1、Reference number ISO/TR 9790:1999(E) ISO 1999 TECHNICAL REPORT ISO/TR 9790 First edition 1999-12-01 Road vehicles Anthropomorphic side impact dummy Lateral impact response requirements to assess the biofidelity of the dummy Vhicules routiers Mannequin anthropomorphe pour essai de choc latral Exigenc
2、es de rponse en choc latral pour valuer la biofidlit du mannequinISO/TR 9790:1999(E) PDF disclaimer This PDF file may contain embedded typefaces. In accordance with Adobes licensing policy, this file may be printed or viewed but shall not be edited unless the typefaces which are embedded are license
3、d to and installed on the computer performing the editing. In downloading this file, parties accept therein the responsibility of not infringing Adobes licensing policy. The ISO Central Secretariat accepts no liability in this area. Adobe is a trademark of Adobe Systems Incorporated. Details of the
4、software products used to create this PDF file can be found in the General Info relative to the file; the PDF-creation parameters were optimized for printing. Every care has been taken to ensure that the file is suitable for use by ISO member bodies. In the unlikely event that a problem relating to
5、it is found, please inform the Central Secretariat at the address given below. ISO 1999 All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without perm
6、ission in writing from either ISO at the address below or ISOs member body in the country of the requester. ISO copyright office Case postale 56 CH-1211 Geneva 20 Tel. + 41 22 749 01 11 Fax + 41 22 734 10 79 E-mail copyrightiso.ch Web www.iso.ch Printed in Switzerland ii ISO 1999 All rights reserved
7、ISO/TR 9790:1999(E) ISO 1999 All rights reserved iii Contents Foreword.vi 1 Scope 1 2 Biomechanical basis .1 2.1 Head Tests1 2.2 Neck Tests1 2.3 Shoulder Tests.1 2.4 Thorax Tests.2 2.5 Abdomen Tests2 2.6 Pelvis Tests 2 3 Overall biofidelity calculation.2 4 Pendulum impacts.4 4.1 Shoulder Test 14 4.1
8、.1 Original Data.4 4.1.2 Test Setup.4 4.1.3 Instrumentation4 4.1.4 Response Requirements.4 4.2 Thorax Tests 1 and 2 .4 4.2.1 Original Data.4 4.2.2 Test Setup.4 4.2.3 Instrumentation4 4.2.4 Response Requirements.5 4.3 Pelvis Tests 1 and 2.5 4.3.1 Original Data.5 4.3.2 Test Setup.5 4.3.3 Instrumentati
9、on5 4.3.4 Response Requirements.5 5 Lateral drops 5 5.1 Head Test 1.5 5.1.1 Original Data.5 5.1.2 Test Setup.5 5.1.3 Instrumentation6 5.1.4 Response Requirement.6 5.2 Head Test 2.6 5.2.1 Original Data.6 5.2.2 Test Setup.6 5.2.3 Instrumentation6 5.2.4 Response Requirement.6 5.3 Thorax Tests 3 & 4 and
10、 Pelvis Tests 3 - 6 .6 5.3.1 Original Data.6 5.3.2 Test Setup.7 5.3.3 Instrumentation7 5.3.4 Response Requirements.7 5.4 Abdomen Tests 1 and 2 7 5.4.1 Original Data.7 5.4.2 Test Setup.7 5.4.3 Instrumentation7 5.4.4 Response Requirements.7 6 Sled tests8 6.1 Neck Test 1 and Shoulder Test 2 .8ISO/TR 97
11、90:1999(E) iv ISO 1999 All rights reserved 6.1.1 Original Data.8 6.1.2 Test Setup.8 6.1.3 Instrumentation8 6.1.4 Response Requirements.8 6.2 Neck Test 2 .8 6.2.1 Original Data.8 6.2.2 Test Setup.9 6.2.3 Instrumentation9 6.2.4 Response Requirements.9 6.3 Neck Test 3 and Shoulder Test 3 .9 6.3.1 Origi
12、nal Data.9 6.3.2 Test Setup.9 6.3.3 Instrumentation9 6.3.4 Response Requirements.10 6.4 Thorax Test 5 and Pelvis Tests 7 - 9 10 6.4.1 Original Data.10 6.4.2 Test Setup.10 6.4.3 Instrumentation10 6.4.4 Response Requirements.10 6.5 Shoulder Test 4, Thorax Test 6, Abdomen Tests 3 - 5, and Pelvis Tests
13、10 - 13 11 6.5.1 Original Data.11 6.5.2 Test Setup.11 6.5.3 Instrumentation11 6.5.4 Response Requirements.11 7 References11 Annex A Analysis of Association PEUGEOT-RENAULT lateral shoulder impact24 A.1 Original Data.24 A.2 Normalized data .24 A.3 Force versus time response requirements .25 A.4 Maxim
14、um deflection response requirement .25 Annex B Analysis of HSRI lateral thoracic impact data30 B.1 Original Data.30 B.2 Normalized data .30 B.3 Response requirements31 Annex C Analysis of WSU/GMR oblique lateral thoracic impact data.38 C.1 Original Data.38 C.2 Normalized data .38 C.3 Comparison of l
15、ateral and oblique lateral test results.39 C.4 Comparison of oblique lateral results to HSRI lateral results.40 C.5 Elimination of massively damaged cadavers .40 C.6 Response requirements40 C.6.1 Normalized Impactor Force Versus Time Corridor for 4,3 m/s Impacts.40 C.6.2 Normalized Impactor Force Ve
16、rsus Time Corridor for 6,7 m/s Impacts.40 Annex D Analysis of onser lateral pelvic impact data 49 D.1 Original Data.49 D.2 Normalized data .49 D.3 Peak impactor force response requirements50 Annex E Analysis of HODGSON and THOMAS lateral head impact data .54 E.1 Original data .54 E.2 Response requir
17、ement54 Annex F Analysis of Association PEUGEOT-RENAULT lateral head impact data.56 F.1 Original data .56 F.2 Response requirement56 Annex G Analysis of Association PEUGEOT-RENAULT lateral thoracic impact data 58 G.1 Original Data.58 G.2 Normalized data .58ISO/TR 9790:1999(E) ISO 1999 All rights res
