欢迎来到麦多课文档分享! | 帮助中心 海量文档,免费浏览,给你所需,享你所想!
麦多课文档分享
全部分类
  • 标准规范>
  • 教学课件>
  • 考试资料>
  • 办公文档>
  • 学术论文>
  • 行业资料>
  • 易语言源码>
  • ImageVerifierCode 换一换
    首页 麦多课文档分享 > 资源分类 > PDF文档下载
    分享到微信 分享到微博 分享到QQ空间

    AASHTO FCAH-1990 Informational Guide on Fencing Controlled Access Highways《公路出入口围栏限制的信息指南.修改件3》.pdf

    • 资源ID:417498       资源大小:417.55KB        全文页数:15页
    • 资源格式: PDF        下载积分:5000积分
    快捷下载 游客一键下载
    账号登录下载
    微信登录下载
    二维码
    微信扫一扫登录
    下载资源需要5000积分(如需开发票,请勿充值!)
    邮箱/手机:
    温馨提示:
    如需开发票,请勿充值!快捷下载时,用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)。
    如需开发票,请勿充值!如填写123,账号就是123,密码也是123。
    支付方式: 支付宝扫码支付    微信扫码支付   
    验证码:   换一换

    加入VIP,交流精品资源
     
    账号:
    密码:
    验证码:   换一换
      忘记密码?
        
    友情提示
    2、PDF文件下载后,可能会被浏览器默认打开,此种情况可以点击浏览器菜单,保存网页到桌面,就可以正常下载了。
    3、本站不支持迅雷下载,请使用电脑自带的IE浏览器,或者360浏览器、谷歌浏览器下载即可。
    4、本站资源下载后的文档和图纸-无水印,预览文档经过压缩,下载后原文更清晰。
    5、试题试卷类文档,如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案,请知晓。

    AASHTO FCAH-1990 Informational Guide on Fencing Controlled Access Highways《公路出入口围栏限制的信息指南.修改件3》.pdf

    1、 AN INFORMATIONAL GUIDE ON FENCING CONTROLLED ACCESS HIGHWAYS Prepared by the Task Force on Geometric Design of the Standing Committee on Highways Subcommittee on Design Published by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials 444 North Capitol St., N.W., Suite 225 Washing

    2、ton, D.C. 20001 November 1990 Copyright, 1990, by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. Printed in the United States of America. All rights reserved. This book, or part thereof, may not be reproduced without written permission of the publishers. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE

    3、1990 PRESIDENT: Kermit Justice, Delaware VICE PRESIDENT: Hal Rives, Georgia SECRETARY: Clyde E. Pyers, Maryland IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT: James P. Pitz, Michigan ELECTED REGIONAL MEMBERS: Region I Dana Connors, Maine, 1990 Howard Yerusalim, Pennsylvania, 1991 Neil Wagoner, Louisiana, 1990 John R. Ta

    4、bb, Mississippi, 1991 Bernard Hurst, Ohio, 1990 Darre1 Rensink, Iowa, 1991 Garth F. Dull, Nevada, 1990 Eugene Findlay, Utah, 1991 Region II Region III Region IV CHAIRPERSONS OF STANDING COMMITTEES: Duane Berentson, Washington, Administration Frederick P. Salvucci, Massachusetts, Planning James P. Pi

    5、tz, Michigan, Highways Ronald Fiedler, Wisconsin, Highway Traffic Safety Franklin E. White, New York, Water Transportation Ben G. Watts, Florida, Aviation Ray D. Pethtel, Virginia, Public Transportation Horace B. Edwards, Kansas, Railway Conference Robert N. Bothman, Oregon, Research Arthur J. Rock,

    6、 Jr., Vermont, Special Committee on Commissioner such as in areas of precipitous slopes or natural barriers. Wherever the safety of highway operation requires fencing, it should be considered as an essential part of the total highway facility, constructed as a highway item. Warrants The basic warran

    7、t for fencing a highway is safety of traffic movement. To this end, fencing is warranted for one or more of the following purposes: 1. To keep animals off the highway. 2. To keep children, pedestrians, and bicyclists off the highway. 3. To prevent objects from being thrown onto a roadway from an ove

    8、rcrossing structure. (For further information, refer to AASHTOs Guide for Protective Screening of Overpass Structures, November 1990.) - AASHTO TITLE FCAH-3 90 W Ob39804 O003624 TO2 Ownership of Fencing On facilities with full control of access, the access control fence should be State owned so that

    9、 the State has complete control of the type of fence and is responsible for proper maintenance. On facilities with partial control of access, the fence may be owned and maintained by the State or the adjacent property owners, depending on the laws and policies of the particular state involved. Simil

    10、arly, frontage road fences not needed for access control may be owned and maintained by the State or the adjacent property owners, depending on the States laws or policies. Time of Erection In many cases, the need for immediate fencing is obvious, and the proper type fence should be provided before

    11、the highway is opened. A fence should be erected 2 as soon as the right-of-way is cleared. It may be necessary to install a temporary fence to deter encroachment into the construction zone and/or traveled way. In any event, a permanent fence should be erected as soon as the right-of-way is cleared a

    12、nd it is practical. In cases where there is an existing adequate fence, the erection of a fence by the State may be deferred to such time as required, Types of Fence The lowest cost type of fence suited to the specific purpose should be provided. Consideration should be given to the likely extent an

    13、d type of maintenance work as well as initial costs. Depending upon the specific purpose to be served, the following types of fence generally apply, either separately or in combination. Each highway agency should, however, develop its own guidelines for types of fence. 1. 2. 3. 4. Multistrand wire,

