欢迎来到麦多课文档分享! | 帮助中心 海量文档,免费浏览,给你所需,享你所想!
麦多课文档分享
全部分类
  • 标准规范>
  • 教学课件>
  • 考试资料>
  • 办公文档>
  • 学术论文>
  • 行业资料>
  • 易语言源码>
  • ImageVerifierCode 换一换
    首页 麦多课文档分享 > 资源分类 > PDF文档下载
    分享到微信 分享到微博 分享到QQ空间

    ACI ITG-8R-2010 Report on Performance-Based Requirements for Concrete.pdf

    • 资源ID:401418       资源大小:340.85KB        全文页数:50页
    • 资源格式: PDF        下载积分:5000积分
    快捷下载 游客一键下载
    账号登录下载
    微信登录下载
    二维码
    微信扫一扫登录
    下载资源需要5000积分(如需开发票,请勿充值!)
    邮箱/手机:
    温馨提示:
    如需开发票,请勿充值!快捷下载时,用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)。
    如需开发票,请勿充值!如填写123,账号就是123,密码也是123。
    支付方式: 支付宝扫码支付    微信扫码支付   
    验证码:   换一换

    加入VIP,交流精品资源
     
    账号:
    密码:
    验证码:   换一换
      忘记密码?
        
    友情提示
    2、PDF文件下载后,可能会被浏览器默认打开,此种情况可以点击浏览器菜单,保存网页到桌面,就可以正常下载了。
    3、本站不支持迅雷下载,请使用电脑自带的IE浏览器,或者360浏览器、谷歌浏览器下载即可。
    4、本站资源下载后的文档和图纸-无水印,预览文档经过压缩,下载后原文更清晰。
    5、试题试卷类文档,如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案,请知晓。

    ACI ITG-8R-2010 Report on Performance-Based Requirements for Concrete.pdf

    1、ACI ITG-8R-10Reported by ACI Innovation Task Group 8Report on Performance-BasedRequirements for ConcreteReport on Performance-Based Requirements for ConcreteFirst PrintingDecember 2010ISBN 978-0-87031-405-6American Concrete InstituteAdvancing concrete knowledgeCopyright by the American Concrete Inst

    2、itute, Farmington Hills, MI. All rights reserved. This materialmay not be reproduced or copied, in whole or part, in any printed, mechanical, electronic, film, or otherdistribution and storage media, without the written consent of ACI.The technical committees responsible for ACI committee reports an

    3、d standards strive to avoid ambiguities,omissions, and errors in these documents. In spite of these efforts, the users of ACI documents occasionallyfind information or requirements that may be subject to more than one interpretation or may beincomplete or incorrect. Users who have suggestions for th

    4、e improvement of ACI documents arerequested to contact ACI. Proper use of this document includes periodically checking for errata atwww.concrete.org/committees/errata.asp for the most up-to-date revisions.ACI committee documents are intended for the use of individuals who are competent to evaluate t

    5、hesignificance and limitations of its content and recommendations and who will accept responsibility for theapplication of the material it contains. Individuals who use this publication in any way assume all risk andaccept total responsibility for the application and use of this information.All info

    6、rmation in this publication is provided “as is” without warranty of any kind, either express or implied,including but not limited to, the implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose ornon-infringement.ACI and its members disclaim liability for damages of any kind, includi

    7、ng any special, indirect, incidental,or consequential damages, including without limitation, lost revenues or lost profits, which may resultfrom the use of this publication.It is the responsibility of the user of this document to establish health and safety practices appropriate tothe specific circu

    8、mstances involved with its use. ACI does not make any representations with regard tohealth and safety issues and the use of this document. The user must determine the applicability of allregulatory limitations before applying the document and must comply with all applicable laws and regulations,incl

    9、uding but not limited to, United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) healthand safety standards.Order information: ACI documents are available in print, by download, on CD-ROM, through electronicsubscription, or reprint and may be obtained by contacting ACI.Most ACI standards

    10、 and committee reports are gathered together in the annually revised ACI Manual ofConcrete Practice (MCP).American Concrete Institute38800 Country Club DriveFarmington Hills, MI 48331U.S.A.Phone: 248-848-3700Fax: 248-848-3701www.concrete.orgACI ITG-8R-10 and was adopted and published December 2010.C

    11、opyright 2010, American Concrete Institute.All rights reserved including rights of reproduction and use in any form or by anymeans, including the making of copies by any photo process, or by electronic ormechanical device, printed, written, or oral, or recording for sound or visual reproduc-tion or

    12、for use in any knowledge or retrieval system or device, unless permission inwriting is obtained from the copyright proprietors.1ACI Committee Reports, Guides, Manuals, and Commentariesare intended for guidance in planning, designing, executing,and inspecting construction. This document is intended f

    13、or theuse of individuals who are competent to evaluate thesignificance and limitations of its content and recommendationsand who will accept responsibility for the application of thematerial it contains. The American Concrete Institute disclaimsany and all responsibility for the stated principles. T