18、erved v G.3 Elimination of massively damaged cadavers .59 G.4 Response requirements59 Annex H Analysis of Association Peugeot-Renault lateral pelvic impact data71 H.1 Original Data.71 H.2 Normalized data .71 H.3 Peak acceleration response requirements .72 Annex I Characteristics of APR padding74 Ann
19、ex J Analysis of Association Peugeot-Renault Lateral abdominal impact data.75 J.1 Original Data.75 J.2 Normalized data .75 J.3 Force versus time corridors .76 J.4 Peak T12 acceleration requirements .76 J.5 Peak acceleration requirements of the near side rib .77 J.6 Abdominal penetration77 Annex K An
20、alysis of EWING Lateral neck bending and shoulder displacement data .89 K.1 Original data.89 K.2 Response requirements89 Annex L Analysis of Patrick and Chou Lateral neck bending response data .95 L.1 Original data.95 L.2 Response requirements95 Annex M Analysis of TARRIERE lateral neck bending resp
21、onse data97 M.1 Original data.97 M.2 Response requirements97 Annex N Analysis of University of Heidelberg Lateral Thoracic impact data99 N.1 Original Data.99 N.2 Normalized data .99 N.3 Inclusion of massively damaged cadavers.100 N.4 Response requirements100 Annex O Analysis of University of Heidelb
22、erg Lateral pelvic impact data 109 O.1 Original Data.109 O.2 Normalized data .109 O.3 Comparison of normalized test results from both series110 O.4 Response requirements110 Annex P Analysis of Wayne State University Lateral shoulder and thoracic impact data.112 P.1 Original Data.112 P.2 Normalized d
23、ata .112 P.3 Elimination of massively damaged cadavers .113 P.4 Response requirements113 Annex Q Analysis of Wayne State University Lateral abdominal impact data121 Q.1 Original Data.121 Q.2 Normalized data .121 Q.3 Response requirements122 Annex R Analysis of Wayne State University Lateral pelvic i
24、mpact data131 R.1 Original Data.131 R.2 Normalized data .131 R.3 Response requirements132 Annex S Weighting factors for the body regions, impact conditions and responses 142ISO/TR 9790:1999(E) vi ISO 1999 All rights reserved Foreword ISO (the International Organization for Standardization) is a worl
25、dwide federation of national standards bodies (ISO member bodies). The work of preparing International Standards is normally carried out through ISO technical committees. Each member body interested in a subject for which a technical committee has been established has the right to be represented on
26、that committee. International organizations, governmental and non-governmental, in liaison with ISO, also take part in the work. ISO collaborates closely with the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) on all matters of electrotechnical standardization. International Standards are drafted i
27、n accordance with the rules given in the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 3. The main task of technical committees is to prepare International Standards. Draft International Standards adopted by the technical committees are circulated to the member bodies for voting. Publication as an International Standard
28、 requires approval by at least 75 % of the member bodies casting a vote. In exceptional circumstances, when a technical committee has collected data of a different kind from that which is normally published as an International Standard (“state of the art“, for example), it may decide by a simple maj
29、ority vote of its participating members to publish a Technical Report. A Technical Report is entirely informative in nature and does not have to be reviewed until the data it provides are considered to be no longer valid or useful. Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of t
30、his Technical Report may be the subject of patent rights. ISO shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights. ISO/TR 9790, was prepared by Technical Committee ISO/TC 22, Road vehicles, Subcommittee SC 12, Restraint systems. This first edition cancels and replaces the ISO
31、/TR 9790 parts 1 to 6 (1989), which have been reviewed, updated and organized into a single Technical Report.TECHNICAL REPORT ISO/TR 9790:1999(E) ISO 1999 All rights reserved 1 Road vehicles Anthropomorphic side impact dummy Lateral impact response requirements to assess the biofidelity of the dummy
32、 1 Scope This Technical Report describes laboratory test procedures and impact response requirements suitable for assessing the lateral impact biofidelity of the head, neck, shoulder, thorax, abdomen and pelvis of crash test dummies, subcomponent test devices, and math models that are used to repres
33、ent a 50th percentile adult male. The method used by ISO to determine an overall biofidelity rating for a given side impact surrogate has been added to this Technical Report. 2 Biomechanical basis The impact response requirements presented in this Technical Report are the result of a critical evalua
