欢迎来到麦多课文档分享! | 帮助中心 海量文档,免费浏览,给你所需,享你所想!
麦多课文档分享
全部分类
  • 标准规范>
  • 教学课件>
  • 考试资料>
  • 办公文档>
  • 学术论文>
  • 行业资料>
  • 易语言源码>
  • ImageVerifierCode 换一换
    首页 麦多课文档分享 > 资源分类 > DOC文档下载
    分享到微信 分享到微博 分享到QQ空间

    【考研类试卷】全国硕士研究生入学统一考试英语一真题2015年及答案解析.doc

    • 资源ID:1402211       资源大小:157KB        全文页数:26页
    • 资源格式: DOC        下载积分:2000积分
    快捷下载 游客一键下载
    账号登录下载
    微信登录下载
    二维码
    微信扫一扫登录
    下载资源需要2000积分(如需开发票,请勿充值!)
    邮箱/手机:
    温馨提示:
    如需开发票,请勿充值!快捷下载时,用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)。
    如需开发票,请勿充值!如填写123,账号就是123,密码也是123。
    支付方式: 支付宝扫码支付    微信扫码支付   
    验证码:   换一换

    加入VIP,交流精品资源
     
    账号:
    密码:
    验证码:   换一换
      忘记密码?
        
    友情提示
    2、PDF文件下载后,可能会被浏览器默认打开,此种情况可以点击浏览器菜单,保存网页到桌面,就可以正常下载了。
    3、本站不支持迅雷下载,请使用电脑自带的IE浏览器,或者360浏览器、谷歌浏览器下载即可。
    4、本站资源下载后的文档和图纸-无水印,预览文档经过压缩,下载后原文更清晰。
    5、试题试卷类文档,如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案,请知晓。

    【考研类试卷】全国硕士研究生入学统一考试英语一真题2015年及答案解析.doc

    1、全国硕士研究生入学统一考试英语一真题 2015 年及答案解析(总分:100.00,做题时间:120 分钟)一、Section Use of (总题数:1,分数:20.00)We have more genes in common with people we pick to be our friends than with strangers. Though not biologically related, friends are as “related“ as fourth cousins, sharing about 1% of genes. That is 1 a study publ

    2、ishedfrom the University of California and Yale University in theProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, has 2 . The study is a genome-wide analysis conducted 3 1932 unique subjects which 4 pairs of unrelated friends and unrelated strangers. The same people were used in both 5. While 1% may

    3、 seem 6 , it is not so to a geneticist. As co-author of the study James Fowler, professor of medical genetics at UC San Diego says, “Most people do not even 7 their fourth cousins but somehow manage to select as friends the people who 8 our kin.“ The team 9 developed a “friendship score“ which can p

    4、redict who will be your friend based on their genes. The study also found that the genes for smell were something shared in friends but not genes for immunity. Why this similarity in olfactory genes is difficult to explain, for now. 10, as the team suggests, it draws us 11similar environments but th

    5、ere is more to it. There could be many mechanisms working in tandem that 12us in choosing genetically similar friends 13 “functional kinship“ of being friends with 14 ! One of the remarkable findings of the study was that the similar genes seem to be evolving 15 than other genes. Studying this could

    6、 help 16 why human evolution picked pace in the last 30,000 years, with social environment being a major 17 factor. The findings do not simply corroborate peoples 18to befriend those of similar et 19 backgrounds, say the researchers. Though all the subjects were drawn from a population of European e

    7、xtraction, care was taken to 20that all subjects, friends and strangers were taken from the same population. The team also controlled the data to check ancestry of subjects.(分数:20.00)A.whatB.whyC.howD.whenA.defendedB.concludedC.withdrawnD.advisedA.forB.withC.byD.onA.separatedB.soughtC.comparedD.conn

