欢迎来到麦多课文档分享! | 帮助中心 海量文档,免费浏览,给你所需,享你所想!
麦多课文档分享
全部分类
  • 标准规范>
  • 教学课件>
  • 考试资料>
  • 办公文档>
  • 学术论文>
  • 行业资料>
  • 易语言源码>
  • ImageVerifierCode 换一换
    首页 麦多课文档分享 > 资源分类 > PPT文档下载
    分享到微信 分享到微博 分享到QQ空间

    BACKWARD DESIGN, LANGUAGE TEACHING, AND .ppt

    • 资源ID:378810       资源大小:142.50KB        全文页数:10页
    • 资源格式: PPT        下载积分:2000积分
    快捷下载 游客一键下载
    账号登录下载
    微信登录下载
    二维码
    微信扫一扫登录
    下载资源需要2000积分(如需开发票,请勿充值!)
    邮箱/手机:
    温馨提示:
    如需开发票,请勿充值!快捷下载时,用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)。
    如需开发票,请勿充值!如填写123,账号就是123,密码也是123。
    支付方式: 支付宝扫码支付    微信扫码支付   
    验证码:   换一换

    加入VIP,交流精品资源
     
    账号:
    密码:
    验证码:   换一换
      忘记密码?
        
    友情提示
    2、PDF文件下载后,可能会被浏览器默认打开,此种情况可以点击浏览器菜单,保存网页到桌面,就可以正常下载了。
    3、本站不支持迅雷下载,请使用电脑自带的IE浏览器,或者360浏览器、谷歌浏览器下载即可。
    4、本站资源下载后的文档和图纸-无水印,预览文档经过压缩,下载后原文更清晰。
    5、试题试卷类文档,如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案,请知晓。

    BACKWARD DESIGN, LANGUAGE TEACHING, AND .ppt

    1、BACKWARD DESIGN, LANGUAGE TEACHING, AND TECHNOLOGY,Can we adapt this widely used K-12 curriculum design process to language teaching? What help from technology?Franoise Sorgen-Goldschmidt, UC Berkeley sorgengdsocrates.berkeley.edu With warm thanks to Valrie Braimah for her introduction to Backward D

    2、esign, her insights, and her help.,What Is Backward Design?,Backward Design is a process of lesson planning created by Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe and introduced in Understanding by Design (1998). Have you heard about it? This lesson design process concentrates on developing the lesson in a differ

    3、ent order than in traditional lesson planning.,Identify desired results.,Determine acceptable evidence.,Plan learning experiences and instruction.,Wiggins, G & McTighe, J. (1998). Understanding by Design.Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. http:/www.ascd.org/publi

    4、cations/books/198199/chapter1.html,Backward Design and Language Teaching: WHY?,We have been using or referring to analogous processes and/or concepts for decades When we start “at the end”, I.e., when we consider the target audience (learner) first in designing WHAT and HOW we are going to teach. Wh

    5、en we adapt National Standards to Language Teaching. When stressing “authentic” vs. “de-contextualized” contexts.Our assessment methods have been affected by “backward processes” (although far from universally) When we assess what learners can do with the language and not just what they know about t

    6、he language. When we assess the whole language vs. only discrete points. (The familiarity of the discourse is what initially got me interested in ”Backward Design”.) However we have not systematically used this design process, particularly where the passage from assessment to curriculum is concerned

    7、. What do you think?,Backward Design and Language Teaching: WHO?,Chinese Language Teachers - CLTA conference http:/clta.osu.edu/flyers/program2003.htm Applying “Backward Design“ to Chinese 8-12 Curricula Chair: Butler, Craig, Hong Kong International School * “Backward Design“ ,“Technology by Design”

    8、, “Listening by Design“Margaret Azevedo teaches BD in her course on Curriculum and Instruction in Foreign Language at Stanford Ed.264I have found no higher learning institution that uses or promotes BD. Do you know any? What do you think?,Backward Design and Language Teaching: HOW?,Stage 1: Identify

    9、 Desired Results - The issue of standardsNational Standards for World (or Foreign) Languages were regrouped around five categories (the 5 Cs), each with sub-categories. Communications: Communicate in Languages Other Than English Cultures: Gain Knowledge and Understanding of Other Cultures Connection

    10、s: Connect with Other Disciplines and Acquire Information Comparisons: Develop Insight into the Nature of Language and Culture Communities: Participate in Multilingual Communities at Home & Around the World The state of Hawaii for example, has defined “Performance Standards” for World Languages, and

    11、 indicated “Benchmarks” for each one. Here is a short excerpt from a sub-category of the 1st C, i.e., Communications Content Area: World Languages Grade Cluster: 9-12 Content Standard: INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION “Students engage in conversations, provide and obtain information, express feelings and

