristics that may occur andsome common reasons for that occurrence. Specifications forthese seal characteristics need to be established by individualorganizations for their specific product and package styles.

    30、Each requirement should be established with appropriaterationale and necessary supporting documentation.X1.2 Unsealed AreasAn unsealed area occurs when aheat seal is never made to the package or when a seal has beenmade to a package and is later ruptured. Causes to this probleminclude misalignment o

    31、f package to seal bar or platen, mis-alignment of the seal bar or platen to the mating seal surface,foreign matter underneath the seal bar or platen preventing aseal, or damage to the seal bar or platen that prevents the seal.There also can be foreign contamination on the packagingmaterials that pre

    32、vents a seal from being made. Seal rupturecan occur due to internal or external forces placed on the sealdue to sterilization conditions, weight of product, stressfulhandling of the package, and so forth. The visual characteris-tics of a package that has never been sealed versus one that hasbeen sea

    33、led, and subsequently opened, are very different, anddepend on the material substrates being examined.X1.3 Nonhomogeneous or Undersealed AreasThis occurswhen a heat seal is made, and may not have adequate strengthdue to incorrect process parameters, such as temperature,pressure, or dwell. Insufficie

    34、nt sealing temperature either toomuch, too little, or unevenly applied pressure; too short aprocess time; or, excessive material thickness variation aresome of the conditions that may cause seals to appear to bespotty or mottled. A spotty or mottled appearance may be afunction of the adhesive proper

    35、ties, as well. This attribute maybe in varying degrees of severity and should be categorizedbased on appearance and whether sterile package integrity canbe maintained. Often it is easier to see this type of defect undera magnifying light or UV light box.X1.4 Oversealed AreasA combination of too much

    36、 heat,pressure, or dwell time may cause oversealing to the point thatit may cause packaging components to melt and become brittleand susceptible to cracking. When TYVEK spunbonded poly-olefin or a similar porous material is one of the substrates, thiscondition often is seen as a transparent or trans

    37、lucent sealwhere the material fibers are fused. This may become evidentthrough an evaluation for pinholes or cracks along the seal.Another result of oversealing may be a spotty or incompletelooking seal where, in this case, the heat seal adhesive isoverheated and flows into the porous fiber structur

    38、e of thematerial.X1.5 Narrow SealsThis may occur either during thesealing process or as a result of seal creep or partial rupture ofthe seal due to environmental stresses. Misalignment of thepackage under the sealing die, skewed packaging components,bulging product, or misalignment of cutters/slitte

    39、rs during thetrimming operation are a few causes that may occur during thesealing process. Seal creep may be a result of the sterilizationprocess or stressed seals at temperature extremes. Impact alsomay cause the seals to partially rupture. The width of packageseals need to be compared to individua

    40、lly defined specificationlimits to ensure the package will maintain its integrity throughthe expected sterilization, handling, and distribution systems.X1.6 ChannelsThis is seen as an unsealed pathway acrossthe entire width of the intended seal. Causes for channels havebeen discussed above in X1.2.X

    41、1.7 Wrinkles/Foldovers/CracksFoldovers occur when amaterial is folded over prior to the seal being formed. In somesituations the seal may be of adequate strength to form acomplete seal. In other situations there may not be adequatestrength, and a channel results. Wrinkles and cracks occur aftera sea

    42、l is formed and are caused by the handling of the package.Generally, this occurs with flexible substrates. These too canresult in a channel through the entire seal. These types ofcharacteristics often are hard to judge by visual inspectionalone and need to be further evaluated by alternate means suc

    43、has dye penetration.X1.8 Tears/PinholesThese typically occur within the ma-terial substrates, rather than the seal itself. Visual inspectionmay or may not detect tears or pinholes. Further evaluationmay be required if visual inspection is not adequate todetermine acceptability. Light box inspection

    44、or physicalpackage integrity tests may be appropriate.F 1886 98 (2004)3ASTM International takes no position respecting the validity of any patent rights asserted in connection with any item mentionedin this standard. Users of this standard are expressly advised that determination of the validity of

    45、any such patent rights, and the riskof infringement of such rights, are entirely their own responsibility.This standard is subject to revision at any time by the responsible technical committee and must be reviewed every five years andif not revised, either reapproved or withdrawn. Your comments are

    46、 invited either for revision of this standard or for additional standardsand should be addressed to ASTM International Headquarters. Your comments will receive careful consideration at a meeting of theresponsible technical committee, which you may attend. If you feel that your comments have not rece

    47、ived a fair hearing you shouldmake your views known to the ASTM Committee on Standards, at the address shown below.This standard is copyrighted by ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959,United States. Individual reprints (single or multiple copies) of this standard may be obtained by contacting ASTM at the aboveaddress or at 610-832-9585 (phone), 610-832-9555 (fax), or serviceastm.org (e-mail); or through the ASTM website(www.astm.org).F 1886 98 (2004)4


    注意事项

    本文(ASTM F1886-1998(2004) Standard Test Method for Determining Integrity of Seals for Medical Packaging by Visual Inspection《用目视检验测定医疗包装密封完整性的标准试验方法》.pdf)为本站会员(twoload295)主动上传,麦多课文档分享仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知麦多课文档分享(点击联系客服),我们立即给予删除!




    关于我们 - 网站声明 - 网站地图 - 资源地图 - 友情链接 - 网站客服 - 联系我们

    copyright@ 2008-2019 麦多课文库(www.mydoc123.com)网站版权所有
    备案/许可证编号:苏ICP备17064731号-1 

    收起
    展开