1、 Reference number ISO 13232-3:2005(E) ISO 2005INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO 13232-3 Second edition 2005-12-15 Motorcycles Test and analysis procedures for research evaluation of rider crash protective devices fitted to motorcycles Part 3: Motorcyclist anthropometric impact dummy Motocycles Mthodes dess
2、ai et danalyse de lvaluation par la recherche des dispositifs, monts sur les motocycles, visant la protection des motocyclistes contre les collisions Partie 3: Mannequin anthropomtrique de motocycliste pour essais de choc ISO 13232-3:2005(E) PDF disclaimer This PDF file may contain embedded typeface
3、s. In accordance with Adobes licensing policy, this file may be printed or viewed but shall not be edited unless the typefaces which are embedded are licensed to and installed on the computer performing the editing. In downloading this file, parties accept therein the responsibility of not infringin
4、g Adobes licensing policy. The ISO Central Secretariat accepts no liability in this area. Adobe is a trademark of Adobe Systems Incorporated. Details of the software products used to create this PDF file can be found in the General Info relative to the file; the PDF-creation parameters were optimize
5、d for printing. Every care has been taken to ensure that the file is suitable for use by ISO member bodies. In the unlikely event that a problem relating to it is found, please inform the Central Secretariat at the address given below. ISO 2005 All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no par
6、t of this publication may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from either ISO at the address below or ISOs member body in the country of the requester. ISO copyright office Case postale 5
7、6 CH-1211 Geneva 20 Tel. + 41 22 749 01 11 Fax + 41 22 749 09 47 E-mail copyrightiso.org Web www.iso.org Published in Switzerland ii ISO 2005 All rights reservediiiContents Page Foreword.viii Introductionix 1 Scope1 2 Normative references1 3 Definitions 2 4 Mechanical requirements for the motorcycli
8、st anthropometric impact dummy.2 4.1 Basis dummy .2 4.2 Motorcyclist dummy head and head skins .3 4.3 Motorcyclist dummy neck components3 4.4 Motorcyclist dummy upper torso components 4 4.5 Motorcyclist dummy lower torso components.4 4.6 Arms and modified elbow bushing5 4.7 Motorcyclist dummy hands
9、5 4.8 Motorcyclist dummy upper leg components5 4.9 Motorcyclist dummy frangible knee assembly.6 4.10 Leg retaining cables7 4.11 Motorcyclist dummy lower leg components.7 4.12 Complete motorcyclist dummy 7 4.13 Certification documentation.7 5 Sampling of frangible components .8 5.1 Initial conformity
10、 of production .8 5.2 Subsequent conformity of production 8 5.3 Condition of sampled frangible components .8 6 Test methods .8 6.1 Frangible bone static bending deflection test8 6.2 Frangible bone static torsional deflection test.9 6.3 Frangible bone dynamic bending fracture test 9 6.4 Frangible bon
11、e dynamic torsional fracture test .9 6.5 Frangible femur bone static axial load fracture test 10 6.6 Frangible knee static strength and deflection test 10 6.7 Frangible abdomen test 10 6.8 Motorcyclist neck dynamic test for initial conformity of production.10 6.9 Motorcyclist neck static tests for s
12、ubsequent conformity of production .20 7 Marking and documentation of frangible components20 7.1 Marking .20 7.2 Documentation.20 Annex A (normative) Drawings for motorcyclist anthropometric impact dummy special components .21 Annex B (informative) Rationale for ISO 13232-3.50 Annex C (normative) Mo
13、torcyclist neck subsequent conformity of production test procedures81 ISO 13232-3:2005(E) ISO 2005 All rights reservediv Figures Figure 1 Extension moment vs. head angle.12 Figure 2 Neck flexion bending moment vs. head angle.15 Figure 3 Neck flexion occipital condyle and head centre of gravity posit
14、ion .15 Figure 4 Flexion neck angle vs. head angle 16 Figure 5 Lateral head angle vs. time18 Figure 6 Lateral head centre of gravity position.18 Figure 7 Neck torsion stiffness.19 Figure A.1 Motorcyclist head skins and extensions.22 Figure A.2 Neck shroud specifications.23 Figure A.3 Hybrid III modi
15、fied lower neck mount .24 Figure A.4 Motorcyclist neck and interface requirements25 Figure A.5 Lower lumbar spine transducer mount and ballast block for the six-axis load cell 26 Figure A.6 Lower lumbar spine transducer mount and ballast block for the three-axis load cell 27 Figure A.7 Lumbar spine
16、abdomen reaction plate for the six-axis load cell 28 Figure A.8 Lumbar spine abdomen reaction plate for the three-axis load cell 29 Figure A.9 Replacement frangible solid abdominal insert .30 Figure A.10 Elbow joint scribe marks for 10 arm pivot .31 Figure A.11 Frangible femur bone to knee adaptor .
