1、Designation: D5163 08D5163 16Standard Guide forEstablishing a Program for Condition Assessment ofCoating Service Level I Coating Systems in Nuclear PowerPlants1This standard is issued under the fixed designation D5163; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year oforiginal ad
2、option or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. Asuperscript epsilon () indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.1. Scope1.1 This standard covers procedures for establishing a monitoring program
3、for condition assessment of Coating Service Level(CSL) I coating systems in operating nuclear power plants. Monitoring is an ongoing process of evaluating the condition andperformance of the in-service coating systems.1.2 It is the intent of this standard to provide a recommended basis for establish
4、ing a coatings condition assessment program,not to mandate a singular basis for all programs. Variations or simplifications of the program described in this standard may beappropriate for each operating nuclear power plant depending on their licensing commitments. Similar guidelines are applicablefo
5、r Coating Service Level III and other areas outside containment.1.3 This standard does not address the requirements of ASME Section XI, In-Service Inspection Subsections IWE andIWL.IWL are beyond the scope of this standard.1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if
6、any, associated with its use. It is the responsibilityof the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatorylimitations prior to use.2. Referenced Documents2.1 ASTM Standards:2D610 Practice for Evaluating Degree of Rusting on P
7、ainted Steel SurfacesD714 Test Method for Evaluating Degree of Blistering of PaintsD1186 Test Methods for Nondestructive Measurement of Dry Film Thickness of Nonmagnetic Coatings Applied to a FerrousBase (Withdrawn 2006)3D3359 Test Methods for Measuring Adhesion by Tape TestD4538 Terminology Relatin
8、g to Protective Coating and Lining Work for Power Generation FacilitiesD4541 Test Method for Pull-Off Strength of Coatings Using Portable Adhesion TestersD5498 Guide for Developing a Training Program for Personnel Performing Coating and Lining Work Inspection for NuclearFacilitiesD6677 Test Method f
9、or Evaluating Adhesion by KnifeD7091 Practice for Nondestructive Measurement of Dry Film Thickness of Nonmagnetic Coatings Applied to Ferrous Metalsand Nonmagnetic, Nonconductive Coatings Applied to Non-Ferrous MetalsD7108 Guide for Establishing Qualifications for a Nuclear Coatings SpecialistD7234
10、Test Method for Pull-Off Adhesion Strength of Coatings on Concrete Using Portable Pull-Off Adhesion Testers2.2 SSPC Standards:3SSPC-PA 2 Procedure for Determining Conformance to Dry Coating Thickness RequirementsSSPC-PA 29 Measurement of Dry Paint Thickness With Magnetic Coating Thickness on Cementi
11、tious Substrates UsingUltrasonic Gages1 This guide is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee D33 on Protective Coating and Lining Work for Power Generation Facilities and is the direct responsibilityof Subcommittee D33.04 on Quality Systems and Inspection.Current edition approved Nov. 1, 2008Oct.
12、1, 2016. Published December 2008December 2016. Originally approved in 1991. Last previous edition approved in 20052008as D5163 05a.D5163 08. DOI: 10.1520/D5163-08.10.1520/D5163-16.2 For referencedASTM standards, visit theASTM website, www.astm.org, or contactASTM Customer Service at serviceastm.org.