    12、 emotions, and exchange opinions.”,Backward Design and Language Teaching: HOW?,Stage 2: Determine Acceptable Evidence - The issue of assessment,Lets imagine that our goal (Desired Result) is for students to be able to communicate with (understand) natives speaking at natural speed in an authentic co

    13、ntext. What evidence can we use to determine whether they have met standards/proficiencies? Here are some possibilities: For message (global) comprehension Students listen to or watch an authentic discussion, and are asked to - Sum up the topic of the discussion (orally or in writing) Multiple choic

    14、e format is possible for less advanced students, with instructor suggesting different topics - Imagine a continuation to the discussion - Create an answer where one was erased from the recording. For discrete point comprehension Multiple Choice or Cloze Exercises for checking comprehension of discre

    15、te points of the discussion.,Backward Design and Language Teaching: HOW?,Stage 3: Plan Learning Experiences and Instruction,Learning experiences are planned after desired results and the method of measurement of those results are identified. What will the students need to know in order to achieve th

    16、e desired goal, learning, or understanding? Possible learning experiences for message (global) comprehension Expose students to a wide variety of spoken registers, and vary length of clips. Provide different sorts of help when necessary, such as: - Pre-listening or previewing activities for greater

    17、advance familiarity with a topic or a place, - Images or video, which provide a context that facilitates understanding of general meaning. - Play the same authentic clip at different speeds, - Same type of activities as defined above for Stage 2. Possible learning experiences for discrete point comp

    18、rehension - Train students to recognize patterns (rather than individual words) that make understanding the spoken language difficult. For example in English: “Waddaya” for “What do you”; or “I wanna” for “I want to” - Demonstrate, teach, and/or explain these patterns, depending on what strategy wil

    19、l be most useful for better comprehension. - Train students to alternate between using and not using help (e.g. same language captions or written transcripts), when listening or watching, with the aim in mind of understanding the audio or video clip without the assistance of the written word.,Using

    20、multimedia technology in the Backward Design Process expands possibilities for assessing and teaching. While the possibilities are too numerous to adequqtely develop in the poster format, here are a few that I use in the case chosen to illustrate the three stages of Backward Design, i.e., where the

    21、desired result (Stage 1) is for students to understand native speakers. For determining evidence (Stage 2) of students understanding of authentic spoken French, I use a virtual lab (Langlab, currently demonstrated in the vendor area and on some of the lab computers), which allows me to have students

    22、 respond orally to what they hear during the pauses I create within a discussion, or write what they hear, or about what they hear natives say.For learning experiences that will get them there (Stage 3), I use the multimedia website I have created, which combines a variety of audio clips, video clip

    23、s, written texts, images, explanations. My website can be visited on some of the lab computersWhat would you recommend?,Role of Technology,“Enduring” Understanding Guide for “Establishing Curricular Priorities”,Wiggins, G & McTighe, J. (1998). Understanding by Design. Alexandria, VA: Association for

    24、 Supervision and Curriculum Development.,How can the notion of “Enduring Understanding” be applied to Language Learning? (More thinking and research needed, referring back to the 5 Cs in the Standards.),Worth being familiar with,Important to know and do.,Discussions and Open Questions,Adapting BD to

    25、 Language Teaching and Language Teaching to BD: Does the basic backward process have potential for our profession? Proficiency Guidelines may not fit the definition of “enduring” understanding, but can we benefit from the tenets of BD? The BD Process sharpens our sense for curriculum design: “Activi

    26、ties” (which are used in languages more than in other fields at the University level, partly because beginning language students lose their regular communication abilities in their new language), are not good in and of themselves, when gratuitous and not aligned with goals and assessments. We start

    27、to understand that “Determining Acceptable Evidence” BEFORE establishing a curriculum is NOT the same as the often decried “teaching to the test”: it can au contraire insure more coherence (less of a disconnect) between classroom activities and “whats on the exam”. What standards should we use? Are

    28、some more conducive to using BD? What is the relationship between Proficiency Standards and Language Skills and how do they fit in with (or into) the BD Process for creating curricula?Are YOU also interested in exploring this further?A final note: This was clearly too ambitious a project for a mere poster session. Ill try to develop it into a presentation for IALLT, and look forward to your feedback. THANKS! Franoise Sorgen-Goldschmidt sorgengdsocrates.berkeley.edu,


    注意事项

    本文(BACKWARD DESIGN, LANGUAGE TEACHING, AND .ppt)为本站会员(rimleave225)主动上传,麦多课文档分享仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知麦多课文档分享(点击联系客服),我们立即给予删除!




    关于我们 - 网站声明 - 网站地图 - 资源地图 - 友情链接 - 网站客服 - 联系我们

    copyright@ 2008-2019 麦多课文库(www.mydoc123.com)网站版权所有
    备案/许可证编号:苏ICP备17064731号-1 

    收起
    展开