欢迎来到麦多课文档分享! | 帮助中心 海量文档,免费浏览,给你所需,享你所想!
麦多课文档分享
全部分类
  • 标准规范>
  • 教学课件>
  • 考试资料>
  • 办公文档>
  • 学术论文>
  • 行业资料>
  • 易语言源码>
  • ImageVerifierCode 换一换
    首页 麦多课文档分享 > 资源分类 > PPT文档下载
    分享到微信 分享到微博 分享到QQ空间

    A Neural Network Model of Subliminal Priming.ppt

    • 资源ID:377848       资源大小:764.50KB        全文页数:45页
    • 资源格式: PPT        下载积分:2000积分
    快捷下载 游客一键下载
    账号登录下载
    微信登录下载
    二维码
    微信扫一扫登录
    下载资源需要2000积分(如需开发票,请勿充值!)
    邮箱/手机:
    温馨提示:
    如需开发票,请勿充值!快捷下载时,用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)。
    如需开发票,请勿充值!如填写123,账号就是123,密码也是123。
    支付方式: 支付宝扫码支付    微信扫码支付   
    验证码:   换一换

    加入VIP,交流精品资源
     
    账号:
    密码:
    验证码:   换一换
      忘记密码?
        
    友情提示
    2、PDF文件下载后,可能会被浏览器默认打开,此种情况可以点击浏览器菜单,保存网页到桌面,就可以正常下载了。
    3、本站不支持迅雷下载,请使用电脑自带的IE浏览器,或者360浏览器、谷歌浏览器下载即可。
    4、本站资源下载后的文档和图纸-无水印,预览文档经过压缩,下载后原文更清晰。
    5、试题试卷类文档,如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案,请知晓。

    A Neural Network Model of Subliminal Priming.ppt

    1、A Neural Network Model of Subliminal Priming,Howard Bowman Computing Laboratory, University of Kent at Canterbury,Collaborators: Friederike Schlaghecken (Psychology, Univ Warwick) Adam Aron (Psychiatry, University of Cambridge) Prof. Martin Eimer (Psychology, Birkbeck College) Prof. Phil Barnard (Co

    2、gnition and Brain Sciences Unit),Contents,Connectionism Now Subliminal Priming Eimer and Schlaghecken Pattern Masked Priming Lateral Inhibition and Opponent Processes The Model Predictions and Future Directions,Connectionism - The Claim,Connectionism claims to offer a bridge between cognition and th

    3、e brain. How complex behaviour emerges from the interaction of a multitude of computationally unsophisticated (one might even say dumb) units.,Is this claim justified?,Arguments against Connectionism Neural networks are not actually biologically plausible, e.g. problems with backpropagation How are

    4、computational implementations related to psychological theories? Does the model work because of the theory it realises or because of hidden implementation assumptions? Models can do anything, e.g. backpropagation can learn any computable function!,Connectionism Now,Biological plausibility all models

    5、 are abstractions connectionist abstractions are becoming more grounded, e.g. spiking neurons and biologically plausible learning re-circulation algorithms instead of backpropagation Hebbian learning, sparse representations and sparsification techniques,Reducing the degrees of freedom,work closely w

    6、ithin context of existing cognitive theory; apply biological constraints; systematic and transparent parameter setting (e.g. do statistics on model); make clear the key mechanisms involved; testable predictions from the models (especially counter-intuitive ones).,Theoretical Background,Two central t

    7、heoretical issues the role of conscious control in visuomotor performance the “cognitive levels” at which inhibition functions,Issue 1: Consciousness and Visuomotor Performance,Tight coupling of vision and action actions planned on basis of visual information action execution guided by vision The de

    8、bate, “To what extent is conscious experience a prerequisite for the control of visuomotor performance?” “Is there a direct, below conscious, link from vision to action?”,Direct Parameter Specification Hypothesis Neumann & Klotz,94,Tentative Support for Direct Parameter Specification (1),Blindsight

    9、Weiskrantz et al,74 above chance visual guided action in absence of visual awareness Visual Illusions Carey,01 movements (e.g. grasp apertures) resist visual illusions Visual Form Agnosia Milner et al,91 profound deficits in object recognition, but intact visuomotor performance,Note: dissociation do