13、 For Annual Book of ASTM Standardsvolume information, refer to the standardsstandards Document Summary page on the ASTM website.3 Available from Society for Protective Coatings (SSPC), 40 24th St., 6th Floor, Pittsburgh, PA 15222-4656, http:/www.sspc.org.This document is not an ASTM standard and is
14、intended only to provide the user of an ASTM standard an indication of what changes have been made to the previous version. Becauseit may not be technically possible to adequately depict all changes accurately, ASTM recommends that users consult prior editions as appropriate. In all cases only the c
15、urrent versionof the standard as published by ASTM is to be considered the official document.Copyright ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States1SSPC-VIS 2 Standard Method of Evaluating Degree of Rusting on Painted Steel Surfaces3. Termin
16、ology3.1 DefinitionsDefinitions for use with this standard are shown in Terminology D4538 or other applicable standards.3.2 Definitions of Terms Specific to This Standard:3.2.1 coating condition assessment, noverall evaluation of the coating condition based upon performance monitoring andvisual insp
17、ection.3.2.2 coating maintenance work, nall-inclusive term associated with coating work that expressly relates to repair,refurbishment, or replacement of an existing coating. (See also coating work.)3.2.3 in-service coatings monitoring program, nsystematic program established to assess and document
18、the condition of anexisting coating system with respect to prescribed performance attributes.4. Significance and Use4.1 Establishment of an in-service coatings monitoring program permits planning and prioritization of coatings maintenancework as needed to maintain coating integrity and performance i
19、n nuclear Coating Service Level CSL I coating systems. Foradditional information on nuclear maintenance coating work, refer toASTM Manual on Maintenance Coatings for Nuclear PowerPlants.MNL8.44.2 A coatings monitoring program enables early identification and detection of potential problems in coatin
20、g systems. SomeCoating Service Level CSLI coating systems may be known in advance to be suspect, deficient, or unqualified. Monitoring coatingperformance will assist in developing follow-up procedures to resolve any significant deficiency relative to coating work.4.3 Degraded coatings may generate d
21、ebris under design basis accident conditions that could adversely affect the performanceof the post-accident safety systems. A coatings monitoring program may be required to fulfill safety analysis report and genericletter commitments for Coating Service Level CSL I coating work in a nuclear power p
22、lant facility.5. Responsibility5.1 The licensee or his designee shallshould identify the department or group within the organization to be responsible forestablishing the applicable requirements for activities or procedures covered by this guidestandard and shallshould document thescope of their res
23、ponsibility. Delegation of this responsibility to other outside qualified organizations is permitted and shallshouldbe documented.5.2 It is the responsibility of the licensee or his designee performing these activities to The assigned department or group shallspecify the detailed methods and procedu
24、res for meeting the applicable requirements of this guide.standard.5.3 The licensee or his designee shall assign a coordinator to be responsible for supervising coating inspection activities, datacollection and documentation, and for ensuring that inspection personnel are adequately trained and qual
25、ified.licensees NuclearCoating Specialist, or other individual assigned by the department or group should be responsible for:5.3.1 Coordinating inspections, and any necessary testing, of existing coatings.5.3.2 Evaluating the results and assessing the coating condition.5.3.3 Establishing priorities
26、for coating repair/replacement.5.3.4 Performing a specific follow-up inspection as necessary to investigate and resolve anomalies or degradation identifiedduring the initial walk down.5.4 The licensee or his designee shall assign responsibility for evaluating the results of inspection activities car
27、ried out underthe in-service coatings monitoring program.5.4 In the event of conflict, users of this guide must recognize that the licenseeslicensees plant-specific quality assuranceprogram and licensing commitments shall prevail with respect to the coating performance monitoring process.6. Frequenc
28、y6.1 Frequency of in-service coating inspection monitoring shall be determined by the licensee or his designee. In operatingnuclear power plants, certain monitoring activities may be restricted to major maintenance outages or refueling outages. It is a goodpractice to perform inspections during each
29、 refueling outage or during other major maintenance outages.7. Records and Past History7.1 Coating performance will depend on the operating conditions experienced by the coating systems. Records of theseconditions shall be obtained for each operating unit. These may include, but not be limited to, a
30、mbient conditions, temperatures,4 MNL8, Manual on Maintenance Coatings for Nuclear Power Plants. Available from ASTM International Headquarters, 100 Barr Harbor Dr., West Conshohocken, PA19428-2959.D5163 162humidity, immersion, splash and spillage, chemical exposures, radiation exposures, previous d
31、econtamination procedures, abrasionand physical abuse, and start-up/shutdown frequency. Any change in service criteria or modifications of the physical design shallbe identified and dated.7.2 The last two performance monitoring reports pertaining to the coating systems shallshould be reviewed prior