34、tion of data selected from experiments agreed to by experts as being the best and most up-to-date information available. The following describes the biomechanical data used to describe response requirements for the head, neck, shoulder, thorax, abdomen and pelvis. 2.1 Head Tests Two lateral head imp
35、act tests are defined. Head Test 1 is based on the rigid surface cadaver impacts conducted by Hodgson and Thomas (1). Head Test 2 is based on the padded surface cadaver impacts of the Association Peugeot-Renault (APR) (2). Padded surface impact tests of Hodgson and Thomas (1), McElhaney et al. (3),
36、Nahum et al. (4), Nahum et al. (5), Schneider et al. (6) and Got et al. (7) were not used since either the padding characteristics were not specified or a given piece of padding was subjected to multiple impacts, changing its response characteristics. Detailed discussions of the influences of these
37、factors on head acceleration data are given by Mertz (8), Mertz et al. (9) and Mertz (10). The rigid surface impacts of McElhaney et al. (3) were not used because the impact velocities were not given for each test. The rigid surface impact data of Got et al. (7) were not used since significant skull
38、 fractures were produced. 2.2 Neck Tests Three lateral neck bending tests are defined. Neck Test 1 is based on the human volunteer data of Ewing et al. (11), and the requirements are based on the analysis of Wismans et al. (12). Neck Test 2 is based on the human volunteer data of Patrick and Chou (1
39、3). Neck Test 3 is based on the cadaver tests of the APR (2). To evaluate if the biofidelity requirements are met, the respective sled test environments that were used to obtain the human volunteer and/or cadaver data must be duplicated. 2.3 Shoulder Tests Four lateral impact test conditions are def
40、ined for the shoulder. Shoulder Test 1 is based on impactor tests conducted by the APR using unembalmed cadavers (14). Shoulder Test 2 is based on the Ewing et al. (11) volunteer sled tests. Shoulder Test 3 is based on the cadaver sled tests of Tarriere (30). In both of these sled tests, the dummy m
41、ust mimic the shoulder reaction with the rigid vertical side board in order for the kinematics of its upper thoracic spine to meet the T1 response requirements. Shoulder Test 4 is based on the cadaver sled tests of Wayne State University (WSU) (15, 16). Shoulder response data from the APR and WSU we
42、re normalized toISO/TR 9790:1999(E) 2 ISO 1999 All rights reserved represent the response characteristics of a 50th percentile adult male using the method described by Mertz (17). No adjustments were made to the cadavers responses to account for muscle tone. 2.4 Thorax Tests Six lateral thoracic imp
43、act test conditions are defined. Thorax Tests 1 and 2 are based on cadaver impactor tests conducted by the Highway Safety Research Institute (HSRI) (18) and WSU (19). Thorax Tests 3 and 4 are based on the cadaver drop tests of the APR (20, 21, 22). Thorax Test 5 is based on cadaver sled tests of the
44、 University of Heidelberg (23). Thorax Test 6 is based on cadaver sled tests of WSU (15, 16). All thoracic data were normalized to represent the response characteristics of a 50th percentile adult male using either the method described by Mertz (17) or an extension of the method developed by Lowne (
45、24). The force versus time response corridors for Thorax Tests 1 and 2 were constructed around the normalized cadaver curve and then shifted 700 N upward to account for muscle tone. The force versus time response corridors of Thorax Tests 3 - 6 were not adjusted to account for muscle tone. Cadavers
46、with more than 5 rib fractures were not used in defining the response requirements, except for Thorax Test 5 where results from cadavers with 2, 7 and 9 fractured ribs were all used. 2.5 Abdomen Tests Five lateral abdominal impact test conditions are defined. Abdomen Tests 1 and 2 are based on the l
47、ateral cadaver drop tests conducted by the APR (25, 14). Abdomen Tests 3 - 5 are based on cadaver sled tests of WSU (16). All data were normalized to represent the responses of a 50th percentile adult male using the method described by Mertz (17). 2.6 Pelvis Tests Thirteen lateral pelvic impact test
48、 conditions are defined. Pelvis Tests 1 and 2 are based on impactor tests of ONSER (26, 27, and 28). Pelvis Tests 3 - 6 are based on free fall cadaver tests of the APR (29). Pelvis Tests 7 - 9 are based on cadaver sled tests of the University of Heidelberg (23). Pelvis Tests 11 - 13 are based on cad
49、aver sled tests of WSU (16). All pelvic data were normalized to represent the responses of a 50th percentile adult male using the method described by Mertz (17). Note that it may be difficult to develop a dummy that meets all of the prescribed requirements. For example, some of the neck response requirements are based on the responses of volunteers, while others are based on the response of a cadaver whose neck fractured. In some thoracic requirements, the force has been increased to account for muscle tone present in th