    14、barbed or smooth: for controlling livestock. Woven wire: for controlling small livestock and in residential areas for controlling small children and pets. Chain link, usually 4 to 6 feet high: for controlling pedestrians in developed areas, particularly those containing multiple dwelling units, indu

    15、strial establishments, business districts, parks, sports areas, schools, or other institutional buildings. Where bikepaths are being separated from the roadway, a minimum 4.5 foot high fence is recommended. Fences 7 to 10 feet high: for limited special areas where there are exceptional conditions. 3

    16、 5. Miscellaneous types which serve as fence and sound barriers: fencesbarriers of this type can consist of stone, masonry block, precast concrete panels, wood rails, etc. Special fences other than above or in combination may be needed along highways where control of big game animals (elk, buffalo,

    17、deer, big horn sheep, antelope, etc.) is necessary. Under most conditions, fences for controlling smaller game animals (cougar, bobcat, etc.) are not considered necessary. In some areas, mainly in the western States, there is a seasonal migration of deer and antelope between summer and winter feedin

    18、g grounds. During these periods of migration, which are of short duration and which can be predicted within an accuracy of two or three weeks, these animals could create a serious problem for unwarned motorists. To deter these animals would require a fence 10 or more feet high. The cost of a continu

    19、ous fence of this height would be excessive and the biologic effects on animal life would be undesirable. Intermittent sections of fence for the purpose of channeling these animals from habitual crossing sites to more suitable locations would be impractical since some of the animals would stray betw

    20、een the fences along the sides of the highway and become trapped. The best solution to the condition created by these migrations crossing the highway appears to lie in the use of warning signs. The purpose of fencing may change within a relatively short length of highway and as a consequence, freque

    21、nt changes in the type of fence may be suggested. Where the fence is continuous, changes in type of fence at short intervals are undesirable, and generally should be avoided. 4 Installation of higher type fences, such as chain link, should be made on the basis of existing and reasonable assured deve

    22、lopment and land use. The type of fence and supporting posts should be considered separately in terms of the local area conditions of availability, cost, durability, safety, maintenance, etc. A statewide standard for a single type of wire or post may not be logical, and highway agencies should estab

    23、lish standards accordingly. In deciding upon the type of material best suited to a particular purpose, consideration should be given to some of the characteristics of the fencing materials other than its deterrent qualities. Chain link fencing, for example, is available in various colors of vinyl co

    24、atings. This may produce a more aesthetically pleasing appearance in environmentally sensitive areas. Chain link fencing, however, may restrict sight distance, particularly on curves and along lines approximately parallel to the direction of the fence and close to it. Woven-wire fence may also offer

    25、 a restriction to view, but to a lesser degree than the chain link variety. A chain link fence is more of a trash and waste paper collector than other more open type fences and, in some areas, is apt to result in snow or soil drifting problems. Location of Fences Normally fences of the strand and wo

    26、ven-wire type, as used in rural and some suburban areas, should be placed on or just inside the highway right-of-way line or access controlled line. For continuity, these fences may be erected substantially on a continuous line even though there may be some irregular right-of-way comers that are out

    27、side the fence line. Under some suburban or urban conditions, and rural interchanges with considerable commercial development, a chain link fence would be similarly located. 5 Along urban highways with frontage roads within the right-of-way, fences for both animal, pedestrian, and bicycle control ma

    28、y be located just inside the frontage road. The same condition for a limited length may occur in rural areas. In these cases the frontage road is a land service road and there may be no reason insofar as overall highway purposes are concerned to erect a duplicate fence of any type along the right-of

    29、-way line. This may be done at the discretion of the property owner, but normally the necessary safeguards can be effected by a single fence. Where an otherwise continuous fence inside a frontage road (between the through-traffic lanes and the frontage road) is interrupted by ramps at an interchange

    30、, it may be necessary to place sections of fence in the median to discourage pedestrians from crossing. Continuous fencing located inside the frontage road is not always warranted as a means of preventing indiscriminate vehicle crossing of the outer separation. Under some conditions, such controls a

    31、re effected by cross-section design, planting, construction of guardrail, and policing, rather than by fencing. Gates Gates in fences along controlled access highways, through which access is provided to the right-of-way or through-traffic roadways, should be kept to a minimum number. Where provided

    32、 they should be secured in a manner not detrimental to the highway operation. Each gate should be of the appropriate type and installation as fitting to the particular fence and condition. Gates may be needed in special cases as a means of outside access to utility facilities. 6 - AASHTO TITLE FCAH-

    33、3 90 W Ob39804 0003629 594 W Where fencing is installed for range control, it may be necessary at interchanges and connecting roadways to use cattle guards instead of gates, Fences along the outside of frontage roads should have gates only to the minimum extent necessary to serve the abutting property. While there may be an advantage, such gates need not necessarily be under lock control where the control of access line lies inside the frontage road. 7


    注意事项

    本文(AASHTO FCAH-1990 Informational Guide on Fencing Controlled Access Highways《公路出入口围栏限制的信息指南.修改件3》.pdf)为本站会员(李朗)主动上传,麦多课文档分享仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知麦多课文档分享(点击联系客服),我们立即给予删除!




    关于我们 - 网站声明 - 网站地图 - 资源地图 - 友情链接 - 网站客服 - 联系我们

    copyright@ 2008-2019 麦多课文库(www.mydoc123.com)网站版权所有
    备案/许可证编号:苏ICP备17064731号-1 

    收起
    展开