17、32 Figure A.12 Frangible femur bone interface and size requirements33 Figure A.13 Upper femur load cell simulator34 Figure A.14 Frangible knee and knee clevis assembly .35 Figure A.15 Frangible tibia bone to ankle joint adaptor .36 Figure A.16 Frangible tibia interface and size requirements .37 Figu
18、re A.17 Modified lower skin.38 Figure A.18 Frangible leg bone extensions for the bone bending tests 39 Figure A.19 Specimen supports for the bone dynamic bending fracture test40 Figure A.20 Impactor head for the bone dynamic bending fracture test41 Figure A.21 Impactor box for the bone dynamic bendi
19、ng fracture test42 Figure A.22 Impactor accelerometer support for the bone dynamic bending fracture tests43 ISO 13232-3:2005(E) ISO 2005 All rights reservedvFigure A.23 Impactor end plate and bearing mount for the bone dynamic bending fracture test44 Figure A.24 Impactor rail support for the bone dy
20、namic bending fracture test45 Figure A.25 Frangible femur bone static axial load fracture test apparatus 46 Figure A.26 Frangible knee test apparatus47 Figure A.27 Frangible abdomen test apparatus.48 Figure A.28 Neck torsion test schematic .49 Figure B.1 Sample extension acceleration pulse.52 Figure
21、 B.2 Sample flexion acceleration pulse53 Figure B.3 Sample lateral acceleration pulse 53 Figure B.4 Human neck elongation observed in Navy volunteer testing .57 Figure B.5 Human response corridor and modified lumbar spine response of static moment vs. thoracic angular displacement59 Figure B.6 Lower
22、 leg dynamic impact tests impact force vs. time: Hybrid III and cadaver legs.62 Figure B.7 Lower leg dynamic impact tests impact force vs. time: Hybrid III legs and frangible leg, as defined in 4.11.1.63 Figure B.8 Instrumented lower leg impact tests mid-tibia moment vs. time for drop height = 1,016
23、 m: Hybrid III leg and frangible leg, as defined in 4.11.1.63 Figure B.9 Instrumented lower leg impact tests mid-tibia moment vs. time for drop height = 1,778 m: Hybrid III leg and frangible leg, as defined in 4.11.1.64 Figure B.10 Lower leg impact tests mid-tibia bending moment M yvs. impact veloci
24、ty: Hybrid III leg and frangible leg, as defined in 4.11.1 64 Figure B.11 View of ATB simulated offset frontal impact, medium conventional motorcycle, with and without frangible leg bones, as defined in 4.8.1 and 4.11.1.65 Figure B.12 Head trajectory comparison of frangible and non-frangible legs65
25、Figure B.13 Shoulder trajectory comparison of frangible and non-frangible legs66 Figure B.14 Hip trajectory comparison of frangible and non-frangible legs.66 Figure B.15 Knee trajectory comparison of frangible and non-frangible legs67 Figure B.16 Ankle trajectory comparison of frangible and non-fran
26、gible legs .67 Figure B.17 Pelvis trajectory comparison of frangible and non-frangible bones, full-scale test, offset frontal impact, large conventional motorcycle 67 Figure B.17 Pelvis trajectory comparison of frangible and non-frangible bones, full-scale test, offset frontal impact, large conventi
27、onal motorcycle 68 Figure B.18 Sensed upper and lower tibia bending moments vs. time in Hybrid III tibia, for three point impact test sufficient to fracture human tibia68 ISO 13232-3:2005(E) ISO 2005 All rights reservedvi Figure B.19 Impactor time histories for nine cadaver tibia specimens from Full
28、er and Snyder, 1989 69 Figure B.20 Comparison of composite tibia fracture force response with envelopes of cadaver tibia fracture force response 69 Figure B.21 Lower leg dynamic impact tests impact force vs. time: frangible and cadaver legs .70 Figure C.1 Neck load cell simulator .85 Figure C.2 Neck
29、 calibration test fixture 86 Figure C.3 Neck calibration torque extension arm.87 Figure C.4 Neck calibration assembly .88 Tables Table 1 Neck subsequent conformity of production specifications.4 Table 2 Specified values for certification of replacement abdominal insert .5 Table 3 Specified values fo
30、r certification of frangible femur components6 Table 4 Specified values for certification of frangible knee assembly components .6 Table 5 Specified values for certification of frangible tibia components 7 Table 6 Frangible component subsequent conformity of production characteristics .8 Table 7 Fra
31、ngible bone static bending deflection test specifications9 Table 8 Neck extension sled pulse criteria11 Table 9 Neck extension bending corridor .11 Table 10 Neck flexion sled pulse criteria12 Table 11 Neck flexion bending corridor13 Table 12 Neck flexion head centre of gravity corridor 13 Table 13 N
32、eck flexion occipital condyle corridor 14 Table 14 Neck flexion change in neck angle vs. change in head angle corridor .14 Table 15 Lateral sled pulse criteria 16 Table 16 Lateral head angle vs. time corridor17 Table 17 Lateral head centre of gravity corridor 17 Table 18 Neck torsion stiffness corri
33、dor .19 Table B.1 Neck biofidelity criteria .52 Table B.2 Subsequent conformity of production test results 54 Table B.3 Neck FST loads comparison55 ISO 13232-3:2005(E) ISO 2005 All rights reservedviiTable B.4 Neck moments produced by pendulum drop tests55 Table B.5 History of subsequent conformity o
