1、考研英语（翻译）-试卷 6 及答案解析(总分：60.00，做题时间：90 分钟)一、Reading Comprehensio(总题数：6，分数：60.00)1.Section II Reading Comprehension（分数：10.00）_2.Part CDirections: Read the following text carefully and then translate the underlined segments into Chinese.（分数：10.00）_【F1】 We“re moving; into another era, as the toxic effect
2、s of the bubble and its grave consequences spread through the financial system. Just a couple of years ago investors dreamed of 20 percent returns forever. Now surveys show that they“re down to a “realistic“ 8 percent to 10 percent range. But what if the next few years turn out to be below normal ex
3、pectations? Martin Barners of the Bank Credit Analyst in Montreal expects future stock returns to average just 4 percent to 6 percent. Sound impossible?【F2】 After a much smaller bubble that burst in the mid-1960s Standard Iraq would be even more unstable as a result of its liberation; and a conflict
4、 would increase the threat posed by terrorists.【F1】 What we did not know was that Tony Blair had received intelligence and advice that raised the very same points. Last week“s report from the Intelligence and Security Committee included the revelation that some of the intelligence had warned that a
5、war against Iraq risked an increased threat of terrorism. Why did Mr. Blair not make this evidence available to the public in the way that so much of the alarmist intelligence on Saddam“s weapons was published?【F2】 Why did he choose to ignore the intelligence and argue instead that the war was neces
6、sary, precisely because of the threat posed by international terrorism? There have been two parliamentary investigations into this war and the Hutton inquiry reopens tomorrow.【F3】 In their different ways they have been illuminating, but none of them has addressed the main issues relating to the war.
7、 The Foreign Affairs Committee had the scope to range widely, but chose to become entangled in the dispute between the Government and the BBC. The Intelligence Committee reached the conclusion that the Government“s file on Saddam“s weapons was not mixed up, but failed to explain why the intelligence
8、 was so hopelessly wrong. The Hutton inquiry is investigating the death of Dr. David Kelly, a personal tragedy of marginal relevance to the war against Iraq. Tony Blair has still to come under close examination about his conduct in the building-up to war. Instead, the Defence Secretary, Geoff Hoon,
9、is being fingered as if he were master-minding the war behind everyone“s backs from the Ministry of Defence. Mr. Hoon is not a minister who dares to think without consulting Downing Street first. At all times he would have been dancing to Downing Street“s tunes. Mr. Blair would be wrong to assume th
10、at he can draw a line under all of this by making Mr. Hoon the fall-guy.【F4】 It was Mr. Blair who decided to take Britain to war, and a Cabinet of largely skeptical ministers that backed him. It was Mr. Blair who told MPs that unless Saddam was removed, terrorists would pose a greater global threate
11、ven though he had received intelligence that suggested a war would lead to an increase in terrorism. Parliament should be the forum in which the Prime Minister is called more fully to account, but Iain Duncan Smith“s support for the war has neutered an already inept opposition.【F5】 In the absence of
12、 proper parliamentary scrutiny, it is left to newspapers like this one to keep asking the most important questions until the Prime Minister answers them.（分数：10.00）(1).【F1】（分数：2.00）_(2).【F2】（分数：2.00）_(3).【F3】（分数：2.00）_(4).【F4】（分数：2.00）_(5).【F5】（分数：2.00）_【F1】 Sending your child to piano or violin less
13、ons in a bid to boost their academic achievement is a waste of money, according to scientists. Although research has shown that youngsters who take music lessons are more likely to be top of their class, Professor Schellenberg claims this link is misleading.【F2】 Instead, improved academic performanc
14、e may be because brighter children from privileged backgrounds are more likely to learn an instrument, rather than music classes helping to boost their intelligence. “Music may change you a bit, but it“s also the case that different children take music lessons.“ said Professor Schellenberg, who adde