    8、ectedA.testsB.objectsC.samplesD.examplesA.insignificantB.unexpectedC.unreliableD.incredibleA.visitB.missC.knowD.seekA.surpassB.influenceC.favorD.resembleA.againB.alsoC.insteadD.thusA.MeanwhileB.FurthermoreC.LikewiseD.PerhapsA.aboutB.toC.fromD.likeA.driveB.observeC.confuseD.limitA.according toB.rathe

    9、r thanC.regardless ofD.along withA.chancesB.responsesC.benefitsD.missionsA.fasterB.slowerC.laterD.earlierA.forecastB.rememberC.understandD.expressA.unpredictableB.contributoryC.controllableD.disruptiveA.tendencyB.decisionC.arrangementD.endeavorA.politicalB.religiousC.ethnicD.economicA.seeB.showC.pro

    10、veD.tell二、Section Reading(总题数:4,分数:20.00)Text1 King JuanCarlos of Spain once insited” kings dont abdicate, they die in their sleep.” But embarrassing scandals and the popularity of the republican left in the recenet Euro-elections have forced him to eat his words and stand down. So does the Spanish

    11、crisis suggestthat monarchy is seeing its last days? Does that mean the writing is on the wall for all European royals, withtheir magnificent uniforms andmajestic lifestyles? The Spanish case provides arguments both for and against monarchy. When public opinion is particularly polarized, as it was f

    12、ollowing the end of the Franco regime, monarchs can rise above” mere”politics and “embody” a spirit of national unity. Itis this apparenttranscendence of politics that explains monarchs continuing popularity as heads of state. And so, the Middle East excepted, Europe is the mostmonarch- infested reg

    13、ion in the world, with 10 kingdoms (not counting Vatican City and Andorra).But unlike their absolutist counterpartsin the Gulf and Asia, most royal families have survived because they allow voters to avoid the difficult searchfor a non-controversial but respected public figure. Even so, kings and qu

    14、eens undoubtedly have a downside. Symbolic of national unity as they claim to be, their very history-and sometimes the way they behave today-embodies outdated and indefensible privileges and inequalities. At a time when Thomas Piketty and other economists are warming of rising inequality and the inc

    15、reasing power of inherited wealth, it is bizarre that wealthy aristocratic families should still be the symbolic heart of modern democratic states. The most successful monarchies strive to abandon or hide their old aristocratic ways. Princes and princesses have day-jobs and ride bicycles, not horses

    16、(or helicopters). Even so, these are wealthy families who party with the international 1%, and media intrusiveness makes it increasingly difficult to maintain the right image. While Europes monarchies will no doubt be smart enough to survive for some time to come, it is the British royals who have m

    17、ost to fear from the Spanish example. It is only the Queen who has preserved the monarchys reputation with her rather ordinary (if well-heeled) granny style.The danger will come with Charles. Who has both an expensive taste of lifestyle and a pretty hierarchical view of theworld. He has failed to un

    18、derstand that monarchies have largely survived because they provide a service- as non-controversial and non-political heads of state. Charles ought to know that as English history shows, it is kings, not republicans, who are the monarchys worst enemies.(分数:5.00)(1).According to the first two paragra

    19、phs, King Juan Carlos of Spain (分数:1.00)A.used to enjoy high public supportB.was unpopular among European royalsC.eased his relationship with his rivalsD.ended his reign in embarrassment(2).Monarchs are kept as heads of state in Europe mostly (分数:1.00)A.owing to their undoubted and respectable statu

    20、sB.to achieve a balance between tradition and realityC.to give voters more public figures to look up toD.due to their everlasting political embodiment(3).Which of the following is shown to be odd, according to Paragraph 4? (分数:1.00)A.Aristocrats excessive reliance on inherited wealthB.The role of th

    21、e nobility in modern democraciesC.The simple lifestyle of the aristocratic familiesD.The nobilitys adherence to their privileges(4).The British royals ”have most of fear” because Charles (分数:1.00)A.takes a tough line on political issuesB.fails to change his lifestyle as advisedC.takes republicans as

