欢迎来到麦多课文档分享! | 帮助中心 海量文档,免费浏览,给你所需,享你所想!
麦多课文档分享
全部分类
  • 标准规范>
  • 教学课件>
  • 考试资料>
  • 办公文档>
  • 学术论文>
  • 行业资料>
  • 易语言源码>
  • ImageVerifierCode 换一换
    首页 麦多课文档分享 > 资源分类 > PPT文档下载
    分享到微信 分享到微博 分享到QQ空间

    A Comparison of Consecutive and Concurrent Input Text entry.ppt

    • 资源ID:377812       资源大小:1.12MB        全文页数:30页
    • 资源格式: PPT        下载积分:2000积分
    快捷下载 游客一键下载
    账号登录下载
    微信登录下载
    二维码
    微信扫一扫登录
    下载资源需要2000积分(如需开发票,请勿充值!)
    邮箱/手机:
    温馨提示:
    如需开发票,请勿充值!快捷下载时,用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)。
    如需开发票,请勿充值!如填写123,账号就是123,密码也是123。
    支付方式: 支付宝扫码支付    微信扫码支付   
    验证码:   换一换

    加入VIP,交流精品资源
     
    账号:
    密码:
    验证码:   换一换
      忘记密码?
        
    友情提示
    2、PDF文件下载后,可能会被浏览器默认打开,此种情况可以点击浏览器菜单,保存网页到桌面,就可以正常下载了。
    3、本站不支持迅雷下载,请使用电脑自带的IE浏览器,或者360浏览器、谷歌浏览器下载即可。
    4、本站资源下载后的文档和图纸-无水印,预览文档经过压缩,下载后原文更清晰。
    5、试题试卷类文档,如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案,请知晓。

    A Comparison of Consecutive and Concurrent Input Text entry.ppt

    1、A Comparison of Consecutive and Concurrent Input Text entry Techniques for Mobile Phones,Daniel Wigdor & Ravin Balakrishnan,2,Text Messaging,Estimated 500,000,000,000 text messages in 2003 worldwideMore popular outside North America,3,Ambiguity,Pressing “2” : 2,a,b,c,A,B,C,4,Problem,Multiple selecti

    2、on actions required MacKenzie & Soukoreff: Between group selection: 2,a,b,c,A,B,C Within group selection: a,5,Consecutive Selection,Most prior techniques consecutive: First make between group selection Then make within group selection, or disambiguation of automatic selection MultiTap, T9, 2-Key, Le

    3、tterWise, WordWise What about selecting concurrently?,6,Concurrent Selection: TiltText,Presented at UIST 2003 Between-group selection: press key Within-group selection: tilt phone Actions performed concurrently Suggests new area of research,7,Taxonomy: Multiplexed Keypad,1,2 not possible 4 & 5 are r

    4、egressive 3 suggests a use for chording,8,Mobile Chording,Chording input for mobile devices:Selection tasks suggests better fit for chording on mobile phone,9,ChordTap,Mobile phone selection tasks: Between group selection (phone keypad) Within group selection (chord keys) Performed concurrently,10,D

    5、esign Issues,Mapping chord states to within-group selection Event that triggers text generation,11,Chord Mappings,Ignoring case, buttons have 4 or 5 characters Each chord has 2 states (down=0, up=1) log25 = 3, 3 chords needed,12,Chord Mappings,13,Character Generation Event,Issue: when is character g

    6、enerated? Actions To Generate a Character:,Depress keypad button,Depress chord Key,1.,2.,3.,Release which?,14,Why Does it Matter?,Non-event keys can be visualized Reduces erroneous text entry Helps with learning Non-event key can be held for subsequent character, savings,15,Keypad Button Release (eg

    7、):,1.,Depress keypad button:,2.,Depress chord key:,Screen:,3.,Release keypad button text is generated. If next character requires same chord, keep it held down to skip step 2.,16,Work Savings,Subsequent characters with same chords:,17,Keypad Button Release,Allows for visualization of within-group se

    8、lection Allows same chord to be held for successive characters Savings on 20% of pairings,18,Chord Key Release (eg):,1.,Depress chord key:,2.,Depress keypad button:,3.,Release chord key text is generated. If next character requires same chord, keep it held down to skip step 2.,19,Work Savings,Subseq

    9、uent characters with same keypad button:,20,Chord-Key Release,Character generated when chord-key released Allows for visualization of between-group selection Allows same button to be held for successive characters Savings on 9% of pairings,21,Chord-Key or Keypad Button,Text generated every time any

    10、key released Allows for no pre-visualization Greatest savings: 29%,22,Our Prototype,Button release text generation Equipped with 3 chords Implemented on Mot i95cl Mouse board for chords 2-handed,23,The Study,Comparing ChordTap to MultiTap Between-Subject Design: 15 participants 3 techniques (MultiTa

    11、p: 1 or 2 handed, ChordTap) 16 blocks of 20 phrases each 2 sessions Same phrases for both techniques Measured time & accuracy Participants told to correct mistakes,24,Results: Overall Speed,End of experiment: MT1: 11.05, MT2: 12.04, CT: 16.06,Day 1,Day 2,25,Power-Law Extrapolation,26,Results: Error

    12、Rate,Day 1,Day 2,27,Conclusions,Identified taxonomy of research Explored a new area within taxonomy Fit chording to mobile-phone keypad: Mappings Text generation event Implemented prototype Formal study conducted Chording better than MultiTap,28,Future Work,Chording for one hand Further exploration of taxonomy Study of text generation event and mappings,29,Acknowledgements,Tovi Grossman Maya Przybylski Krista Strickland DGP Lab members Study participants Microsoft Research,30,Thank You!,


    注意事项

    本文(A Comparison of Consecutive and Concurrent Input Text entry.ppt)为本站会员(孙刚)主动上传,麦多课文档分享仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知麦多课文档分享(点击联系客服),我们立即给予删除!




    关于我们 - 网站声明 - 网站地图 - 资源地图 - 友情链接 - 网站客服 - 联系我们

    copyright@ 2008-2019 麦多课文库(www.mydoc123.com)网站版权所有
    备案/许可证编号:苏ICP备17064731号-1 

    收起
    展开