15、d that parents“ education was the most influential factor on musicality.【F3】 Children who take music lessons come from families with higher incomes, they come from families with more educated parents, they also do more extracurricular activities, they have higher IQs, and they do better at school. 【
16、F4】 In tests on 167 children who played piano or other instruments, they found their answer to personality tests could predict how likely it was for them to continue their music lessons. Those who were more outgoing and conscientious were more likely to continue to play. “We were motivated by the fa
17、ct that kids who take music lessons are particularly good students, in school they actually do better than you would predict from their IQ, so obviously something else is going on.“ Professor Schellenberg told the American Association for the Advancement of Science(A A AS)annual conference in Boston
18、. 【F5】 Asked if so-called helicopter parents were wasting their money sending their children to music lessons in the belief they could boost their school results, he said “yes“. “Clearly studying music changes the brain, but so does any learning. In fact, that is what learning is.“ he said.（分数：10.00
19、）(1).【F1】（分数：2.00）_(2).【F2】（分数：2.00）_(3).【F3】（分数：2.00）_(4).【F4】（分数：2.00）_(5).【F5】（分数：2.00）_Relativity theory has had a profound influence on our picture of matter by forcing us to modify our concept of a particle in an essential way.【F1】 In classical physics, the mass of an object had always been as
20、sociated with an indestructible material substance, with some “stuff“ of which all things were thought to be made. Relativity theory showed that mass has nothing to do with any substance, but is a form energy. Energy, however, is a dynamic quantity associated with activity, or with processes.【F2】 Th
21、e fact that the mass of a particle is equivalent to a certain of energy means that the particle can no longer be seen as a static object, but has to be conceived as a dynamic pattern. This new view of particles was initiated by Dirac when he formulated a relativistic equation describing the behavior
22、 of electrons.【F3】 Dirac“s theory was not only extremely successful in accounting for the fine details of atomic structure, but also revealed a fundamental symmetry between matter and anti-matter. It predicted the existence of an anti-matter with the same mass as the electron but with an opposite ch
23、arge. This positively charged particle, now called the positron, was indeed discovered two years after Dirac had predicted it. The symmetry between matter and anti-matter implies that for every particle there exists an antiparticles with equal mass and opposite charge. Pairs of particles and antipar
24、ticles can be created if enough energy is available and can be made to turn into pure energy in the reverse process of destruction.【F4】 These processes of particle creation and destruction had been predicted from Dirac“s theory before they were actually discovered in nature, and since then they have
25、 been observed millions of times. The creation of material particles from pure energy is certainly the most spectacular effect of relativity theory, and it can only be understood in terms of the view of particles outlined above.【F5】 Before relativistic particle physics, the constituents of matter ha
26、d always been considered as being either elementary units which were indestructible and unchangeable, or as composite objects which could be broken up into their constituent parts. The basic question was whether one could divide matter again and again, or whether one would finally arrive at some sma
27、llest indivisible units.（分数：10.00）(1).【F1】（分数：2.00）_(2).【F2】（分数：2.00）_(3).【F3】（分数：2.00）_(4).【F4】（分数：2.00）_(5).【F5】（分数：2.00）_考研英语（翻译）-试卷 6 答案解析(总分：60.00，做题时间：90 分钟)一、Reading Comprehensio(总题数：6，分数：60.00)1.Section II Reading Comprehension（分数：10.00）_解析：2.Part CDirections: Read the following text careful
28、ly and then translate the underlined segments into Chinese.（分数：10.00）_解析：【F1】 We“re moving; into another era, as the toxic effects of the bubble and its grave consequences spread through the financial system. Just a couple of years ago investors dreamed of 20 percent returns forever. Now surveys sho
29、w that they“re down to a “realistic“ 8 percent to 10 percent range. But what if the next few years turn out to be below normal expectations? Martin Barners of the Bank Credit Analyst in Montreal expects future stock returns to average just 4 percent to 6 percent. Sound impossible?【F2】 After a much s
