欢迎来到麦多课文档分享! | 帮助中心 海量文档,免费浏览,给你所需,享你所想!
麦多课文档分享
全部分类
  • 标准规范>
  • 教学课件>
  • 考试资料>
  • 办公文档>
  • 学术论文>
  • 行业资料>
  • 易语言源码>
  • ImageVerifierCode 换一换
    首页 麦多课文档分享 > 资源分类 > PPT文档下载
    分享到微信 分享到微博 分享到QQ空间

    Age Stratified Risk Prediction of Invasive versus In-situ Breast .ppt

    • 资源ID:378124       资源大小:1.38MB        全文页数:22页
    • 资源格式: PPT        下载积分:2000积分
    快捷下载 游客一键下载
    账号登录下载
    微信登录下载
    二维码
    微信扫一扫登录
    下载资源需要2000积分(如需开发票,请勿充值!)
    邮箱/手机:
    温馨提示:
    如需开发票,请勿充值!快捷下载时,用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)。
    如需开发票,请勿充值!如填写123,账号就是123,密码也是123。
    支付方式: 支付宝扫码支付    微信扫码支付   
    验证码:   换一换

    加入VIP,交流精品资源
     
    账号:
    密码:
    验证码:   换一换
      忘记密码?
        
    友情提示
    2、PDF文件下载后,可能会被浏览器默认打开,此种情况可以点击浏览器菜单,保存网页到桌面,就可以正常下载了。
    3、本站不支持迅雷下载,请使用电脑自带的IE浏览器,或者360浏览器、谷歌浏览器下载即可。
    4、本站资源下载后的文档和图纸-无水印,预览文档经过压缩,下载后原文更清晰。
    5、试题试卷类文档,如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案,请知晓。

    Age Stratified Risk Prediction of Invasive versus In-situ Breast .ppt

    1、Age Stratified Risk Prediction of Invasive versus In-situ Breast Cancer: A Logistic Regression Model,Mehmet Ayvaci1,2Oguzhan Alagoz1,Jagpreet Chhatwal3, Mary Lindstrom4,Houssam Nassif5,Elizabeth S Burnside2,1Industrial and Systems Engineering, UW-Madison 2Radiology, UW-Madison 3Merck Research Labara

    2、tories 4Biostatistics 5Computer Science, UW-Madison,Breast Anatomy,Breast profile: A ducts B lobules C dilated section of duct to hold milk D nipple E fat F pectoralis major muscle G chest wall/rib cage Enlargement: A normal duct cells B basement membrane C lumen (center of duct),www.breastcancer.or

    3、g,Age Stratified Risk Prediction of Invasive vs In-situ Breast Cancer: A Logistic Regression Model,Progression of Breast Cancer,Normal duct,Typical ductal hyperplasia,Atypical ductal hyperplasia,Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS),Invasive ductal carcinoma,Primary modality of screening or diagnosis: Mam

    4、mography,Age Stratification for Invasive vs In-situ Breast Cancer,Performs differently in different age groups Sensitivity: Age 65 81% Sensitivity: Breast Density 68% vs. 85% Younger vs. older,Primary modality of detecting type of breast cancer: Biopsy,Age Stratification for Invasive vs In-situ Brea

    5、st Cancer,Incidence of DCIS has increased since adoption of mammography DCIS has favorable prognosis: will often not cause mortality for years PPV of biopsy 20%,Invasive vs. DCIS distinction important because:,Age Stratification for Invasive vs In-situ Breast Cancer,Requires different treatment Life

    6、 expectancy difference in older and younger women Over diagnosis which does not correspond to reduced mortality Breast cancer less aggressive in older women Invasive procedures more risky in older women Resources could be better spent on more serious co-morbidities,Develop a risk prediction model fo

    7、r prospective differentiation of DCIS versus invasive breast cancerMeasure and compare model performance for different age groups,Purpose and Methods,Purpose and Methods Contd.,Measure Risk Of Invasive Cancer Given Information,Validation of The Model,Optimize Sequential Decision Making in the Contex