    14、he Instituteshall not be liable for any loss or damage arising therefrom.Reference to this document shall not be made in contractdocuments. If items found in this document are desired by theArchitect/Engineer to be a part of the contract documents, theyshall be restated in mandatory language for inc

    15、orporation bythe Architect/Engineer.Report on Performance-Based Requirementsfor ConcreteReported by ACI Innovation Task Group 8ACI ITG-8R-10This report discusses the differences between performance and prescrip-tive requirements for concrete, and provides information on developingperformance require

    16、ments as an alternative to the current prescriptiverequirements in codes and specifications. Performance-based require-ments allow the contractor and concrete producer to be more innovativein concrete applications, providing an element for sustainability ofconcrete construction. The essential elemen

    17、ts of a performance-basedrequirement are reviewed, which include the desired performance charac-teristics, sampling and testing procedures to verify these characteristics,and acceptance criteria. Because acceptance criteria are crucial elementsof effective performance specifications, factors to cons

    18、ider in developingcriteria that distribute risks to the owner and members of the constructionteam are also discussed. Considerations for implementing performance-based requirements on a project are presented and development of perfor-mance-based requirements for durability emphasized. Alternative pe

    19、rfor-mance-based requirements are proposed for the prescriptive durabilityrequirements in ACI 318.Keywords: acceptance criteria; bonus-penalty provisions; building code; dura-bility; in-place tests; performance specification; prescriptive specification;quality assurance (QA); responsibility; samplin

    20、g; sustainability; test methods.CONTENTSChapter 1Introduction, p. 21.1Background1.2Objective and scope1.3Performance-based requirements1.4Comparison of performance-based and prescriptiverequirements1.5Sustainability and performance-based requirements1.6Responsibilities of involved parties1.7ACI code

    21、s and specificationsChapter 2Definitions and acronyms, p. 122.1Definitions2.2AcronymsChapter 3Elements of performance-based requirements, p. 143.1Quality characteristics3.2Prequalification, identity, and surrogate testing3.3Test methods3.4Point of sampling and testing3.5Acceptance criteriaChapter 4D

    22、evelopment of acceptance criteria,p. 204.1Introduction4.2Factors to considerVoting membersJohn A. Bickley*Anthony E. Fiorato Frank S. MalitsNicholas J. CarinoKenneth C. Hover*Ross S. MartinMark F. Chrzanowski*Consulting membersTerence C. Holland R. Doug Hooton*John W. Vaughan*Contributing author.Pri

    23、ncipal author.Kenneth B. RearChair2 REPORT ON PERFORMANCE-BASED REQUIREMENTS FOR CONCRETE (ACI ITG-8R-10)American Concrete Institute Copyrighted Materialwww.concrete.org4.3Setting acceptability limits4.4Actions when acceptance criteria are not satisfiedChapter 5Implementation guidelines, p. 275.1 In

    24、troduction5.2Pre-bid conference5.3Pre-award meeting5.4Preconstruction conferences5.5Bonus-penalty provisions5.6Challenges to successful implementationChapter 6Prescriptive durability requirements in ACI 318 and ACI 301 and performance-based alternatives, p. 346.1Review of existing prescriptive requi

    25、rements fordurability6.2Proposed alternative performance specifications forconcreteChapter 7Summary and future actions, p. 407.1Summary7.2Path forwardChapter 8References, p. 428.1Referenced standards and reports8.2Cited referencesCHAPTER 1INTRODUCTION1.1Background1.1.1 Prescriptive and performance s

    26、pecificationAsdefined by ASTM, a “specification” is an explicit set ofrequirements to be satisfied by a material, product, system,or service (ASTM 2010). In the concrete constructionindustry, the primary types of specifications are materialsspecifications and construction specifications. The formerp

    27、rovide minimum requirements for composition and proper-ties, and the latter form part of the contract between ownerand contractor. Specifications can be of the “prescriptive” or“performance” type. A prescriptive specification forconcrete focuses on the properties of raw materials; mixtureproportions

    28、; batching, mixing, and transport of freshconcrete; and a range of construction operations fromplacing to curing. Prescriptive specifications rely onobserved or implied relationships between the details speci-fied and the desired final, in-place, or end-product concreteperformance. Under a prescript

    29、ive specification, the desiredend-product performance may or may not be described. Aperformance specification, however, defines requiredresults, the criteria to judge performance, and verificationmethods without requirements for how the results are to beobtained. An alternative name used by some age

    30、ncies is end-result specification (ERS). The Federal Highway Adminis-tration (FHWA) has invested considerable resources topromote the use of performance-related specifications (PRS)in its projects (FHWA 1998). The PRS approach is intendedto ensure the completed product will perform as specified.Pres

    31、criptive and performance specifications have been inexistence as long as code requirements and specifications forconcrete have existed. For example, in 1910, the NationalAssociation of Cement Users (NACU), the forerunner ofACI, adopted its “Standard Building Regulations for Rein-forced Concrete” (NA

    32、CU 1910). These regulations providedalternatives for concrete strength:“Concrete composed of materials meeting the require-ments of these regulations, mixed in proportion of one partof cement and six parts of aggregate (fine and coarse), shalldevelop a compressive strength of 2000 pounds per squarei