    10、rsal (where) stream ventral (what) stream but subcortical routes also significant,Support for Direct Parameter Specifiction (2),More direct evidence provided by masking experiments. Two varieties, Metacontrast masked priming Pattern masked priming,Metacontrast Masked Priming,Fehrer & Raab (1962), Ne

    11、umann & Klotz (1994), Vorberg (2002) For example, Neumann & Klotz,94 subjects not told of presence of prime subjects either respond to diamonds or squares respond left or right depending upon target position target stimulus metacontrast masks the prime strict criteria for perception of prime - signa

    12、l detection,Neumann and Klotz Metacontrast Priming Paradigm Neumann & Klotz,94,Results,Positive compatibility results, compatible trials yield behavioural benefits (both errors and reaction times) incompatible trials yield behavioural costs,Signal Detection Blocks,Signal detection blocks follow reac

    13、tion time blocks (rules out learning) subjects asked to state whether prime present on 5 point scale, e.g. “I am pretty sure that prime was present” signal detection gives d-prime statistically equivalent to zero, i.e. no phenomenological experience of prime,Implications,“ a stimulus can have access

    14、 to the motor system and activate or even start an intended, planned response without being represented in consciousness.” Neumann & Klotz,94 Note further, this preconscious processing requires integration of form (diamonds vs squares) and position (left vs right) information. More than just a prese

    15、nce / absence judgement.,what - where dissociation?,Issue 2 - Levels of Inhibition,Inhibitory mechanisms certainly ubiquitous in brain, e.g. GABAergic interneurons throughout cortex and subcortical regions. Typically, psychological theories situate inhibitory mechanisms at level of attentional (exec

    16、utive) function, e.g. (working memory) Baddeleys central executive Shallices Supervisory Attentional System,Inhibition as a (pre)frontal lobe function?,Inhibition and task / set shifting,Neuropsychological example - frontal lobe damage yields perseveration errors (e.g. Wisconsin Card Sorting task) a

    17、nd increased distractibility. Psychological example - negative priming (conscious inhibition of distractors) Inhibition argued to be central to conscious attentional control QUESTION: could inhibition arise at level of direct parameter specification?,Eimer and Schlagheckens Pattern Masked Priming Ta

    18、sk,response buttons under left and right index fingers; basic stimuli -neutral stimuli - and and ,A subliminal priming paradigm, (right response) and (left response);,(other masks explored, e.g. classic pattern masks),16 ms,100 ms,100 ms,Time,PRIME,MASK,TARGET,NOTE: Prime is subliminal (verified by

    19、forced choice blocks, which follow RT-blocks.),Conditions,Eimer 99 - Results,Implications,negative compatibility; behavioural costs on compatible trials and benefits on incompatible trials; candidate explanation: inhibitory processes at work; suppression of response activation (even before response

    20、fires); supporting evidence from EEG study.,Eimer 99 - LRPs,Further Implications,LRP shows it is more than just sensory priming, i.e. residual perceptual activation. Prime induced activation propagated right through to response systems.,Candidate Explanation,low-level inhibitory mechanism “emergency

    21、 brake” - suppress response once visual evidence for that response removed possibly part of a larger “clearing-up” mechanism - suppress activation traces of completed responses in order to enable sequences of co-ordinated actions.,Data to reproduce,short mask-target SOAs (0-32ms) yield positive comp

    22、atibility (target and mask presented together) longer mask-target SOAs (64ms - 150ms (ish) yield negative compatibility low strength primes yield positive compatibility. Reduce strength by, presenting prime in periphery, or, presenting prime centrally, but overlaid with random-dot degradation,Furthe

    23、r Data to Reproduce,forced choice - at chance forced choice blocks both with and without target forced choice blocks follow reaction time response blocks (thus, learning to detect prime not an explanation) QUESTION? - how can priming affect target response speeds but not forced choice judgements?,NO

    24、TE: Signal-detection theory not used.,Further LRP Data,Schlaghecken and Eimer data,Mechanism (1) - competition and masking,masked and masking stimuli compete for shared neural resources, see Keysers & Perrett,02 neural trace of prime rapidly suppressed when mask presented implementation possibilitie

    25、s, lateral inhibition gating mechanism,Mechanism (2) - response competition,responses compete in a winner take all fashion. only one response can be executed. sustains (in fact, accentuates) response separation, c.f. M00 condition. implemented through lateral inhibition between response nodes.,respo