30、maller bubble that burst in the mid-1960s Standard Iraq would be even more unstable as a result of its liberation; and a conflict would increase the threat posed by terrorists.【F1】 What we did not know was that Tony Blair had received intelligence and advice that raised the very same points. Last we
31、ek“s report from the Intelligence and Security Committee included the revelation that some of the intelligence had warned that a war against Iraq risked an increased threat of terrorism. Why did Mr. Blair not make this evidence available to the public in the way that so much of the alarmist intellig
32、ence on Saddam“s weapons was published?【F2】 Why did he choose to ignore the intelligence and argue instead that the war was necessary, precisely because of the threat posed by international terrorism? There have been two parliamentary investigations into this war and the Hutton inquiry reopens tomor
33、row.【F3】 In their different ways they have been illuminating, but none of them has addressed the main issues relating to the war. The Foreign Affairs Committee had the scope to range widely, but chose to become entangled in the dispute between the Government and the BBC. The Intelligence Committee r
34、eached the conclusion that the Government“s file on Saddam“s weapons was not mixed up, but failed to explain why the intelligence was so hopelessly wrong. The Hutton inquiry is investigating the death of Dr. David Kelly, a personal tragedy of marginal relevance to the war against Iraq. Tony Blair ha
35、s still to come under close examination about his conduct in the building-up to war. Instead, the Defence Secretary, Geoff Hoon, is being fingered as if he were master-minding the war behind everyone“s backs from the Ministry of Defence. Mr. Hoon is not a minister who dares to think without consulti
36、ng Downing Street first. At all times he would have been dancing to Downing Street“s tunes. Mr. Blair would be wrong to assume that he can draw a line under all of this by making Mr. Hoon the fall-guy.【F4】 It was Mr. Blair who decided to take Britain to war, and a Cabinet of largely skeptical minist
37、ers that backed him. It was Mr. Blair who told MPs that unless Saddam was removed, terrorists would pose a greater global threateven though he had received intelligence that suggested a war would lead to an increase in terrorism. Parliament should be the forum in which the Prime Minister is called m
38、ore fully to account, but Iain Duncan Smith“s support for the war has neutered an already inept opposition.【F5】 In the absence of proper parliamentary scrutiny, it is left to newspapers like this one to keep asking the most important questions until the Prime Minister answers them.（分数：10.00）(1).【F1】
39、（分数：2.00）_正确答案：(正确答案：我们不知道的是托尼布莱尔已经收到了提出以上几点的情报或建议。)解析：(2).【F2】（分数：2.00）_正确答案：(正确答案：为什么他选择了无视情报，而只强调战争的必要性正是源于国际恐怖组织的威胁吗?)解析：(3).【F3】（分数：2.00）_正确答案：(正确答案：它们用不同的方法进行阐述，但却没有一个涉及到关系这场战争的症结所在。)解析：(4).【F4】（分数：2.00）_正确答案：(正确答案：是布莱尔决定将英国弓 I 向战争，而持很大怀疑态度的部长们组成的内阁支持着他。)解析：(5).【F5】（分数：2.00）_正确答案：(正确答案：在议会缺乏应有
40、的详细审查的情况下，像独立报这样的报纸只好不断询问最重要的问题，直到首相作出回答。)解析：【F1】 Sending your child to piano or violin lessons in a bid to boost their academic achievement is a waste of money, according to scientists. Although research has shown that youngsters who take music lessons are more likely to be top of their class, Prof
41、essor Schellenberg claims this link is misleading.【F2】 Instead, improved academic performance may be because brighter children from privileged backgrounds are more likely to learn an instrument, rather than music classes helping to boost their intelligence. “Music may change you a bit, but it“s also
42、 the case that different children take music lessons.“ said Professor Schellenberg, who added that parents“ education was the most influential factor on musicality.【F3】 Children who take music lessons come from families with higher incomes, they come from families with more educated parents, they also do more extracurricular activities, they have higher IQs, and they do better at school. 【F4】 In tests on 167 children who played piano or other instruments, they found their answer to personality tests could predict how likely it was for them to continue t