34、f production test results56 Table B.6 Sampled static bending stiffness of composite femurs .72 Table B.7 Sampled static torsional stiffness of composite femurs73 Table B.8 Sampled dynamic bending strength of composite femurs 73 Table B.9 Sampled dynamic torsional strength of composite femurs .74 Tab
35、le B.10 Sampled static bending stiffness of composite tibias74 Table B.11 Sampled static torsional stiffness of composite tibias.75 Table B.12 Sampled dynamic bending strength of composite tibias.75 Table B.13 Sampled dynamic torsional strength of composite tibias76 Table B.14 Sampled deflection of
36、abdominal inserts76 Table B.15 Sampled static torsion strength and deflection of knees.77 Table B.16 Sampled static valgus strength and deflection of knees77 Table B.17 Sampled static axial strength of composite femurs.78 Table C.1 Procedures for flexion bending and head forward displacement static
37、tests81 Table C.2 Procedure for extension-bending static test82 Table C.3 Procedures for lateral-bending static test83 Table C.4 Procedures for torsion static test 84 ISO 13232-3:2005(E) ISO 2005 All rights reservedviii Foreword ISO (the International Organization for Standardization) is a worldwide
38、 federation of national standards bodies (ISO member bodies). The work of preparing International Standards is normally carried out through ISO technical committees. Each member body interested in a subject for which a technical committee has been established has the right to be represented on that
39、committee. International organizations, governmental and non-governmental, in liaison with ISO, also take part in the work. ISO collaborates closely with the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) on all matters of electrotechnical standardization. International Standards are drafted in acc
40、ordance with the rules given in the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2. The main task of technical committees is to prepare International Standards. Draft International Standards adopted by the technical committees are circulated to the member bodies for voting. Publication as an International Standard requ
41、ires approval by at least 75 % of the member bodies casting a vote. ISO 13232-3 was prepared by Technical Committee ISO/TC 22, Road vehicles, Subcommittee SC 22, Motorcycles. This second edition cancels and replaces the first version (ISO 13232-3:1996), which has been technically revised. ISO 13232
42、consists of the following parts, under the general title Motorcycles Test and analysis procedures for research evaluation of rider crash protective devices fitted to motorcycles: Part 1: Definitions, symbols and general considerations Part 2: Definition of impact conditions in relation to accident d
43、ata Part 3: Motorcyclist anthropometric impact dummy Part 4: Variables to be measured, instrumentation and measurement procedures Part 5: Injury indices and risk/benefit analysis Part 6: Full-scale impact-test procedures Part 7: Standardized procedures for performing computer simulations of motorcyc
44、le impact tests Part 8: Documentation and reports ISO 13232-3:2005(E) ISO 2005 All rights reservedixIntroduction ISO 13232 has been prepared on the basis of existing technology. Its purpose is to define common research methods and a means for making an overall evaluation of the effect that devices w
45、hich are fitted to motorcycles and intended for the crash protection of riders, have on injuries, when assessed over a range of impact conditions which are based on accident data. It is intended that all of the methods and recommendations contained in ISO 13232 should be used in all basic feasibilit
46、y research. However, researchers should also consider variations in the specified conditions (for example, rider size) when evaluating the overall feasibility of any protective device. In addition, researchers may wish to vary or extend elements of the methodology in order to research issues which a
47、re of particular interest to them. In all such cases which go beyond the basic research, if reference is to be made to ISO 13232, a clear explanation of how the used procedures differ from the basic methodology should be provided. ISO 13232 was prepared by ISO/TC 22/SC 22 at the request of the Unite
48、d Nations Economic Commission for Europe Group for Road Vehicle General Safety (UN/ECE/TRANS/SCI/WP29/GRSG), based on original working documents submitted by the International Motorcycle Manufacturers Association (IMMA), and comprising eight interrelated parts. This revision of ISO 13232 incorporate
49、s extensive technical amendments throughout all the parts, resulting from extensive experience with the standard and the development of improved research methods. In order to apply ISO 13232 properly, it is strongly recommended that all eight parts be used together, particularly if the results are to be published. ISO 13232-