    33、nch in 28 days when tested as 8-in. diameter cylinders 16 in.long under laboratory conditions of manufacture andstorage, using the same consistency as is used in the field.When the proportion of cement is increased, using the bestquality of aggregates, an increase may be made in allworking stresses

    34、proportional to the increase in compressivestrength at 28 days, as determined by actual tests, but thisincrease shall not exceed 25 per cent.”Thus, it is seen in this early document governing concreteconstruction, there were elements of prescriptive and perfor-mance requirements.In 1936, ACI adopted

    35、 the “Building Regulations forReinforced Concrete (ACI 501-36T),” which serves as abasis for many provisions that are still in use today (Amer-ican Concrete Institute 1936). ACI 501-36T permitted aperformance-based alternative to the prescriptive water-cement ratio (w/c) requirements for different d

    36、esignstrengths. Alternative mixture proportions were permitted byprequalifying a mixture on the basis of test data correlatingstrength to w/c. Four different w/c values had to be tested,and the w/c approved for production was that value corre-sponding to a compressive strength that was:20% greater t

    37、han the design strength when designstrength was less than 2500 psi (17 MPa); and15% greater than the design strength when designstrength was 2500 psi (17 MPa) or above.These requirements are the forerunner of todays“required strength” based on standard deviation of historicaldata. Once the proposed

    38、mixture was approved, no substitutionsin materials were permitted without additional tests.For durability, ACI 501-36T included that, “All concreteexposed to the weather shall have a minimum ultimate 28-daycompressive strength of not less than 3000 lb per sq. in.”According to ACI 501-36T, design pro

    39、fessionals wereresponsible for on-site inspection of construction, includingmaintaining records of “the quality and quantity of concretematerials, the mixing and placing of the concrete, and theplacing of the reinforcing steel.”Today the responsibility for site verification of concreteproduction has

    40、 shifted away from the licensed designprofessional toward the concrete producer. The licenseddesign professional, however, is still responsible for review orapproval of the submitted mixture ingredients and proportions.Other changes in the concrete industry since these earlycodes were written includ

    41、e:Recognition that for many applications concrete strengthis not the only characteristic considered in developing anacceptable concrete mixture for a project;Portland cement is not the only cementitious material;REPORT ON PERFORMANCE-BASED REQUIREMENTS FOR CONCRETE (ACI ITG-8R-10) 3American Concrete

    42、 Institute Copyrighted Materialwww.concrete.orgWater content and aggregate size are not the only factorsthat influence slump; andWater-cement ratio is not the only factor influencingpermeability.A variety of admixtures have emerged to impart characteristicsto a concrete mixture that are otherwise di

    43、fficult or impossibleto attain by varying only the basic ingredients of cement,aggregate, and water. Chemical admixtures and supplementarycementitious materials (SCMs), such as pozzolans and slagcement, affect air content, air-void characteristics, workability,setting time, bleeding, rate of strengt

    44、h gain, later-agestrength, and resistance to fluid penetration. In addition,combinations of the various cementitious materials andadmixtures may or may not be mutually compatible.It is difficult to write prescriptive specifications that makeuse of these developments while, at the same time, avoiding

    45、their pitfalls. It is evident that evaluating concrete durabilityis more difficult than evaluating strength. The increasingdemand for improved concrete durability and growingcomplexity of concrete mixture design and proportioningadd importance to the debate of prescriptive versusperformance-based re

    46、quirements.Interest in performance-based requirements is fueled bythe changes in practice that have evolved to enhanceconcrete durability and sustainability. For example, considerthe high-performance, low-permeability concretes requiredto ensure durable structures under severe exposures. Suchmixture

    47、s often use portland cement along with one or moresupplementary cementitious material, may use one or moretype of admixture, may incorporate at least three sizes ofaggregate, and may have a corrosion inhibitor. Developingan acceptable mixture requires experience with specificmaterials, including rec

    48、ognition that traditional relationships,such as those between workability and water content andthose between strength and w/c, are affected by a variety offactors, such as types and amounts of admixtures and SCM.In addition, the compatibility of admixtures with cementitiousmaterials should be invest

    49、igated (Taylor et al. 2006). Toensure durability, the risk of cracking should be controlled,and the curing of such a mixture requires special attention toaccommodate rapid surface drying, rapid setting, and a highshrinkage potential.So, if questioned why performance-based requirementsshould be considered when prescriptive requirements havebeen the mainstay of the concrete industry, one answer mightbe that today we are demanding more of concrete, making itdifficult to take full advantage of the wide range of availableoptions under a strictly pres


    注意事项

    本文(ACI ITG-8R-2010 Report on Performance-Based Requirements for Concrete.pdf)为本站会员(proposalcash356)主动上传,麦多课文档分享仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知麦多课文档分享(点击联系客服),我们立即给予删除!




    关于我们 - 网站声明 - 网站地图 - 资源地图 - 友情链接 - 网站客服 - 联系我们

    copyright@ 2008-2019 麦多课文库(www.mydoc123.com)网站版权所有
    备案/许可证编号:苏ICP备17064731号-1 

    收起
    展开