欢迎来到麦多课文档分享! | 帮助中心 海量文档,免费浏览,给你所需,享你所想!
麦多课文档分享
全部分类
  • 标准规范>
  • 教学课件>
  • 考试资料>
  • 办公文档>
  • 学术论文>
  • 行业资料>
  • 易语言源码>
  • ImageVerifierCode 换一换
    首页 麦多课文档分享 > 资源分类 > PDF文档下载
    分享到微信 分享到微博 分享到QQ空间

    ASTM C1394-2003 Standard Guide for In-Situ Structural Silicone Glazing Evaluation《原位结构硅酮门窗玻璃评价的标准指南》.pdf

    • 资源ID:464462       资源大小:32.66KB        全文页数:4页
    • 资源格式: PDF        下载积分:10000积分
    快捷下载 游客一键下载
    账号登录下载
    微信登录下载
    二维码
    微信扫一扫登录
    下载资源需要10000积分(如需开发票,请勿充值!)
    邮箱/手机:
    温馨提示:
    如需开发票,请勿充值!快捷下载时,用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)。
    如需开发票,请勿充值!如填写123,账号就是123,密码也是123。
    支付方式: 支付宝扫码支付    微信扫码支付   
    验证码:   换一换

    加入VIP,交流精品资源
     
    账号:
    密码:
    验证码:   换一换
      忘记密码?
        
    友情提示
    2、PDF文件下载后,可能会被浏览器默认打开,此种情况可以点击浏览器菜单,保存网页到桌面,就可以正常下载了。
    3、本站不支持迅雷下载,请使用电脑自带的IE浏览器,或者360浏览器、谷歌浏览器下载即可。
    4、本站资源下载后的文档和图纸-无水印,预览文档经过压缩,下载后原文更清晰。
    5、试题试卷类文档,如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案,请知晓。

    ASTM C1394-2003 Standard Guide for In-Situ Structural Silicone Glazing Evaluation《原位结构硅酮门窗玻璃评价的标准指南》.pdf

    1、Designation: C 1394 03Standard Guide forIn-Situ Structural Silicone Glazing Evaluation1This standard is issued under the fixed designation C 1394; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year oforiginal adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number

    2、in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. Asuperscript epsilon (e) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.INTRODUCTIONSSG is popular because of its unique method of retaining glass or other panels in smooth exteriorwalls, interrupted only by narrow sealant jo

    3、ints. The first four-sided SSG in commercial constructionis on the former corporate headquarters building of SHG Incorporated (formerly known as Smith,Hinchman unknown structuralsealant durability; and the level of understanding of the principles of SSG by glazers. This guideaddresses these concerns

    4、 by providing suggestions for in situ evaluations of completed installations ofany age.1. Scope1.1 It is recommended to periodically evaluate the existingcondition of structural sealant glazing (hereinafter called SSG)installations in situ to detect problems before they becomesevere or pervasive. Ev

    5、aluation of existing SSG installationsare required by certain building codes and local ordinances.This guide provides a program to evaluate the existing condi-tions, lists typical conditions, which might be found, andsuggests times when such evaluations are appropriate. Thecommittee with jurisdictio

    6、n over this standard is not aware ofany comparable standards published by any other organiza-tions.2. Referenced Documents2.1 ASTM Standards:2C 717 Terminology for Building Seals and SealantsC 1392 Guide for Evaluating Failure of Structural SealantGlazingC 1401 Guide for Structural Sealant GlazingE

    7、122 Practice for Choice of Sample Size to Estimate aMeasure of Quality for a Lot or Process3. Terminology3.1 Definitions: The definitions of the following terms usedin this guide are found in Terminology C 717: structuralsealant; structural sealant glazing; two-sided structural sealantglazing; four-

    8、sided structural sealant glazing; fluid migration.3.2 Definitions of Terms Specific to This Standard:3.2.1 qualified personone with a recognized degree orprofessional registration and extensive knowledge and experi-ence in the field of structural sealant glazing, and who iscapable of design, analysi

