欢迎来到麦多课文档分享! | 帮助中心 海量文档,免费浏览,给你所需,享你所想!
麦多课文档分享
全部分类
  • 标准规范>
  • 教学课件>
  • 考试资料>
  • 办公文档>
  • 学术论文>
  • 行业资料>
  • 易语言源码>
  • ImageVerifierCode 换一换
    首页 麦多课文档分享 > 资源分类 > PPT文档下载
    分享到微信 分享到微博 分享到QQ空间

    Canadian National Site Licensing ProjectProjet canadien de .ppt

    • 资源ID:379283       资源大小:52KB        全文页数:21页
    • 资源格式: PPT        下载积分:2000积分
    快捷下载 游客一键下载
    账号登录下载
    微信登录下载
    二维码
    微信扫一扫登录
    下载资源需要2000积分(如需开发票,请勿充值!)
    邮箱/手机:
    温馨提示:
    如需开发票,请勿充值!快捷下载时,用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)。
    如需开发票,请勿充值!如填写123,账号就是123,密码也是123。
    支付方式: 支付宝扫码支付    微信扫码支付   
    验证码:   换一换

    加入VIP,交流精品资源
     
    账号:
    密码:
    验证码:   换一换
      忘记密码?
        
    友情提示
    2、PDF文件下载后,可能会被浏览器默认打开,此种情况可以点击浏览器菜单,保存网页到桌面,就可以正常下载了。
    3、本站不支持迅雷下载,请使用电脑自带的IE浏览器,或者360浏览器、谷歌浏览器下载即可。
    4、本站资源下载后的文档和图纸-无水印,预览文档经过压缩,下载后原文更清晰。
    5、试题试卷类文档,如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案,请知晓。

    Canadian National Site Licensing ProjectProjet canadien de .ppt

    1、April 4, 2001,Canadian National Site Licensing Project Projet canadien de licences de site nationales (CNSLP / PCLSN) Debriefing Session for Ontario Libraries,Toronto, April 4, 2001,April 4, 2001,Goals,Increase quantity, breadth & depth of research literature build capacity, within and across multip

    2、le disciplines share costs and reduce economic barriers to participation Maximize use and utility of content for researchers speed transition from print to electronic resources encourage large-scale adoption of digital formats Influence the marketplace reduce volatility and unpredictability achieve

    3、advantageous terms and conditions for usage develop new models,April 4, 2001,Review of licensing process,Formal procurement process: Best value for each dollar spent Fair opportunity for vendors Pre-qualification bid Open call to vendor community 42 responses 23 fulltext/sole source vendors selected

    4、 for RFP, Phase I Request for Proposal, Phase I (RFP #200085) 23 vendors invited to bid; 21 bids received Evaluation produced prioritized list of 20 Preferred Bidders Negotiations In order of prioritized list of Preferred Bidders 11 negotiations; 7 vendors retained; 3-year contracts totalling $46M,A

    5、pril 4, 2001,Timeline,March April 2000: licensing principles established May June 2000: pre-qualification bid June August 2000: RFP and model license developed August 2000: RFP release Sept Oct 2000: RFP response evaluation Oct 2000: ranked list of preferred bidders and budget allocation approved No

    6、v Dec 2000: negotiations commence; 3 vendors retained January 2001: negotiations continue; 4 vendors retained February 2001: access activated under trial provisions,April 4, 2001,Request for Proposal Phase I,Professional assistance from University of Ottawa and Partnering & Procurement Inc. Key comp

    7、onents: maximum competition among vendors maximum negotiations advantage for CNSLP Formal scoring and evaluation methodology, and attention to due diligence Draft model license agreement included as part of evaluation criteria,April 4, 2001,Negotiations Process,CNSLP negotiators: Grald Boudreau, Deb

    8、 deBruijn, Yves Jobin, Brian Owen, Faye Abrams Preparation: Installed base of product, and current institutional spend Vendors existing pricing model Market intelligence: publication plans, competitors, reasonable expectation of market growth over next 3 years Issues: functionality, license, pricing

    9、 Drop-dead issues, and fall-back positions,April 4, 2001,Negotiations Objectives,Aggressive counter-proposal to vendors quoted price Reasonable base for Year 1 Containment of annual cost increases (3-5%) All available backfiles at low or no cost New titles added at no charge Refunds to libraries for