    26、nse 1,response 2,inhibitory,excitatory,Mechanism (3) - Opponent Processes,previously investigated in a number of models, e.g. negative priming and inhibition of return Houghton & Tipper,94 serial order in working memory and in motor action sequencing Houghton,90,An Opponent Circuit,Response Node,Exc

    27、itatory Link,Inhibitory Link,(Opponent) OFF Node,Inhibitory feedback can be threshold gated,OFF node just an inhibitory interneuron,Mechanism (4) - S-R Binding,nodes in relevant stimulus-response pathways pre-activated and hence foregrounded from the set of possible S-R bindings called response-set

    28、delineation in Bowman et al,02 implemented by giving backgrounded nodes a strongly negative bias,The Network,15,14,1,3,2,Perception Layer,Mask/ Neutral,Response Selection Layer,6,5,LEFT ON,RIGHT ON,7,8,OFF,OFF,Perceptual Pathways,Response Selection: difference between response node activation,Exampl

    29、e (left compatible): 1 cycle of ; 6 cycles ofthe mask; 6 cycles of .,Perceptual Pathways: apply time averaging to perceptual input,Formal Parameters,Time averaging activation function:,Sigmoidal, (squashes activation into range 0 to +1),activation on cycle i+1,regulates time averaging,input to node

    30、on cycle i,t set to 0.3,Basic Results,difference between response nodes gives separation; similar pattern to LRP.,Response Time Comparison,Assuming: (i) one cycle corresponds to 16.6666 ms; (ii) selection criteria -separation magnitude (absolute value) - 0.4; (iii) latency of 200 ms compared to Eime

    31、r data.,NOTE: RTs currently very approximate!,(mean response times),Reduced Strength Prime,Prime induced response activation does not cross opponent circuit threshold; reproduces basic switch to positive compatibility,Observations (i),model RTs in right general ball park (parameter optimizations wou

    32、ld improve these); RT difference between conditions is good; time course of separation close to LRP profile.,Observations (ii),explanation of forced choice results, selection criteria is the models analogue of super / subliminality threshold (simplification since just located at action end). while s

    33、election criteria not satisfied, no evidence available for decision process, i.e. at chance residual activation from prime only affects outcome if it is built upon (since it influences speed with which threshold (selection criteria) is crossed) one reason for selection criteria is to ensure backgrou

    34、nd fluctuations do not yield overt responses,Relationship to Houghton and Tipper Model,inhibition modulated by high level attentional processes in HT94; selection of target from distractor in negative priming; orienting system in inhibition of return; our model - a direct (low level) link from perce

    35、ption to action - inhibition is a “dumb” mechanism (not directed by high-level attention).,Further Work,Biological plausibility - fMRI studies suggest basal ganglia as locus of inhibition broaden scope of model - locate pattern and metacontrast masked priming in same modelling framework modelling er

    36、ror rates,Conclusions,Masked priming data fits with a theory of consciousness in which, “when we apperceive the stimulus, we have usually already started responding to it; our motor apparatus does not wait for consciousness, but does restlessly its duty, and our consciousness watches it and is not e

    37、ntitled to order it about.” Munsterberg,1889 Two largely independent effects of a stimulus, determines a motor response has later effect in consciousness,Also see Libets work and implicit memory literature,Further Conclusions,Effects not restricted to specific stimulus-response connections Neumann &

    38、 Klotz,94 rapidly modified through instruction cues cannot be explained through automaticity,Discussion Points,Why this model? Clearly (even at psychological level) there are many models which could satisfy the data (even infinitely many); In favour of model,+ Simple and canonical; + Opponent networks used to model a number ofinhibitory phenomena; + Increasing body of empirical data explained.,


    注意事项

    本文(A Neural Network Model of Subliminal Priming.ppt)为本站会员(boatfragile160)主动上传,麦多课文档分享仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知麦多课文档分享(点击联系客服),我们立即给予删除!




    关于我们 - 网站声明 - 网站地图 - 资源地图 - 友情链接 - 网站客服 - 联系我们

    copyright@ 2008-2019 麦多课文库(www.mydoc123.com)网站版权所有
    备案/许可证编号:苏ICP备17064731号-1 

    收起
    展开