    9、s, evaluation, and specifications inthe subject.4. Significance and Use4.1 Guidelines are provided for the procedures to evaluateexisting SSG installations, including two- and four-sidedinstallations. Due to the unlimited range of materials that maybe used in a particular building, the information c

    10、ontained inthis guide is general in nature. For a discussion of new SSGinstallations, refer to Guide C 1401.4.2 Typical conditions are listed that might be discoveredduring, or suggest the need for, such evaluations. Guidelinesare also suggested for times to perform evaluations. Theseguidelines are

    11、also necessarily general. Professional judgmentof a qualified person should be used in determining theappropriate time to perform an evaluation on a particularbuilding.1This guide is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee C24 on Building Sealsand Sealants and is the direct responsibility of Subcom

    12、mittee C24.10 on Specifi-cations, Guides, and Practices.Current edition approved Dec. 1, 2003. Published January 2004. Originallyapproved in 1998. Last previous edition approved in 1998 as C 139498.2For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, orcontact ASTM Customer Service

    13、at serviceastm.org. For Annual Book of ASTMStandards volume information, refer to the standards Document Summary page onthe ASTM website.1Copyright ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States.4.3 This guide should not be the only reference

    14、consultedwhen determining the scope of a proposed evaluation. Forexample, the local building code and the manufacturersproduct literature for the actual materials used (if known)should also be considered.4.4 This document is not a substitute for experience andjudgment in assessing the condition of t

    15、he specialized types ofconstruction discussed.5. Reasons to Perform an Evaluation5.1 There are numerous reasons that a building owner ormanager (hereinafter “owner”) may choose to evaluate an SSGsystem, whether discretionary or to comply with an ordinance.The recommended evaluation levels, as discus

    16、sed in Section 7,are referenced for each situation. The findings from one levelof investigation may trigger the need for a more in-depthinvestigation. At a minimum, it is recommended that anexisting SSG installation be evaluated when triggered by anyof the following events:5.1.1 After a natural disa

    17、ster, such as an earthquake or majorwind storm, or a man-made disaster such as a bomb blast,Level 2;5.1.2 After a recall or published concern over a specificproduct or system, Level 1;5.1.3 Upon a change of property ownership, Level 1;5.1.4 Before repeating a new design, Level 1;5.1.5 As dictated by

    18、 government regulations, Level 1 or 2;or5.1.6 When distress is discovered (see Section 8), Level 2,or, if prevalent distress is found, Level 3.5.2 In addition to event-triggered evaluations, it is recom-mended that proactive owners also perform periodic evalua-tions at the following intervals: (Note

    19、 that some of theseperiods may overlap. If distress is found during any evaluation,then more frequent and more in-depth evaluations should beconsidered.)5.2.1 When convenient, such as in conjunction with occa-sional glass replacement, or when access is available, Level 1;5.2.2 Immediately after inst

    20、allation of a new system, Level2;5.2.3 Just before expiration of the warranty period, Level 2;5.2.4 Between 1 and 2 years after substantial completion,Level 1;5.2.5 After 5 years, Level 1;5.2.6 After 10 years, Level 2;5.2.7 After 15 years, Level 1 (if Level 2 was performed asrecommended after 10 yea

    21、rs); and5.2.8 After 20 years, and each successive 10 years, Level 2.6. Symptoms of Problems With SSG6.1 Whether due to original construction mistakes or latentdefects, SSG installations sometimes exhibit distress. Thefollowing list summarizes conditions that may indicate poororiginal construction or

    22、 a subsequent failure of the structuralsealant, and therefore require evaluation. This list may not beall-inconclusive.6.1.1 Glass breakage from an unknown causeThere arenumerous potential causes of spontaneous glass breakage; ifthe cause is unknown, then it should be investigated prior toglass repl