    10、 2001 subscriptions already paid Flip model from print-based with electronic add-on, to electronic-based with print add-on Broad interpretation of authorized users Sustainability in Year 4,April 4, 2001,Summary Results,All vendors agreed to: Sign CNSLP model license Offer three-year agreement, with

    11、fixed pricing in Cdn $ Hold annual price increases significantly lower than prevailing rates Commit to a price increase cap in Year 4, at license renewal Change pricing model so as to unbundle print and electronic; several vendors will for the first time implement an electronic-based model, with pri

    12、nt treated as an incremental and optional add-on,April 4, 2001,Model License Agreement,Significant achievement Based on & aligned with international developments Developed by NRT and endorsed by SC Benefit of expert legal counsel Vendor feedback incorporated following RFP evaluation,April 4, 2001,Mo

    13、del License Agreement (cont.),Significant features: Canadian jurisdiction Limited content repurposing rights Balanced obligations between vendors and institutions Provision for access rights that survive termination of the agreement Limits on liability for third-party breaches or claims Model licens

    14、e may be applied regionally and locally,April 4, 2001,Product Mix,Approx. 700 fulltext titles Chemistry, physics, math, science/tech, engineering, health, environment, economics, law, social sciences 2 fulltext reviewing journals Mathematics Links to full text articles from Springer and Academic Pre

    15、ss journals 3 major citation indexing tools, covering over 8500 journal titles Links to Springer, Academic Press, ACS,April 4, 2001,Publisher Mix,Commercial publishers Academic Press, Springer, ISISociety/Non-profit AMS, RSC, IOP, ACSSPARC publications represented: ACS, RSC titles,April 4, 2001,Acad

    16、emic Press IDEAL,176 current fulltext titles; 205 titles total (some discontinued titles still online) New titles that come available added at no charge (collections excluded) All available backfiles, 1993- Agreement to honour same model if CNSLP wishes to add new institutions (teaching hospitals, e

    17、tc.),April 4, 2001,ACS Web Editions,First time to sign a multi-year agreement; CNSLP is ACSs largest deal 30 full-text titles All available backfiles (1996-2000) Forthcoming titles (2 per year projected) to be added at no charge,April 4, 2001,AMS MathSciNet,Database containing full-text reviews from

    18、 Mathematical Reviews, 1940-, and Current Mathematical Publications 22 institutions will have access to this database for the first time,April 4, 2001,IOP Journals,34 fulltext titles All available backfiles included 10-year fulltext archive 31 year abstract archive Forthcoming titles (3-4 titles pro

    19、jected) to be added at no charge,April 4, 2001,ISI Web of Science,Web versions of SCI, SSCI, and A server will support up to 600 s.u. with average response time less than 10 seconds,April 4, 2001,RSC Electronic Journals,23 fulltext journals All available backfiles (1997-2000), one-time charge Forthc

    20、oming titles not included,April 4, 2001,Springer-Verlag LINK,410 fulltext titles, 480 titles total (moving indexing & abstracting titles to fulltext over term of the license) New titles that become available included at no charge (e-books and book series excluded) All available backfiles,April 4, 20

    21、01,What Have We Learned?,Competition for CNSLP dollars, unified national market, confidentiality, multi-year stability/predictability, and CNSLP ability to “walk” were powerful motivators for vendors Vendors unaccustomed to formal process not “business as usual” Process worked best with highly-price

    22、d products; low margin of savings on some products may argue against national process Strategic pricing rewarded Preliminary estimates suggest that value that institutions receive is at least double that spent (for every $1 CNSLP spends, institutions receive $2 in value.) More detailed cost-benefit

    23、analysis required,April 4, 2001,Where To From Here?,What elements from this process can we apply to expansion? What are the gaps we would like to fill in content? What are our priorities within those content groups? Are our institutional/regional priorities shared by other CNSLP institutions/regions? Where does it make strategic sense to apply the CNSLP model? What resources do we need to finance this content? Self-funded Proposals to funders How can the organization and model be expanded to include other players?,


    注意事项

    本文(Canadian National Site Licensing ProjectProjet canadien de .ppt)为本站会员(ownview251)主动上传,麦多课文档分享仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知麦多课文档分享(点击联系客服),我们立即给予删除!




    关于我们 - 网站声明 - 网站地图 - 资源地图 - 友情链接 - 网站客服 - 联系我们

    copyright@ 2008-2019 麦多课文库(www.mydoc123.com)网站版权所有
    备案/许可证编号:苏ICP备17064731号-1 

    收起
    展开