    22、 his potential alliesD.fails to adapt himself to his future role(5).Which of the following is the best title of the text? (分数:1.00)A.Carlos, Glory and Disgrace CombinedB.Charles, Anxious to Succeed to the ThroneC.Carlos, a Lesson for All European MonarchsD.Charles, Slow to React to the Coming Threat

    23、s.Text2 JUST HOW much does the Constitution protect your digital data? The Supreme Court is only just coming to grips with that question. On Tuesday,it will consider whether police can search the contents of a mobile phonewithout a warrant if the phone is on or around a person during an arrest. Cali

    24、fornia has asked the justices to refrain from a sweeping ruling, particularly one that upsets the old assumption that authorities may search through the effects of suspects at the time of their arrest. Even if the justices are tempted, the state argues, it is hard for judges to assess the implicatio

    25、ns of new and rapidly changing technologies. The court would be recklessly modest if it followed Californias advice. Enough of the implications are discernable, even obvious, that the justices can and should provide updated guidelines to police, lawyers and defendants. They should start by discardin

    26、g Californias lame argument that exploring the contents of a smartphone a vast storehouse of digital information is similar to, say, rifling through a suspects purse. The court has ruled that police dont violate the Fourth Amendment when they sift through the wallet or pocketbook of an arrestee with

    27、out a warrant. But exploring ones smartphone is more like entering his or her home. A smartphone may contain an arrestees reading history, financial history, medical history and comprehensive records of recent correspondence. The development of “cloud computing,” meanwhile, means that police officer

    28、s could conceivably access even more information with a few swipes on a touchscreen. Americans should take steps to protect their digital privacy. But keeping sensitive information on these devices is increasingly a requirement of normal life. Citizens still have a right to expect private documents

    29、to remain private and protected by the Constitutions prohibition on unreasonable searches. As so often is the case, stating that principle doesnt ease the challenge of line-drawing. In many cases, it would not be overly onerous for authorities to obtain a warrant to search through phone contents. Th

    30、ey could still trump Fourth Amendment protections when facing severe, exigent circumstances, such as the threat of immediate harm, and they could take reasonable measures to ensure that phone data are not erased or altered while a warrant is pending. The court, though, may want to allow room for pol

    31、ice to cite situations where they are entitled to more leeway. But the justices should not swallow Californias argument whole. New, disruptive technology sometimes demands novel applications of the Constitutions protections. Orin Kerr, a law professor who blogs on The Posts Volokh Conspiracy,compare

    32、sthe explosion and accessibility of digital information in the 21st century with the establishment of automobile use as a virtual necessity of life in the 20th: The justices had to specify novel rules for the new personal domain of the passenger car then; they must sort out how the Fourth Amendment

    33、applies to digital information now.(分数:5.00)(1).The Supreme court, will work out whether, during an arrest, it is legitimate to (分数:1.00)A.search for suspects mobile phones without a warrant.B.check suspects phone contents without being authorized.C.prevent suspects from deleting their phone content

    34、s.D.prohibit suspects from using their mobile phones.(2).The authors attitude toward Californias argument is one of (分数:1.00)A.tolerance.B.indifference.C.disapproval.D.cautiousness.(3).The author believes that exploring ones phone content is comparable to (分数:1.00)A.getting into ones residence.B.han

    35、ding ones historical records.C.scanning ones correspondences.D.going through ones wallet.(4).In Paragraph 5 and 6, the author shows his concern that (分数:1.00)A.principles are hard to be clearly expressed.B.the court is giving police less room for action.C.phones are used to store sensitive informati

    36、on.D.citizens privacy is not effective protected.(5).Orin Kerrs comparison is quoted to indicate that (分数:1.00)A.the Constitution should be implemented flexibly.B.New technology requires reinterpretation of the Constitution.C.Californias argument violates principles of the Constitution.D.Principles

    37、of the Constitution should never be altered.Text3 The journal Science is adding an extra round of statistical checks to its peer-review process, editor-in-chief Marcia McNutt announced today. The policy follows similar efforts from other journals, after widespread concern that basic mistakes in data