    23、acement whether an SSG defect contributed to thefailure.6.1.2 Air or water infiltrationIf air or water migratesthrough or to the structural sealant joint, then it must also havelost its structural functionat least for part of its length.Symptoms of air or water leakage include:6.1.2.1 Visible accumu

    24、lation of liquid water during orfollowing storms;6.1.2.2 Wet insulation;6.1.2.3 Organic growth;6.1.2.4 Water stains or salt deposits;6.1.2.5 Audible rattle or whistle;6.1.2.6 Discoloration of laminated glazing;6.1.2.7 Condensation or frost on glazing;6.1.2.8 Fogging of insulated glass units;6.1.2.9

    25、Opacifier failure on spandrel glassMoisture is afactor in the failure of some opacifiers, and may indicate waterinfiltration; and6.1.2.10 Visible sealant failures Sealant failures may beobserved from inside or outside, depending on the design, andmay involve the weather-seal joint as well as the str

    26、ucturaljoint. Visible manifestations of sealant failures include:6.1.2.10.1 Intermittent loss of adhesionNonadhered seal-ant may differ in iridescence or reflectivity compared toadhered sealant when viewed through the glass;6.1.2.10.2 Fluid migration or exudation The accumula-tion of a fluid residue

    27、 on the sealant or glass may indicate achemical reaction between the sealant and an incompatibleadjacent material;6.1.2.10.3 Discoloration of the sealantA color changemay indicate a chemical reaction between the sealant and anincompatible adjacent material;6.1.2.10.4 Cohesive failureAlthough difficu

    28、lt to observefrom inside or outside, cohesive failure could indicate over-stressing of the sealant;6.1.2.11 Disengaged or nonaligned lites, or displaced spac-ers or setting blocks, which may indicate glass displacement;and6.1.2.12 Poor dimensional control of a structural sealantjointWhen viewed from

    29、 inside or outside, the structuralsealant should have uniform dimensions and full joints. Vary-ing dimensions may indicate poor original installation prac-tices, or improper/inadequate cure of the sealant.7. Procedures for Evaluating Existing Conditions7.1 The following evaluation procedures are rec

    30、ommendedto be performed in determining the condition of an SSGinstallation. Depending on the reason for the evaluation and thetype of installation, only certain procedures may be necessary;for example, more scrutiny is warranted for high-rise, 4-sidedSSG than for low-rise, 2-sided SSG. The objective

    31、 of theevaluation is to obtain a reasonable degree of confidence in theexisting system, since one hundred percent certainty is notpossible.C13940327.2 Different levels of expertise are needed to perform thevarious levels of evaluation, but in all cases a qualified personshould supervise the evaluati

    32、on.7.3 Level 1Perform all of the following evaluation proce-dures:7.3.1 Review project documentation, including original de-sign drawings, shop drawings, mock-up testing report, andprevious evaluation reports. Review original SSG designcalculations, or if not available, perform calculations to deter

    33、-mine stress on sealant from thermal and wind loading (and,where appropriate, seismic loading);7.3.2 Interview building management and maintenance per-sonnel and tenants regarding breakage history of lites and otherdistress. Map findings on elevation drawings, and assesswhether a pattern exists; and

    34、7.3.3 Perform a cursory visual assessment from the interior,and from the exterior ground, roofs, and balconies.7.4 Level 2Perform the following, plus all of the proce-dures of Level 1 (unless a Level 1 evaluation has beenperformed previously and the documentation recommended tobe kept by the owner i

    35、n 8.2 is available):7.4.1 Perform close-up visual evaluation from the interior;7.4.2 Observe weatherseal joints and structural joints fromthe exterior. Document distress, and assess whether a patternexists. Utilize high-powered optical tools to assist in observingfrom remote viewing areas, or from s

    36、uspended scaffolding.Choose scaffold “drops” to represent the entire building,including different wind zones, elevations, exposures, details,and construction times; and7.4.3 Qualitatively measure the sealant adhesion by press-ing in with a thumb. Alternatively, semi-quantitative adhesionstrength dat