    8、t Of Breast Cancer Screening,Markov Decision Processes,Risk Assessment Tools,Clinical Implications,Clinical Implications,ROC & PR Curves, Statistical Testing,Structure of Data Used,NMD National Mammography Database Format,Free Text,Structured,Demographic Factors,Mammographic Descriptors,Radiologists

    9、 Overall Assessment of the Mammogram with Some Repeat to the Structured Part,BIRADS descriptors,Turned into Structured format using Natural Language Processing,Information retrieval from free text given a standardized lexicon Parse sentences to detect BIRADS descriptors using Natural Language Proces

    10、sing in PERL Test on a set of 100 which is manually populated 97.7% Precision 95.5% Recall,Methods: Processing Free Text,Data in Detail,Free Text,= Features Extracted Using NLP,1475 Diagnostic Mammograms 1378 Patients 1298 patients with single mammogram 81 patients with 2 mammograms 5 patients with

    11、three mammograms1063 cases invasive vs. 412 DCIS Age range 27 to 97 with Mean 59.7 and standard deviation 13.4,Summary of Data,Regress with a dichotomous outcome, where the patient is known to have malignant condition, i.e. Invasive or DCISStratified data into 3 groups Overall Model LR 1475 records

    12、Age Less Than 50 LRyoung 374 records Age Greater Than 65 LROld 533 recordsUsed stepwise regression to find the appropriate models. Possibility of interactions were investigated,Methods: Performing Logistic Regression,P(Invasive|Demographic Factors, Mammographic Descriptors),Methods: Validation Techn

    13、ique,n fold cross-validation Leave-one-out,Sensitivity vs. 1-Specificity at all thresholds Sensitivity: True Positive Rate Specificity: True Negative Rate Thresholds: Probability above which call “Invasive” AUC: Area Under the Curve,Methods: Measuring Performance,Sensitivity=a/(a+c)Specificity = d/(

    14、b+d),Results: LR,Overall model significant at p-value0.01 Not enough power to justify inclusion of interaction terms (Over-fitting) Acceptable ROC Decreasing trend in Error rates,Results: LRyoung vs. LRold,Difference in AUC = 0.07 Significant at p-value = 0.045,Results: LRyoung vs. LRold,Improvement

    15、 is in False Negatives,Results: LRyoung vs. LRold,Mammography is not perfect and performs better in older women. There is a need for discriminating between invasive and DCIS to better manage the breast disease in the context of age and other comorbidities An age based risk prediction model for asses

    16、sing performance difference in discriminating invasive vs. DCIS is necessary Such a model would enable physicians to make more informed decisions Demonstration of performance difference and varying risk factors in different age cohorts justifies,In Summary,Future Work,Measure Risk Of Invasive Cancer

    17、 Given Information,Validation of The Model,Optimize Sequential Decision Making in the Context Of Breast Cancer Screening,Markov Decision Processes,Risk Assessment Tools,Clinical Implications,Clinical Implications,ROC & PR Curves, Statistical Testing,Get in Literature,Using POMDPs to Determine the Optimal Mammography Screening Schedule From the Patients Perspective Presenting Author: Turgay Ayer,University of Wisconsin Co-Author: Oguzhan Alagoz,Assistant Professor, University of Wisconsin-Madison,THANK YOU!,Questions?,


    注意事项

    本文(Age Stratified Risk Prediction of Invasive versus In-situ Breast .ppt)为本站会员(花仙子)主动上传,麦多课文档分享仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知麦多课文档分享(点击联系客服),我们立即给予删除!




    关于我们 - 网站声明 - 网站地图 - 资源地图 - 友情链接 - 网站客服 - 联系我们

    copyright@ 2008-2019 麦多课文库(www.mydoc123.com)网站版权所有
    备案/许可证编号:苏ICP备17064731号-1 

    收起
    展开