    38、 analysis are contributing to the irreproducibility of many published research findings. “Readers must have confidence in the conclusions published in our journal,” writes McNutt in an editorial. Working with the American Statistical Association, the journal has appointed seven experts to a statisti

    39、cs board of reviewing editors (SBoRE). Manuscript will be flagged up for additional scrutiny by the journals internal editors, or by its existing Board of Reviewing Editors or by outside peer reviewers. The SBoRE panel will then find external statisticians to review these manuscripts. Asked whether

    40、any particular papers had impelled the change, McNutt said: “The creation of the statistics board was motivated by concerns broadly with the application of statistics and data analysis in scientific research and is part of Sciences overall drive to increase reproducibility in the research we publish

    41、.” Giovanni Parmigiani, a biostatistician at the Harvard School of Public Health, a member of the SBoRE group, says he expects the board to “play primarily an advisory role.” He agreed to join because he “found the foresight behind the establishment of the SBoRE to be novel, unique and likely to hav

    42、e a lasting impact. This impact will not only be through the publications in Science itself, but hopefully through a larger group of publishing places that may want to model their approach after Science.”(分数:5.00)(1).It can be learned from Paragraph 1 that _ (分数:1.00)A.Science intends to simplify it

    43、s peer-review process.B.journals are strengthening their statistical checks.C.few journals are blamed for mistakes in data analysis.D.lack of data analysis is common in research projects.(2).The phrase “flagged up ”(Para.2)is the closest in meaning to _ (分数:1.00)A.foundB.revisedC.markedD.stored(3).G

    44、iovanni Parmigiani believes that the establishment of the SBoRE may _ (分数:1.00)A.pose a threat to all its peersB.meet with strong oppositionC.increase Sciences circulation.D.set an example for other journals(4).David Vaux holds that what Science is doing now _ (分数:1.00)A.adds to researchers workload

    45、.B.diminishes the role of reviewers.C.has room for further improvement.D.is to fail in the foreseeable future.(5).Which of the following is the best title of the text? (分数:1.00)A.Science Joins Push to Screen Statistics in PapersB.Professional Statisticians Deserve More RespectC.Data Analysis Finds I

    46、ts Way onto Editors DesksD.Statisticians Are Coming Back with ScienceText4 Two years ago, Rupert Murdochs daughter, Elisabeth, spoke of the “unsettling dearth of integrity across so many of our institutions”. Integrity had collapsed, she argued, because of a collective acceptance that the only “sort

    47、ing mechanism” in society should be profit and the market. But “its us, human beings, we the people who create the society we want, not profit”. Driving her point home, she continued: “Its increasingly apparent that the absence of purpose, of a moral language within government, media or business cou

    48、ld become one of the most dangerous goals for capitalism and freedom.” This same absence of moral purpose was wounding companies such as News International, she thought, making it more likely that it would lose its way as it had with widespread illegal telephone hacking. As the hacking trial conclud

    49、esfinding guilty one ex-editor of the News of the World, Andy Coulson, for conspiring to hack phones, and finding his predecessor, Rebekah Brooks, innocent of the same chargethe wider issue of dearth of integrity still stands. Journalists are known to have hacked the phones of up to 5,500 people. This is hacking on an industrial scale, as was acknowledged by Glenn Mulcaire, the man hired by the News of the World in 2001 to be the point person for phone hacking. Others await trial. This saga still unfolds. In many respects, the deart


    注意事项

    本文(【考研类试卷】全国硕士研究生入学统一考试英语一真题2015年及答案解析.doc)为本站会员(explodesoak291)主动上传,麦多课文档分享仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知麦多课文档分享(点击联系客服),我们立即给予删除!




    关于我们 - 网站声明 - 网站地图 - 资源地图 - 友情链接 - 网站客服 - 联系我们

    copyright@ 2008-2019 麦多课文库(www.mydoc123.com)网站版权所有
    备案/许可证编号:苏ICP备17064731号-1 

    收起
    展开