32、to themonitoring process. Other past coatings history data to be reviewed may include:7.2.1 Copies of coating specifications, manufacturersmanufacturers product data sheets, and application procedures forin-place coatings.7.2.2 Quality control documentation for the existing in-place coating systems
33、and their application.7.2.3 Copies of previous inspection or monitoring reports.7.2.4 Documentation pertaining to any maintenance work performed on existing coating systems.8. Monitoring Procedure8.1 Prior to conducting an inspection of the coating systems, the responsible organization shall ensure
34、that the necessaryservices and equipment required for inspection are provided. Factors that must be considered while planning the inspectionactivities include, but are not limited to, lighting, access to coated surfaces, cleaning surfaces of any deposit or build up, ventilationand, where necessary,
35、special underwater inspection requirements.8.2 Station access procedures for Coating Service Level CSL I coating systems monitoring shall be followed. While accessprocedures may vary from plant to plant, specific station access procedures may include:8.2.1 Security clearance for protected, radiation
36、 controlled, and vital areas, and escorted or unescorted clearance as required,8.2.2 Radiological history including prior radiation exposure for all personnel involved,8.2.3 Health physics classroom training in the use of radiation detection and monitoring devices and procedures for wearinganti-cont
37、amination clothing,8.2.4 A radiation work permit based on health physicsphysics radiological survey of the work location,8.2.5 Compliance with radiation work permit requirements and other special radiation controls unique to each work location,and8.2.6 Issuance of dosimetry.8.3 The safety requiremen
38、ts of the facility licensee or his designee must be met when performing all inspection operations.9. Personnel Requirements, Qualifications, and Training9.1 The Nuclear Coating Specialist shall meet the requirements of Guide D7108.9.2 Individuals who perform visual assessment and coordinate coating
39、condition assessment shall be other than the NuclearCoating Specialist (Guideperforming D7108) or personnel judged to be acceptable by the Nuclear Coating Specialist. After visualassessment, should the Nuclear Coating Specialist determine that a specific follow-up inspection is needed, individuals p
40、erformingthat inspection the functions of a Nuclear Coating Specialist shall be trained into the applicable referenced standards of GuideD5498 and the plant specific requirements of licensees the licensees Quality Assurance program.10. Inspection Plan10.1 The licensee or his designee shallshould dev
41、elop a plant specific inspection plan to accomplish the objectives of themonitoring program. A visual inspection shall be conducted on all accessible coated surfaces during a walk-through. After thewalk-through, thorough visual inspections shallshould be carried out on previously designated areas an
42、d on areas noted as deficientduring the walk-through. The inspection plan shall address the following based on specific licensee or his designee requirements:10.1.1 Apre-inspection briefing to familiarize all personnel performing inspection with objectives of the inspections, proceduresto be followe
43、d, and precautions to be taken,10.1.2 Monitoring team(s) assignments to specific areas for inspection(s), and10.1.3 Location maps dividing the plant into identifiable areas for inspection activities to be issued to inspection teams. Themaps shallshould also identify items/areas requiring special tes
44、ting, if any. The locations of all defects and of all tests performedshall defects, tests performed, and photographs (analog, digital, and/or video) taken should be recorded on the maps so thatadditional testing, recoating, and further monitoring may be performed.10.2 During walk-through, visually e
45、xamine coated surfaces for any visible defects, such as blistering, cracking, flaking/peeling,rusting, and physical damage.10.2.1 BlisteringCompare any blistering found to the blistering pictorial standards of coatings defects (refer to Test MethodD714) and record size and frequency. If the blisters
46、 are larger than those on the comparison photographs, measure, record size andextent, and photograph. Report if blistered portions are intact.10.2.2 CrackingCracking may be limited to the one layer of coating or extend through to the substrate. Measure the lengthof the crack or if extensive cracking
47、 has occurred, measure the size of the area affected. Determine if the cracking is isolated oris part of a pattern. Record measurements and describe crack depth and pattern on the inspection report. Photograph the areaaffected.D5163 16310.2.3 Flaking/Peeling/DelaminationMeasure the approximate size
48、of the degraded coating area and note the pattern formed.Carefully test to see if lifting can be easily achieved beyond the obvious peeled area. Note all observations including location offailure within the coating film, whether the failure is cohesive or adhesive, etc., on the inspection report and
49、 photograph the areaaffected.10.2.4 RustingCompare with the pictorial standards of Test Method D610/SSPC-VIS 2 to determine the degree of rusting. Tryto determine the source of rusting (that is, is it surface stain caused by rusting elsewhere, or is it a failure of the coating allowingthe substrate to rust). Photograph the affected area and record observations on the inspection report.10.2.5 If no defects are found, mark “Coating Intact, No Defects” on the inspection report.10.2.6 If portions of the coating cannot be inspected, note the specific areas on the