    37、a can be obtained using a Chatalon spring loadindicator, or pulling cut tabs to failure and measuring theelongation.7.5 Level 3Perform all of the following procedures underthe field supervision of a qualified person, plus the proceduresof Levels 1 and 2 (except that Level 1 may be eliminated if itha

    38、s been performed previously and the documentation recom-mended to be kept by the owner in 8.2 is available:7.5.1 Consider whether the existing conditions indicate thatevaluation of all lites is warranted. If not, develop a rationalapproach for evaluating a representative sample of the totallites. Th

    39、ere is a trade-off between accuracy and the cost of thestudy. For quantitative tests and measurements, it is recom-mended that the number of specimens or tests be selected toensure achieving at least a 90 % confidence interval with amaximum 20 % margin of error. Different levels of study mayrequire

    40、stricter parameters; and7.5.2 Perform in-situ load testing on selected lites, either byuniform load (air pressure) or point load (suction cups). Oneapplicable test method is described in Guide C 1392.8. Report and Record Keeping8.1 At the conclusion of the evaluation, a written reportshould be prepa

    41、red presenting findings, conclusions, and, ifappropriate, recommendations for remedial action.8.2 It is very important that the evaluation data be main-tained by the building owner in a standardized format tofacilitate comparisons over time. It is recommended that allevaluation reports be kept in on

    42、e notebook binder, along withother information pertinent to the SSG installation.8.3 The report should provide the following information:8.3.1 Building identification, background information, andreferences to original design and construction firms.8.3.2 Purpose of evaluation, and triggering event or

    43、 reason.8.3.3 Evaluation procedures used, including referencing thespecified levels of evaluation in this guide.8.3.4 Availability and adequacy of original design andconstruction documentation, drawings, and calculations, espe-cially in relation to current code requirements or state-of-the-art SSG d

    44、esign procedures.8.3.5 Distress and defects observed.8.3.6 Changes since last evaluation.8.3.7 Field testing results. Record findings and test locationson elevation drawings in an appendix.8.3.8 Expected reliability of extrapolating the findings fromlimited areas to the entire system.8.3.9 Recommend

    45、ations for further evaluation or remedialaction.9. Keywords9.1 distress; durability; glazing; structural glazing; struc-trual sealant glazing; structural sealant joint; structural silicone;SSG; SSG design calculation; SSG design procedure; SSGevaluation; SSG installations;C1394033APPENDIX(Nonmandato

    46、ry Information)X1. BIBLIOGRAPHYX1.1 For more information see the following:X1.1.1 Documents prepared by manufacturers and tradeassociations:X1.1.1.1 Structural Silicone Glazing, by Dow Corning Cor-poration.X1.1.1.2 Structural Silicone Glazing Guide, by GeneralElectric (GE Silicones) CompanyX1.1.1.3

    47、Architectural Guidelines for Glazing Systems, byTremco CorporationX1.1.1.4 Curtain Wall Manual No. 13, Structural SealantGlazing Systems (CW-13), AAMA, Schaumburg, Illinois,1985.X1.1.2 Books:X1.1.2.1 Sealants in Construction, Jerome M. Klosowski,Marcel Dekker, Inc., 1989.X1.1.2.2 Construction Sealants and Adhesives, Julian R.Panek or through the ASTM website(www.astm.org).C1394034


    注意事项

    本文(ASTM C1394-2003 Standard Guide for In-Situ Structural Silicone Glazing Evaluation《原位结构硅酮门窗玻璃评价的标准指南》.pdf)为本站会员(boatfragile160)主动上传,麦多课文档分享仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知麦多课文档分享(点击联系客服),我们立即给予删除!




    关于我们 - 网站声明 - 网站地图 - 资源地图 - 友情链接 - 网站客服 - 联系我们

    copyright@ 2008-2019 麦多课文库(www.mydoc123.com)网站版权所有
    备案/许可证编号:苏ICP备17064731号-1 

    收起
    展开